Moderator: Andrew
Jonny B wrote:The Pats were fined 1 million for Deflategate.
The Pats will save 1.8 million because of Brady's suspension, which is without pay.
So the Pats actually get a net gain of 800K for violating the integrity of the game.
It would be more financially punishing to the Pats' salary cap to repeal the suspension and let Brady play.
How's your integrity working out for you, NFL?
Jonny B wrote:The Pats were fined 1 million for Deflategate.
The Pats will save 1.8 million because of Brady's suspension, which is without pay.
So the Pats actually get a net gain of 800K for violating the integrity of the game.
It would be more financially punishing to the Pats' salary cap to repeal the suspension and let Brady play.
How's your integrity working out for you, NFL?
YoungJRNYfan wrote:Whatever Mettenberger does from here on out will be an audition for another franchise. QB needy teams like Cleveland, Buffalo, Houston or hell, even Chicago at this point will probably be watching Mettenberger closer this preseason incase he becomes available. Afterall, QB's in his position like Matt Flynn and Josh McCown made the most of playing well in backup duty or a fill-in with an injury to land them a spot elsewhere. Mettenberger has starting experience and some upside, especially with size, which doesn't come along often. He won't go unnoticed this preseason.
S2M wrote:Wow. I don't even know where to begin. First.... Goodell had Jastrzemski's and McNally's texts. He didn't need Tom's. Second, if Goodell had already exonerated both Kraft, AND the team - and this is all about Tom....why the unprecedented fine, and loss of draft picks? Next, prior infractions for doctoring footballs have garnered negligible fines. Why the different levy?
This all adds up to the other teams being tired of NE winning all the time(jealousy), coupled with Goodell taking a beating on all other cases up to this point, and looking for some sort of redemption.
Not to mention Goodell /Wells inventing a standard that doesn't exist, 'more probable than not' There is no such standard in law, or any other official tribunal, unofficial proceeding...etc.
Memorex wrote:To be honest, I don't care about it either.[b] It follows their reputation[/b], so it's got that element. But other than that, whatever. But it's for the league to decide what is proper or not and while I don't care about deflated footballs, I also don't care if Brady has to sit down for a few games because the rules were broken. I'd be saying the same if it was my team. Just play the game or take the lumps.
I have to follow the rules at work and so should people that work in the sports world. They get paid a lot of money to just do their job.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests