
Moderator: Andrew
StocktontoMalone wrote:Lost to Jays 12-0 tonight....WTF?!?!?!?!
StocktontoMalone wrote:treetopovskaya wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Hopefully not.
that's what i was going to say! }:C)
GO ANGELS!!!!! }=C))
Halos can't beat the sox......MWAAAAAHAAAHAHAA!
StocktontoMalone wrote:Lost to Jays 12-0 tonight....WTF?!?!?!?!
Enigma869 wrote: I honestly don't like their chances against the Yankees this season. Their lineup is simply too dominant.
strangegrey wrote:Enigma869 wrote: I honestly don't like their chances against the Yankees this season. Their lineup is simply too dominant.
While I'll be inclined to agree with you...
However, it's the loss of certain 'players' in the Sox lineup, which is just as much a factor. The loss of the 10th 'player' on the Red Sox linup, which is the baggie of pharmaceutical googies that Ortiz and Manny dug into with gusto....is long gone. That was the competitive advantage this team had....
That and once you remove the protection Manny gave Roid Papi....Roid Papi is reduced to that third string, dead pull slug he was prior to joining the Red Sox...
There's a reason why he's hovering around 230-240....and it's not because he was 'hurt'
Ehwmatt wrote:And that's the reason, other than it being a terribly boring sport, that I hate baseball
strangegrey wrote:It was really mind boggling to watch teams pitch around a former dead pull slug, with zero business being in the majors....then all of a sudden, he mysteriously comes out of his shell when he joins the Red Sox along with Manny
Enigma869 wrote:I find myself in the VERY odd position of defending David Ortiz. A couple of points here. First and foremost, let me get it out of the way that I think more than 50% of baseball players are taking some form of "banned substance".
Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote:I find myself in the VERY odd position of defending David Ortiz. A couple of points here. First and foremost, let me get it out of the way that I think more than 50% of baseball players are taking some form of "banned substance".
That's what you think, but where are the positive tests, ala Ortiz'?
When they're all proven frauds, too, we'll decry them as well.
Enigma869 wrote:
I find myself in the VERY odd position of defending David Ortiz. A couple of points here. First and foremost, let me get it out of the way that I think more than 50% of baseball players are taking some form of "banned substance". They're not all steroids, but a banned substance, nonetheless. Also, you're conveniently forgetting that Yankees players have also tested positive for banned substances (including the best offensive player on their team)!
strangegrey wrote: I'm going to reserve judgment on clemens' use contributing to the championships of 99 and 2000, because I don't think him using or not using was instrumental in those WS wins.
strangegrey wrote:I suggest you refer to Ortiz's numbers PRIOR to joining the red sox...which range from utility player numbers to average.
Enigma869 wrote:strangegrey wrote: I'm going to reserve judgment on clemens' use contributing to the championships of 99 and 2000, because I don't think him using or not using was instrumental in those WS wins.
Sorry dude...That's a RIDICULOUS argument! You can't pick and choose who was "instrumental" and who wasn't! Also, in the 1999 and 2000 postseason, only one single time did Clemens not pitch at least 7 innings! Also, in 3 out of his six appearances in those two championship seasons, he gave up ZERO runs and in another appearance, he only gave up one run! The bottom line is that there are many guys (on the Yankees, Red Sox, and EVERY other team in MLB) who were taking shit that they weren't supposed to be taking and just because you and I haven't heard about them testing positive for anything doesn't mean that any of those teams were clean. At this point I wouldn't be stunned to hear that Cal Ripken and Derek Jeter were taking something at some point!
Enigma869 wrote:strangegrey wrote:I suggest you refer to Ortiz's numbers PRIOR to joining the red sox...which range from utility player numbers to average.
If you read what I wrote, I cited the two years for Ortiz while he was playing in Minnesota and I'm fairly certain for a guy playing only half the season that his numbers weren't close to that of a "utility player". I don't know many utility players who can put up 35 HR and 100 RBI!
strangegrey wrote:remove those two years (which were average numbers, at best) and he's a 1-tool utility player. Nothing more....
I'll also add that I believe Ortiz was juicing before he arrived to Boston....he wouldn't have been signed if he wasn't....
strangegrey wrote: Ortiz went from a part time bench player putting up average numbers for several years to a league threat in less than 2 years.
strangegrey wrote:Oh, and Ortiz DID test postive in 2003.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests