Tragedy in AZ: God be w/Rep. Gabrielle Giiffords and others

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:06 am

Angel wrote:
Behshad wrote:I knew you would get this off track to the whole palin shooting killing hunting thread.
I never said it was right or wrong to kill animals or people for that matter ! Some people need to be shot ( yep youre one of them)..... I made a very clear and simple statement that GUNS are made to kill as opposed to CARS. get it, got it , good !

What I get is that you are as dense as they come if you can't understand that mentally unstable people that wish to cause harm and/or do mass destruction will find a way to do so with or without guns.

The charts you put up are really cute, but show me the evidence that it is actually gun control regulations that makes the difference and not some other variable.


Why are you even in this debate if you dont know the facts about Europe and EU gun controls and tight laws?
Here's just a few countries rules and regulations.


European Union

The 1991 Council Directive 91/477/EEC started the process of creating a new common legal system for gun owners in the EU, and introduced the European Firearms Pass for owners carrying firearms from one member state to another. In late 2007 the European Parliament and Council adopted a legislative report to tighten gun control laws and establish an extensive firearms database.[20] Passed with overwhelming backing, the tough new gun control rules were "hoped to prevent Europe from becoming a gun-friendly culture like the United States," in the words of the International Herald Tribune.[21] Certain countries such as the United Kingdom are unaffected as they maintain more stringent gun control laws than those effectively set as a minimum by the European Union.





Germany
Gun ownership in Germany is currently regulated by Federal Weapons Act (German: Waffengesetz), 1972; it extends previous gun legislation.

In 1945 the Allies commanded full disarmament of the country, private ownership of firearms was not allowed until after 1956 when restrictions effectively returned to 1928 policy. In 1972 the Federal Weapons Act revised much of the regulations.

Under this act Germany maintains a two-tier policy to firearm ownership. A firearms ownership license allows for the purchasing of weapons by those over the age of 18 who meet various competency/trustworthiness guidelines. Convicted felons, those with a mental disability or those deemed unreliable are denied licenses. The second tier is a firearms carry permit which allows concealed or open carry in public. The permits are usually only issued to individuals with a particular need; such as hunters, law-enforcement, etc. The laws apply to any weapons with a fire energy exceeding 7.5 Joule.



Sweden

To start with, you have to be 18 yrs or older to qualify in to getting a gun.

Second: You have to have been "clean" for atleast 5 years. If you have a license and get arrested, even down to beeing to drunk so the police take you in and place you in custody over the night, you could lose you`re license and they will take you`re gun. No compensation given for the weapons they take.

Third: You have to be a member in a shooting club and follow their rules. That includes taking a newbie course. That will cost you about 250$. You have to pass the shooting test and the theorethical test in order to get passed. Once you have passed you get a green card. Then you have to have been a member for 6 months and have passed another, more difficult shooting test (called "gold series") in order to be able to buy youre first gun. Oh, i almost forgot, you have to have done 4 competitions in that weapons class to be able to buy the gun. But since you have been a member no longer than 6 months, you can not buy anything else that a .22 pistol or revolver... This can vary between diffrent clubs though, i think. Anyways. After a year you can buy any gun you want that is legal in Sweden, but only if you have participated in 4 or more competitions for that weapons class.


Norway

To own a gun in Norway, one must document a use for the gun. By far, the most common grounds for civilian ownership are hunting and sports shooting, in that order. Other needs can include special guard duties or self defense, but the first is rare and the second is practically never accepted as a reason for gun ownership.

There are special rules for collectors of guns. They are exempt from many parts of the regulation, but, in turn, they must meet even more narrow qualifications. Collectors may purchase, but not fire without permission, all kinds of guns in their respective areas of interest, which they have defined in advance.

Ownership is regulated in paragraph 7,[1] and responsibility for issuing a gun ownership license is given to the police authority in the applicant's district.

Rifle and shotgun ownership permission can be given to "sober and responsible" persons 18 years or older. The applicant for the permission must document a need for the weapon. Two exceptions exist to this age qualification. Persons under the age of 18, but over 16 may apply for rifle or shotgun ownership license with the consent of parents or guardian. For handguns, the lowest ownership age is 21 with no exceptions allowed. For inherited weapons, it is up to the local police chief to make a decision based on the individual facts of the case.

An applicant must have a clean police record in order to obtain an ownership license.

For hunting
To obtain a hunting license, the applicant must complete a 30 hour, 9 session course and pass a written multiple choice exam. The course includes firearm theory, firearm training, wildlife theory, and environmental protection training.

Once the exam is passed, the applicant may enroll in the hunter registry and receive a hunting license. The membership must be renewed each year, through license payment. The hunting license is brought to the police station, where the applicant fills out an application for obtaining the proper firearm for his or her hunt. After evaluation, part of the application is sent back to the applicant if it was approved. Upon approval, the applicant can take the returned form to the store and purchase the firearm listed in the application.
For sports shooters
The qualification process for sporting is theoretically easier, but requires more time and practice. The applicant must enroll in a firearm safety course, lasting at least 9 hours. The course includes a written test, but is shorter than the hunting exam, as it only deals with firearm safety. Two thirds of the course is completed on the shooting range as practice. The passing of the test results in acceptance to the approved gun club, and a license for competition. However, while the hunters can obtain their firearm almost at once, sports shooters must prove their intentions to compete by actively training or competing in the gun club. This means regular attendance (at least 15 times) at gun club training over the course of six months. The applicant must use firearms owned by the club or borrowed at the range for this period. After six months, the applicant may apply for weapon ownership. The start license and a written recommendation from the gun club president are brought to the police station, and the competition class is filled out on the application. If approved, it will be returned to the applicant as with the hunter license.

In both cases, if the application is rejected, the applicant is allowed an explanation of the reason, and an appeal.


___________________________________________________________________________________________



Thats just a few of rules and regulations. What would be So wrong with us having STRICT laws and regulations to even BUY a gun. Take away the guns from Walmarts and Kmarts and invest in a massive pre-purchase-qualification! You'll be surprised how it will lower the rate of mass-shootings!
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:10 am

Switzerland

To carry firearms in public or outdoors (and for an individual who is a member of the militia carrying a firearm other than his Army-issue personal weapons off-duty), a person must have a Waffentragschein (gun carrying permit), which in most cases is issued only to private citizens working in occupations such as security.

It is, however, quite common to see a person serving military service to be en route with his rifle.

Conditions for getting a Carrying Permit

There are three conditions:

fulfilling the conditions for a buying permit (see section below)
stating plausibly the need to carry firearms to protect oneself, other people, or real property from a specified danger
passing an examination proving both weapon handling skills and knowledge regarding lawful use of the weapon
The carrying permit remains valid for a term of five years (unless otherwise surrendered or revoked), and applies only to the type of firearm for which the permit was issued. Additional constraints may be invoked to modify any specific permit. Neither hunters nor game wardens require a carrying permit

Buying guns

Conditions under the 1999 Gun ActTo purchase a firearm in a commercial shop, one needs to have a Waffenerwerbsschein (weapon acquisition permit). A permit allows the purchase of three firearms. Everyone over the age of 18 who is not psychiatrically disabled (such as having had a history of endangering his own life or the lives of others) or identified as posing security problems, and who has a clean criminal record (requires a Criminal Records Bureau check) can request such a permit.
To buy a gun from an individual, no permit is needed, but the seller is expected to establish a reasonable certainty that the purchaser will fulfill the above-mentioned conditions (usually done through a Criminal Records Bureau check). The participants in such a transaction are required to prepare a written contract detailing the identities of both vendor and purchaser, the weapon's type, manufacturer, and serial number. The law requires the written contract to be kept for ten years by the buyer and seller. The seller is also required to see some official ID from the purchaser, for such sales are only allowed to Swiss nationals and foreigners with a valid residence permit, with the exception of those foreigners that come from certain countries (Croatia, Bosnia, Macedonia, Turkey, Sri Lanka, Albania, Algeria), to whom such sales are not allowed even if they do have a residence permit. Foreigners without a residence permit or from countries on the ban list must ask for a special permit.
After turning 18, any individual can buy singleshot or semiautomatic long arms (breech-loading or muzzle-loading) without a permit (so-called "free arms"). Likewise, members of a recognized rifle association do not need a buying permit for purchasing antique repeaters, and hunters do not need one for buying typical hunting rifles.
Basically, the sale of automatic firearms, selective fire weapons and certain accessoires such as sound suppressors ("silencers") is forbidden (as is the sale of certain disabled automatic firearms which have been identified as easily restored to fully automatic capability). The purchase of such items is however legal with a special permit issued by cantonal police. The issuance of such a permit requires additional requirements to be met, e.g. the possession of a specific gun locker.
Most types of ammunition are available for commercial sale, including full metal jacket bullet calibres for military-issue weapons; hollow point rounds are only permitted for hunters. Ammunition sales are registered only at the point of sale by recording the buyer's name in a bound book.
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:14 am

Fact Finder wrote:Homeowner Shoots Suspected Kidnapper - KRGV CHANNEL 5 NEWS - The ...Authorities say three armed men entered the house and tried to kidnap the homeowner. The homeowner shot at the suspects, hitting one of them twice in the ...
www.krgv.com/.../Homeowner-Shoots.../KA ... f6_3A.cspx

Homeowner shoots, kills burglary suspect - San Antonio Express-NewsNov 3, 2010 ... A homeowner shot and killed one intruder and gravely injured another after a group of knife-wielding men kicked in the man's door early ...
www.mysanantonio.com/.../Homeowner-shoo ... 797108.php

Homeowner shoots alleged robber four times | StAugustine.comJan 5, 2011 ... Putnam County Sheriff's deputies are investigating an armed home invasion robbery that took place in Interlachen early this morning, ...
staugustine.com/.../homeowner-shoots-alleged-robber-four-times

Homeowner Shoots At Robbers On Driveway - Houston News Story ...Jan 4, 2011 ... HOUSTON -- A homeowner opens fire when masked gunmen try to rob him on his driveway after he returns from the mall, deputies say.
www.click2houston.com/news/26362662/detail.html

Search ResultsHomeowner shoots teen burglary suspects | Tampa Bay, St ...The other injured teen, William Murphy, 16, was shot in the torso and is in stable condition. Judd says the homeowner called 911 and responding Davenport ...
www.wtsp.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=147048

Puyallup area homeowner shoots, kills intruderNov 3, 2010 ... PUYALLUP -- An intruder was killed during a home-invasion robbery near here early Wednesday morning, and police were looking for a second ...
www.seattlepi.com/local/429516_dead.html

Homeowner shoots, kills intruder | San Bernardino County | PE.com ...Oct 11, 2010 ... A homeowner shot and killed an intruder before dawn yesterday in Victorville, according to San Bernardino County sheriff's officials. ...
www.pe.com/.../PE_News_Local_D_webintruder.4a71a36.html

Homeowner Shoots At Fake FBI Agents - News Story - KTVZ BendJul 14, 2010 ... COOPER CITY, Fla. -- Police say three men posing as FBI agents took off when the owner of a Florida home they were trying to rob shot at ...
www.ktvz.com/news/24258714/detail.html


and that's just a few from Page 3 of about 196,000 results....need I go on?


Show me a case where one of these mass shootings were completely turned around because of civilians having guns and firing back and disarming the bad guy ! :wink:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Michigan Girl » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:16 am

Behshad wrote:What would be So wrong with us having STRICT laws and regulations to even BUY a gun. Take away the guns from Walmarts and Kmarts and invest in a massive pre-purchase-qualification! You'll be surprised how it will lower the rate of mass-shootings!
I support this ^^^^^earn the right to keep and bear arms, I mean how many people
have to have a gun right now?!?! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Melissa » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:17 am

Thanks B, I understand where you're coming from, truly. ;)
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:20 am

Melissa wrote:Thanks B, I understand where you're coming from, truly. ;)


Yay ! :lol:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:50 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Show me a case where one of these mass shootings were completely turned around because of civilians having guns and firing back and disarming the bad guy !



OK...



College Student Shoots, Kills Home Invader

Posted: 4:53 pm EDT May 4, 2009
Updated: 6:41 pm EDT May 4, 2009

COLLEGE PARK, Ga. - A group of college students said they are lucky to be alive and they’re thanking the quick-thinking of one of their own. Police said a fellow student shot and killed one of two masked me who burst into an apartment.

Channel 2 Action News reporter Tom Jones met with one of the students to talk about the incident. “Apparently, his intent was to rape and murder us all,” said student Charles Bailey.

Bailey said he thought it was the end of his life and the lives of the 10 people inside his apartment for a birthday party after two masked men with guns burst in through a patio door.

“They just came in and separated the men from the women and said, ‘Give me your wallets and cell phones,’” said George Williams of the College Park Police Department.

Bailey said the gunmen started counting bullets. “The other guy asked how many (bullets) he had. He said he had enough,” said Bailey.

That’s when one student grabbed a gun out of a backpack and shot at the invader who was watching the men. The gunman ran out of the apartment.The student then ran to the room where the second gunman, identified by police as 23-year-old Calvin Lavant, was holding the women.

“Apparently the guy was getting ready to rape his girlfriend. So he told the girls to get down and he started shooting. The guy jumped out of the window,” said Bailey.

A neighbor heard the shots and heard someone running nearby.“And I heard someone say, ‘Someone help me. Call the police. Somebody call the police,’” said a neighbor. The neighbor said she believes it was Lavant, who was found dead near his apartment, only one building away.

Bailey said he is just thankful one student risked his life to keep others alive.“I think all of us are really cognizant of the fact that we could have all been killed,” said Bailey.One female student was shot several times during the crossfire. She is expected to make a full recovery.

Police said they are close to making the arrest of the second suspect.



Thats still a case of burglary. Not a crazy whacko goin off and shoot in public. Nice try. Next !
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:04 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
Show me a case where one of these mass shootings were completely turned around because of civilians having guns and firing back and disarming the bad guy !



OK...



College Student Shoots, Kills Home Invader

Posted: 4:53 pm EDT May 4, 2009
Updated: 6:41 pm EDT May 4, 2009

COLLEGE PARK, Ga. - A group of college students said they are lucky to be alive and they’re thanking the quick-thinking of one of their own. Police said a fellow student shot and killed one of two masked me who burst into an apartment.

Channel 2 Action News reporter Tom Jones met with one of the students to talk about the incident. “Apparently, his intent was to rape and murder us all,” said student Charles Bailey.

Bailey said he thought it was the end of his life and the lives of the 10 people inside his apartment for a birthday party after two masked men with guns burst in through a patio door.

“They just came in and separated the men from the women and said, ‘Give me your wallets and cell phones,’” said George Williams of the College Park Police Department.

Bailey said the gunmen started counting bullets. “The other guy asked how many (bullets) he had. He said he had enough,” said Bailey.

That’s when one student grabbed a gun out of a backpack and shot at the invader who was watching the men. The gunman ran out of the apartment.The student then ran to the room where the second gunman, identified by police as 23-year-old Calvin Lavant, was holding the women.

“Apparently the guy was getting ready to rape his girlfriend. So he told the girls to get down and he started shooting. The guy jumped out of the window,” said Bailey.

A neighbor heard the shots and heard someone running nearby.“And I heard someone say, ‘Someone help me. Call the police. Somebody call the police,’” said a neighbor. The neighbor said she believes it was Lavant, who was found dead near his apartment, only one building away.

Bailey said he is just thankful one student risked his life to keep others alive.“I think all of us are really cognizant of the fact that we could have all been killed,” said Bailey.One female student was shot several times during the crossfire. She is expected to make a full recovery.

Police said they are close to making the arrest of the second suspect.



Thats still a case of burglary. Not a crazy whacko goin off and shoot in public. Nice try. Next !



You're pathetic and may only have 6 braincells... :lol:


“Apparently, his intent was to rape and murder us all,” said student Charles Bailey.



it wasnt a public shooting. What the intent was is just a guess. 6 braincells is still 6 more than the 0 you have liepaster ;) :lol:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby StevePerryHair » Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:51 am

This thread is weird... because it shows Duncan as the last poster... but clearly it was B.... :lol:
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby slucero » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:02 am

Something that I received in my email... pretty much sums it up...

A shooting took place this weekend in Arizona which was devastating, to say the least... but in my mind, no more or less devastating than any other murderous rampage, whether in the United States or anywhere in the world. Because a US Congresswoman was ostensibly the intended victim, however, it's captured worldwide attention.

Speaker of the House John Boehner summarized many politicians' reactions to Saturday's shooting when he said, "an attack on one who serves is an attack on all who serve. Acts and threats of violence against public officials have no place in our society."

I'm inclined to believe that acts and threats of violence against -all people- have no place in any free society. The life of a politician is not worth more than the life of the nine year old girl who was shot and later died at the hospital, or the 76-year old man who died on the scene as he was protecting his wife, or of any of the other victims.

I've seen mainstream media reports that portray the apparent shooter as an anti-government subversive whose favorite books include Mein Kampf and the Communist Manifesto. This makes absolutely no sense-- what kind of anti-government proponent counts Hitler, Marx, and Engels as his favorite authors?

Rather, it's more likely that the shooter was just another loony who owned a firearm and decided to use it. If the victim had been Gabrielle the bus driver instead of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, it would have barely registered a few words at the bottom of the CNN news ticker.

With one of their own victimized, however, I'm concerned that politicians will close ranks, capitalize on the social mood to generate a renewed faith in government, and pass a host of reactionary policies... all after sanitizing their Twitter feeds for any reference to violence, of course.

Perhaps some form of gun control is in the works... though with a Republican controlled Congress, I'd think new legislation targeting suspected 'Anti-American subversives' could be on the table, or something that gives sweeping new powers to government agents and police forces.

In 1946, the 79th Congress of the United States passed public law 601 giving permanent standing to the House Committee on Un-American Activities. This committee was authorized significant powers to investigate 'subversive and un-American propaganda' and assist Congress in 'necessary remedial legislation.'

Ironically, in its efforts to ensure that America was nothing like the Soviet Union, the US government began turning the country into a fascist collective. Given what may come after the weekend's shooting, I fear we may be returning to a time when it is increasingly dangerous to be a free thinking individual anywhere in the West.

With Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano perched above WalMart shoppers encouraging Americans to spy on each other, I sense the boiling frog may soon be getting a few degrees warmer.


Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:18 am

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599204144800

Interesting take on why psychos get guns...once again our government gets a failing grade...
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby hoagiepete » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:24 am

I feel bad for the families of the victims for more reasons than one, but I find it awful that the media has barely mentioned them other than the Congresswoman, the 9 year old and the judge. After searching, I found the dead were primarily older ladies. Terrible.

The entire thing is tragic, but to start pointing fingers (which we all knew would happen) its really going to get sick. You can't blame anyone but the sick dude that did the shooting. Period. I guess you could blame the system for allowing him to be out there, but that would be about it.
hoagiepete
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:16 am

Postby slucero » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:24 am

thats a mugshot...

Image

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:30 am

slucero wrote:thats a mugshot...

Image


is it me or does he look like a cross between Andrew , Everett and Stu ? :shock:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Melissa » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:36 am

I really can't stand the media too in all this, for allowing things like pictures of her stripped down to her underwear while on a stretcher with her head wound pretty visible (pic I saw on AOL last night) to be made public. I really think it takes a special kind of scumbag to work in the media sometimes.
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:49 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599204144800

Interesting take on why psychos get guns...once again our government gets a failing grade...


Don't blame the Gov't Mr Right Wing NRA supporter. If I was president, as I have said before, the number one thing I would do is ban soccer. All soccer would cease immediately, and thus all soccer fields would convert to real football playing surfaces. Next thing I would do is ban every fucking gun in this country. There is NO need for anyone to have a gun. The 2nd ammendment is a bit past due and completely retarded.

The Gov't didn't fail here...the right wing GOP did, as it insists upon the right to bear arms...No, I didn't read your link but I can guess what it says, and I am calling bullshit before reading it.
Last edited by Rockindeano on Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Angel » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:52 am

Behshad wrote:
Angel wrote:
Behshad wrote:I knew you would get this off track to the whole palin shooting killing hunting thread.
I never said it was right or wrong to kill animals or people for that matter ! Some people need to be shot ( yep youre one of them)..... I made a very clear and simple statement that GUNS are made to kill as opposed to CARS. get it, got it , good !

What I get is that you are as dense as they come if you can't understand that mentally unstable people that wish to cause harm and/or do mass destruction will find a way to do so with or without guns.

The charts you put up are really cute, but show me the evidence that it is actually gun control regulations that makes the difference and not some other variable.


Why are you even in this debate if you dont know the facts about Europe and EU gun controls and tight laws?
Here's just a few countries rules and regulations.


You're having problems with reading comprehension again. I didn't ask WHAT the regulations were, I simply asked for evidence that supported that these regulations are the REASON for decreased crime and not some other variable, such as, better mental health services, harsher sentences for violent crime, etc...

I have already said that I do think we need stricter gun regulations, I'm not arguing that at all.
User avatar
Angel
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3995
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:41 am

Postby RedWingFan » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:03 am

Behshad wrote:Show me a case where one of these mass shootings were completely turned around because of civilians having guns and firing back and disarming the bad guy ! :wink:


You don't remember this one?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Color ... _shootings

The 2007 Colorado YWAM and New Life shootings occurred on December 9, 2007, when Matthew J. Murray attacked the Youth With A Mission training center in Arvada, Colorado, and New Life Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado. These attacks caused two fatalities in each location. The second attack was stopped when Murray was wounded by Jeanne Assam, a church member and volunteer security guard. Murray then took his own life.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby steveo777 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:08 am

Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599204144800

Interesting take on why psychos get guns...once again our government gets a failing grade...


Don't blame the Gov't Mr Right Wing NRA supporter. If I was president, as I have said before, the number one thing I would do is ban soccer. All soccer would cease immediately, and thus all soccer fields would convert to real football playing surfaces. Next thing I would do is ban every fucking gun in this country. There is NO need for anyone to have a gun. The 2nd ammendment is a bit past due and completely retarded.

The Gov't didn't fail here...the right wing GOP did, as it insists upon the right to bear arms...No, I didn't read your link but I can guess hwta it says, and I am calling bullshit before reading it.


Ban guns to your hearts desire....like that will really keep people of ill intent from getting them. :roll:
We need to be able to keep guns to protect us from such savages. Some of us like to go hunting too.
People will still kill people whether they have guns or not.
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby Angel » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:17 am

Rockindeano wrote:Next thing I would do is ban every fucking gun in this country. There is NO need for anyone to have a gun. The 2nd ammendment is a bit past due and completely retarded.


WTH? How am I supposed to get an elk? Wrestle it down and try to scare it to death????
User avatar
Angel
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3995
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:41 am

Postby ebake02 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:32 am

Angel wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:Next thing I would do is ban every fucking gun in this country. There is NO need for anyone to have a gun. The 2nd ammendment is a bit past due and completely retarded.


WTH? How am I supposed to get an elk? Wrestle it down and try to scare it to death????



No, Rambo style with a KA-BAR. :lol:
Penn Staters across the globe should feel no shame in saying "We are…Penn State." - Joe Paterno
ebake02
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3122
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:01 pm
Location: Northeast

Postby Angel » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:56 am

Fact Finder wrote:
Angel wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:Next thing I would do is ban every fucking gun in this country. There is NO need for anyone to have a gun. The 2nd ammendment is a bit past due and completely retarded.


WTH? How am I supposed to get an elk? Wrestle it down and try to scare it to death????



Sarah is that you? :wink: :shock: :D :lol:

You never know......... :?: :P :wink:
User avatar
Angel
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3995
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:41 am

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:58 am

Angel wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Angel wrote:
Behshad wrote:I knew you would get this off track to the whole palin shooting killing hunting thread.
I never said it was right or wrong to kill animals or people for that matter ! Some people need to be shot ( yep youre one of them)..... I made a very clear and simple statement that GUNS are made to kill as opposed to CARS. get it, got it , good !

What I get is that you are as dense as they come if you can't understand that mentally unstable people that wish to cause harm and/or do mass destruction will find a way to do so with or without guns.

The charts you put up are really cute, but show me the evidence that it is actually gun control regulations that makes the difference and not some other variable.


Why are you even in this debate if you dont know the facts about Europe and EU gun controls and tight laws?
Here's just a few countries rules and regulations.


You're having problems with reading comprehension again. I didn't ask WHAT the regulations were, I simply asked for evidence that supported that these regulations are the REASON for decreased crime and not some other variable, such as, better mental health services, harsher sentences for violent crime, etc...

I have already said that I do think we need stricter gun regulations, I'm not arguing that at all.



Were you dropped on your head as a baby ?! Don't answer ! :lol: How can I prove it any further ?!
I give you the gun laws of European country vs ours. Then I give you the stats of random shootings in Europe vs US.
If you can't put two & two together , that's your issue.

Let's try your logic( or lack of) in your field of profession, shall we ?!
Tell me how you can prove that a pregnant mom smoking can be risky for the fetus.

( I'm not arguing it. Just trying to give you an example of how ridiculous your request for REASON is )
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Angel » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:07 pm

Behshad wrote:Were you dropped on your head as a baby ?!


Not that I'm aware of, but you never know...

Behshad wrote:Let's try your logic( or lack of) in your field of profession, shall we ?!
Tell me how you can prove that a pregnant mom smoking can be risky for the fetus.

By evaluating the outcomes of mothers that smoke with the outcomes of similar populations that do not smoke. When I say similar populations I mean all other things being equal, such as socioeconomic status, age, nutritional status, previous health history, previous pregnancy history etc. You could easily take a group of wealthy, well nourished mothers who smoke and compare them with poor women on drugs with medical problems and poor nutrition and compare outcomes and likely get better outcomes in the first group but that does not mean that smoking leads to better outcomes overall-does it?
User avatar
Angel
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3995
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:41 am

Postby Melissa » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:14 pm

Behshad wrote:Tell me how you can prove that a pregnant mom smoking can be risky for the fetus


Well I'm not her, but this one is too easy, lol, by birth weight alone of babies I've taken care of over many years who were born to smoking mothers. A full term (singleton) baby weighing in at barely 5 pounds is a pathetic full term birth weight. And that's just one of the many problems those babies are born with.
Melissa
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5542
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:00 pm

Postby Behshad » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:23 pm

Angel wrote:
Behshad wrote:Were you dropped on your head as a baby ?!


Not that I'm aware of, but you never know...

Behshad wrote:Let's try your logic( or lack of) in your field of profession, shall we ?!
Tell me how you can prove that a pregnant mom smoking can be risky for the fetus.

By evaluating the outcomes of mothers that smoke with the outcomes of similar populations that do not smoke. When I say similar populations I mean all other things being equal, such as socioeconomic status, age, nutritional status, previous health history, previous pregnancy history etc. You could easily take a group of wealthy, well nourished mothers who smoke and compare them with poor women on drugs with medical problems and poor nutrition and compare outcomes and likely get better outcomes in the first group but that does not mean that smoking leads to better outcomes overall-does it?


But with all that said how can you say those are the actual REASONS ?! :lol:


Smelly , I know smoking affects a fetus. Was just giving NastyNat a taste of her own wicked medicine :lol:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Angel » Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:26 pm

Behshad wrote:
Angel wrote:
Behshad wrote:Were you dropped on your head as a baby ?!


Not that I'm aware of, but you never know...

Behshad wrote:Let's try your logic( or lack of) in your field of profession, shall we ?!
Tell me how you can prove that a pregnant mom smoking can be risky for the fetus.

By evaluating the outcomes of mothers that smoke with the outcomes of similar populations that do not smoke. When I say similar populations I mean all other things being equal, such as socioeconomic status, age, nutritional status, previous health history, previous pregnancy history etc. You could easily take a group of wealthy, well nourished mothers who smoke and compare them with poor women on drugs with medical problems and poor nutrition and compare outcomes and likely get better outcomes in the first group but that does not mean that smoking leads to better outcomes overall-does it?


But with all that said how can you say those are the actual REASONS ?! :lol:


My point exactly.....
User avatar
Angel
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3995
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:41 am

Postby Seven Wishes2 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:40 pm

Politicizing issues to the point where you cease to follow a logical thread, and instead attempt to subvert a very reasonable conclusion and cast it into doubt, is not a mechanism for curing societal ills. At some point you have to say, "C is logical because every time A and B happen, C is the result." An example would be intelligent government spending with some fiscal restraint, and the condition of realizing taxation of the highest income earners is the most certain way toward successful economic policy.

Yes, there IS a connection between thinly veiled references to gun violence and an increase in threats against those whose ideals and platforms run in stark contrast to the receptor of those messages. Is Palin herself to blame? Of course not. However, her rhetoric - and in some cases clearly identifiable language (as in "taking up arms" against Democrats) - is toxic, and has contributed to more of the maelstrom of angry political debate in the past few years than any other politician in America.
User avatar
Seven Wishes2
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1621
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:49 am
Location: Charlotte, NC

Postby RossValoryRocks » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:40 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599204144800

Interesting take on why psychos get guns...once again our government gets a failing grade...


Don't blame the Gov't Mr Right Wing NRA supporter. If I was president, as I have said before, the number one thing I would do is ban soccer. All soccer would cease immediately, and thus all soccer fields would convert to real football playing surfaces. Next thing I would do is ban every fucking gun in this country. There is NO need for anyone to have a gun. The 2nd ammendment is a bit past due and completely retarded.

The Gov't didn't fail here...the right wing GOP did, as it insists upon the right to bear arms...No, I didn't read your link but I can guess what it says, and I am calling bullshit before reading it.


Yeah...you didn't read it...and you are a 100% idiot when it comes to this response.

Thank GOD you could never be elected President. The Second Amendment ensures the people can defend themselves from the government. We the People shouldn't fear our government, the government should fear the people. Once again you prove that being a c+ polisci graduate doesn't prove anything, other than you and Bledsoe drank too much and didn't study enough.

The article talks about how the government databases that track psychos like this are not shared between the various states and the federal government and vice-versa.

IF the information on this particular psycho had made it into the databases he would have been denied a firearm...so who's fault is it?

Please expend just a tad of your considerable brain power and actually READ before making an assumption?
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:50 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599204144800

Interesting take on why psychos get guns...once again our government gets a failing grade...


Don't blame the Gov't Mr Right Wing NRA supporter. If I was president, as I have said before, the number one thing I would do is ban soccer. All soccer would cease immediately, and thus all soccer fields would convert to real football playing surfaces. Next thing I would do is ban every fucking gun in this country. There is NO need for anyone to have a gun. The 2nd ammendment is a bit past due and completely retarded.

The Gov't didn't fail here...the right wing GOP did, as it insists upon the right to bear arms...No, I didn't read your link but I can guess what it says, and I am calling bullshit before reading it.


Yeah...you didn't read it...and you are a 100% idiot when it comes to this response.

Thank GOD you could never be elected President. The Second Amendment ensures the people can defend themselves from the government. We the People shouldn't fear our government, the government should fear the people. Once again you prove that being a c+ polisci graduate doesn't prove anything, other than you and Bledsoe drank too much and didn't study enough.

The article talks about how the government databases that track psychos like this are not shared between the various states and the federal government and vice-versa.

IF the information on this particular psycho had made it into the databases he would have been denied a firearm...so who's fault is it?

Please expend just a tad of your considerable brain power and actually READ before making an assumption?


LOL, the 2nd ammendment ensures people can defend themselves from the government? LOL, ok dude. I am sure Jethro down in South Carolina will use his 38 pistol against 5 soldiers brandishing M16's...real effective there. :roll: It's obvious the 2nd ammendment is outdated.

I am just waiting for you to defend the NRA and it's ridiculous lobbying....fighting for the right to bear oozies and machine guns...Good Lord.

Oh, and Sarah Palin can be elected president, but I can't? I guarantee you I am smarter than she is, and would be a better president too.

Hit the rack Stu, you're making an ass of yourself here.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests