Moderator: Andrew
Angel wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:I am not a vegan. I do not support PETA. However, I eat meat only about once every few months, if that. My diet is about 90% vegetarian. Not every animal raised for food is raised in those conditions. There are farms where animals are treated humanely and not given any kind of drugs or anything else.
Much like the live an elk or deer would live in the wild???BobbyinTN wrote:Some people are great hunters and respect the animals and lands they hunt. Some people, like Palin, don't give a shit what they take or how much of it they take, they do it for political reasons more than they do it for life sustaining food.
I would dare say most hunters are respectful of the animals they hunt-all of the hunters I know are.
How do you know Sarah Palin only takes animals for political reasons or for sport? Do you KNOW that her family doesn't consume the meat from the animals?BobbyinTN wrote:And anyone that thinks shooting wolves from helicopters to control predation or population is a fucking idiot and should probably be shot like the wolves are.
Well, now you've just started a whole new argument-totally unrelated....but I wish you could meet some of my farming friends-the ones that raise cows in the favorable conditions that you previously discussed here....BobbyinTN wrote:There are farms where animals are treated humanely and not given any kind of drugs or anything else.
I wish you could meet them and learn how they lose many animals per year to wolves and the laws keep flipping back and forth from allowing them to shoot wolves and not shoot wolves.
So, I am also wondering, the meat that you eat "every few months" where does it come from and why is it OK to kill the meat you eat but not the meat Sarah Palin eats?
Saint John wrote:Aerial wolf hunting was aimed keeping endangered Elk and Caribou populations intact. Alaska is huge, with very unforgiving and vast terrain. It's virtually impossible, in certain areas, to hunt wolves from the ground. Seems like a plausible method to me.
G.I.Jim wrote:Saint John wrote:Aerial wolf hunting was aimed keeping endangered Elk and Caribou populations intact. Alaska is huge, with very unforgiving and vast terrain. It's virtually impossible, in certain areas, to hunt wolves from the ground. Seems like a plausible method to me.
I don't see how the direction the bullet is traveling will make any difference to the wolf.
artist4perry wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Saint John wrote:Aerial wolf hunting was aimed keeping endangered Elk and Caribou populations intact. Alaska is huge, with very unforgiving and vast terrain. It's virtually impossible, in certain areas, to hunt wolves from the ground. Seems like a plausible method to me.
I don't see how the direction the bullet is traveling will make any difference to the wolf.
And if they are overpopulated, that bullet would be more forgiving regardless of trajectory than starving from lack of food.
BobbyinTN wrote:artist4perry wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Saint John wrote:Aerial wolf hunting was aimed keeping endangered Elk and Caribou populations intact. Alaska is huge, with very unforgiving and vast terrain. It's virtually impossible, in certain areas, to hunt wolves from the ground. Seems like a plausible method to me.
I don't see how the direction the bullet is traveling will make any difference to the wolf.
And if they are overpopulated, that bullet would be more forgiving regardless of trajectory than starving from lack of food.
They're not killing the wolves because they are starving, they're killing them because the wolves are eating the Caribou and Palin and her crooks want the Caribou for themselves.
BobbyinTN wrote:artist4perry wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Saint John wrote:Aerial wolf hunting was aimed keeping endangered Elk and Caribou populations intact. Alaska is huge, with very unforgiving and vast terrain. It's virtually impossible, in certain areas, to hunt wolves from the ground. Seems like a plausible method to me.
I don't see how the direction the bullet is traveling will make any difference to the wolf.
And if they are overpopulated, that bullet would be more forgiving regardless of trajectory than starving from lack of food.
They're not killing the wolves because they are starving, they're killing them because the wolves are eating the Caribou and Palin and her crooks want the Caribou for themselves.
lights1961 wrote:LAST WORD... is what Bobby is saying really is this... HE can be what he is... but Sarah cant be what she is... hmmm
lights1961 wrote:LAST WORD... is what Bobby is saying really is this... HE can be what he is... but Sarah cant be what she is... hmmm
lights1961 wrote:LAST WORD... is what Bobby is saying really is this... HE can be what he is... but Sarah cant be what she is... hmmm
BobbyinTN wrote:lights1961 wrote:LAST WORD... is what Bobby is saying really is this... HE can be what he is... but Sarah cant be what she is... hmmm
I don't like Sarah Palin because she's a liar, a cheat and a media whore. There are many republicans I like, and many hunters. Her ethics, her ideals, her bullshit and the complete package is why I don't like Sarah Palin, not because she's a heterosexual or a woman or white or anything to do with who she is but what comes out of her lying mouth.
Wolves, elk, caribou and all wildlife survived just fine before man. Nature takes it course, if the food gets scarce the wolves die out, if the food is plentiful, the wolves thrive. It's bullshit to believe that man has to control the wolf population.
As for hunting deer, I totally agree with it, as I do caribou, elk and other large game, when the hunting is done for food or clothing, but to kill for "sport" or the fun of it is wrong and nothing will convince me otherwise.
BobbyinTN wrote:lights1961 wrote:LAST WORD... is what Bobby is saying really is this... HE can be what he is... but Sarah cant be what she is... hmmm
I don't like Sarah Palin because she's a liar, a cheat and a media whore. There are many republicans I like, and many hunters. Her ethics, her ideals, her bullshit and the complete package is why I don't like Sarah Palin, not because she's a heterosexual or a woman or white or anything to do with who she is but what comes out of her lying mouth.
Wolves, elk, caribou and all wildlife survived just fine before man. Nature takes it course, if the food gets scarce the wolves die out, if the food is plentiful, the wolves thrive. It's bullshit to believe that man has to control the wolf population.
As for hunting deer, I totally agree with it, as I do caribou, elk and other large game, when the hunting is done for food or clothing, but to kill for "sport" or the fun of it is wrong and nothing will convince me otherwise.
BobbyinTN wrote:Why don't you try an honest debate for once instead of loading your questions.
BobbyinTN wrote:The meat I eat is high end, high priced lean cuts from local butchers, WHEN I eat it.
BobbyinTN wrote:Sarah Palin is a disgrace and if she were a true hunter, she'd not be trying to make money from it. She's a media whore whose only intention is to get rich.
BobbyinTN wrote:And if the wolves are getting your friend's cattle, maybe the should build higher fences.
Or maybe they should have thought about the wolves territory before moving their cattle there. But of course, that makes WAY too much sense. LMAO!
BobbyinTN wrote:lights1961 wrote:LAST WORD... is what Bobby is saying really is this... HE can be what he is... but Sarah cant be what she is... hmmm
I don't like Sarah Palin because she's a liar, a cheat and a media whore. There are many republicans I like, and many hunters. Her ethics, her ideals, her bullshit and the complete package is why I don't like Sarah Palin, not because she's a heterosexual or a woman or white or anything to do with who she is but what comes out of her lying mouth.
Wolves, elk, caribou and all wildlife survived just fine before man. Nature takes it course, if the food gets scarce the wolves die out, if the food is plentiful, the wolves thrive. It's bullshit to believe that man has to control the wolf population.
As for hunting deer, I totally agree with it, as I do caribou, elk and other large game, when the hunting is done for food or clothing, but to kill for "sport" or the fun of it is wrong and nothing will convince me otherwise.
artist4perry wrote: If you feel it is no big deal for wolves to die in mass numbers out of hunger and disease you and I will definitely disagree on this idea. If we can keep numbers in check, they have a better chance at survival, and thus a continuation of the species.
Seven Wishes wrote:artist4perry wrote: If you feel it is no big deal for wolves to die in mass numbers out of hunger and disease you and I will definitely disagree on this idea. If we can keep numbers in check, they have a better chance at survival, and thus a continuation of the species.
Typical Republican response. Do whatever you can do to validate the job-quitting, hypocritical, crazy lady shooting healthy wolves from a moving chopper.
On the other hand, I fully support the rights of anyone to kill a non-endangered animal for sustenance purposes. Most hunters I know don't kill for sport.
lights1961 wrote:Seven Wishes wrote:artist4perry wrote: If you feel it is no big deal for wolves to die in mass numbers out of hunger and disease you and I will definitely disagree on this idea. If we can keep numbers in check, they have a better chance at survival, and thus a continuation of the species.
Typical Republican response. Do whatever you can do to validate the job-quitting, hypocritical, crazy lady shooting healthy wolves from a moving chopper.
On the other hand, I fully support the rights of anyone to kill a non-endangered animal for sustenance purposes. Most hunters I know don't kill for sport.
LMAO at the ignorant post this is...
hunting is a sport as it is a way of life... always has been always will be... why else is there a SEASON associated with hunting of all kinds...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
you have RABBIT SEASON, DUCK SEASON, DEER SEASON, BIG GAME SEASON... PHEASANT SEASON... ETC...
and 7 wishes... you either support hunting or you dont... dont be wishy washy with support of some hunting but not all hunting... just saying...
Seven Wishes wrote:artist4perry wrote: If you feel it is no big deal for wolves to die in mass numbers out of hunger and disease you and I will definitely disagree on this idea. If we can keep numbers in check, they have a better chance at survival, and thus a continuation of the species.
Typical Republican response. Do whatever you can do to validate the job-quitting, hypocritical, crazy lady shooting healthy wolves from a moving chopper.
On the other hand, I fully support the rights of anyone to kill a non-endangered animal for sustenance purposes. Most hunters I know don't kill for sport.
Seven Wishes wrote:I would like to interject here that Stu has pretty much unwaveringly supported Bobby's basic rights over the past few months, his own feelings on the issues aside.
And yes, you CAN support the right to hunt and be COMPLETELY against sport hunting or Palinesque "population control" measures.
Just my two cents.
Seven Wishes wrote:artist4perry wrote: If you feel it is no big deal for wolves to die in mass numbers out of hunger and disease you and I will definitely disagree on this idea. If we can keep numbers in check, they have a better chance at survival, and thus a continuation of the species.
Typical Republican response. Do whatever you can do to validate the job-quitting, hypocritical, crazy lady shooting healthy wolves from a moving chopper.
On the other hand, I fully support the rights of anyone to kill a non-endangered animal for sustenance purposes. Most hunters I know don't kill for sport.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests