Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:07 am

RedWingFan wrote:
YoungJRNYfan wrote:This is foreshadowing the coming of Darkseid. It's showing a post-Apokoliptic world where evil exists in the world. But at the time of Bruce's nightmare, he was dead keen on destroying and killing Superman. His hate for Superman was running wild, so instead of noticing the signs of Darkseid, the Omega Symbol and the Parademons, he dreampt of Superman soldiers as well and feared Superman would one day go rogue and turn evil. His dreams convinced him more that Superman was evil.

But then Martha!



RWF, I've seen you detoured. The Marvel thread you created is that way. The place where you can stand up and loudly applaud the skillfull and impeccable timing of the hilarious Marvel humor over the Quick Silver death scene in AoU while he's laying there dead as a rat. But it's funny! :lol:
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:37 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
RedWingFan wrote:
YoungJRNYfan wrote:This is foreshadowing the coming of Darkseid. It's showing a post-Apokoliptic world where evil exists in the world. But at the time of Bruce's nightmare, he was dead keen on destroying and killing Superman. His hate for Superman was running wild, so instead of noticing the signs of Darkseid, the Omega Symbol and the Parademons, he dreampt of Superman soldiers as well and feared Superman would one day go rogue and turn evil. His dreams convinced him more that Superman was evil.

But then Martha!


"Save, Martha"
"Why did you say her name?!?!!!!!!!!"

People actually defend this shit? After BvS, Snyder will be lucky to land a job as an assistant grip on a Ron Jeremy porn shoot.


You really got to make up your mind. You're into politics, what do they call that? Bullshit? One moment you're talking about how the film is the biggest fail as a film in its "subtextual aspiritions" claiming all everybody ever wanted was a popcorn flick but can't accept that moment that actual has an influence in the mythos inside the head of the Batman character?

So you say the movie sucks and it being a disaster for its own good of the over complicated story that missed badly, but can't accept a very simple, but clever comic book solution in the form of a popcorn moment, no matter how nitpicking stupid it may be?

Cool.
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:23 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:Wayne, a multi-millionaire with presumably thousands of employees, would be driven to fight Superman because of the disgruntled behavior of one ex-employee?


Not because of that. Because his entire WE building got scissored by Kryptonian energy beams. Scores of people died. And that's still not why. It's because he perceived Superman as being an untouchable entity who considers himself alongside humanity but also above us, in that everything he does potentially leads to massive collateral damage for which he doesn't step up for. That's why Superman finally shows up for court (remember, the film takes place 18 months later). Before that, to my knowledge, he'd never been formally called out in a legal venue. Of course, Lex took advantage of that, evil manchild that he is, and even let his assistant Mercy die (she was not in on it, as she even turned around, wondering where he was).
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:25 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:People actually defend this shit? After BvS, Snyder will be lucky to land a job as an assistant grip on a Ron Jeremy porn shoot.


This is the only place (well, there's one other) where I know somebody who can drop the Hedgehog into a joke. I love it! :mrgreen:
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:27 am

"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:28 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
verslibre wrote:Where was the gore in Blade 2? Blaxploitation? First time I've ever heard that in reference to Blade 2. Btw, TCM is showing Shaft in Africa this Saturday night. :wink:

Blade 2 was rated R for violence. I think at one point they even autopsy one of the creatures, which is really just an excuse for Del Toro to show off fake viscera. As for it being blaxploitation... of course it is. It owes as much to Marvel Comics as it does to Shaft and Blacula and old Bruce Lee kung fu movies.


I saw Blade 2 in the theater. It was a big disappointment. Everything else GdT's done is way better. I wish they'd get going on another Pacific Rim movie.
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:30 am

verslibre wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:People actually defend this shit? After BvS, Snyder will be lucky to land a job as an assistant grip on a Ron Jeremy porn shoot.


This is the only place (well, there's one other) where I know somebody who can drop the Hedgehog into a joke. I love it! :mrgreen:


I've said it multiple times how much I look forward to TNC'S responses. Andrew always let this shit be a free for all. How can you not love this? :lol:
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:34 am

YoungJRNYfan wrote:So you say the movie sucks and it being a disaster for its own good of the over complicated story that missed badly, but can't accept a very simple, but clever comic book solution in the form of a popcorn moment, no matter how nitpicking stupid it may be?


I love the fact that people call BvS "overcomplicated." After how simple-stupid both Avengers movies were, in spite of their huge action, I could use a few more layers of story in a multi-hero epic. Funny that over in that other "place," all these people bitch and moan about the first hour being slow (even though it begins with a flippin' reprise of Black Zero), blah, blah, blah. Once things rev up in BvS, it's one major sequence after another. That fuckin' warehouse scene...damn!!
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:41 am

Dude, when Bats rock bottomed that worthless piece of shit and then proceed to reverse bulldog the other scumbag head first into the table, I was giddy as a damn schoolgirl.
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:47 am

YoungJRNYfan wrote:Dude, when Bats rock bottomed that worthless piece of shit and then proceed to reverse bulldog the other scumbag head first into the table, I was giddy as a damn schoolgirl.


That whole scene's nuts. Every move is right out of Batman: Year One, the Dark Knight Returns, and various Englehart/O'Neill stories. Before that scene, the only other time you could watch a guy drop four opponents like that was in a movie starring Jackie Chan or Jet Li. Dragons Forever, Police Story, Fist of Legend, take your pick. But now we have something of that intensity starring Batman. :shock:
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:51 am

Updated. 468 big ones worldwide, up through Monday.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=superman2015.htm

Domestic: $181,047,843 38.6%
+ Foreign: $287,500,000 61.4%


= Worldwide: $468,547,843
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:42 pm

verslibre wrote:I saw Blade 2 in the theater. It was a big disappointment. Everything else GdT's done is way better. I wish they'd get going on another Pacific Rim movie.


I saw it in theaters also. I would take Blade 2 over Pacific Rim, Hellboy, and the overrated Pans Labyrinth any day.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16052
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:07 pm

YoungJRNYfan wrote:You really got to make up your mind. You're into politics, what do they call that? Bullshit? One moment you're talking about how the film is the biggest fail as a film in its "subtextual aspiritions" claiming all everybody ever wanted was a popcorn flick but can't accept that moment that actual has an influence in the mythos inside the head of the Batman character?

No, I can't accept it. Because of the coincidence of a shared maternal name, Batman goes from vowing to destroy Superman to informing Martha "I’m a friend of your son." The change of heart, is just not credible in the slightest. The Nolan films knew how to walk the line between character introspection and crowd-pleaser. The “Martha” moment did not peel back the layers of Bruce’s psyche. It was just a lazy and groan-worthy resolution to a conflict the movie didn’t pull-off very convincingly.

YoungJRNYfan wrote:You've been wrong about this the entire time. So I don't blame you for keeping up with the same shtick. Justice League starts filming in a few weeks and SSQUAD and Wonder Woman are finished, let alone James Wann digging deep for Aquaman. But whatever makes you sleep at night for the sake of your argument, so, I humor you.

Remind me, what’s the status of the Man of Steel solo sequel again? If anything, I’ve been consistently proven right. Watching the movie, I think it’s pretty obvious that the initial reports about Warner Bros. requesting additional Batman footage were also true. Here’s a movie where Superman battles Doomsday and the only real positive feedback is about Batfleck.

YoungJRNYfan wrote:So you say the movie sucks and it being a disaster for its own good of the over complicated story that missed badly, but can't accept a very simple, but clever comic book solution in the form of a popcorn moment, no matter how nitpicking stupid it may be?


No. The Usual Suspects is complicated. BvsS is borderline incoherent. Earlier drafts of the script reportedly had Lex being manipulated by Braniac. I would not be surprised if deleted scenes added to the DVD back that up. As it stands now, Snidely Whiplash was a better written villain.

YoungJRNYfan wrote:What you're doing is pounding your chest claiming intelligence and forgetting the fact that this is still comic book property. Most of the time, things are going to be wonky in logic. Stop being so uptight into not realizing that.


In other words, asking for a movie to make sense is too much to ask. All movies, super hero films especially, require suspension of disbelief. No argument there. But you shouldn’t be forced to connect the dots like a Telenovela missing subtitles. And again, I don’t believe Snyder was challenging his audience to draw their own conclusions. Nothing in his repertoire would indicate that. The film plays like large chunks of footage have been torn out. It's also worth noting that the majority of critics who panned BvsS gave positive reviews to the Nolan entries. There's no grand anti-DC conspiracy at play here. It's just a really crappy movie.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16052
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Wed Mar 30, 2016 4:02 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
verslibre wrote:I saw Blade 2 in the theater. It was a big disappointment. Everything else GdT's done is way better. I wish they'd get going on another Pacific Rim movie.


I saw it in theaters also. I would take Blade 2 over Pacific Rim, Hellboy, and the overrated Pans Labyrinth any day.


You didn't like Pacific Rim, man?!
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby Abitaman » Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:03 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
verslibre wrote:I saw Blade 2 in the theater. It was a big disappointment. Everything else GdT's done is way better. I wish they'd get going on another Pacific Rim movie.


I saw it in theaters also. I would take Blade 2 over Pacific Rim, Hellboy, and the overrated Pans Labyrinth any day.



Blade 2 is by far the best in the Blade series.
Finally got around to watching Pacific Rim a couple weeks ago, ok at best.
Eric, the Abitaman
Abitaman
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: NO LONGER in West TN, now in East TN's beautiful Smokey Mountains

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby Abitaman » Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:04 pm

verslibre wrote:
YoungJRNYfan wrote:So you say the movie sucks and it being a disaster for its own good of the over complicated story that missed badly, but can't accept a very simple, but clever comic book solution in the form of a popcorn moment, no matter how nitpicking stupid it may be?


I love the fact that people call BvS "overcomplicated." After how simple-stupid both Avengers movies were, in spite of their huge action, I could use a few more layers of story in a multi-hero epic. Funny that over in that other "place," all these people bitch and moan about the first hour being slow (even though it begins with a flippin' reprise of Black Zero), blah, blah, blah. Once things rev up in BvS, it's one major sequence after another. That fuckin' warehouse scene...damn!!



The warehouse scene was the best Batman and one the best fight scenes ever.
Eric, the Abitaman
Abitaman
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: NO LONGER in West TN, now in East TN's beautiful Smokey Mountains

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 9:53 pm

No, I can't accept it. Because of the coincidence of a shared maternal name, Batman goes from vowing to destroy Superman to informing Martha "I’m a friend of your son." The change of heart, is just not credible in the slightest. The Nolan films knew how to walk the line between character introspection and crowd-pleaser. The “Martha” moment did not peel back the layers of Bruce’s psyche. It was just a lazy and groan-worthy resolution to a conflict the movie didn’t pull-off very convincingly.


Fair enough, TNC. It was one of the highlights of the film for me. Being a comic book fan and seeing the mythology over and over again, I thought it was a very fair and simple way to bring the hero's together by what they both had in common in a movie that had dark undertones and themes that asked biblical and modern world questions. The simplistic and comic book nature of it was a relief and heart tugger for me and my audiences seem to react nicely to it every time. But, I see where you're coming from.


Remind me, what’s the status of the Man of Steel solo sequel again?


The ending told me everything I needed to know. MoS-JLP1, like Chris Terrio said, is one saga. After JLP1, the new phase in this universe will begin. BvS and the future of the Justice League stories, if you paid attention, focus's on Superman at the core. Even when Supes didn't have screen time, his presence was felt everywhere. Snyder already touched upon this. Though Bruce Wayne assembles the Justice League, it's Superman's absence that is the missing link. JLP1 will focus on bringing him back.

If anything, I’ve been consistently proven right.


About?

Watching the movie, I think it’s pretty obvious that the initial reports about Warner Bros. requesting additional Batman footage were also true. Here’s a movie where Superman battles Doomsday and the only real positive feedback is about Batfleck.


That's not true. The entire cast is safe in future films. Cavill, Affleck and Gadot did phenomenal. If there's anything even the worst review took from BvS, was the fantastic acting across the board. If anything, WB will slowly TONALLY move away from the moodiness, but Snyder already said that's natural with JL anyhow. The character arcs, even for Batman, is already being provin' to be a more optimistic view within' his mindset. Superman changed him. Made him believe there could be good in this world. I think the tone in MoS and BvS is appropriate. The stories were a continuation and one in the same. JLP1 closes this saga, so the next step is to gradually build to a world who will accept superhero's.

We'll get a Batman solo after JLP1 and a Superman solo before JLP2 or immediately after to take us into the next phase. Mark the words.

No. The Usual Suspects is complicated. BvsS is borderline incoherent. Earlier drafts of the script reportedly had Lex being manipulated by Braniac. I would not be surprised if deleted scenes added to the DVD back that up. As it stands now, Snidely Whiplash was a better written villain.



Lets wait until the Ultimate Director's cut of BvS comes out. I'm hearing from critics who didn't like BvS that it's better; ala Watchmen.



In other words, asking for a movie to make sense is too much to ask. All movies, super hero films especially, require suspension of disbelief. No argument there. But you shouldn’t be forced to connect the dots like a Telenovela missing subtitles. And again, I don’t believe Snyder was challenging his audience to draw their own conclusions. Nothing in his repertoire would indicate that. The film plays like large chunks of footage have been torn out. It's also worth noting that the majority of critics who panned BvsS gave positive reviews to the Nolan entries. There's no grand anti-DC conspiracy at play here. It's just a really crappy movie.


Fair enough. A good barometer for these types of movies for me is how my wife reacts to it. Most of these movies, ESPECIALLY superhero movies, she just doesn't get and most of the comic book stuff flies way over her head. I had to explain many movies to her a few times before she got the concept. She loved Batman V Superman and followed it nicely. There were actually some parts that I missed the first time that she pointed out to me. I was shocked she understood and how easily she followed. People can speak for themselves, but givin' my wife's personality and her understanding, the movie making no sense at all is greatly exaggerated.
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:29 pm

Forbes: Zack Snyder Loves Superman, And 'Batman V Superman' Proves It
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/ ... 4ec51e258e


The Critics Must Be Crazy: 'Batman V Superman' Is Fantastic
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/20 ... 0f72b61cc5
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby RedWingFan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:26 pm

YoungJRNYfan wrote:
RedWingFan wrote:
YoungJRNYfan wrote:This is foreshadowing the coming of Darkseid. It's showing a post-Apokoliptic world where evil exists in the world. But at the time of Bruce's nightmare, he was dead keen on destroying and killing Superman. His hate for Superman was running wild, so instead of noticing the signs of Darkseid, the Omega Symbol and the Parademons, he dreampt of Superman soldiers as well and feared Superman would one day go rogue and turn evil. His dreams convinced him more that Superman was evil.

But then Martha!



RWF, I've seen you detoured. The Marvel thread you created is that way. The place where you can stand up and loudly applaud the skillfull and impeccable timing of the hilarious Marvel humor over the Quick Silver death scene in AoU while he's laying there dead as a rat. But it's funny! :lol:

Yeah, well this Marvel fan doesn't see the need to form circle jerks in forums to constantly try to reinforce how great their movies are. They have their many hits and a few misses. Judging what I witnessed Saturday night, marvel has nothing to worry about. Suicide Squad and WW May be finished, I'm betting they'll be box office disappointments and neither will see a sequel. That may be enough to crawl to the JL movies which will be another much needed payday for DC. Can't see them throwing good money after bad with more standalone films outside of Batman.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:38 pm

Abitaman wrote:
The_Noble_Cause wrote:
verslibre wrote:I saw Blade 2 in the theater. It was a big disappointment. Everything else GdT's done is way better. I wish they'd get going on another Pacific Rim movie.


I saw it in theaters also. I would take Blade 2 over Pacific Rim, Hellboy, and the overrated Pans Labyrinth any day.



Blade 2 is by far the best in the Blade series.
Finally got around to watching Pacific Rim a couple weeks ago, ok at best.


I thought Pacific Rim was OK. I'm surprised that Del Toro quit doing The Hobbit to make it. One of my issues with Pacific, (as well as BvsS and Lee's Hulk) is it had too many fight sequences set at night in the rain. Am I going legally blind? The ending set underwater was especially hard to see.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16052
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby The_Noble_Cause » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:39 pm

YoungJRNYfan wrote:
No, I can't accept it. Because of the coincidence of a shared maternal name, Batman goes from vowing to destroy Superman to informing Martha "I’m a friend of your son." The change of heart, is just not credible in the slightest. The Nolan films knew how to walk the line between character introspection and crowd-pleaser. The “Martha” moment did not peel back the layers of Bruce’s psyche. It was just a lazy and groan-worthy resolution to a conflict the movie didn’t pull-off very convincingly.


Fair enough, TNC. It was one of the highlights of the film for me. Being a comic book fan and seeing the mythology over and over again, I thought it was a very fair and simple way to bring the hero's together by what they both had in common in a movie that had dark undertones and themes that asked biblical and modern world questions. The simplistic and comic book nature of it was a relief and heart tugger for me and my audiences seem to react nicely to it every time. But, I see where you're coming from.


Remind me, what’s the status of the Man of Steel solo sequel again?


The ending told me everything I needed to know. MoS-JLP1, like Chris Terrio said, is one saga. After JLP1, the new phase in this universe will begin. BvS and the future of the Justice League stories, if you paid attention, focus's on Superman at the core. Even when Supes didn't have screen time, his presence was felt everywhere. Snyder already touched upon this. Though Bruce Wayne assembles the Justice League, it's Superman's absence that is the missing link. JLP1 will focus on bringing him back.

If anything, I’ve been consistently proven right.


About?

Watching the movie, I think it’s pretty obvious that the initial reports about Warner Bros. requesting additional Batman footage were also true. Here’s a movie where Superman battles Doomsday and the only real positive feedback is about Batfleck.


That's not true. The entire cast is safe in future films. Cavill, Affleck and Gadot did phenomenal. If there's anything even the worst review took from BvS, was the fantastic acting across the board. If anything, WB will slowly TONALLY move away from the moodiness, but Snyder already said that's natural with JL anyhow. The character arcs, even for Batman, is already being provin' to be a more optimistic view within' his mindset. Superman changed him. Made him believe there could be good in this world. I think the tone in MoS and BvS is appropriate. The stories were a continuation and one in the same. JLP1 closes this saga, so the next step is to gradually build to a world who will accept superhero's.

We'll get a Batman solo after JLP1 and a Superman solo before JLP2 or immediately after to take us into the next phase. Mark the words.

No. The Usual Suspects is complicated. BvsS is borderline incoherent. Earlier drafts of the script reportedly had Lex being manipulated by Braniac. I would not be surprised if deleted scenes added to the DVD back that up. As it stands now, Snidely Whiplash was a better written villain.



Lets wait until the Ultimate Director's cut of BvS comes out. I'm hearing from critics who didn't like BvS that it's better; ala Watchmen.



In other words, asking for a movie to make sense is too much to ask. All movies, super hero films especially, require suspension of disbelief. No argument there. But you shouldn’t be forced to connect the dots like a Telenovela missing subtitles. And again, I don’t believe Snyder was challenging his audience to draw their own conclusions. Nothing in his repertoire would indicate that. The film plays like large chunks of footage have been torn out. It's also worth noting that the majority of critics who panned BvsS gave positive reviews to the Nolan entries. There's no grand anti-DC conspiracy at play here. It's just a really crappy movie.


Fair enough. A good barometer for these types of movies for me is how my wife reacts to it. Most of these movies, ESPECIALLY superhero movies, she just doesn't get and most of the comic book stuff flies way over her head. I had to explain many movies to her a few times before she got the concept. She loved Batman V Superman and followed it nicely. There were actually some parts that I missed the first time that she pointed out to me. I was shocked she understood and how easily she followed. People can speak for themselves, but givin' my wife's personality and her understanding, the movie making no sense at all is greatly exaggerated.


I'm glad it delivered for you, YJF. Speaking with a friend last night (he liked BvS more than me). We both agreed we would see it again. Alot of movie chains nowadays offer beer and wine. So I would be glad to have a few cold ones and check it out. In fairness to Vers and you, by the time of the warehouse rescue scene, I was pretty mentally checked out. I just was no longer invested in any of the action/drama unfolding on-screen. By the time of the Doomsday climax especially, the film washed over me in a vomit blur of pixelated CGI.
"I think we should all sue this women for depriving us of our God given right to go down with a clear mind, and good thoughts." - Stu, Consumate Pussy Eater
User avatar
The_Noble_Cause
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16052
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 9:14 am
Location: Lake Titicaca

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:54 pm

The_Noble_Cause wrote: I'm glad it delivered for you, YJF. Speaking with a friend last night (he liked BvS more than me). We both agreed we would see it again. Alot of movie chains nowadays offer beer and wine. So I would be glad to have a few cold ones and check it out. In fairness to Vers and you, by the time of the warehouse rescue scene, I was pretty mentally checked out. I just was no longer invested in any of the action/drama unfolding on-screen. By the time of the Doomsday climax especially, the film washed over me in a vomit blur of pixelated CGI.


I appreciate your feedback, TNC and was looking forward to your word the most when I saw it. I knew there was going to be no in between and you were either going to generally like it or tear it apart. After I saw it, I knew it was going to be the latter, lol. Your honesty and style is the best thing about the MR boards with free reign and is the reason why I keep coming back here. Is there a divide with this? Absolutely and I recognize that.

Back in the Superman Return days, I barely posted on forums because when I wanted to say something about it, it simply wasn't good or nice haha. I know what it's like to be on that other side so I'm just happy I have the chance at defending something I like for a change. MoS; BvS is not everyone's can of beer and the criticisms, while sometimes outrageously laughable, are fair. Keep posting, TNC. We have an ENTIRE film slate to argue over :lol: I dig these convos man.
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Thu Mar 31, 2016 1:06 am

‘Aquaman’ Director Says His Movie Will Be Less Serious Than ‘Batman v Superman’
He told IGN at WonderCon, “Aquaman is a character that a lot of people have made fun of over the years, and I just think it’s fun to actually show a really different, cool, badass side to this character — but at the same time, let’s not forget to have fun with it.”
https://www.yahoo.com/movies/aquaman-di ... 01327.html
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:00 am

I don't think they should feel obligated to say it's going to be less serious because people complain BvS is too serious.

Suicide Squad looks like it covers the spectrum. The trailer (not the int'l one, but the one playing in front of BvS) is awesome. It's loaded with humor. It looks like it's got it all, except Ron Jeremy. :lol:
Last edited by verslibre on Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby Abitaman » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:06 am

The_Noble_Cause wrote:
I thought Pacific Rim was OK. I'm surprised that Del Toro quit doing The Hobbit to make it. One of my issues with Pacific, (as well as BvsS and Lee's Hulk) is it had too many fight sequences set at night in the rain. Am I going legally blind? The ending set underwater was especially hard to see.



Give me a good fight in the daylight anytime. But the daylight doesn't work to good for Batman, so at least lighten up the scene. Most theaters do not run there projectors at a high enough wattage. There was an article on this a few years back, it is a way for them to save money.
When I saw Lee's Hulk I left so pissed off, because I could not tell what wa going on at the end of the movie in the final fight. I wasn't until it came out on DVD and I watched it at home that I knew what was going on.
Eric, the Abitaman
Abitaman
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: NO LONGER in West TN, now in East TN's beautiful Smokey Mountains

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:13 am

RedWingFan wrote:Yeah, well this Marvel fan doesn't see the need to form circle jerks in forums to constantly try to reinforce how great their movies are. They have their many hits and a few misses. Judging what I witnessed Saturday night, marvel has nothing to worry about. Suicide Squad and WW May be finished, I'm betting they'll be box office disappointments and neither will see a sequel. That may be enough to crawl to the JL movies which will be another much needed payday for DC. Can't see them throwing good money after bad with more standalone films outside of Batman.


We're just talking about these movies. We're Marvel fans, too. Unless you missed how much I splitzed over The Winter Soldier.

I think you're going to dig Suicide Squad. "Just a feeling."
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:15 am

Abitaman wrote:Give me a good fight in the daylight anytime. But the daylight doesn't work to good for Batman, so at least lighten up the scene. Most theaters do not run there projectors at a high enough wattage. There was an article on this a few years back, it is a way for them to save money.


The warehouse scene's perfect. It's indoors, so it's not dark at all.

I understand the complaint where Pacific Rim is concerned, but I thought everything was very well done, and I love kaiju and giant robots (but not the Transformers movies), so GdT's awesome for doing that movie, which pits kaiju against giant robots! :D
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:32 am

Yeah, well this Marvel fan doesn't see the need to form circle jerks in forums to constantly try to reinforce how great their movies are. They have their many hits and a few misses. Judging what I witnessed Saturday night, marvel has nothing to worry about. Suicide Squad and WW May be finished, I'm betting they'll be box office disappointments and neither will see a sequel. That may be enough to crawl to the JL movies which will be another much needed payday for DC. Can't see them throwing good money after bad with more standalone films outside of Batman.


Calm down, killer. I was only joking :lol: Did you get that reference? :wink: I agree that Marvel has nothing to worry about. Neither does DC. That's a fanboy conclusion right there. It's stupid to go there. These worlds will continue to exist and WB is full throttle in the DCEU. They must feel confident in their story and where we are heading. You have to tell A to get to Z. If Marvel can "miss" then DC should have the same luxury with only 2 films in. We live in the age where the fans are winning. I say, the more the merrier. More importantly to me though, is they're different.
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby YoungJRNYfan » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:36 am

For anybody fascinated to go inside the minds and the hard works of the people involved to give us these movies:

BATMAN V SUPERMAN World Press Conference - Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Gal Gadot, Jesse Eisenberg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_uuPXOBpp0

They start talking about the Martha scene at 24:19.
User avatar
YoungJRNYfan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 12:35 pm

Re: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice THREAD

Postby verslibre » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:37 am

What's funny is that a lot of people still want their cinematic Superman to be Christopher Reeve.

But nobody noticed or would care that Downey's Stark acts nothing like the guy from the comics. He didn't have a one-liner in every panel.

So when they eventually recast Stark, the "new guy" might have a really hard time filling the armor.
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests