YoungJRNYfan wrote:I thought Snyder did a good job. He had a lot on his plate and he delivered enough to have the huge 3rd act Trinity battle/ Superman's death pay off.
Oh, come on. He did not do his job when 2/3 of the movie isn't worth seeing.
He had a choice. Either ignore back story and getting people to care about the characters and try to get right into the action sooner, or spend time getting us to care and tell us who these characters are. He chose to try to get people to care. Poor Superman is being persecuted. Poor Batman is old and grumpy

. Then get these characters that we care about to fight each other, by Lex's manipulation.
I predicted this storyline months ago.
The problem is that Snyder did a HORRIBLE job getting us to give a shit about EITHER of these characters. So, by the time they had their 10 minute fight scene, nobody really cared...except that it was at least some action in a pretty boring movie up to that point.
NO matter what he did he was going to end up with a bad movie....but what he did do made a bad movie even worse.
So much so, that people were sniffling at the end. That means people bought it. And if people cheered Wonder Woman, that means people invested in her character development as well, so another win.
I think you are over estimating this reaction. I bet just as many people walked out before Wonder Woman showed up as the number who cheered.
Snyder really brought home the notion of how Affleck's Bruce Wayne and Batman was tortured and a broken man.
No he didn't. That is just not true. Most of that shit was inexplicable, unless you already knew what he was going for. So, Batman has taken to torturing and branding people so they are murdered in prison...that is more disturbing and "WTF" worthy then showing Batman is a tortured sole himself. In fact, I say it is shock drama, ala breaking Zod's neck, and lazy writing.
The acting throughout was phenomenal.
PHENOMENAL? Come down to reality.
There were a ton of setups; a lot to balance but the themes that needed to carry on from Man of Steel still needed to be orchestrated in order to build the platform. It's not a fist-pumping fun movie so don't go see it if you want a Marvel-esq;
"Marvel-esq" is not the point. This is far away from being "The Dark Night-esq". It is more "Nighwatch-esq". That may be OK, but not for a film that touts "The Son of Krypton vs. The Bat of Gotham". It did not meet those expectations...expectations that DC/Marvel, Snyder, and people like you set. A comparison to Marvel is unnecessary.
Disney force feed of a laugh out loud good time.
When it is appropriate, yes they do. For things like Ant-Man and Guardians of the Galaxy - it makes sense. When it comes to Tony Stark - it makes sense. But, I will not expect "force feed" for Civil War or Doctor Strange, probably not even Black Panther. But, for a second Guardians or Ant-Man - I do expect it. In fact, any film that has Tony Stark in it is going to have some one-liners, because that is how his character rolls.
It's not that and it doesn't try to be that. The movie hit a lot of personal cravings for me and even if you hated it, it set up future movies that people invested in and want to see. If it was going to miss, atleast it hit in the right spots as far as future DC films is concerned.
The only future DC film it hit for was Wonder Woman...and MAYBE Justice League, because it cameoed so many of the characters. If they cameoed the Wonder Twins, maybe things would have been different.