StocktontoMalone wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:lights1961 wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:My top 5 are:
1. Montana
2. Unitas
3. Marino
4. Bradshaw
5. Elway
------------
Manning (Win this SB and he catapults), Namath, Aikman, Young, Staubach, Favre, Starr and eventually Brady all have their place as well depending on taste.
only thing is its hard to put Unitas and Bradshaw in same catagory.. they played in totaly different eras...
Era's play a big part in anything and shouldn't be considered in some ways people view it. Yes, era's will jumble things up, but guys like Unitas and Namath earned their spots, and it should be no different than what the guys like Manning are doing today. Is it a factor? Of course, but they earned their placement regardless.
If you add Namath and Bradshaw, you must add Dilfer. Bradshaw suffered from a lights out DEFENSE. Just like Brady did. Don't think I'm gonna back the local guy. Brady's good, but he had a great DEFENSE behind him. Also, Give credit to Vinatieri - his foot won all 3 games.
Bradshaw and Dilfer are cut from the same cloth - just along for the ride.
Bradshaw has 2 more TDs than INTs - 212-210, with a career QB rating of 70.9.....EXTREMELY mediocre.
Dilfer had 16 more INTs than TDs - 113-129, with a measely career QB rating of 70.2
Both of them were hacks. Terry was just a luckier hack.....
First off, to put Dilfer in the same sentence as Namath and Bradshaw is a sin.
Second, to call Terry Bradshaw a lucky hack is mind boggling. The Steelers pretty much ran the same staple as they did in the 90's era with Cowher. Run the ball, run the ball, be aggressive, and run the damn ball. Bradshaw made a lot of things happen, and when it came down to it, he was a gritty son of a bitch who would lower the boom when needed, and he threw a deadly accurate ball and had a beautiful deep pass. He put up the numbers he needed, in a HEAVY run oriented offense. For Bradshaw to put up the numbers he did then in that kind of system is spectacular. Again, looking at the H.O.F as a number thing is a MISTAKE and is NOT the way it works. Also, that is an era to where the defense was allowed to maul you, even after the 5 yard range, to where receivers were limited when targeted down field.
As for Brady, although he had solid defense's, the staple to that team was the offense, period. I always said Brady piled up all of his yardage more-so on relying on throwing the dump off and his receivers pounding out the major yards after the catch. In every game that I've watched, Brady and the Pats used that to perfection and most of Brady's yardage are dump offs within 3-5 yards at the line of scrimmage.