If Hilary Wins...

[The_Noble_Cause]

Clinton is BY FAR the better choice to lead the country compared to Trump.

KC was talking about Hillary NOT Trump. Why are you utterly incapable of discussing Hillary on her own merits?

[The_Noble_Cause]

I do not believe for one moment that Trump will win the youth vote. THAT is hilarious.

But I never said that Trump will win the youth vote. Only that Hillary will lose it, while Democratic nominees have historically won it.

The victims families care. Compassionate people who can empathize with those families care what is said in those moments. People cared when W first spoke during 9/11.

Stop the bullshit. The only reason you are pretending to care is to attack Trump. If the topic was the victims in the Benghazi attack or collateral victims in an Obama drone strike, you would completely dismiss it. Your relative moral outrage is grotesque.

And THAT dominates the news cycle rather than "Gee, I wonder if Trump's crazy antics will hurt him this time?"

You assume the “news cycle” still matters. You talk just like your candidate – another old fart who hasn’t kept up with the times. Nobody is waiting for Uncle Cronkite to tell them what to think anymore.

[Monker]

I do not believe for one moment that Trump will win the youth vote. THAT is hilarious.

But I never said that Trump will win the youth vote. Only that Hillary will lose it, while Democratic nominees have historically won it.

So are you saying the youth would rather stay home than vote for either Clinton or Trump? I don't think so. Between Obama and Sanders trying to keep them on board, and the fact that Tramp is an ass, they will vote for Cinton.

Stop the bullshit. The only reason you are pretending to care is to attack Trump. If the topic was the victims in the Benghazi attack or collateral victims in an Obama drone strike, you would completely dismiss it. Your relative moral outrage is grotesque.

I did not say I cared or did not care. I am saying Obama did care and people saw that...especially when contrasting it to Trump the Tyrant's raging on in his speech.

And THAT dominates the news cycle rather than "Gee, I wonder if Trump's crazy antics will hurt him this time?"

You assume the “news cycle” still matters. You talk just like your candidate – another old fart who hasn’t kept up with the times. Nobody is waiting for Uncle Cronkite to tell them what to think anymore.

[/quote]

in the other thread, you said, "Trump may be playing the media, but it's a symbiotic relationship. The fact that neither of you realize this, tells me you are the ones ultimately being played."

Since Sanders is no longer in the game, maybe you have joined those being played by Trump.

[Monker]

Monker, just give Hillary 50 million and her or Bill will come give you a speech. Even if your from Syria, Iran, Lybia,ect.

It only takes a few hundred thousand for Trump to get a state attorney general to drop or ignore a fraud case. ""Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to." Rule of Acquisition #3.

[The_Noble_Cause]

So are you saying the youth would rather stay home than vote for either Clinton or Trump? I don't think so. Between Obama and Sanders trying to keep them on board, and the fact that Tramp is an ass, they will vote for Cinton.

I think the youth vote will lean heavily towards the green party possibly or be spread between other third parties. Bernie's popularity was fueled in part by the internet. Whichever candidate can harness social media, can win with the young. But it's certainly not Hilary. The authenticity gap is just too big for her to close. I will respond to the rest of your bullshit later.

[SF-Dano]

Hillary Clinton - "It's time for the US to start thinking of Iraq as a business opportunity."

Just like her and her cronies profited in Bosnia and Kosovo. She is about fostering war and profiting from it. Right or wrong be damned.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMoMajiue24

[The_Noble_Cause]

I did not say I cared or did not care.

The only thing you care about is promoting Hillary while pretending to be straddling the fence of neutrality. You are as big of a partisan fraud as Fact Finder.

I am saying Obama did care and people saw that...especially when contrasting it to Trump the Tyrant's raging on in his speech.

Truthfully, most "people" did not watch either speech and, come November, won't care.
Of all the things to make an important issue of (rigged trade deals, war crimes, FBI indictment etc.), you decide to go on the warpath about a speech? Really?

Since Sanders is no longer in the game, maybe you have joined those being played by Trump.

I was ALWAYS supportive of Trump's unpopular anti-NAFTA stance the same time I was supportive of Bernie's candidacy. Still am. The only person being played is YOU - relentlessly posting DNC propaganda ("she had permission to use a server!") like the good little gagged gimp slave you are. The Corporatocracy will be sure to remember your sacrifices when it is time to mete out rations in the FEMA camp.

[Archetype]

It's so funny watching you guys get so incredibly worked up over all this, as if your lives will be drastically impacted one way or another.

[scarab]

It's so funny watching you guys get so incredibly worked up over all this, as if your lives will be drastically impacted one way or another.

as long as a democrip or a rebloodican wins, you are right, it will never get any better.

[Archetype]

It's so funny watching you guys get so incredibly worked up over all this, as if your lives will be drastically impacted one way or another.

as long as a democrip or a rebloodican wins, you are right, it will never get any better.

They work for each other more than they work for anyone else.

[The_Noble_Cause]

It's so funny watching you guys get so incredibly worked up over all this, as if your lives will be drastically impacted one way or another.

Off the top of my head....Obamacare impacted the lives of several friends of mine without insurance. I also had friends sent to Afghanistan and Gitmo. While America places too much emphasis on the role of the President, it's inaccurate to say that none of it matters. Maybe you just don't know very many people.

[Monker]

It's so funny watching you guys get so incredibly worked up over all this, as if your lives will be drastically impacted one way or another.

I'm not that worked up. I've known Clinton is going to win for about a year now.

[Monker]

It's so funny watching you guys get so incredibly worked up over all this, as if your lives will be drastically impacted one way or another.

as long as a democrip or a rebloodican wins, you are right, it will never get any better.

So, then vote for Johnson. At least he is sane.

[Monker]

I did not say I cared or did not care.

The only thing you care about is promoting Hillary while pretending to be straddling the fence of neutrality. You are as big of a partisan fraud as Fact Finder.

I am not the one going about posting article after article of fiction.

I have simply said that Clinton will be the next President. You can keep pretending differently, but it won't change anything.

I am saying Obama did care and people saw that...especially when contrasting it to Trump the Tyrant's raging on in his speech.

Truthfully, most "people" did not watch either speech and, come November, won't care.
Of all the things to make an important issue of (rigged trade deals, war crimes, FBI indictment etc.), you decide to go on the warpath about a speech? Really?

I think plenty of people saw bits of both. Will they remember in November? That depends on how well the PAC's dip into those quotes. From today's perspective, I would say a lot more will remember Trump's stupidity because they are going to be reminded of it constantly in ads - over and over again....while Trump does not have the $'s to even get an ad on TV, and he lost the support of many of the Republican sponsors (including the Koch brothers). He does not have the money nor the support to do to Clinton what the Democrats are going to do to him. Good luck getting it done on Twitter. This is not the primaries where one liners can take down a candidate.

Since Sanders is no longer in the game, maybe you have joined those being played by Trump.

I was ALWAYS supportive of Trump's unpopular anti-NAFTA stance the same time I was supportive of Bernie's candidacy. Still am. The only person being played is YOU - relentlessly posting DNC propaganda ("she had permission to use a server!") like the good little gagged gimp slave you are. The Corporatocracy will be sure to remember your sacrifices when it is time to mete out rations in the FEMA camp.

No reason to even reply at this point. You are very desperate. It's a bit sad, really.

[The_Noble_Cause]

I am not the one going about posting article after article of fiction.

You are even lazier. You repeat lies (“Hillary had permission to use a private server!”) without any accreditation whatsoever. At least FF makes the effort to copy n paste, no small feat when you consider how much he likes using his mouse-hand to squeeze his nuts like a stress ball.

I have simply said that Clinton will be the next President.

Here we go with the “Little Miss Neutrality” routine again.
If you truly had no horse in this race, you would not be constantly promoting Hillary and Obama.
Have the courage of your political convictions, pussy.

I think plenty of people saw bits of both.

Yeah ok. And then they turned the channel and forgot. The only people still getting tingles up their (shaved) legs when Obama makes a speech are you and Chris Mathews.

From today's perspective, I would say a lot more will remember Trump's stupidity because they are going to be reminded of it constantly in ads - over and over again....while Trump does not have the $'s to even get an ad on TV, and he lost the support of many of the Republican sponsors (including the Koch brothers). He does not have the money nor the support to do to Clinton what the Democrats are going to do to him. Good luck getting it done on Twitter. This is not the primaries where one liners can take down a candidate.

A few things…
In elections, things change fast all the time. Most of this is irrelevant.
Secondly, maybe the Koch Bros. can go fund Hillary. She is more their type anyway.
And third, I am already seeing anti-Hillary ads all over the place.

No reason to even reply at this point.

You’re right. You’re lies don’t work around here. Maybe try a different forum where you haven't been exposed?

You are very desperate. It's a bit sad, really.

Doesn't change the fact that you were caught on this forum repeating lies verbatim, word-for-word from the Hillary campaign. And if that's not desperate, I don't know what is.

[Archetype]

You guys don't even know what a truly effective, loving and attentive national leader looks like. Watch this and then consider if your squabbling over Trump and Clinton is really worth the energy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-xbwAu6xwA