Moderator: Andrew
Memorex wrote:As I watched the movie I was thinking it was really telling the story of so many industries. All this technology changes everything.
I'm developing some software and I had a market research interview with a guy in the industry and he really appreciated what I might do for people, but was very honest about being afraid that I'm going to allow new-comers to skip the pains he had to endure to build what they have internally. I really felt for the guy. But at the same time, I can help people that maybe don't have the resources he was able to put together. So I left that meeting with such a conflicted feeling. This movie gave me that same feeling.
slucero wrote:Memorex wrote:As I watched the movie I was thinking it was really telling the story of so many industries. All this technology changes everything.
I'm developing some software and I had a market research interview with a guy in the industry and he really appreciated what I might do for people, but was very honest about being afraid that I'm going to allow new-comers to skip the pains he had to endure to build what they have internally. I really felt for the guy. But at the same time, I can help people that maybe don't have the resources he was able to put together. So I left that meeting with such a conflicted feeling. This movie gave me that same feeling.
I think it highly ironic that musicians blame technology for the demise of the quality of music.. when its that very technology that they use and and continue to use that has made music so diverse now...
More importantly.. regardless of how many millions of bedroom artists there are now who can put their music out to the world via TuneCore, Itunes, SoundCloud, BandCamp, etc..vs. when the labels had a stranglehold on the distribution channels and could limit what consumers heard.. the old axiom STILL holds true.
"It all comes down to to writing a great song"
Don wrote:slucero wrote:Memorex wrote:As I watched the movie I was thinking it was really telling the story of so many industries. All this technology changes everything.
I'm developing some software and I had a market research interview with a guy in the industry and he really appreciated what I might do for people, but was very honest about being afraid that I'm going to allow new-comers to skip the pains he had to endure to build what they have internally. I really felt for the guy. But at the same time, I can help people that maybe don't have the resources he was able to put together. So I left that meeting with such a conflicted feeling. This movie gave me that same feeling.
I think it highly ironic that musicians blame technology for the demise of the quality of music.. when its that very technology that they use and and continue to use that has made music so diverse now...
More importantly.. regardless of how many millions of bedroom artists there are now who can put their music out to the world via TuneCore, Itunes, SoundCloud, BandCamp, etc..vs. when the labels had a stranglehold on the distribution channels and could limit what consumers heard.. the old axiom STILL holds true.
"It all comes down to to writing a great song"
Or making cool videos. Foo Fighters are great at that.
slucero wrote:I love that movie.. except for Grohl pissing on Protools...
maybe he "forgot" that it was a ProTools rig that was used to make Nevermind...
Pelata wrote:slucero wrote:I love that movie.. except for Grohl pissing on Protools...
maybe he "forgot" that it was a ProTools rig that was used to make Nevermind...
I don't think that's correct. When ProTools officially launched in 1991, it was only available in 4-track format. Nirvana recorded part of Nevermind in 1990, and the rest at Sound City in 1991. ProTools had not been fully integrated into commercial studios yet...let alone a studio like Sound City.
Commercial studios didn't really begin to change over until around 1997 when the 24 & 48 track versions came around.
Jeremey wrote:This is interesting info about Nevermind and Grohl...
I thought the whole reason for the Sound City movie was about how Nevermind was recorded there and how he fell in love with the analog sound of the Neve console and eventually bought it then made the movie around it. And then I watched the FF doc that was released last year and the whole premise of that film was about how he moved an entire tape studio into his house (along with the Neve) to record that last Foos record...
I didn't know that PT was being used during that process.
Now I completely understand if a post guy at the label etc comes in and does post production digital editing - but was a PT rig being used during the actual tracking and production of those records?
slucero wrote:Jeremey wrote:This is interesting info about Nevermind and Grohl...
I thought the whole reason for the Sound City movie was about how Nevermind was recorded there and how he fell in love with the analog sound of the Neve console and eventually bought it then made the movie around it. And then I watched the FF doc that was released last year and the whole premise of that film was about how he moved an entire tape studio into his house (along with the Neve) to record that last Foos record...
I didn't know that PT was being used during that process.
Now I completely understand if a post guy at the label etc comes in and does post production digital editing - but was a PT rig being used during the actual tracking and production of those records?
Are you sure you don't mean his home studio? http://www.nme.com/nme-video/dave-grohl ... 7688254001
they did record purely analog there..
Their 8000 sq ft studio where the Neve is.. 606 West is the studio name.. has a editing desk... Dave talks about the bands that have recorded there besides the FF.. it makes sense t hat this place has PT...
Regardless... Grohl is worth north of $200 Million.. he can afford to only record to tape
Although there is no way to validate it.. its a pretty common belief that there was a rented rig for the Nevermind mixing sessions... and that Nevermind was edited in PT...
Liquid_Drummer wrote:all of that trouble to record to tape for Wasting Light only for it to get brick wall compression in mastering. It sounds like ass on CD. I downloaded a 24/96 resolution rip from the vinyl release and it sounds a million times better. You can not master vinyl that hot because the needle would jump out of the groove. I can't figure out why he is so in to pure analog sound and then allows the mastering folks to destroy the very dynamics he was after. Most people wont hear the vinyl version and this a shame. The cd is pure ear fatigue after a couple of songs and I looked at the waveform myself. There is clipping on it. I suggest trying to get a vinyl rip if you can . Whole different experience. You can hear compressor breathing on the cd for crying out loud !
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests