Moderator: Andrew
Ehwmatt wrote:The fact that our media still isn't branding this the terrorist attack it is is yet ANOTHER indication of how spineless and pathetic we've become as a country. Oh boo hoo, we don't want to offend anybody, give me a fucking break. The radical Muslims are the ones that aren't think it's ok to strap a bomb to your chest and blow innocent people in a coffee shop or an office building up... and then they think they'll get 17 virgins in heaven![]()
. Yet, we think we can reason and talk to these types?
The peaceful Muslims aren't going to be offended if we call a spade a spade. The media and others are continuing to perpetrate the walk-on-eggshells PC garbage that led to this guy being able to pull this off in the first place, despite putting more warning signs up than you could shake an AK-47 at. We aren't ever going to learn from our mistakes it seems, and that's scarier than anything any single terrorist attack could ever do to us.
RedWingFan wrote:SultanOfSwing wrote:RedWingFan wrote:Rhiannon wrote:The guy was a mental health professional on base.
Probably a graduate of VT!!!! *tweek*
You were right.A psychiatrist went psycho.
He served eight years as an enlisted soldier. Military records show he also served in the ROTC as an undergraduate at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg and received a bachelor's degree in biochemistry there in 1997.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_fort_hood ... ng_suspect
What can I say? I'm right so much it's scary!!!
StevePerryHair wrote:RedWingFan wrote:SultanOfSwing wrote:RedWingFan wrote:Rhiannon wrote:The guy was a mental health professional on base.
Probably a graduate of VT!!!! *tweek*
You were right.A psychiatrist went psycho.
He served eight years as an enlisted soldier. Military records show he also served in the ROTC as an undergraduate at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg and received a bachelor's degree in biochemistry there in 1997.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_fort_hood ... ng_suspect
What can I say? I'm right so much it's scary!!!
So now we know, he was a TRAITOR, not an infiltrator
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:RedWingFan wrote:SultanOfSwing wrote:RedWingFan wrote:Rhiannon wrote:The guy was a mental health professional on base.
Probably a graduate of VT!!!! *tweek*
You were right.A psychiatrist went psycho.
He served eight years as an enlisted soldier. Military records show he also served in the ROTC as an undergraduate at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg and received a bachelor's degree in biochemistry there in 1997.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_fort_hood ... ng_suspect
What can I say? I'm right so much it's scary!!!
So now we know, he was a TRAITOR, not an infiltrator
Same difference. What we know he wasn't was just a muslim who had a bad day like you insinuated!
Saint John wrote:Time to close down all mosques in this country. Get that shitty excuse of a religion out of this country.
StevePerryHair wrote:Saint John wrote:Time to close down all mosques in this country. Get that shitty excuse of a religion out of this country.
Um, they'd have to change the constitution first.
StevePerryHair wrote:If you go back and read my post I did not insinuate that. I actually had a couple of scenarios INCLUDING traitor. There IS a BIG difference between an infiltrator and a traitor. This guy was a Major in the army. He did not join the army with the INTENT to commit this act which would be the true definition of a "infiltrator". He joined the army, and somewhere along the way decided he wanted to fight the Muslim extremist cause rather than for the U.S army. THAT is a traitor.
Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:If you go back and read my post I did not insinuate that. I actually had a couple of scenarios INCLUDING traitor. There IS a BIG difference between an infiltrator and a traitor. This guy was a Major in the army. He did not join the army with the INTENT to commit this act which would be the true definition of a "infiltrator". He joined the army, and somewhere along the way decided he wanted to fight the Muslim extremist cause rather than for the U.S army. THAT is a traitor.
Yes, he joined the Army as a devout radical Muslim who told people he was a "Muslim first, an American second" who tried to contact a radical imam over in Yemen 20 times, but oh, he just had a slight change of heart at some point that made him massacre 13 people![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When are people going to learn that pussyfooting around the truth isn't going to help matters?
This was a terrorist. I believe he did join the army with the intent to commit this act, just as those gutless fucks got trained at OUR flight schools to crash planes into buildings.
StevePerryHair wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:If you go back and read my post I did not insinuate that. I actually had a couple of scenarios INCLUDING traitor. There IS a BIG difference between an infiltrator and a traitor. This guy was a Major in the army. He did not join the army with the INTENT to commit this act which would be the true definition of a "infiltrator". He joined the army, and somewhere along the way decided he wanted to fight the Muslim extremist cause rather than for the U.S army. THAT is a traitor.
Yes, he joined the Army as a devout radical Muslim who told people he was a "Muslim first, an American second" who tried to contact a radical imam over in Yemen 20 times, but oh, he just had a slight change of heart at some point that made him massacre 13 people![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When are people going to learn that pussyfooting around the truth isn't going to help matters?
This was a terrorist. I believe he did join the army with the intent to commit this act, just as those gutless fucks got trained at OUR flight schools to crash planes into buildings.
He is a MAJOR. That means he's been in the military a long time. He wasn't some "sleeper cell" buying his time there. He joined BEFORE 9/11, and this was not a technical infiltration. Infiltration means he was PLACED there. You people just need to get your terms straight and GET what I"m saying. I am not pussyfooting. A traitor is no better.
StevePerryHair wrote:And I'm sure he waited all this time just to shoot a few people on a military base... right![]()
Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:If you go back and read my post I did not insinuate that. I actually had a couple of scenarios INCLUDING traitor. There IS a BIG difference between an infiltrator and a traitor. This guy was a Major in the army. He did not join the army with the INTENT to commit this act which would be the true definition of a "infiltrator". He joined the army, and somewhere along the way decided he wanted to fight the Muslim extremist cause rather than for the U.S army. THAT is a traitor.
Yes, he joined the Army as a devout radical Muslim who told people he was a "Muslim first, an American second" who tried to contact a radical imam over in Yemen 20 times, but oh, he just had a slight change of heart at some point that made him massacre 13 people![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When are people going to learn that pussyfooting around the truth isn't going to help matters?
This was a terrorist. I believe he did join the army with the intent to commit this act, just as those gutless fucks got trained at OUR flight schools to crash planes into buildings.
He is a MAJOR. That means he's been in the military a long time. He wasn't some "sleeper cell" buying his time there. He joined BEFORE 9/11, and this was not a technical infiltration. Infiltration means he was PLACED there. You people just need to get your terms straight and GET what I"m saying. I am not pussyfooting. A traitor is no better.
He sat there and got two degrees on our dime, all the while harboring these radical Islamist feelings. He was expressing his desires as early as a year into his master's degree, and likely earlier, I just haven't heard evidence. That was WELL before he became a major. In his first presentation while doing his MPH, he did a presentation on the merits of suicide bombing in an... (wait for it).... environmental health class.
Being a traitor would require him to have a change of heart. Maybe he wasn't placed there by al-Qaeda or some towel-wearing imam when he entered the army, but don't think for a minute that this guy came into the Army wanting to serve America and had an about face that caused him to kill 13 people. Can you really be that narrow-sighted? Come on now.
You're trying to pretend like this is an argument about semantics, but it's not. He was giving off warning signs for years and no one acted on it because people want to be PC and battle over semantics. Fail.
Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:And I'm sure he waited all this time just to shoot a few people on a military base... right![]()
Yeah, and to get two degrees while he was it. They want to use our own resources against us, that's play #1 in the terrorist playbook.
And wow, look at you denigrating the massacre of 13 defenseless people to try and make your argument work. Great work, keep it up.
StevePerryHair wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:If you go back and read my post I did not insinuate that. I actually had a couple of scenarios INCLUDING traitor. There IS a BIG difference between an infiltrator and a traitor. This guy was a Major in the army. He did not join the army with the INTENT to commit this act which would be the true definition of a "infiltrator". He joined the army, and somewhere along the way decided he wanted to fight the Muslim extremist cause rather than for the U.S army. THAT is a traitor.
Yes, he joined the Army as a devout radical Muslim who told people he was a "Muslim first, an American second" who tried to contact a radical imam over in Yemen 20 times, but oh, he just had a slight change of heart at some point that made him massacre 13 people![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When are people going to learn that pussyfooting around the truth isn't going to help matters?
This was a terrorist. I believe he did join the army with the intent to commit this act, just as those gutless fucks got trained at OUR flight schools to crash planes into buildings.
He is a MAJOR. That means he's been in the military a long time. He wasn't some "sleeper cell" buying his time there. He joined BEFORE 9/11, and this was not a technical infiltration. Infiltration means he was PLACED there. You people just need to get your terms straight and GET what I"m saying. I am not pussyfooting. A traitor is no better.
He sat there and got two degrees on our dime, all the while harboring these radical Islamist feelings. He was expressing his desires as early as a year into his master's degree, and likely earlier, I just haven't heard evidence. That was WELL before he became a major. In his first presentation while doing his MPH, he did a presentation on the merits of suicide bombing in an... (wait for it).... environmental health class.
Being a traitor would require him to have a change of heart. Maybe he wasn't placed there by al-Qaeda or some towel-wearing imam when he entered the army, but don't think for a minute that this guy came into the Army wanting to serve America and had an about face that caused him to kill 13 people. Can you really be that narrow-sighted? Come on now.
You're trying to pretend like this is an argument about semantics, but it's not. He was giving off warning signs for years and no one acted on it because people want to be PC and battle over semantics. Fail.
You missed what I added on at the end. Why would he wait ALL THESE YEARS to just shoot a few people? These terrorists are calculated and they want to do big things. I just don't think if this was some well planned out thing, it wouldnt' have been bigger. Like planting bombs, and involving others. Your theory makes no sense in the true sense of the word infiltration. It seems to me he was just buying into those things and slowly over time decided to act on what he was feeling.
Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:If you go back and read my post I did not insinuate that. I actually had a couple of scenarios INCLUDING traitor. There IS a BIG difference between an infiltrator and a traitor. This guy was a Major in the army. He did not join the army with the INTENT to commit this act which would be the true definition of a "infiltrator". He joined the army, and somewhere along the way decided he wanted to fight the Muslim extremist cause rather than for the U.S army. THAT is a traitor.
Yes, he joined the Army as a devout radical Muslim who told people he was a "Muslim first, an American second" who tried to contact a radical imam over in Yemen 20 times, but oh, he just had a slight change of heart at some point that made him massacre 13 people![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
When are people going to learn that pussyfooting around the truth isn't going to help matters?
This was a terrorist. I believe he did join the army with the intent to commit this act, just as those gutless fucks got trained at OUR flight schools to crash planes into buildings.
He is a MAJOR. That means he's been in the military a long time. He wasn't some "sleeper cell" buying his time there. He joined BEFORE 9/11, and this was not a technical infiltration. Infiltration means he was PLACED there. You people just need to get your terms straight and GET what I"m saying. I am not pussyfooting. A traitor is no better.
He sat there and got two degrees on our dime, all the while harboring these radical Islamist feelings. He was expressing his desires as early as a year into his master's degree, and likely earlier, I just haven't heard evidence. That was WELL before he became a major. In his first presentation while doing his MPH, he did a presentation on the merits of suicide bombing in an... (wait for it).... environmental health class.
Being a traitor would require him to have a change of heart. Maybe he wasn't placed there by al-Qaeda or some towel-wearing imam when he entered the army, but don't think for a minute that this guy came into the Army wanting to serve America and had an about face that caused him to kill 13 people. Can you really be that narrow-sighted? Come on now.
You're trying to pretend like this is an argument about semantics, but it's not. He was giving off warning signs for years and no one acted on it because people want to be PC and battle over semantics. Fail.
You missed what I added on at the end. Why would he wait ALL THESE YEARS to just shoot a few people? These terrorists are calculated and they want to do big things. I just don't think if this was some well planned out thing, it wouldnt' have been bigger. Like planting bombs, and involving others. Your theory makes no sense in the true sense of the word infiltration. It seems to me he was just buying into those things and slowly over time decided to act on what he was feeling.
Because he got two degrees for free out of it. Terrorist cells don't want Abdul and Aziz from the opium fields in Afghanistan. They want highly educated, well-trained men. Why not get that training in the U.S.?
Again, you're trying to play semantics and it's as transparent as a piece of cellophane. The guy was probably planning to go over to Yemen and join the cause with the imam he tried to contact 20 times within the last year, but his radicalism made him snap and pull this off.
You're trying to make terrorism into a rational thing. Terrorism and totalitarianism are movements steeped in irrationality. That is why you can't reason with them or use diplomacy... because it's totally irrational.
StevePerryHair wrote:Matthew, you are giving me a HEADACHE!! I NEVER said he WASN'T a terrorist!!! I simply said he wasn't an infiltrator. Yes, semantics, so why not leave it at that and stop telling me what I think and feel about this. This whole act disgusts and scrares me. He IS a terrorist no matter which way you look at it.
Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Matthew, you are giving me a HEADACHE!! I NEVER said he WASN'T a terrorist!!! I simply said he wasn't an infiltrator. Yes, semantics, so why not leave it at that and stop telling me what I think and feel about this. This whole act disgusts and scrares me. He IS a terrorist no matter which way you look at it.
Fair enough, fair enough. I'm just trying to make a point here that I don't want to get lost on anybody:
We HAVE to stop playing PC games and walking on eggshells when it comes to these kinds of issues. The guy was in contact with a radical, violent imam; he talked about terrorism 80% of his time according to classmates at MPH program he was in; and he regularly declared his loyalty to Islam and the illegitimacy of the principle conflict the military he was in was involved in. Yet, no one acted because they were scared of offending. That has to stop. That's why it has to be called for what it is, terrorism. The media doesn't have the balls to say so, neither do the authorities yet.
StevePerryHair wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Matthew, you are giving me a HEADACHE!! I NEVER said he WASN'T a terrorist!!! I simply said he wasn't an infiltrator. Yes, semantics, so why not leave it at that and stop telling me what I think and feel about this. This whole act disgusts and scrares me. He IS a terrorist no matter which way you look at it.
Fair enough, fair enough. I'm just trying to make a point here that I don't want to get lost on anybody:
We HAVE to stop playing PC games and walking on eggshells when it comes to these kinds of issues. The guy was in contact with a radical, violent imam; he talked about terrorism 80% of his time according to classmates at MPH program he was in; and he regularly declared his loyalty to Islam and the illegitimacy of the principle conflict the military he was in was involved in. Yet, no one acted because they were scared of offending. That has to stop. That's why it has to be called for what it is, terrorism. The media doesn't have the balls to say so, neither do the authorities yet.
Well I'm not afraid of offending and I don't get why they are either. maybe for ONCE the media wants to get their facts first adn that would be a firstBut I feel that the military failed if they couldn't have realized these things in a background check. I mean military men get BIG background checks and if these things happened prior to him joining, that is really horrible they didn't catch it .But then that was pre- 9/11 so maybe they weren't looking for those specific things then. I also think it's extreme though to do as some have suggested and not having any Muslims in the military. I think it's unfair to lump a whole HUGE group of people as terrorists just due to their religion. It might be time to do some more extensive background checks now though? I don't know. I'm not a military expert, so I have no idea how they handle everything. And it IS terrorism. This definitely fits the meaning of the word terrorism.
Ehwmatt wrote:Yet, no one acted because they were scared of offending. That has to stop. That's why it has to be called for what it is, terrorism. The media doesn't have the balls to say so, neither do the authorities yet.
Ehwmatt wrote:I never suggested no Muslims in the military and Dan was clearly being facetious.
larryfromnextdoor wrote:DC Sniper Muhammad, exucuted today..
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests