Moderator: Andrew
Lula wrote:yeah cuz only poor people voted for obama, or 75% of the obama voters are poor, the other 25% not so much maybe.
Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:yeah cuz only poor people voted for obama, or 75% of the obama voters are poor, the other 25% not so much maybe.
That's exactly the way I read it. You'd almost have to be a poor, uneducated dumbfuck driving a 1982 Pinto to vote for that fuckhead.3 out 4 seems about right. But, fear not, Lula, you're the other "one."
Rick wrote:[ The Republican ticket offered less. McCain and Palin?
Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:yeah cuz only poor people voted for obama, or 75% of the obama voters are poor, the other 25% not so much maybe.
That's exactly the way I read it. You'd almost have to be a poor, uneducated dumbfuck driving a 1982 Pinto to vote for that fuckhead.3 out 4 seems about right. But, fear not, Lula, you're the other "one."
Saint John wrote:Rick wrote:[ The Republican ticket offered less. McCain and Palin?
I beg to differ. You had a war hero and a Governor that had the country's finest run state. A state where people got money back at the end of the year because the budget was run so well. Biden doesn't know when fucking TV was invented and Obama was a street hood that hung around with domestic terrorists, racist, American-hating pastors and was deeply embedded in ACORN. The choice, while neither side offered a compelling team, was still quite easy.
Saint John wrote:Rick wrote:[ The Republican ticket offered less. McCain and Palin?
I beg to differ. You had a war hero and a Governor that had the country's finest run state. A state where people got money back at the end of the year because the budget was run so well. Biden doesn't know when fucking TV was invented and Obama was a street hood that hung around with domestic terrorists, racist, American-hating pastors and was deeply embedded in ACORN. The choice, while neither side offered a compelling team, was still quite easy.
Lula wrote:Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:yeah cuz only poor people voted for obama, or 75% of the obama voters are poor, the other 25% not so much maybe.
That's exactly the way I read it. You'd almost have to be a poor, uneducated dumbfuck driving a 1982 Pinto to vote for that fuckhead.3 out 4 seems about right. But, fear not, Lula, you're the other "one."
yeahc cuz you know i don't drive a pinto!
Fact Finder wrote:Rick wrote:Saint John wrote:Rick wrote:[ The Republican ticket offered less. McCain and Palin?
I beg to differ. You had a war hero and a Governor that had the country's finest run state. A state where people got money back at the end of the year because the budget was run so well. Biden doesn't know when fucking TV was invented and Obama was a street hood that hung around with domestic terrorists, racist, American-hating pastors and was deeply embedded in ACORN. The choice, while neither side offered a compelling team, was still quite easy.
He has credentials, she has none. That being said, after GWB, there was no other choice. He damaged the party beyond repair at that point.
Remember me when this happens. The Republican party WILL have a minority on the ticket next time. That will show you just how shallow they are.
It was the Republican Party that stood against slavery. No amount of revisionist history will change that.
Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:yeah cuz only poor people voted for obama, or 75% of the obama voters are poor, the other 25% not so much maybe.
That's exactly the way I read it. You'd almost have to be a poor, uneducated dumbfuck driving a 1982 Pinto to vote for that fuckhead.3 out 4 seems about right. But, fear not, Lula, you're the other "one."
yeahc cuz you know i don't drive a pinto!
lol...I was only in your car for 5 seconds. It looked nice though!![]()
![]()
Next time, Lu. And I think that next time might be for the New Year.
Dog track?
Fact Finder wrote:Rick wrote:Saint John wrote:Rick wrote:[ The Republican ticket offered less. McCain and Palin?
I beg to differ. You had a war hero and a Governor that had the country's finest run state. A state where people got money back at the end of the year because the budget was run so well. Biden doesn't know when fucking TV was invented and Obama was a street hood that hung around with domestic terrorists, racist, American-hating pastors and was deeply embedded in ACORN. The choice, while neither side offered a compelling team, was still quite easy.
He has credentials, she has none. That being said, after GWB, there was no other choice. He damaged the party beyond repair at that point.
Remember me when this happens. The Republican party WILL have a minority on the ticket next time. That will show you just how shallow they are.
It was the Republican Party that stood against slavery. No amount of revisionist history will change that.
Fact Finder wrote:It was the Republican Party that stood against slavery. No amount of revisionist history will change that.
Lula wrote:Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:yeah cuz only poor people voted for obama, or 75% of the obama voters are poor, the other 25% not so much maybe.
That's exactly the way I read it. You'd almost have to be a poor, uneducated dumbfuck driving a 1982 Pinto to vote for that fuckhead.3 out 4 seems about right. But, fear not, Lula, you're the other "one."
yeahc cuz you know i don't drive a pinto!
lol...I was only in your car for 5 seconds. It looked nice though!![]()
![]()
Next time, Lu. And I think that next time might be for the New Year.
Dog track?
dog track? like chasing the electronic bunny? where? i would love to see you and spend some time together. wyatt has changed so much since you saw him last.
