Tragedy in AZ: God be w/Rep. Gabrielle Giiffords and others

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Monker » Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:27 am

RedWingFan wrote:
Monker wrote:
RedWingFan wrote:
Behshad wrote::lol:

Too funny Jose. ;). Were those two evil ?! of course. But so are many insurgents who rape these women daily.
There's no mentioning of the state sanctioned rape rooms ,,, only a brief mention of the typical Arabian Palace Harems. Most those leaders in Arabian nations have those. Let's risk our troops lives to save those women shall we ?! :roll:

Dude you obviously prefer totalitarian states, where I prefer freedom. We'll just have to drop it at that. :roll:


There are 'totalitarian states' all over the world....some MUCH more of a security risk then Iraq. Should we invade those too? Why did you not critique W for invading Iraq rather then Cuba, or N. Korea, or China, or Russia? All of those are a lot more of a threat to this country then Iraq ever could be under Sadam.


It's "than" Einstein. Because it was Iraq that was violating the resolutions they agreed to after the Gulf War.


That's a lame excuse. If all we cared about is some factory, then bomb it and take it out...and do the same to every building that Sadam refused access to. There was NO reason to invade Iraq.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby Monker » Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:29 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Monker wrote:There are 'totalitarian states' all over the world....some MUCH more of a security risk then Iraq. Should we invade those too? Why did you not critique W for invading Iraq rather then Cuba, or N. Korea, or China, or Russia? All of those are a lot more of a threat to this country then Iraq ever could be under Sadam.


Most of them wouldn't give material support to Islamic terrorism...


Neither would Sadam. Remember, he 'gassed his own people'. What people fail to mention is that they were Muslims. The terrorists hated Sadam as much as anybody else. We CREATED an opportunity for Al Queda, we didn't take one away.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby Monker » Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:31 am

RedWingFan wrote:
Behshad wrote:Funny how you expect Iraq to follow UNs rules , yet when UN advises us against invasion you give UN the middle finger :lol:

Yeah, the resolution used the UN as an arbitor. If Saddam violated it, we had the right to go back in with or without UN approval.

Saddam violated the resolution, which gave us the right to go back in. Sorry.


And, it was a very stupid thing to do. No wonder you support it.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby Seven Wishes2 » Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:29 pm

Silly Republican.

Brains are for Democrats.


Image
User avatar
Seven Wishes2
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1621
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:49 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Postby donnaplease » Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:47 am

Seven Wishes wrote:Silly Republican.

Brains are for Democrats.


Image


Careful, Daniel. If a bunny goes on a crazed killing spree, you might be accused of inciting it with your highly inflammatory picture. :P
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby conversationpc » Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:07 am

Seven Wishes wrote:Silly Republican.

Brains are for Democrats.

Image


I prefer this one...

Image
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby slucero » Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:11 am

Image

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Previous

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

cron