Boomchild wrote:What a lame response. First, you must be blind that by doing something like this, Obama is rewarding the kind of people he thinks are not paying enough in taxes.
No. You must be deaf, blind, and dumb to not realize that most constructive people admit that taxes must be increased as part of any balanced budget.
Cutting taxes is not an irresponsible action.
Cutting taxes, increasing unnecessary spending, and starting pointless wars are ALL irresponsible actions and all turned a budget surplus to a deficit and a huge national debt
Not producing and adhering to a balanced budget is.
See above...and handing that over to the next President, along with an economic disaster, entire industries failing, is an impossible situation...whether you admit it or not, where the country is today is a LOT better off then when W. left office. If it wasn't, we would have had a different outcome this past election.
Out of control spending, bills fulled to the brim with pork spending is.
Get over the empty Republican rhetoric. "pork spending" is such a small percentage of the budget, its virtually irrelevant. You want to cut spending, cut the military budget, cut Social Security, cut Medicaid/Medicare. That is where the money is...the rest is just a distraction.
Rising taxes on any income bracket is a futile act to try and get the government out of the red.
By itself, probably true.
All these talks and debates about the "fiscal cliff" and no mention of how our government has not produced and passed an actual budget.
True. And, like I said, CONGRESS is responsible for that....not Obama. Tell the bonehead congress to do their job.
That and the ridiculous approach that you should be able to work out a plan without even making sizable cuts in spending. All this does is "kick the can down the road" for our future generations to deal with. They are only delaying the inevitable.
When Republicans take the military budget out of the discussion and only want to cut social programs, then why not just take the autmatic cuts...since that is a better compromise? Explain how that is negitionating and compromising with good faith....when the punishment of no action is better then their proposed action?