LyricalLady wrote:The $6 was only charged for the past 2 years....and was only to help with the cost of the site since it was an AD FREE SITE. Kathy did bye many of the menbers for that fee that sent her a note or called with a financial prolem regarding the fee. Come on take $6 minus the PPal fee (which is how most ppl paid) and divide it by 365 days.....GET OVER IT. It's closed now and I can pretty much say what was collected in the $6 fee didn't pay for the entire site fee each year it was asked for.
Well... I ran a forumco site. It didn't cost me but $40 a month. I ran it for over 2 years. I understand the more hits you get, the more bandwidth, yada yada yada... but still. No one else has to charge. No one. And many are sites just as big as PV.
The MAW money was garnered from the sale of some items via autions...which was the buyers discrestion to bid or not. Other funds were from the sale of T-shirts and other various items.
. Auctions, not autions. However, was there an accounting made public to those that bid? That's what's in question.
Every year a picture of the donation check to MAW was posted on the main site forum for anyone who wanted to see it could. In 2008 a donation was not made...and it was stated as such on the forum...that since we had several items still open for sale at the time of the cut off date....that it would be held over till 2009. NO ONE made any complaints at that time.
. In 2008, perhaps. But one person did ask, and was banned upon the question. Its in this thread somewhere where it was mentioned. Asked why the photo for 2009 donations showed a 2007 check.
The letter from MAW is legit....you can say its been duped...but really, that type of dupping requires some very expensive copy equipment and some expensive programs on top of it. I'm not poor...but I'd not want to spend that kind of money on such equipment just to have it in case I needed to prove something...would you????
. Duping. And Equipment? Try Kinkos. Try a buck.
As for the posting of the gentlemans name at MAW.....you all did that on your own. Should he not be happy.....that will be yours to deal with.
. gentleman's. Anyway, I'm sure he'd want to know if there were misappropriations that were connected with the fund. We don't know. That's why he needed to be contacted. They now have the means by which to choose to contact him or not. Not my fight, not my call. But I'm sure there will be at least one or two who will.
Be the proof fake or real in your opinion - I can't help you with that...it is what it is.
No you can't. Only K can, and she should be upfront with the people that entrusted their hard earned money to show a full accounting of where the funds were deposited, how they were dispursed or used. That's what legitimate groups do.... they are accountable for their actions.
....I say again to the accuser(s). Where is your proof? YOU need to post what proof you have...so it can be disected like Kathy's.
Again... that's what we were going for... proof. I wasn't the one who whited out the name or delayed getting t-shirts out for over a year. June 29th they were ordered, and just now we see a picture of completed shirts. Two months later. She should perhaps get another vendor. That's an unacceptable in business. In any case, those that wish to pursue this further now can. But I still think a full accounting should be made available. That's a helluva lot of money.