Fact Finder wrote:Rick wrote:Saint John wrote:Rick wrote:[ The Republican ticket offered less. McCain and Palin?
I beg to differ. You had a war hero and a Governor that had the country's finest run state. A state where people got money back at the end of the year because the budget was run so well. Biden doesn't know when fucking TV was invented and Obama was a street hood that hung around with domestic terrorists, racist, American-hating pastors and was deeply embedded in ACORN. The choice, while neither side offered a compelling team, was still quite easy.
He has credentials, she has none. That being said, after GWB, there was no other choice. He damaged the party beyond repair at that point.
Remember me when this happens. The Republican party WILL have a minority on the ticket next time. That will show you just how shallow they are.
It was the Republican Party that stood against slavery. No amount of revisionist history will change that.
Rick wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Rick wrote:Saint John wrote:Rick wrote:[ The Republican ticket offered less. McCain and Palin?
I beg to differ. You had a war hero and a Governor that had the country's finest run state. A state where people got money back at the end of the year because the budget was run so well. Biden doesn't know when fucking TV was invented and Obama was a street hood that hung around with domestic terrorists, racist, American-hating pastors and was deeply embedded in ACORN. The choice, while neither side offered a compelling team, was still quite easy.
He has credentials, she has none. That being said, after GWB, there was no other choice. He damaged the party beyond repair at that point.
Remember me when this happens. The Republican party WILL have a minority on the ticket next time. That will show you just how shallow they are.
It was the Republican Party that stood against slavery. No amount of revisionist history will change that.
Can't argue with that, but it does not, in any way, translate to what the party has become. You want me to respect it now, then fix it. It's, right now, sitting over in the dark corner of the warehouse, labeled "Hazardous Material".![]()
Ehwmatt wrote:The two party system is broken and a laughingstock.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:The two party system is broken and a laughingstock.
What would you suggest we do?
Any effort to get big money out of politics run into free speech issues (see Mccain Feingold).
For now, third parties only stand a chance at the local level.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:What would you suggest we do?
Ehwmatt wrote:Therein lies the problem - there is nothing that can be done. That's why I fear we are going to be hurting for a LONG time to come. The system is so entrenched. I don't think I'll ever see a third party with a legitimate shot at a national level in my lifetime... certainly not a fourth or even fifth party.
Rick wrote:In short, the 'right wing' promotes drug trafficking.
Fact Finder wrote:Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize......Fact Finder throws up...what a joke the Peace Prize has become...
OCTOBER SURPRISE: OBAMA WINS NOBEL PEACE PRIZE...
MIXED REVIEWS; 'EMBARRASSING JOKE'...
PAPER: This makes mockery of peace prize...
White House Aide: 'It's Not April 1st, Is It?'...Analysis: He won, but for what?
By JENNIFER LOVEN,
AP White House Correspondent – 1 hr 14 mins ago
WASHINGTON – The awarding of the Nobel Peace Price to President Barack Obama landed with a shock on darkened, still-asleep Washington. He won! For what?
For one of America's youngest presidents, in office less than nine months — and only for 12 days before the Nobel nomination deadline last February — it was an enormous honor.
The prize seems to be more for Obama's promise than for his performance. Work on the president's ambitious agenda, both at home and abroad, is barely underway, much less finished. He has no standout moment of victory that would seem to warrant a verdict as sweeping as that issued by the Nobel committee.
And what about peace? Obama is running two wars in the Muslim world — in Iraq and Afghanistan — and can't get a climate change bill through his own Congress.
His scorecard for the year is largely an "incomplete," if he's being graded.
He banned torture and other extreme interrogation techniques for terrorists. But he also promised to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a source of much distaste for the U.S. around the world, a difficult task that now seems headed to miss his own January 2010 deadline.
He said he would end the Iraq war. But he has been slow to bring the troops home and the real end of the U.S. military presence there won't come until at least 2012, and that's only if both the U.S. and Iraq stick to their current agreement about American troop withdrawals.
He has pushed for new efforts to make peace between the Israelis and Palestinians. But he's received little cooperation from the two sides.
He said he wants a nuclear-free world. But it's one thing to telegraph the desire, in a speech in Prague in April, and quite another to unite other nations and U.S. lawmakers behind the web of treaties and agreements needed to make that reality.
He has said that battling climate change is a priority. But the U.S. seems likely to head into crucial international negotiations set for Copenhagen in December with legislation still stalled in Congress.
And what about Obama's global prestige? It seemed to take a big hit last week when he jetted across the Atlantic to lobby for Chicago to get the 2016 Olympics — and was rejected with a last-place finish.
Rick wrote:If you continue to let the 'right wing' have control, you have bigger and bigger business, paying their employees as little as possible. What you wind up with is the rich and the poor. Happy rich motherfuckers and poor, pissed off, looting, stealing motherfuckers. selling methamphetamines to feed their kids.
If you let the 'left wing' have control, you still have big business, but they are paying their employees a decent wage, who are not looting, stealing, selling drugs, and ultimately, living a decent life.
In short, the 'right wing' promotes drug traficking.![]()
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests