Moderator: Andrew
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:Dr. Strange trailer. Never followed the character. Wonder if Marvel can pull off another great flick out of a somewhat obscure character.https://youtu.be/wwcSki7r9cQ
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:YoungJRNYfan wrote:I like the fact that Spidey is being played by an actual younger actor. Love his voice. I still think The Amazing Spider Man 2's suit was the best so far, though, I do dig the Retro look. Not surprised to see all the miserable's shitting on it.
Agreed. ASM2 was the best suit by far. Movie sucked though. Raimi's SM2 was by far the best Spidey movie. Sony's screwed it up ever since.
verslibre wrote:Spidey's first Sony/MCU reboot movie shouldn't have other characters in it. That'll take time away from telling his story, no?
RedWingFan wrote:Dr. Strange trailer. Never followed the character. Wonder if Marvel can pull off another great flick out of a somewhat obscure character.https://youtu.be/wwcSki7r9cQ
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:Civil War opens at 94% from critics on Rotten Tomatoes. I'll be disappointed if it winds up below 90%.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
verslibre wrote:Why the hell would you watch a spoiler-laden YT review?
I may not be able to check it out this weekend, but if not, then Mon/Tue at the very latest.
Monker wrote:verslibre wrote:Why the hell would you watch a spoiler-laden YT review?
I may not be able to check it out this weekend, but if not, then Mon/Tue at the very latest.
LOL...why not? Did I break some type of unwritten rule in comic book land?
verslibre wrote:Monker wrote:verslibre wrote:Why the hell would you watch a spoiler-laden YT review?
I may not be able to check it out this weekend, but if not, then Mon/Tue at the very latest.
LOL...why not? Did I break some type of unwritten rule in comic book land?
Why bother watching the movie? Did you do the same for The Force Awakens? Maybe I should have, and saved $15.
Monker wrote: I wish I had stock in Disney...because, damn: Jurassic World, Star Wars, Jungle Book, Zootopia, Inside Out, etc...AND the Marvel films, AoU last year, Civil War, Doctor Strange. It's definitely not 198x any longer for Disney.
With so many characters to care about and look after, with so many personality trait boxes to check off, "Civil War" has to fight hard not to seem as pro forma overall as the cameo moment for Marvel's spry eminence grise Stan Lee inevitably does.
All this time and energy spent in these prescribed pursuits sometimes means that things that are truly important, like convincing us that the Captain America/Iron Man split is more than a convenient plot contrivance, don't get the attention they need.
Whatever flaws "Batman v Superman" had, Ben Affleck's atavistic performance as the Dark Knight left you without the smallest doubt that he loathed the Krypton native. "Civil War" does eventually get to that point with Captain America and Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.), but it frankly takes a shrewd Hail Mary plot twist far into the 2-hour, 27-minute running time to make it happen.
verslibre wrote:Whatever flaws "Batman v Superman" had, Ben Affleck's atavistic performance as the Dark Knight left you without the smallest doubt that he loathed the Krypton native.
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-0505-captain-america-civil-war-review-20160504-snap-story.html
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
verslibre wrote:With so many characters to care about and look after, with so many personality trait boxes to check off, "Civil War" has to fight hard not to seem as pro forma overall as the cameo moment for Marvel's spry eminence grise Stan Lee inevitably does.
All this time and energy spent in these prescribed pursuits sometimes means that things that are truly important, like convincing us that the Captain America/Iron Man split is more than a convenient plot contrivance, don't get the attention they need.
Whatever flaws "Batman v Superman" had, Ben Affleck's atavistic performance as the Dark Knight left you without the smallest doubt that he loathed the Krypton native. "Civil War" does eventually get to that point with Captain America and Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.), but it frankly takes a shrewd Hail Mary plot twist far into the 2-hour, 27-minute running time to make it happen.
Nice to see Turan call it like it is instead of automatically creaming his jeans out of self-obligation.
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-0505-captain-america-civil-war-review-20160504-snap-story.html
Monker wrote:LOL...frankly, this review read INCREDIBLY nit-picky as if he is going out of his way to find something to whine about.
YoungJRNYfan wrote:This will be twice as better as AoU from that aspect alone.
RedWingFan wrote:But then Martha!
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests