SIZE 4 is now "too FAT"....???

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Ehwmatt » Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:29 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:LOL, why are you apologizing? You know what I think of her. Not a good person. Not good at all.


Cuz that's just what I do. :oops:
And you know what I think of her and her situation with Borat. She totally deserves it at this point and should get no sympathy. She's obviously a sycophant who hangs on for the attention, crutch, pity parties, and such. She's had plenty of opportunities. Maybe if she'd get off her lardass, stop buying all those Marc Jacobs bags and invest some time into philanthropy instead of narcissism she'd find herself in a better place. But she's not caught in a vicious cycle, she IS the vicious cycle. So, yeah. F her.


To return this to the general vicinity of the topic at hand - vanity sizing - this chick is a good example of it. Buying 10s and 12s... her real size is 16. But so many times we were shopping and she was buying much smaller sizes. And that's what these clothiers do, especially in the current economy... they call a 16 a 12 and they sell more because "Omg, look I can wear a 12 now, I have lost 2 sizes, now I need all new clothes!!" and presto - profits are up.


That's good business tactics in my book. I always tell people, "Go by what you see in the mirror." People step on a scale and let the number tell them everything. If what I see in the mirror is good, I'm good. If I don't like it, I cut back on the amount of food I consume and take it easy on the beer for a week or two. I never weigh myself unless I'm at a doctor's office or I just get curious.

Conversely, people who sit there and "diet" and lose a bunch of water weight in the short run don't realize they still look like shit and will unless they build tone through exercising.

People on all ends of the spectrum would be far better off if they did an honest "mirror assessment" of themselves weekly instead of going by magical numbers on the scale or suddenly fitting into "smaller" sizes to convince them they are losing weight.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Sarah » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:16 am

Haha well I'm like 2.5x too fat according to them, then.

My excuse for not exercising is that my bike is infested with widow spiders. :(
Sarah
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:34 am
Location: Los Angeles

Postby Lula » Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:03 am

the more expensive the clothing, the smaller the size. i don't care about that stuff anymore. if i feel good that works for me!
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:09 am

Lula wrote:the more expensive the clothing, the smaller the size. i don't care about that stuff anymore. if i feel good that works for me!


+100 :D
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby tammy » Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:12 am

Here's an article about the vanity sizing & how the waist line is wider now to accomodate the nation's expanded bellies: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/ ... 3385.shtml

I know I used to wear a size 3 Levis in the '90s and I recently gave them away...they look like a 10 yr old kid pair of pants! The numbers people need to pay attention to are the ones that measure health: blood pressure, chol/trig, blood sugar and not the clothing sizes. The scale can also be deceiving 'cuz there are many body types (large bone, med, small) and the weight has to match that and your age.
tammy
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2338
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:17 am
Location: leftside

Postby Rhiannon » Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:28 am

tammy wrote:Here's an article about the vanity sizing & how the waist line is wider now to accomodate the nation's expanded bellies: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/ ... 3385.shtml

I know I used to wear a size 3 Levis in the '90s and I recently gave them away...they look like a 10 yr old kid pair of pants! The numbers people need to pay attention to are the ones that measure health: blood pressure, chol/trig, blood sugar and not the clothing sizes. The scale can also be deceiving 'cuz there are many body types (large bone, med, small) and the weight has to match that and your age.


BMI is a good measure for the average person... but doesn't tell the whole truth if you're athletic OR overfat. I've found calculating body fat percentage to be the best. BUT like Matt said, an honest mirror self-assessment will do just fine.
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby TRAGChick » Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:17 am

A few years ago, I posted something about me being a Size 14. :shock: :oops:
Yup.....at 17 years old; supposed to be "the time of my life"...... :roll:

......revenge at 42 - flying in the face of all that BS - kicks ass.
:twisted:

But our Society is effed up.....I mean, I'm a medium-frame, athletic build; now at a size 9.

So - what - I'm an EFFING HOUSE???? :roll: :roll:

I know I'm not; just asking hypothetically....**snaps fingers in air**


:twisted:
Facebook: Search TRAG
Image
TRAGChick
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6634
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:23 am

Previous

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests