NO matter what he did he was going to end up with a bad movie....but what he did do made a bad movie even worse.
So wait, you DID see the movie, then?
I think you are over estimating this reaction. I bet just as many people walked out before Wonder Woman showed up as the number who cheered.
Doubt it.
No he didn't. That is just not true. Most of that shit was inexplicable, unless you already knew what he was going for. So, Batman has taken to torturing and branding people so they are murdered in prison...that is more disturbing and "WTF" worthy then showing Batman is a tortured sole himself. In fact, I say it is shock drama, ala breaking Zod's neck, and lazy writing.
What are your sources?
PHENOMENAL? Come down to reality.
Yet, you're the one living in somebody else's reality. You read well. Or did you see the film and are afraid to admit to seeing it because it goes against your word of not having any interest? Your interest is obviously like a pressure cooker judging by your outburst of posts. And it's okay
But you must protect your role. I understand.When it comes to Tony Stark - it makes sense. In fact, any film that has Tony Stark in it is going to have some one-liners, because that is how his character rolls.
Not really. It's how RDJR rolls. The "character" of Iron Man wasn't created cira 2008 like most of you think.
The only future DC film it hit for was Wonder Woman...and MAYBE Justice League, because it cameoed so many of the characters.
No shit? That was the point. Now you're just hedging and backpeddling
.
