Moderator: Andrew
Liquid_Drummer wrote:I have listened to a lot of the FLOTSM tour boots but this new stuff (new to me and it was posted in the past couple of months) from Feb 13 1995 in New Brunswick shows him doing more ad libbing, less rasp, cleaner (not perfect) top range and but loads of power and LONG powerful sustains..
...I wonder if he was getting back from just USING IT.
madsplash wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLRJW1DOT2I&feature=BFa&list=PLC52BFACF5B432363&lf=results_video&index=11
3:13 to 3:20 is all that needs to be heard.
That embodies the magic that is SP and why he's regarded as the greatest rock/pop/ballad singer of all time.
Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLRJW1DOT2I&feature=BFa&list=PLC52BFACF5B432363&lf=results_video&index=11
3:13 to 3:20 is all that needs to be heard.
That embodies the magic that is SP and why he's regarded as the greatest rock/pop/ballad singer of all time.
By a relatively small segment of the population. Journey and its members have always been criminally underrated and Perry is no exception.
madsplash wrote:Compared to whom? Of the entire WORLD'S population? Maybe. But of music fans over the age of 20, underated my ass.....
Perry is not "underated".
Ask around and see what "The Voice" means to music fans.
Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:Compared to whom? Of the entire WORLD'S population? Maybe. But of music fans over the age of 20, underated my ass.....
Perry is not "underated".
Ask around and see what "The Voice" means to music fans.
I love your enthusiasm.
You look at the world and seem to genuinely believe Perry to be a household name, topping the countless lists of greatest singers, etc. and so forth.
When I look at the world, I see none of that. What I see is a terrifyingly insignificant Wikipedia page, and a man whose accolades include props from Brian May and Randy Jackson and 76th place on Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Singers of all time.
These are not the accolades of a man regarded as the greatest rock/pop/ballad singer of all time. He might very well be, but Perry's name and skills are without question underrated.
madsplash wrote:No one who knows anything gives a RAT'S ASS about anything Rolling Stone says or prints.
That rag has been a joke for years and also makes the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame a joke.
RollingStone.....Is that all you got?
Liquid_Drummer wrote:I have listened to a lot of the FLOTSM tour boots but this new stuff (new to me and it was posted in the past couple of months) from Feb 13 1995 in New Brunswick shows him doing more ad libbing, less rasp, cleaner (not perfect) top range and but loads of power and LONG powerful sustains.. Some of the early boots he sounds really bad at times but here at the end not just the power of his voice seemed to be recovering but there is something about the way he singing. More charged.. The whole band sounds so much better.. Listen to this and compare it to earlier shows. I wonder if he was getting back from just USING IT.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep-yDs1y ... CF5B432363
Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:No one who knows anything gives a RAT'S ASS about anything Rolling Stone says or prints.
That rag has been a joke for years and also makes the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame a joke.
RollingStone.....Is that all you got?
Like I said, I admire the enthusiasm.
I don't share it, because I'm not going to let my love and appreciation for an artist's talent blind me to their popularity and notoriety.
You might regard Perry as the greatest singer in rock and I might agree, but that doesn't make up for the countless people who disagree. He's not a household name and he's far from universally lauded.
onmyjrny wrote:Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:No one who knows anything gives a RAT'S ASS about anything Rolling Stone says or prints.
That rag has been a joke for years and also makes the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame a joke.
RollingStone.....Is that all you got?
Like I said, I admire the enthusiasm.
I don't share it, because I'm not going to let my love and appreciation for an artist's talent blind me to their popularity and notoriety.
You might regard Perry as the greatest singer in rock and I might agree, but that doesn't make up for the countless people who disagree. He's not a household name and he's far from universally lauded.
I agree with you on this. A man with Perry's talents should be a household name. I don't believe he is. The critics always accused Journey of playing it too safe (musically speaking) and I think that had a lot to do with them never receiving credit they were due.
This is NOT in any way a bash against SP or Journey. I just think it is unfortunate.
madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLRJW1DOT2I&feature=BFa&list=PLC52BFACF5B432363&lf=results_video&index=11
3:13 to 3:20 is all that needs to be heard.
That embodies the magic that is SP and why he's regarded as the greatest rock/pop/ballad singer of all time.
By a relatively small segment of the population. Journey and its members have always been criminally underrated and Perry is no exception.
Compared to whom? Of the entire WORLD'S population? Maybe. But of music fans over the age of 20, underated my ass.....
Perry is not "underated".
Ask around and see what "The Voice" means to music fans.
Monker wrote:madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLRJW1DOT2I&feature=BFa&list=PLC52BFACF5B432363&lf=results_video&index=11
3:13 to 3:20 is all that needs to be heard.
That embodies the magic that is SP and why he's regarded as the greatest rock/pop/ballad singer of all time.
By a relatively small segment of the population. Journey and its members have always been criminally underrated and Perry is no exception.
Compared to whom? Of the entire WORLD'S population? Maybe. But of music fans over the age of 20, underated my ass.....
Perry is not "underated".
Ask around and see what "The Voice" means to music fans.
"The Voice" is John Farnham.
annie89509 wrote:I think the reason SP is not universally well known is he was part of a group...not a singer who made it big as a solo artist in the pop genre...ala his contemporaries like Billy Joel, Elton John...heck, throw Rod Stewart, Neil Diamond, in there...and, Barry Manilow. Of course, these artists have a much bigger volume of work than SP's 2 released and 1 unreleased albums.
More people will know the name of the group more than they know the lead singer, as you can say that about just any group that ever lived.
Saint John wrote:The guy's voice is gone. His hoarse laugh is telling. Nothing was coming back. It was just so bad at the beginning that raising the bar to mediocrity seemed huge. If he COULD sing with Journey he would. But he can't.
To use his analogy, imagine having kids, and having them taken away from you, only to be raised by someone else. It kills him ... every day.onmyjrny wrote:Saint John wrote:The guy's voice is gone. His hoarse laugh is telling. Nothing was coming back. It was just so bad at the beginning that raising the bar to mediocrity seemed huge. If he COULD sing with Journey he would. But he can't.
Why WOULD he? Some relationships are just fractured beyond repair.
Saint John wrote:To use his analogy, imagine having kids, and having them taken away from you, only to be raised by someone else. It kills him ... every day.onmyjrny wrote:Saint John wrote:The guy's voice is gone. His hoarse laugh is telling. Nothing was coming back. It was just so bad at the beginning that raising the bar to mediocrity seemed huge. If he COULD sing with Journey he would. But he can't.
Why WOULD he? Some relationships are just fractured beyond repair.
I just listened to that Euro interview he did about a year ago, and his laugh is so hoarse and hollow. Perhaps SOME of that is from lack of use, but the majority of it is from irreparable damage.
madsplash wrote:
No one who knows anything gives a RAT'S ASS about anything Rolling Stone says or prints.
That rag has been a joke for years and also makes the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame a joke.
Saint John wrote:The guy's voice is gone. His hoarse laugh is telling. Nothing was coming back. It was just so bad at the beginning that raising the bar to mediocrity seemed huge. If he COULD sing with Journey he would. But he can't.
Saint John wrote:To use his analogy, imagine having kids, and having them taken away from you, only to be raised by someone else. It kills him ... every day.onmyjrny wrote:Saint John wrote:The guy's voice is gone. His hoarse laugh is telling. Nothing was coming back. It was just so bad at the beginning that raising the bar to mediocrity seemed huge. If he COULD sing with Journey he would. But he can't.
Why WOULD he? Some relationships are just fractured beyond repair.
I just listened to that Euro interview he did about a year ago, and his laugh is so hoarse and hollow. Perhaps SOME of that is from lack of use, but the majority of it is from irreparable damage.
Andrew wrote:madsplash wrote:
No one who knows anything gives a RAT'S ASS about anything Rolling Stone says or prints.
That rag has been a joke for years and also makes the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame a joke.
Agreed x 2.
Kor'n wrote:Monker wrote:madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLRJW1DOT2I&feature=BFa&list=PLC52BFACF5B432363&lf=results_video&index=11
3:13 to 3:20 is all that needs to be heard.
That embodies the magic that is SP and why he's regarded as the greatest rock/pop/ballad singer of all time.
By a relatively small segment of the population. Journey and its members have always been criminally underrated and Perry is no exception.
Compared to whom? Of the entire WORLD'S population? Maybe. But of music fans over the age of 20, underated my ass.....
Perry is not "underated".
Ask around and see what "The Voice" means to music fans.
"The Voice" is John Farnham.
Did that "Voice" make the Top 100 Singers List?
Andrew wrote:Saint John wrote:To use his analogy, imagine having kids, and having them taken away from you, only to be raised by someone else. It kills him ... every day.onmyjrny wrote:Saint John wrote:The guy's voice is gone. His hoarse laugh is telling. Nothing was coming back. It was just so bad at the beginning that raising the bar to mediocrity seemed huge. If he COULD sing with Journey he would. But he can't.
Why WOULD he? Some relationships are just fractured beyond repair.
I just listened to that Euro interview he did about a year ago, and his laugh is so hoarse and hollow. Perhaps SOME of that is from lack of use, but the majority of it is from irreparable damage.
I think you can have a vacation until you get treatment for your issues.
Andrew wrote:Farnham is indeed The Voice here in Oz. and Glenn Hughes is the voice of rock.
But Perry still had the best voice ever in his prime.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest