
Moderator: Andrew
StocktontoMalone wrote:Not the exact car, Ms. Doofus....but the same style, m
odel, year, and color....
Gunbot wrote:
Does Ford own a big stake in Mazda?
Enigma869 wrote:Gunbot wrote:
Does Ford own a big stake in Mazda?
It wouldn't surprise me. I know they own Jaguar and am fairly certain that they have a huge stake in Land Rover and Volvo as well.
Behshad wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Gunbot wrote:
Does Ford own a big stake in Mazda?
It wouldn't surprise me. I know they own Jaguar and am fairly certain that they have a huge stake in Land Rover and Volvo as well.
They do own Mazda and Volvo. They sold Jaguar/Land Rover last year to a company from india , called Tata !
Rhiannon wrote:I have a Ford. It's almost 10 years old. And it is a piece of SHIT. I've spent over $2500 in one year just to keep the thing running. I'm sure Ford has improved in the past five years, but after owning this Fukus for a year, I'm very much looking forward to purchasing my 2010 Toyota or Scion in the coming days.
Gunbot wrote:Now, that ten year old car has lasted me another ten years. I think I have got my money out of it. I've changed the rotors once more and the brake pads three times, changed the tires and had it regularly serviced, just like you would do with a new car, so that's probably an additional 1500 dollars. I can't complain.
Rhiannon wrote:Gunbot wrote:Now, that ten year old car has lasted me another ten years. I think I have got my money out of it. I've changed the rotors once more and the brake pads three times, changed the tires and had it regularly serviced, just like you would do with a new car, so that's probably an additional 1500 dollars. I can't complain.
Yeah, that I understand. I had a 97 Plymouth Breeze that I drove until it had 280k miles on it. Old cars incur maintenance costs just the same. But this model and year of Ford I have is plagued with defects, troubles, and overall flaws. It's not just regular upkeep I've shelled out for. It's a badly designed car that was poorly built.
Gunbot wrote:Yeah, that's why I mentioned it was Toyota. Back in the day, it was hard to find a better brand. I would have taken them over Honda any day. When I was in Japan, every one drove those and Nissan. I asked them why they didn't drive Honda's, I was told they weren't as reliable.
Gunbot wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Gunbot wrote:Now, that ten year old car has lasted me another ten years. I think I have got my money out of it. I've changed the rotors once more and the brake pads three times, changed the tires and had it regularly serviced, just like you would do with a new car, so that's probably an additional 1500 dollars. I can't complain.
Yeah, that I understand. I had a 97 Plymouth Breeze that I drove until it had 280k miles on it. Old cars incur maintenance costs just the same. But this model and year of Ford I have is plagued with defects, troubles, and overall flaws. It's not just regular upkeep I've shelled out for. It's a badly designed car that was poorly built.
Yeah, that's why I mentioned it was Toyota. Back in the day, it was hard to find a better brand. I would have taken them over Honda any day. When I was in Japan, every one drove those and Nissan. I asked them why they didn't drive Honda's, I was told they weren't as reliable.
The funny thing is, no one drives a car that is more than five years old in Japan. The insurance would go through the roof and you couldn't pass their strict emissions, so it is probably cheaper to get a new vehicle. They turn around and sell the used engines over here for a few hundred bucks as the mileage isn't more than 35k on most of them.
Jana wrote:I have many friends who swear by Hondas/Acuras, and really hold their value.
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Jana wrote:I have many friends who swear by Hondas/Acuras, and really hold their value.
Honda absolutely does. I have a friend who, in 1995 bought an 1983 Civic Hatchback. She sold it in 1998 and the next user got another 4 years out of it - and the only reason it died then was that owner did something really dumb. The car would have been fine for awhile yet.
Jana wrote:Gunbot wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Gunbot wrote:Now, that ten year old car has lasted me another ten years. I think I have got my money out of it. I've changed the rotors once more and the brake pads three times, changed the tires and had it regularly serviced, just like you would do with a new car, so that's probably an additional 1500 dollars. I can't complain.
Yeah, that I understand. I had a 97 Plymouth Breeze that I drove until it had 280k miles on it. Old cars incur maintenance costs just the same. But this model and year of Ford I have is plagued with defects, troubles, and overall flaws. It's not just regular upkeep I've shelled out for. It's a badly designed car that was poorly built.
