Gays boycott Chick-fil-a, Miracle rebound for economy

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby verslibre » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:06 pm

Fact Finder wrote:Oh my sides are splitting from laughter....

Alleged UofAZ prof and medical supplier CFO Bullies Chik-fil-a clerk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg-jzlWcc0E

So this jerk claims to be an Adjunct Professor at UofAz and he is also a CFO for a Tuscon Company named Vante which makes catheters. So he goes to CFA and films himself being an ass, then he puts it on youtube and it goes viral.

Then.......


TUCSON, AZ, Aug 02, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- The following is a statement from Vante:

Vante regrets the unfortunate events that transpired yesterday in Tucson between our former CFO/Treasurer Adam Smith and an employee at Chick-fil-A. Effective immediately, Mr. Smith is no longer an employee of our company.


I bet he feels like a real dill-hole right about anytime. :lol:

"I'm totally heterosexual!" Yeah, man. You forgot something. You said "Here I goooo!" at the one-minute mark in your video, and you sounded like a fruit salad when you did it.
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby verslibre » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:09 pm

Monker wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do.


You may want to consider not eating out at fast food establishments/restaurants and buying certain brands/products, etc. Chick-fil-a is by no means the only corporation that "gives to a political cause."


That is not what I said. I said the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that.


You said to give money to Chick-fil-A is to give money to a political cause, which is something you do not do.

And all I said was Chick-fil-A is not the only entity that does that.



When Monker said, "I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do." That's not what he said. What he really said was, "the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that".

easy peasy lemon squeezy! :wink: :lol:

Monk, you are a trip. Btw, it's still $123 Billion over 10 Years.. :P


Oh, please, are you guys this stupid?

It has absolutely nothing to do with how donations were made, which is what I said in what you quoted. I've known about that for years. It is because of all the crap you did NOT quote has made Chick-fill-a, the company itself, political, and eating there is now supporting hatred towards gays. That's just crap, and I'm not going to associate myself with a company that has made themselves so political.


Okay, so it's only a specific political cause you have an issue with. Gotcha. You might want to clarify that. And when you say one thing, and then say no, you said another thing, the quote function might say otherwise. As you were.
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby Rick » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:22 pm

verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do.


You may want to consider not eating out at fast food establishments/restaurants and buying certain brands/products, etc. Chick-fil-a is by no means the only corporation that "gives to a political cause."


That is not what I said. I said the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that.


You said to give money to Chick-fil-A is to give money to a political cause, which is something you do not do.

And all I said was Chick-fil-A is not the only entity that does that.



When Monker said, "I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do." That's not what he said. What he really said was, "the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that".

easy peasy lemon squeezy! :wink: :lol:

Monk, you are a trip. Btw, it's still $123 Billion over 10 Years.. :P


Oh, please, are you guys this stupid?

It has absolutely nothing to do with how donations were made, which is what I said in what you quoted. I've known about that for years. It is because of all the crap you did NOT quote has made Chick-fill-a, the company itself, political, and eating there is now supporting hatred towards gays. That's just crap, and I'm not going to associate myself with a company that has made themselves so political.


Okay, so it's only a specific political cause you have an issue with. Gotcha. You might want to clarify that. And when you say one thing, and then say no, you said another thing, the quote function might say otherwise. As you were.


Monker will have to grow his own food if he wants to find an unaffiliated fast food restaurant. The chains are always gong to affiliate with one cause or another.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby steveo777 » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:36 pm

Rick wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do.


You may want to consider not eating out at fast food establishments/restaurants and buying certain brands/products, etc. Chick-fil-a is by no means the only corporation that "gives to a political cause."


That is not what I said. I said the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that.


You said to give money to Chick-fil-A is to give money to a political cause, which is something you do not do.

And all I said was Chick-fil-A is not the only entity that does that.



When Monker said, "I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do." That's not what he said. What he really said was, "the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that".

easy peasy lemon squeezy! :wink: :lol:

Monk, you are a trip. Btw, it's still $123 Billion over 10 Years.. :P


Oh, please, are you guys this stupid?

It has absolutely nothing to do with how donations were made, which is what I said in what you quoted. I've known about that for years. It is because of all the crap you did NOT quote has made Chick-fill-a, the company itself, political, and eating there is now supporting hatred towards gays. That's just crap, and I'm not going to associate myself with a company that has made themselves so political.


Okay, so it's only a specific political cause you have an issue with. Gotcha. You might want to clarify that. And when you say one thing, and then say no, you said another thing, the quote function might say otherwise. As you were.


Monker will have to grow his own food if he wants to find an unaffiliated fast food restaurant. The chains are always gong to affiliate with one cause or another.


Don't most of these types of people live in Northern Idaho? :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby verslibre » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:52 pm

Rick wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do.


You may want to consider not eating out at fast food establishments/restaurants and buying certain brands/products, etc. Chick-fil-a is by no means the only corporation that "gives to a political cause."


That is not what I said. I said the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that.


You said to give money to Chick-fil-A is to give money to a political cause, which is something you do not do.

And all I said was Chick-fil-A is not the only entity that does that.



When Monker said, "I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do." That's not what he said. What he really said was, "the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that".

easy peasy lemon squeezy! :wink: :lol:

Monk, you are a trip. Btw, it's still $123 Billion over 10 Years.. :P


Oh, please, are you guys this stupid?

It has absolutely nothing to do with how donations were made, which is what I said in what you quoted. I've known about that for years. It is because of all the crap you did NOT quote has made Chick-fill-a, the company itself, political, and eating there is now supporting hatred towards gays. That's just crap, and I'm not going to associate myself with a company that has made themselves so political.


Okay, so it's only a specific political cause you have an issue with. Gotcha. You might want to clarify that. And when you say one thing, and then say no, you said another thing, the quote function might say otherwise. As you were.


Monker will have to grow his own food if he wants to find an unaffiliated fast food restaurant. The chains are always gong to affiliate with one cause or another.


That was the point of my initial response. A nickel is going to go here, there or somewhere, for something. There's no way around it. This particular hot-button issue is the one that's currently getting attention. Remember Prop. 187? A lot of people opposed it but they didn't stop drinking Coke when Coca-Cola Corp. visibly supported it.

Like you said, we'd have to raise our own chickens for eggs and meat and stew dandelions and drink rainwater to get away from all that. :lol:
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby slucero » Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:54 pm

steveo777 wrote:
Rick wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do.


You may want to consider not eating out at fast food establishments/restaurants and buying certain brands/products, etc. Chick-fil-a is by no means the only corporation that "gives to a political cause."


That is not what I said. I said the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that.


You said to give money to Chick-fil-A is to give money to a political cause, which is something you do not do.

And all I said was Chick-fil-A is not the only entity that does that.



When Monker said, "I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do." That's not what he said. What he really said was, "the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that".

easy peasy lemon squeezy! :wink: :lol:

Monk, you are a trip. Btw, it's still $123 Billion over 10 Years.. :P


Oh, please, are you guys this stupid?

It has absolutely nothing to do with how donations were made, which is what I said in what you quoted. I've known about that for years. It is because of all the crap you did NOT quote has made Chick-fill-a, the company itself, political, and eating there is now supporting hatred towards gays. That's just crap, and I'm not going to associate myself with a company that has made themselves so political.


Okay, so it's only a specific political cause you have an issue with. Gotcha. You might want to clarify that. And when you say one thing, and then say no, you said another thing, the quote function might say otherwise. As you were.


Monker will have to grow his own food if he wants to find an unaffiliated fast food restaurant. The chains are always gong to affiliate with one cause or another.


Don't most of these types of people live in Northern Idaho? :lol: :lol: :lol:



Hmmmm........... I recall a recent news story of a survivalist fella who killed his wife and kid... then fled to his mountain bunker, barricaded himself in and had a standoff with the police - then offed himself,


....and lived in Washington..

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Rick » Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:19 pm

slucero wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
Rick wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Monker wrote:I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do.


You may want to consider not eating out at fast food establishments/restaurants and buying certain brands/products, etc. Chick-fil-a is by no means the only corporation that "gives to a political cause."


That is not what I said. I said the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that.


You said to give money to Chick-fil-A is to give money to a political cause, which is something you do not do.

And all I said was Chick-fil-A is not the only entity that does that.



When Monker said, "I'll never eat at Chick-fil-a again. Not because of their donations but because to give that company money is to give it to a political cause - which is something I simply do not do." That's not what he said. What he really said was, "the CEO turned the company into a political tool. the very fact that this thread exists and its contents are proof of that".

easy peasy lemon squeezy! :wink: :lol:

Monk, you are a trip. Btw, it's still $123 Billion over 10 Years.. :P


Oh, please, are you guys this stupid?

It has absolutely nothing to do with how donations were made, which is what I said in what you quoted. I've known about that for years. It is because of all the crap you did NOT quote has made Chick-fill-a, the company itself, political, and eating there is now supporting hatred towards gays. That's just crap, and I'm not going to associate myself with a company that has made themselves so political.


Okay, so it's only a specific political cause you have an issue with. Gotcha. You might want to clarify that. And when you say one thing, and then say no, you said another thing, the quote function might say otherwise. As you were.


Monker will have to grow his own food if he wants to find an unaffiliated fast food restaurant. The chains are always gong to affiliate with one cause or another.


Don't most of these types of people live in Northern Idaho? :lol: :lol: :lol:



Hmmmm........... I recall a recent news story of a survivalist fella who killed his wife and kid... then fled to his mountain bunker, barricaded himself in and had a standoff with the police - then offed himself,


....and lived in Washington..


Yep, location is irrelevant. I live in Texas, and you can Google search all the shit that's gone on here. It's never been relegated to one area or another. It's everywhere. I'll blast Monker when I think he's wrong, mostly because he's kind of arrogant but that dude is right more times than not.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby verslibre » Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:23 pm

Rick wrote:I live in Texas


How often do you run into Chuck Walker, I mean Cordell Norris?
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby Rick » Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:32 pm

verslibre wrote:
Rick wrote:I live in Texas


How often do you run into Chuck Walker, I mean Cordell Norris?


Every day.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby RedWingFan » Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:39 pm

Rick wrote:I'll blast Monker when I think he's wrong, mostly because he's kind of arrogant but that dude is right more times than not.

He's taken over for 7 Wishes as the poster that's ALWAYS wrong.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby Rick » Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:59 pm

RedWingFan wrote:
Rick wrote:I'll blast Monker when I think he's wrong, mostly because he's kind of arrogant but that dude is right more times than not.

He's taken over for 7 Wishes as the poster that's ALWAYS wrong.


It all boils down to perspective. As does anything. And didn't I ask you to rename yourself Rightwingfag before? I know you remember that, bro. lol
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby AR » Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:15 pm

I'm going to see Ted Nugent live tonight. I wonder if he will weigh in on this topic this evening? :shock: :lol:
User avatar
AR
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8530
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:21 am

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:18 pm

Fact Finder wrote:The Civil Rights Agenda Chick-fil-A Complaint

http://chicagophoenix.com/the-civil-rig ... complaint/


This is humorous and the attorneys who assisted in preparing this complaint should be sanctioned.

You cannot allege discrimination under ANY employment or public accommodations discrimination law on the mere basis of personal biases or dislikes against your protected class (e.g., your sexual orientation, gender, race etc); rather, there must be tangible discrimination against the claimant. You must be able to allege that Chick-Fil-A refused to serve you, let you in the door, spit in your food, etc. upon learning of your membership in a protected class. You can't just rely on "he doesn't like my kind!" and hope to have a colorable lawsuit or administrative agency complaint.

The crux of this joke of a complaint lies in paragraph 6:

Although I would like to be treated equally and with dignity and respect at ChickF
fil-A restaurants, the companyjs widely published corporate philosophy, culture
and policies make clear to me that as an unmarried homosexual in a "non-
traditional" family unit, i am inferior to married heterosexuals and therefore,
unwelcome, objectionable and unacceptable to Chick-fil-A.


Ridiculous. This (i.e., the CEO remarks alone) are not actionable discrimination in ANY legal sense of the word, and whoever filed this complaint should be ashamed of themselves.

Here is how the Illinois Department of Human Rights (which is where this complaint was filed because federal anti-discrimination laws do NOT protect sexual orientation as a protected class) defines discrimination in a public accommodation:

IDHR wrote:PROHIBITED PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS ACTIONS
The Illinois Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination in several public settings, for example:

A place of public accommodation: To deny or refuse the full and equal enjoyment of facilities, goods and services.


Here is also what IDHR specifically says it cannot do:

IDHR wrote:WHAT THE DEPARTMENT CANNOT DO
The Department cannot investigate Public Accommodations charges:

Based on political affiliations, personality conflicts, etc., unless such actions are alleged to be discriminatory for one or more of the reasons listed above.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Yoda » Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:42 pm

That is ridiculous! There's no discrimination, never was. Some of these people are just pissed that their stupid boycott backfired.
“Do or do not... there is no try.”
User avatar
Yoda
8 Track
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:36 am

Postby Starrider » Sat Aug 04, 2012 12:32 am

AR wrote:I'm going to see Ted Nugent live tonight. I wonder if he will weigh in on this topic this evening? :shock: :lol:


Almost a guarantee. I saw Ted open for REO and Styx earlier this summer. He actually made it all the way to the end of his set before getting political.

His best line of the night was when he was talking about all the hits REO and Styx had. He then said "but they don't have love songs like this" and launched into Wang Dang Sweet Poontang.
User avatar
Starrider
45 RPM
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:56 am

Postby Liam » Sat Aug 04, 2012 12:40 am

AR wrote:I'm going to see Ted Nugent live tonight. I wonder if he will weigh in on this topic this evening? :shock: :lol:


If he does...BOOT IT. lol

I DO wonder if the gay population realizes that they're promoting Chick-Fil-A with this little "kiss day" bullshit. YOU'RE KEEPING IT IN THE PUBLIC EYE, MORONS.
Liam

"It ain't how hard you can hit. It's how hard you can get it, and keep goin'." - Rocky
User avatar
Liam
MP3
 
Posts: 10064
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:54 am

Postby Liam » Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:11 am

Tastes damn good, is my response. LOL


BTW...I stated my case earlier in this thread, but they keep this shit up, I'm gonna fire right back.
Liam

"It ain't how hard you can hit. It's how hard you can get it, and keep goin'." - Rocky
User avatar
Liam
MP3
 
Posts: 10064
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:54 am

Postby hoagiepete » Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:35 am

I'm sick of this "hate" BS. Just because you believe in what is stated in the bible, doesn't make you "hate" someone. This is spin at its worst. The same "consultants" that dream this shit up are the same ones that work the DC political scene. Keep saying it enough and people may actually start to believe it.
hoagiepete
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:16 am

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:51 am

verslibre wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Oh my sides are splitting from laughter....

Alleged UofAZ prof and medical supplier CFO Bullies Chik-fil-a clerk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg-jzlWcc0E

So this jerk claims to be an Adjunct Professor at UofAz and he is also a CFO for a Tuscon Company named Vante which makes catheters. So he goes to CFA and films himself being an ass, then he puts it on youtube and it goes viral.

Then.......

TUCSON, AZ, Aug 02, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- The following is a statement from Vante:

Vante regrets the unfortunate events that transpired yesterday in Tucson between our former CFO/Treasurer Adam Smith and an employee at Chick-fil-A. Effective immediately, Mr. Smith is no longer an employee of our company.


I bet he feels like a real dill-hole right about anytime. :lol:

"I'm totally heterosexual!" Yeah, man. You forgot something. You said "Here I goooo!" at the one-minute mark in your video, and you sounded like a fruit salad when you did it.


Wow! This is a real TGIF! Hope he’s happy with himself now. Heterosexual really? He seemed like a total flame thrower in that video. Now he’s unemployed. He could always deep fry is cock and say he found it in the box of chicken nuggets that he ordered from the store, sort a like what the Wendy’s chili finger lady did a few years back but with a finger, and sue for millions.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:55 am

AR wrote:I'm going to see Ted Nugent live tonight. I wonder if he will weigh in on this topic this evening? :shock: :lol:


If he does, please let us know what he says. Ought to be great.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Sat Aug 04, 2012 2:48 am

So is that kiss-off happening tonight? Ought to be a hoot. However, I'm sure some of them are going to go beyond just kissing, such as sitting down uninvited at a table occupied by a family or even show up naked like they do to things in San Francisco. In which case this may spark some physical altercations. I know if I was having a meal with my kids and wife and some gay dudes sat at our table kissing because them just kissing outside the building didn't create enough reaction, I'd be seriously tempted to physically remove them from our table with whatever means possible. It's going to happen cause these types of homos do things for a reaction. If what they are doing doesn't cause the reaction they are looking for, they push on further until they get what they are looking for.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Liam » Sat Aug 04, 2012 2:50 am

Cops WILL be there. Bet'cha anything.
Liam

"It ain't how hard you can hit. It's how hard you can get it, and keep goin'." - Rocky
User avatar
Liam
MP3
 
Posts: 10064
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:54 am

Postby Don » Sat Aug 04, 2012 2:59 am

I think after the initial surge in sales, this will hurt the store a little bit over the long run.
It's easier for those who are pissed to stay away because they can always find an alternative place to go. It's not like Chick-fil-A has much variety anyway.
On the other hand, people going there that normally don't to simply show support doesn't seem to be something that will continue indefinitely. Unless they simply fall in love with the food, I don't think the majority will go out of their way to continuously eat something strictly on principle.
Eventually people will be questioning themselves why they are eating something they don't care for and also, they'll rationalize that others are still going there to support the cause so them not going anymore won't matter much.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby verslibre » Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:07 am

The Sushi Hunter wrote:
verslibre wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Oh my sides are splitting from laughter....

Alleged UofAZ prof and medical supplier CFO Bullies Chik-fil-a clerk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg-jzlWcc0E

So this jerk claims to be an Adjunct Professor at UofAz and he is also a CFO for a Tuscon Company named Vante which makes catheters. So he goes to CFA and films himself being an ass, then he puts it on youtube and it goes viral.

Then.......

TUCSON, AZ, Aug 02, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- The following is a statement from Vante:

Vante regrets the unfortunate events that transpired yesterday in Tucson between our former CFO/Treasurer Adam Smith and an employee at Chick-fil-A. Effective immediately, Mr. Smith is no longer an employee of our company.


I bet he feels like a real dill-hole right about anytime. :lol:

"I'm totally heterosexual!" Yeah, man. You forgot something. You said "Here I goooo!" at the one-minute mark in your video, and you sounded like a fruit salad when you did it.


Wow! This is a real TGIF! Hope he’s happy with himself now. Heterosexual really? He seemed like a total flame thrower in that video. Now he’s unemployed. He could always deep fry is cock and say he found it in the box of chicken nuggets that he ordered from the store, sort a like what the Wendy’s chili finger lady did a few years back but with a finger, and sue for millions.


And all he'll get out of it "So sorry about putting a mini-corn dog in with your spicy chicken bites. We'll give you a replacement order, free of charge."
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby Rick » Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:42 am

The Chick-Fil-A dude should have gone public before he made that statement. His stock would be going through the roof. This is the best thing that's ever happened to that company.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Liam » Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:13 am

Fact Finder wrote:Image



:lol: :lol:


:lol: :lol: :lol:
Liam

"It ain't how hard you can hit. It's how hard you can get it, and keep goin'." - Rocky
User avatar
Liam
MP3
 
Posts: 10064
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:54 am

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:17 am

I've been reading some of what the pro-gay protesters and the gays themselves have been up to in regards to Chick-Fil-A and they're true sick colors are coming through loud and clear. One protester instructs fellow protesters to get jobs at Chick-Fil-A and then change the company from the inside. Obviously what that would include is discriminating against people who do not agree with the same sex lifestyle. That there is discriminating and against the law. I've seen that and experienced it in the work place first hand. Just imagine what it would be like working for or even with that dickhead who drove through the drive-thru harassing the window clerk while he videotaped it? If he was in such a position that he could fire, hire, or even have input on performance evaluations ultimately influencing outcome of evaluations, he'd fuck over whoever didn't share his same beliefs. Seen that and experienced it in workplaces such as a very prestigious educational institution in the bay area. These morons are out there and they are downright dirty fuckers, make no mistake about that. This is coming from someone who's had first hand experiences dealing with dickheads like that guy. And this is the reason I no longer consider myself to be "gay friendly" any longer and never fucking again will, despite the environment I was raised in.

What we are going to see next in regards to this issue, and this is what I’ve mentioned previously, if you support a company, business, organization such as one that believes in the traditional marriage even if you vote in favor of the traditional marriage, the primary homosexual organizations go after your personal information such as you and your family members names, where you live, where you work, license plate of your car(s) etc. After getting that information, they have that information published in local papers. The sole purpose of that is to threaten and intimidate?

With that information, people like that moron who drove through the drive-thru can look that information up and then go to where you live or they can cause issues at where you work. They can even stalk and harass family members as well. That’s their true colors right there.
Last edited by The Sushi Hunter on Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:38 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby StevePerryHair » Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:35 am

What cracks me up most reading these posts is how everyone generalizes and puts all gays and liberals under one umbrella, like they all think and feel the same and act the same. Think about this. If we "heteros" are all different in the things we think or feel, and I definitely would never line myself up with most people posting here, in my beliefs, why do you lump them as all alike? What a joke. Some of you are very closed/simple minded people who just generalize like crazy. Just unbelievable to me.
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:43 am

StevePerryHair wrote:What cracks me up most reading these posts is how everyone generalizes and puts all gays and liberals under one umbrella, like they all think and feel the same and act the same. Think about this. If we "heteros" are all different in the things we think or feel, and I definitely would never line myself up with most people posting here, in my beliefs, why do you lump them as all alike? What a joke. Some of you are very closed/simple minded people who just generalize like crazy. Just unbelievable to me.


Well I've perhaps not indicated which "one's" I'm talking about. I have no gripe with two butt plumbers who want to snake each other's raw sewage holes, just as long as they keep it behind closed doors and don't include me or any of my tax dollars in any way if the relationship sours because of a specific contracted STD that's incurable. Where my gripe lies is these protesters coming out of the woodwork and fucking with this company and all who patronize it simply because thier values is that of marriage between a biological man and biological woman only. That's who I'm talking about. I have not been clear on that in any of my previous posts so for that I am sorry.
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Michigan Girl » Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:21 am

StevePerryHair wrote:What cracks me up most reading these posts is how everyone generalizes and puts all gays and liberals under one umbrella, like they all think and feel the same and act the same. Think about this. If we "heteros" are all different in the things we think or feel, and I definitely would never line myself up with most people posting here, in my beliefs, why do you lump them as all alike? What a joke. Some of you are very closed/simple minded people who just generalize like crazy. Just unbelievable to me.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
I am LMAO!!
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests