BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
Racist.
Moderator: Andrew
BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
I understand that!!Carlitto H@kk wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:artist4perry wrote:I was a military wife for 10 years. Not the same as serving I know. But I heard the talk after hours. I think your hitting the nail on the head. It is one thing to do your job side by side. But I notice on even this board an underlying hostility to openly gay members sometimes. Do you think a bunch of macho guys are any different in the service? Yes, if they hurt someone because they are gay they should be dishonorably discharged, no question. But I am afraid more gays are going to see some hostility, if not physical, possibly more insidious in nature. I hope that is not true. No one should be harmed because they are gay. Emotionally or otherwise.
I believe he is referring to the damage that could incur during
a wartime situation due to lack of bonding and trust prior to ...not only for gay soldiers, but non~gay as well!!
Similar to the bond and trust police officers/partners must have for one another!!
Good Post Carlitto!!
No, I meant in times of War AND Peace. Its simple. Imagine going to work everyday
and feeling that most of your coworkers are just tolerating you because they have to,
not because they want to.
There is a BIG difference between Tolerance and Total Acceptance.
Duncan wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
Racist.
Carlitto H@kk wrote:No, I meant in times of War AND Peace. Its simple. Imagine going to work everyday
and feeling that most of your coworkers are just tolerating you because they have to,
not because they want to.
There is a BIG difference between Tolerance and Total Acceptance.
artist4perry wrote:Duncan wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
Racist.
Duncan you a Brit?
Duncan wrote:artist4perry wrote:Duncan wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
Racist.
Duncan you a Brit?
yep.
artist4perry wrote:Duncan wrote:artist4perry wrote:Duncan wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
Racist.
Duncan you a Brit?
yep.
I love British humor! And most Brits I have met aren't too bad either!![]()
![]()
Duncan wrote:artist4perry wrote:Duncan wrote:artist4perry wrote:Duncan wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
Racist.
Duncan you a Brit?
yep.
I love British humor! And most Brits I have met aren't too bad either!![]()
![]()
That's probably a minority view around here.
Duncan wrote:artist4perry wrote:Duncan wrote:artist4perry wrote:Duncan wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
Racist.
Duncan you a Brit?
yep.
I love British humor! And most Brits I have met aren't too bad either!![]()
![]()
That's probably a minority view around here.
S2M wrote:I don't think DADT stopped gays from being themselves, or interfered with serving in the highest capacity. Hell, I loved playing Dungeons & Dragons, read LOTR twice a year...I don't remember my nerdiness getting in the way of serving...and nobody asked me either. I was also a virgin when I enlisted. Even that didn't affect my service. I think it's a bunch of BS. And although I have nothing against gays/lesbians. I think it is a shame that they want it in our faces. But of course they will respond with the lame retort that heterosexuality is in their faces....and it just goes round and round.
artist4perry wrote:S2M wrote:I don't think DADT stopped gays from being themselves, or interfered with serving in the highest capacity. Hell, I loved playing Dungeons & Dragons, read LOTR twice a year...I don't remember my nerdiness getting in the way of serving...and nobody asked me either. I was also a virgin when I enlisted. Even that didn't affect my service. I think it's a bunch of BS. And although I have nothing against gays/lesbians. I think it is a shame that they want it in our faces. But of course they will respond with the lame retort that heterosexuality is in their faces....and it just goes round and round.
Instant replay?
S2M wrote:artist4perry wrote:S2M wrote:I don't think DADT stopped gays from being themselves, or interfered with serving in the highest capacity. Hell, I loved playing Dungeons & Dragons, read LOTR twice a year...I don't remember my nerdiness getting in the way of serving...and nobody asked me either. I was also a virgin when I enlisted. Even that didn't affect my service. I think it's a bunch of BS. And although I have nothing against gays/lesbians. I think it is a shame that they want it in our faces. But of course they will respond with the lame retort that heterosexuality is in their faces....and it just goes round and round.
Instant replay?
Oh crap! No, I had that passage saved as a copy/paste because MR had been acting wonky earlier. I always copy a post when MR is slow, in case it freezes then I forget exactly what I typed.....sorry.
Carlitto H@kk wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:Here's what I find absurd about the whole thing, especially people that have a problem with it, soldiers are trained to take orders. If part of their life in the military is to accept homosexuals as equals and treat them equally they MUST do it, those are the rules and soldiers don't get to pick and choose the rules.
If they have a problem with following the rules, they can quit and if that problem turns into violence, they can get dishonorably discharged and lose all their benefits.
Bobby, you know I am an advocate of this decision but
this line of thought just doesn't work.
You're right, military service members are trained to follow rules and orders
from their appointed leaders. However, aside from respecting your superiors and peers,
and doing what you are told, there is absolutle NOTHING in the regulations that say you
also have to be freindly, personable, and kind to your fellow military members.
Friendships, personal relationships, trust, and acceptance are the glues that
hold our military services together, especially when deployed down-range.
Even though this is now a law that all military members will be required to abide by,
there will still be many that will not offer that friendship, acceptance, personal relationship, or trust
to people openly serving.
Its really a shame but, trust me, thats just the way its going to be
for a long time.
Duncan wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:comedyisnotpretty wrote:I submit the following video for your viewing pleasure:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ol5Dfs7jqFI
They're not gay, they're British.
Racist.
artist4perry wrote: I am less concerned over this matter than our 9/11 responders not getting care. Explain to me why this is more crucial to push through right now, when some of them are sick and in danger of their health and lives? It should be no question that their medical needs be met, they did what many would fear to do. They risked their lives for our own. Maybe that should be of a higher concern now?
Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote: I am less concerned over this matter than our 9/11 responders not getting care. Explain to me why this is more crucial to push through right now, when some of them are sick and in danger of their health and lives? It should be no question that their medical needs be met, they did what many would fear to do. They risked their lives for our own. Maybe that should be of a higher concern now?
Oh I just saw this. Why was DADT pushed through now instead of the 9/11 first responders? LOL, ask your newly elected republican party. They won't address the 9/11 first responders until they get their tax cuts for the rich. This is disgusting. Here, read all about it.---
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote: I am less concerned over this matter than our 9/11 responders not getting care. Explain to me why this is more crucial to push through right now, when some of them are sick and in danger of their health and lives? It should be no question that their medical needs be met, they did what many would fear to do. They risked their lives for our own. Maybe that should be of a higher concern now?
Oh I just saw this. Why was DADT pushed through now instead of the 9/11 first responders? LOL, ask your newly elected republican party. They won't address the 9/11 first responders until they get their tax cuts for the rich. This is disgusting. Here, read all about it.---
9/11 First Responders Challenge Teary-Eyed McConnell: ‘Where Is His Human Feeling For Us?’
In this lame duck session, Senate Republicans are grasping at every possible reason to “run out the clock” on any Democratic priority. Their brazen obstruction, however, took some victims last week when they used another filibuster to block the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010. Named after a New York City policeman who died from health complications, this legislation that provides health care to 9/11 first responders and emergency workers who suffered illnesses from working at Ground Zero.
Not one Republican senator came to the floor to explain why the desperately needed, fully paid-for compensation didn’t deserve to pass. When Fox News’ Don Imus pressed Sen. John Thune (R-SD) for an explanation, Thune said the tax cuts are a bigger priority because “there is a deadline.” And when first responders came to the Senate to advocate for the bill yesterday, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) actually called the Capitol police on them to prevent a sit-in.
Such callous miscarriage of responsibility was not lost on The Daily Show. Ripping the GOP earlier this week for “co-opting 9/11 imagery” while simultaneously killing legislation to help 9/11 victims, host Jon Stewart dedicated his entire show last night to censure their obstruction. Disgusted by Thune’s “deadline for taxes” excuse, Stewart scoffed, “yes there are only two sure things in life. Death and taxes. Apparently, the only thing this cat cares about is taxes.”
RedWingFan wrote:Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote: I am less concerned over this matter than our 9/11 responders not getting care. Explain to me why this is more crucial to push through right now, when some of them are sick and in danger of their health and lives? It should be no question that their medical needs be met, they did what many would fear to do. They risked their lives for our own. Maybe that should be of a higher concern now?
Oh I just saw this. Why was DADT pushed through now instead of the 9/11 first responders? LOL, ask your newly elected republican party. They won't address the 9/11 first responders until they get their tax cuts for the rich. This is disgusting. Here, read all about it.---
Dude, they haven't even been sworn in yet. Dems still have control over both houses.
artist4perry wrote:Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote: I am less concerned over this matter than our 9/11 responders not getting care. Explain to me why this is more crucial to push through right now, when some of them are sick and in danger of their health and lives? It should be no question that their medical needs be met, they did what many would fear to do. They risked their lives for our own. Maybe that should be of a higher concern now?
Oh I just saw this. Why was DADT pushed through now instead of the 9/11 first responders? LOL, ask your newly elected republican party. They won't address the 9/11 first responders until they get their tax cuts for the rich. This is disgusting. Here, read all about it.---
9/11 First Responders Challenge Teary-Eyed McConnell: ‘Where Is His Human Feeling For Us?’
In this lame duck session, Senate Republicans are grasping at every possible reason to “run out the clock” on any Democratic priority. Their brazen obstruction, however, took some victims last week when they used another filibuster to block the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010. Named after a New York City policeman who died from health complications, this legislation that provides health care to 9/11 first responders and emergency workers who suffered illnesses from working at Ground Zero.
Not one Republican senator came to the floor to explain why the desperately needed, fully paid-for compensation didn’t deserve to pass. When Fox News’ Don Imus pressed Sen. John Thune (R-SD) for an explanation, Thune said the tax cuts are a bigger priority because “there is a deadline.” And when first responders came to the Senate to advocate for the bill yesterday, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) actually called the Capitol police on them to prevent a sit-in.
Such callous miscarriage of responsibility was not lost on The Daily Show. Ripping the GOP earlier this week for “co-opting 9/11 imagery” while simultaneously killing legislation to help 9/11 victims, host Jon Stewart dedicated his entire show last night to censure their obstruction. Disgusted by Thune’s “deadline for taxes” excuse, Stewart scoffed, “yes there are only two sure things in life. Death and taxes. Apparently, the only thing this cat cares about is taxes.”
Sugar bear, I already said both parties are being stupid. Especially one duffus Rep. This should be a no brainier for all the above. You and I both can see the need. Anyone with red white and blue in their veins should!
Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote:Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote: I am less concerned over this matter than our 9/11 responders not getting care. Explain to me why this is more crucial to push through right now, when some of them are sick and in danger of their health and lives? It should be no question that their medical needs be met, they did what many would fear to do. They risked their lives for our own. Maybe that should be of a higher concern now?
Oh I just saw this. Why was DADT pushed through now instead of the 9/11 first responders? LOL, ask your newly elected republican party. They won't address the 9/11 first responders until they get their tax cuts for the rich. This is disgusting. Here, read all about it.---
9/11 First Responders Challenge Teary-Eyed McConnell: ‘Where Is His Human Feeling For Us?’
In this lame duck session, Senate Republicans are grasping at every possible reason to “run out the clock” on any Democratic priority. Their brazen obstruction, however, took some victims last week when they used another filibuster to block the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010. Named after a New York City policeman who died from health complications, this legislation that provides health care to 9/11 first responders and emergency workers who suffered illnesses from working at Ground Zero.
Not one Republican senator came to the floor to explain why the desperately needed, fully paid-for compensation didn’t deserve to pass. When Fox News’ Don Imus pressed Sen. John Thune (R-SD) for an explanation, Thune said the tax cuts are a bigger priority because “there is a deadline.” And when first responders came to the Senate to advocate for the bill yesterday, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) actually called the Capitol police on them to prevent a sit-in.
Such callous miscarriage of responsibility was not lost on The Daily Show. Ripping the GOP earlier this week for “co-opting 9/11 imagery” while simultaneously killing legislation to help 9/11 victims, host Jon Stewart dedicated his entire show last night to censure their obstruction. Disgusted by Thune’s “deadline for taxes” excuse, Stewart scoffed, “yes there are only two sure things in life. Death and taxes. Apparently, the only thing this cat cares about is taxes.”
Sugar bear, I already said both parties are being stupid. Especially one duffus Rep. This should be a no brainier for all the above. You and I both can see the need. Anyone with red white and blue in their veins should!
This has NOTHING to do with the Democrats Ginger and you know it. This is all on the republicans. This spin by you close minded sonsofbitches is exactly what we can look forward to the next two years, when the public wises up and kicks you sorry assholes out of office.
Disgusting.
Do us all a favor GOP and it's voters. Don't say you give a shit about 9/11 or you "won't forget" and all that bullshit. It's clear a tax cut is much more imperative in your eyes.
Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote:Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote: I am less concerned over this matter than our 9/11 responders not getting care. Explain to me why this is more crucial to push through right now, when some of them are sick and in danger of their health and lives? It should be no question that their medical needs be met, they did what many would fear to do. They risked their lives for our own. Maybe that should be of a higher concern now?
Oh I just saw this. Why was DADT pushed through now instead of the 9/11 first responders? LOL, ask your newly elected republican party. They won't address the 9/11 first responders until they get their tax cuts for the rich. This is disgusting. Here, read all about it.---
9/11 First Responders Challenge Teary-Eyed McConnell: ‘Where Is His Human Feeling For Us?’
In this lame duck session, Senate Republicans are grasping at every possible reason to “run out the clock” on any Democratic priority. Their brazen obstruction, however, took some victims last week when they used another filibuster to block the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010. Named after a New York City policeman who died from health complications, this legislation that provides health care to 9/11 first responders and emergency workers who suffered illnesses from working at Ground Zero.
Not one Republican senator came to the floor to explain why the desperately needed, fully paid-for compensation didn’t deserve to pass. When Fox News’ Don Imus pressed Sen. John Thune (R-SD) for an explanation, Thune said the tax cuts are a bigger priority because “there is a deadline.” And when first responders came to the Senate to advocate for the bill yesterday, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) actually called the Capitol police on them to prevent a sit-in.
Such callous miscarriage of responsibility was not lost on The Daily Show. Ripping the GOP earlier this week for “co-opting 9/11 imagery” while simultaneously killing legislation to help 9/11 victims, host Jon Stewart dedicated his entire show last night to censure their obstruction. Disgusted by Thune’s “deadline for taxes” excuse, Stewart scoffed, “yes there are only two sure things in life. Death and taxes. Apparently, the only thing this cat cares about is taxes.”
Sugar bear, I already said both parties are being stupid. Especially one duffus Rep. This should be a no brainier for all the above. You and I both can see the need. Anyone with red white and blue in their veins should!
This has NOTHING to do with the Democrats Ginger and you know it. This is all on the republicans. This spin by you close minded sonsofbitches is exactly what we can look forward to the next two years, when the public wises up and kicks you sorry assholes out of office.
Disgusting.
Do us all a favor GOP and it's voters. Don't say you give a shit about 9/11 or you "won't forget" and all that bullshit. It's clear a tax cut is much more imperative in your eyes.
Don wrote:It will come to pass. I have been fortunate to have served great tours while in the service. My permanent assignments along with special duties include Clark RP, Yokota & Kadena Japan, Alconbury UK, Stavanger Norway and installations in over two dozen other countries.
I have faith that unlike desegregation, this will be accepted a lot quicker as many upper brass have been tolerating the situation under the radar for years. The hardest part will be at bases in the states, especially in the Bible Belt as instigators in outside comunities will still try to have some sway in trying to propogate the idea that this is such a terrible decision but after a time, even that will fall on deaf ears as the military continues to educate it's troops on the power of diversity in the service.
parfait wrote:Don wrote:It will come to pass. I have been fortunate to have served great tours while in the service. My permanent assignments along with special duties include Clark RP, Yokota & Kadena Japan, Alconbury UK, Stavanger Norway and installations in over two dozen other countries.
I have faith that unlike desegregation, this will be accepted a lot quicker as many upper brass have been tolerating the situation under the radar for years. The hardest part will be at bases in the states, especially in the Bible Belt as instigators in outside comunities will still try to have some sway in trying to propogate the idea that this is such a terrible decision but after a time, even that will fall on deaf ears as the military continues to educate it's troops on the power of diversity in the service.
Read over this thread, and Don, you're a smart, reflected guy. What did you think of Stavanger and Norway? Norwegians got a rep of being distant and cold.
Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote:Rockindeano wrote:artist4perry wrote: I am less concerned over this matter than our 9/11 responders not getting care. Explain to me why this is more crucial to push through right now, when some of them are sick and in danger of their health and lives? It should be no question that their medical needs be met, they did what many would fear to do. They risked their lives for our own. Maybe that should be of a higher concern now?
Oh I just saw this. Why was DADT pushed through now instead of the 9/11 first responders? LOL, ask your newly elected republican party. They won't address the 9/11 first responders until they get their tax cuts for the rich. This is disgusting. Here, read all about it.---
9/11 First Responders Challenge Teary-Eyed McConnell: ‘Where Is His Human Feeling For Us?’
In this lame duck session, Senate Republicans are grasping at every possible reason to “run out the clock” on any Democratic priority. Their brazen obstruction, however, took some victims last week when they used another filibuster to block the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010. Named after a New York City policeman who died from health complications, this legislation that provides health care to 9/11 first responders and emergency workers who suffered illnesses from working at Ground Zero.
Not one Republican senator came to the floor to explain why the desperately needed, fully paid-for compensation didn’t deserve to pass. When Fox News’ Don Imus pressed Sen. John Thune (R-SD) for an explanation, Thune said the tax cuts are a bigger priority because “there is a deadline.” And when first responders came to the Senate to advocate for the bill yesterday, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) actually called the Capitol police on them to prevent a sit-in.
Such callous miscarriage of responsibility was not lost on The Daily Show. Ripping the GOP earlier this week for “co-opting 9/11 imagery” while simultaneously killing legislation to help 9/11 victims, host Jon Stewart dedicated his entire show last night to censure their obstruction. Disgusted by Thune’s “deadline for taxes” excuse, Stewart scoffed, “yes there are only two sure things in life. Death and taxes. Apparently, the only thing this cat cares about is taxes.”
Sugar bear, I already said both parties are being stupid. Especially one duffus Rep. This should be a no brainier for all the above. You and I both can see the need. Anyone with red white and blue in their veins should!
This has NOTHING to do with the Democrats Ginger and you know it. This is all on the republicans. This spin by you close minded sonsofbitches is exactly what we can look forward to the next two years, when the public wises up and kicks you sorry assholes out of office.
Disgusting.
Do us all a favor GOP and it's voters. Don't say you give a shit about 9/11 or you "won't forget" and all that bullshit. It's clear a tax cut is much more imperative in your eyes.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests