Rockindeano wrote:I've always maintained an idea all my own too, that rankings shouldn't come out until week 5 or 6. By then, the season has unfolded and ranking officials can at least look at the toughness of a team's OOC. Florida although quite good, plays cream puffs while USC played a tough schedule. It's my belief that if college football went to a mid season ranking system, teams like UF wouldn't be scheduling the Citadel and Florida Int'l, or Penn State wouldn't have Buffalo on its' schedule at all. Teams would have to play decent OOC to be in the hunt for the Nat'l Championship. This would also make it more fair for a mid major like Cincinnati or TCU who could schedule some good OOC and bolster its' resume. What's the difference if a TCU plays in a weak conference with a tough OOC, or a decent team like Penn State plays in a tough conference with a weak, really weak OOC? It would be harder to rule out Mid Majors' if this were the case and create a more fair system. Of course if we had a 16 team playoff.................
Preseason rankings are a guesstimate anyways, and the same can be said for NCAA basketball too. The difference of course is your preseason ranking in basketball doesn't matter, because you have the ultimate decider- the playoff system, ie, March madness.
Agree with NCCA hoops points BUT a team with a preseason top 4 or 5 will get a good bracket and location and thus get that advantage with the selection committee.
Also, these schedules are made out years in advance.....who knows how good a syracuse, a UNC, or a Kansas will be year to year.....conversely, how good a TCU, Boise state, bowling green, or Hawaii will be.....
Its bad enough some power conferences won't play certain cupcakes, making it hard for these lessers to ever get better.....