Yeah, that's why I mentioned it was Toyota. Back in the day, it was hard to find a better brand. I would have taken them over Honda any day. When I was in Japan, every one drove those and Nissan. I asked them why they didn't drive Honda's, I was told they weren't as reliable.
The funny thing is, no one drives a car that is more than five years old in Japan. The insurance would go through the roof and you couldn't pass their strict emissions, so it is probably cheaper to get a new vehicle. They turn around and sell the used engines over here for a few hundred bucks as the mileage isn't more than 35k on most of them.
I have many friends who swear by Hondas/Acuras, and really hold their value. But I once had a Toyota for five years and a Mitsubishi after that for five years, and I was abusive to them beyond belief and were never once in the shop beyond past-due maintenance and past-due oil changes or a belt or something. Though, the Mitsubishi didn't hold its value for trade in a couple of years ago like my Nissan and Toyota did. And my Nissan really held its value but only owned it four years. But I've never owned a car past 75K to 80k miles at the most, so who knows what would have happened after that. But I have family and friends with American cars, same mileage as my cars about, and they were in the shop quite often as time wore on and they took fantastic care of their cars and couldn't believe my luck and swtiched to foreign b/c of their experiences. Though, my one friend loved her Explorers and kept them for years and said they were great and refuses to buy foreign makes.
Ehwmatt wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Jana wrote:I have many friends who swear by Hondas/Acuras, and really hold their value.
Honda absolutely does. I have a friend who, in 1995 bought an 1983 Civic Hatchback. She sold it in 1998 and the next user got another 4 years out of it - and the only reason it died then was that owner did something really dumb. The car would have been fine for awhile yet.
My 05 Altima is at 55.5K miles and still running like a charm. I anticipate on having it for at least another three years.
Jana wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Jana wrote:I have many friends who swear by Hondas/Acuras, and really hold their value.
Honda absolutely does. I have a friend who, in 1995 bought an 1983 Civic Hatchback. She sold it in 1998 and the next user got another 4 years out of it - and the only reason it died then was that owner did something really dumb. The car would have been fine for awhile yet.
My 05 Altima is at 55.5K miles and still running like a charm. I anticipate on having it for at least another three years.
When I was in an accident a few months ago, they gave me the new model 09 black Altima while it was in the body shop. I had so much fun in that car. It cornered so nicely and had such speedy pickup.
Sarah wrote:I'd like to add that my car has 180k miles.
Also, I'm embarrassed for you jerkwads re: Mexicans. If it'd been black people, would you call it a "nigger symbol" too?
Sarah wrote:I'd like to add that my car has 180k miles.
Also, I'm embarrassed for you jerkwads re: Mexicans. If it'd been black people, would you call it a "nigger symbol" too? Thieves suck but no need to get racist.
Ehwmatt wrote:
My 05 Altima is at 55.5K miles and still running like a charm.
Ehwmatt wrote:
I traded in an 00 Bonneville
Enigma869 wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:
My 05 Altima is at 55.5K miles and still running like a charm.
Why is this news? Why wouldn't an 05 model year vehicle with only 55 miles (low miles for the year) be running like a charm? I had a 2004 Crown Vic that had 75K on it and I never had a single problem with that vehicle. There is a reason that police departments and taxi companies rack up 300K + miles on these beasts!
Enigma869 wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:
I traded in an 00 Bonneville
Ah yes...the good old Pontiac Bonneville. My neighbor used to buy one of those shitboxes every few years. The back windows didn't open., and I don't mean they were defective. Some genius at GM apparently decided that it was a good idea to design a vehicle that had rear windows that weren't even capable of being opened without throwing a brick through them
Ehwmatt wrote:
It was actually a really nice car, it was a lease I bought after it was returned. Fully loaded minus leather, great sound system and a great ride/lots of power. Just too many problems.
Enigma869 wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:
It was actually a really nice car, it was a lease I bought after it was returned. Fully loaded minus leather, great sound system and a great ride/lots of power. Just too many problems.
But, did the back windows roll down?
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests