10 Ways You're Getting Ripped Off

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Everett » Wed May 19, 2010 11:58 am

stevew2 wrote:
ScarabGator wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Melissa wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Angel wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:I don't consider the ready to drink baby formula a rip~off!! People that choose to buy it, do so for a reason!!
I always used it when traveling, for the safety of the babes ...well worth the extra $$$. I'm sure lazy people
that use it regularly feel the same way ...ha ha!! :wink:


It IS a rip off. Just breastfeed...that's free! :wink:

Absolutely!!! But depending on the mom ...a baby could starve!!
The Formula, therefore; becomes thee source of nutrition necessary for survival ...not a rip-off!! :wink:


True, and this happens as a necessity more than 1% of the time. I see babies at work ALL the time who lose 10% or more of their birth weight (not a good thing) by 3-5 days old because of mom's milk not being in and various other problems with breastfeeding and the great lactation consultant I work with who has done her job for over 30 years now will be the first to say when those babies NEED formula, at least until the breastfeeding problems get worked out, and the baby gets back to birth weight (at the VERY least) or bigger by 2 weeks old.

I agree MG, the ready to feed was better when traveling when mine were babies! :lol: I used the powder most of the time though! :lol: :wink:

Well, it's good to know I'm not a freak alone!! :lol: :wink:


how are you tonight sweetheart?
Im doing fine


I don't think he's talkin to YOU :lol:
All in a day's work
Everett
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5791
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu May 20, 2010 1:17 am

stevew2 wrote:
ScarabGator wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:Well, it's good to know I'm not a freak alone!! :lol: :wink:


how are you tonight sweetheart?
Im doing fine
lol!!
Good to see you hangin' round, Gator~pooh!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu May 20, 2010 2:55 am

Angel wrote:but here's a rip off....$250 to REMOVE an IUD...I just discovered the cost the other day and I was appalled!!!!!!!!!!!


Hey, even if they never found any of those in Iraq, U.N. weapons inspectors don't come cheap!

Image
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby DrFU » Thu May 20, 2010 2:57 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
Angel wrote:but here's a rip off....$250 to REMOVE an IUD...I just discovered the cost the other day and I was appalled!!!!!!!!!!!


Hey, even if they never found any of those in Iraq, U.N. weapons inspectors don't come cheap!

Image


Wrong missle defense system, Rip ...
DrFU
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:43 pm

Postby Melissa » Thu May 20, 2010 3:07 am

DrFU wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:
Angel wrote:but here's a rip off....$250 to REMOVE an IUD...I just discovered the cost the other day and I was appalled!!!!!!!!!!!


Hey, even if they never found any of those in Iraq, U.N. weapons inspectors don't come cheap!

Image


Wrong missle defense system, Rip ...


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby Ehwmatt » Thu May 20, 2010 3:22 am

Jesus christ, all this talk about lactating and breastfeeding... what's next, placenta soup recipes?
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu May 20, 2010 3:34 am

Ehwmatt wrote:Jesus christ, all this talk about lactating and breastfeeding... what's next, placenta soup recipes?


It was, actually, supposed to be nachos , don't know what became of that!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Everett » Thu May 20, 2010 3:40 am

We could derail the bottom line thread :shock: :lol:
All in a day's work
Everett
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5791
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Postby Melissa » Thu May 20, 2010 4:09 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:Jesus christ, all this talk about lactating and breastfeeding... what's next, placenta soup recipes?


It was, actually, supposed to be nachos , don't know what became of that!! :wink:


Actually it DID move on to several topics since then :lol:

gift cards
air bases
SR-71's
bats
dishes
sweethearts
missile defense systems

But maybe HE still wants to talk about boobies :lol: :wink:
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby Angel » Thu May 20, 2010 5:15 am

Ehwmatt wrote:Jesus christ, all this talk about lactating and breastfeeding... what's next, placenta soup recipes?


Nah, you just eat those raw, no recipe needed.
User avatar
Angel
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3995
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:41 am

Postby jrnyman28 » Thu May 20, 2010 5:25 am

Angel wrote:
Melissa wrote:True, and this happens as a necessity more than 1% of the time. I see babies at work ALL the time who lose 10% or more of their birth weight (not a good thing) by 3-5 days old because of mom's milk not being in and various other problems with breastfeeding and the great lactation consultant I work with who has done her job for over 30 years now will be the first to say when those babies NEED formula, at least until the breastfeeding problems get worked out, and the baby gets back to birth weight (at the VERY least) or bigger by 2 weeks old.


Yep, I agree...and 99% of women that DON'T have breastfeeding problems (latch is good, frequent feedings etc) and don't have a pathology resulting in delayed lactogenesis ( retained placenta, decreased prolactin, breast reduction resulting in decreased breast tissue,etc) make enough milk. I'm not including those that have breastfeeding issues in that 99% and no, I don't know that's an EXACT statistic I chose it to make a point, but I'm fairly certain it's not far off. I just know that lots of women think they are not producing enough and give up without getting help to correct the problem-and that's a shame.


now...back to ten ways to get ripped off.... :lol:


My wife tried everything she could to breastfeed this last time around. She would feed. She would pump in between feedings. She did see a consultant. She could never get enough milk.

For our older child she didn't have a problem feeding but he was intolerant so he HAD to go on formula.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby jrnyman28 » Thu May 20, 2010 5:26 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:Jesus christ, all this talk about lactating and breastfeeding... what's next, placenta soup recipes?


It was, actually, supposed to be nachos , don't know what became of that!! :wink:


It's nacho decision where this thread goes!! ;-)
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby S2M » Thu May 20, 2010 5:41 am

I would remove IUDs for free....to save money, of course.... :twisted: :wink: :P
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu May 20, 2010 5:44 am

Melissa wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:Jesus christ, all this talk about lactating and breastfeeding... what's next, placenta soup recipes?


It was, actually, supposed to be nachos , don't know what became of that!! :wink:


Actually it DID move on to several topics since then :lol:

gift cards
air bases
SR-71's
bats
dishes
sweethearts
missile defense systems

But maybe HE still wants to talk about boobies :lol: :wink:


ha ha!!
and LOL@jrnyman28
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu May 20, 2010 8:33 am

jrnyman28 wrote:For our older child she didn't have a problem feeding but he was intolerant so he HAD to go on formula.


If he's breast intolerant, I'd definitely keep a close eye on him. Buy him lots of G.I. Joes, but if nature wins out over nurture, buy him a G.I. Jim. :lol:
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Arianddu » Thu May 20, 2010 12:14 pm

StocktontoMalone wrote:I would remove IUDs for free....to save money, of course.... :twisted: :wink: :P


Why do I get the feeling that what you really mean is that you would test them for effectiveness for free. :twisted:
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Postby jrnyman28 » Fri May 21, 2010 3:26 am

Rip Rokken wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:For our older child she didn't have a problem feeding but he was intolerant so he HAD to go on formula.


If he's breast intolerant, I'd definitely keep a close eye on him. Buy him lots of G.I. Joes, but if nature wins out over nurture, buy him a G.I. Jim. :lol:


Funny.

Maybe that's what happened after all!!

BTW, he is 14 now, just graduated middle school last night.
jrnyman28
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6732
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 2:15 pm

Postby stevew2 » Fri May 21, 2010 6:54 am

jrnyman28 wrote:
Angel wrote:
Melissa wrote:True, and this happens as a necessity more than 1% of the time. I see babies at work ALL the time who lose 10% or more of their birth weight (not a good thing) by 3-5 days old because of mom's milk not being in and various other problems with breastfeeding and the great lactation consultant I work with who has done her job for over 30 years now will be the first to say when those babies NEED formula, at least until the breastfeeding problems get worked out, and the baby gets back to birth weight (at the VERY least) or bigger by 2 weeks old.


Yep, I agree...and 99% of women that DON'T have breastfeeding problems (latch is good, frequent feedings etc) and don't have a pathology resulting in delayed lactogenesis ( retained placenta, decreased prolactin, breast reduction resulting in decreased breast tissue,etc) make enough milk. I'm not including those that have breastfeeding issues in that 99% and no, I don't know that's an EXACT statistic I chose it to make a point, but I'm fairly certain it's not far off. I just know that lots of women think they are not producing enough and give up without getting help to correct the problem-and that's a shame.


now...back to ten ways to get ripped off.... :lol:


My wife tried everything she could to breastfeed this last time around. She would feed. She would pump in between feedings. She did see a consultant. She could never get enough milk.

For our older child she didn't have a problem feeding but he was intolerant so he HAD to go on formula.
thats cause she was trying to feed both of you
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Everett » Fri May 21, 2010 7:07 am

stevew2 wrote:
jrnyman28 wrote:
Angel wrote:
Melissa wrote:True, and this happens as a necessity more than 1% of the time. I see babies at work ALL the time who lose 10% or more of their birth weight (not a good thing) by 3-5 days old because of mom's milk not being in and various other problems with breastfeeding and the great lactation consultant I work with who has done her job for over 30 years now will be the first to say when those babies NEED formula, at least until the breastfeeding problems get worked out, and the baby gets back to birth weight (at the VERY least) or bigger by 2 weeks old.


Yep, I agree...and 99% of women that DON'T have breastfeeding problems (latch is good, frequent feedings etc) and don't have a pathology resulting in delayed lactogenesis ( retained placenta, decreased prolactin, breast reduction resulting in decreased breast tissue,etc) make enough milk. I'm not including those that have breastfeeding issues in that 99% and no, I don't know that's an EXACT statistic I chose it to make a point, but I'm fairly certain it's not far off. I just know that lots of women think they are not producing enough and give up without getting help to correct the problem-and that's a shame.


now...back to ten ways to get ripped off.... :lol:


My wife tried everything she could to breastfeed this last time around. She would feed. She would pump in between feedings. She did see a consultant. She could never get enough milk.

For our older child she didn't have a problem feeding but he was intolerant so he HAD to go on formula.
thats cause she was trying to feed both of you


lmao steve 8)
All in a day's work
Everett
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5791
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:17 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Fri May 21, 2010 4:48 pm

Rip Rokken wrote:
Angel wrote:but here's a rip off....$250 to REMOVE an IUD...I just discovered the cost the other day and I was appalled!!!!!!!!!!!


Hey, even if they never found any of those in Iraq, U.N. weapons inspectors don't come cheap!


$250 a pop? That's hella cheap!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bbb_9zanFyk
I've never eaten a piece of sushi I didn't thoroughly enjoy.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Previous

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests