Religion & Morality

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby conversationpc » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:55 pm

S2M wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
S2M wrote:10 pages...and I have not heard one believer even ask any non-believer the reasons why they don't believe. Granted, I have offered a few...but my answers weren't all inclusive. No offense, but i do find the religious a bit defensive, and sensitive.....


We haven't had to ask...Half of this thread has been about why Rip doesn't believe any longer, not to mention that we've heard both yours and Rip's comments about this before. Why would we ask if we've been discussing it here ad infitum.

BTW...As for being "a bit defensive and sensitive", it just goes with what you guys have been posting here, especially comments like the non-religious are more intelligent than those with faith. When you make a statement like that or ask the questions you're asking and then double that up by claiming how ridiculous the answer is (you'd say it regardless of what the answer is) that tends to make the other person appear argumentative or defensive when it's really mostly from the set-up of how the question was asked in the first place.


Welcome to courtroom law 101....I hope you are taking notes. :wink:


How's your love of "In the Spirit of Things" coming along, btw? :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby artist4perry » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:02 pm

conversationpc wrote:
S2M wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
S2M wrote:10 pages...and I have not heard one believer even ask any non-believer the reasons why they don't believe. Granted, I have offered a few...but my answers weren't all inclusive. No offense, but i do find the religious a bit defensive, and sensitive.....


We haven't had to ask...Half of this thread has been about why Rip doesn't believe any longer, not to mention that we've heard both yours and Rip's comments about this before. Why would we ask if we've been discussing it here ad infitum.

BTW...As for being "a bit defensive and sensitive", it just goes with what you guys have been posting here, especially comments like the non-religious are more intelligent than those with faith. When you make a statement like that or ask the questions you're asking and then double that up by claiming how ridiculous the answer is (you'd say it regardless of what the answer is) that tends to make the other person appear argumentative or defensive when it's really mostly from the set-up of how the question was asked in the first place.


Welcome to courtroom law 101....I hope you are taking notes. :wink:


How's your love of "In the Spirit of Things" coming along, btw? :lol:


I just think he needs to fix that scratch in his broken record. I think he forgets we already talked about this at the beginning. I mean how many times can you go over the same thing really? :wink: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Rip Rokken » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:44 pm

Duncan wrote:Just remembered. The Ledge. Don't know if it's any good.


Ahh, looks brand new - wonder if it's out on DVD yet? Sounds interesting!

Plot: The Ledge (2011)
Foresight
A thriller in which a battle of philosophies between a fundamentalist Christian and an atheist escalates into a lethal battle of wills. Ultimately, as a test of faith, or lack of it, the believer forces the non-believer onto the ledge of a tall building. He then has one hour to make a choice between his own life and someone else's. Without faith in an afterlife, will he be capable of such a sacrifice?
Image
User avatar
Rip Rokken
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9203
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Location: Vadokken City

Postby Arianddu » Thu Aug 04, 2011 4:28 pm

artist4perry wrote: I mean how many times can you go over the same thing really? :wink: :lol:


Depends on the topic. Steve Perry's perfect hair? 93,471 times. Whether or not Steve Perry can still sing? Can't tell you, the counter is ticking over too fast to read. ;)
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Postby Greg » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:02 am

S2M wrote:I'll use this example again. I've never seen an amputee miraculously grow a new limb...and I'm sure they've prayed to 'god' for new ones. So either praying is useless, or 'god' just hates amputees..


Assumption isn't fact.

S2M wrote:And more to your point about existence before essense - astronomers can see the effects of blacks holes without actually observing the black hole itself. So I think that religious types uses unexplained phenomena to actually 'prove' the existence of a supreme being. They claim to see the effects of him...thus moving to the conclusion that he must exist.


Your black hole analogy doesn't match with your argument. We already have proof that black holes exist, so knowing this, there would be no mystery to their effects. Personally, I think it's a bunch of whoo haaa that one day, this "big bang" came about and just happened to make a perfectly livable planet in which all living things on the planet happened to have their own unique DNA code as if it was all carefully planned out. The nonreligious speak of being more intelligent than the religious, yet they would believe all of this stuff happened because of an accident? Come on! I actually believe it would take much more faith to believe in that than to believe that there was a supreme being that carefully plotted out a plan for all of this.
User avatar
Greg
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2317
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:16 am
Location: Stealth Mode

Postby artist4perry » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:22 am

Arianddu wrote:
artist4perry wrote: I mean how many times can you go over the same thing really? :wink: :lol:


Depends on the topic. Steve Perry's perfect hair? 93,471 times. Whether or not Steve Perry can still sing? Can't tell you, the counter is ticking over too fast to read. ;)


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby S2M » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:31 am

Your black hole analogy doesn't match with your argument. We already have proof that black holes exist, so knowing this, there would be no mystery to their effects. Personally, I think it's a bunch of whoo haaa that one day, this "big bang" came about and just happened to make a perfectly livable planet in which all living things on the planet happened to have their own unique DNA code as if it was all carefully planned out. The nonreligious speak of being more intelligent than the religious, yet they would believe all of this stuff happened because of an accident? Come on! I actually believe it would take much more faith to believe in that than to believe that there was a supreme being that carefully plotted out a plan for all of this.

Greg, all this...and then you have a sig like that?
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby conversationpc » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:32 am

Greg wrote:Personally, I think it's a bunch of whoo haaa that one day, this "big bang" came about and just happened to make a perfectly livable planet in which all living things on the planet happened to have their own unique DNA code as if it was all carefully planned out.


The structure of DNA and the "machines" that do the work in cells in the body is simply amazing. If you've ever seen an animation of what looks like manufactured machinery in our cells doing all the work behind the scenes, it's really mind-blowing.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby parfait » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:55 am

Greg wrote:
S2M wrote:I'll use this example again. I've never seen an amputee miraculously grow a new limb...and I'm sure they've prayed to 'god' for new ones. So either praying is useless, or 'god' just hates amputees..


Assumption isn't fact.

S2M wrote:And more to your point about existence before essense - astronomers can see the effects of blacks holes without actually observing the black hole itself. So I think that religious types uses unexplained phenomena to actually 'prove' the existence of a supreme being. They claim to see the effects of him...thus moving to the conclusion that he must exist.


Your black hole analogy doesn't match with your argument. We already have proof that black holes exist, so knowing this, there would be no mystery to their effects. Personally, I think it's a bunch of whoo haaa that one day, this "big bang" came about and just happened to make a perfectly livable planet in which all living things on the planet happened to have their own unique DNA code as if it was all carefully planned out. The nonreligious speak of being more intelligent than the religious, yet they would believe all of this stuff happened because of an accident? Come on! I actually believe it would take much more faith to believe in that than to believe that there was a supreme being that carefully plotted out a plan for all of this.


The Big Bang model is well established in cosmology. Modern science, particularly quantum physics, which in some respect seems more confusing the more one studies it, continues to shed light on earlier hypotheses. String theory, loop quantum gravity, and causal sets will in the future give answer to the early timeline of the BB. The Big bang isn't based on faith and hunches, in comparison to whatever mumbo jumbo you might think happened. Just because you reject the evidence, doesn't make your "theory" (or lack thereof) correct.

You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.
User avatar
parfait
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:38 pm
Location: France

Postby conversationpc » Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:05 am

parfait wrote:You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


[sarcasm]Yeah, you're right...Only religious people have agendas.[/sarcasm]
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby S2M » Fri Aug 05, 2011 5:59 am

conversationpc wrote:
parfait wrote:You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


[sarcasm]Yeah, you're right...Only religious people have agendas.[/sarcasm]


Religion, as a whole, has an agenda. To control people. It's rather obvious. The Catholic church is the largest landowner in the world...pass the basket, the school needs a new roof for the 4th time this decade....church frowns on gambling? Please attend Bingo, Saturday evening at 7pm...entertainment provided by Big Black Caddy & The Pedophiles....the church even has reciprocal employment with other dioceses...Father Copafeel's feelin the heat, no worries...he can take advantage of the lateral transfer system. Witness Protection Program for Priests....Who's your daddy now?
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby conversationpc » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:07 am

S2M wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
parfait wrote:You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


[sarcasm]Yeah, you're right...Only religious people have agendas.[/sarcasm]


Religion, as a whole, has an agenda. To control people. It's rather obvious. The Catholic church is the largest landowner in the world...pass the basket, the school needs a new roof for the 4th time this decade....church frowns on gambling? Please attend Bingo, Saturday evening at 7pm...entertainment provided by Big Black Caddy & The Pedophiles....the church even has reciprocal employment with other dioceses...Father Copafeel's feelin the heat, no worries...he can take advantage of the lateral transfer system. Witness Protection Program for Priests....Who's your daddy now?


You guys keep bringing up Catholicism as if you think you're scoring points against me. I'm not Catholic. I'm not an apologist for the Catholic church and, in fact, have many things against it.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby S2M » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:15 am

conversationpc wrote:
S2M wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
parfait wrote:You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


[sarcasm]Yeah, you're right...Only religious people have agendas.[/sarcasm]


Religion, as a whole, has an agenda. To control people. It's rather obvious. The Catholic church is the largest landowner in the world...pass the basket, the school needs a new roof for the 4th time this decade....church frowns on gambling? Please attend Bingo, Saturday evening at 7pm...entertainment provided by Big Black Caddy & The Pedophiles....the church even has reciprocal employment with other dioceses...Father Copafeel's feelin the heat, no worries...he can take advantage of the lateral transfer system. Witness Protection Program for Priests....Who's your daddy now?


You guys keep bringing up Catholicism as if you think you're scoring points against me. I'm not Catholic. I'm not an apologist for the Catholic church and, in fact, have many things against it.


Catholicism IS a religion, Dave...and I'm not trying to score points. These people are doing things in the name of religion....the terrorists are doing things in the name of religion. Syria, Palestine, and Israel do things in the name of religion....religion is the cause of quite a lot of strife in the world...don't worry, I'm an equal opportunity contrarian....I just happen to be on Catholics today....
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby conversationpc » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:26 am

S2M wrote:
conversationpc wrote:You guys keep bringing up Catholicism as if you think you're scoring points against me. I'm not Catholic. I'm not an apologist for the Catholic church and, in fact, have many things against it.


Catholicism IS a religion, Dave...and I'm not trying to score points. These people are doing things in the name of religion....the terrorists are doing things in the name of religion. Syria, Palestine, and Israel do things in the name of religion....religion is the cause of quite a lot of strife in the world...don't worry, I'm an equal opportunity contrarian....I just happen to be on Catholics today....


I didn't say Catholicism wasn't a religion. It is. I don't agree with it.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby artist4perry » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:20 pm

conversationpc wrote:
parfait wrote:You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


[sarcasm]Yeah, you're right...Only religious people have agendas.[/sarcasm]


Dave, don't feed the troll. Read my sig again. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby S2M » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:40 pm

artist4perry wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
parfait wrote:You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


[sarcasm]Yeah, you're right...Only religious people have agendas.[/sarcasm]


Dave, don't feed the troll. Read my sig again. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Sweeping in for that wry okeefanokee whimsy, I see....
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby artist4perry » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:43 pm

S2M wrote:
artist4perry wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
parfait wrote:You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


[sarcasm]Yeah, you're right...Only religious people have agendas.[/sarcasm]


Dave, don't feed the troll. Read my sig again. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Sweeping in for that wry okeefanokee whimsy, I see....


Gotta love us southern chicks. LOL! :wink: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby verslibre » Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:37 pm

conversationpc wrote:
S2M wrote:
conversationpc wrote:You guys keep bringing up Catholicism as if you think you're scoring points against me. I'm not Catholic. I'm not an apologist for the Catholic church and, in fact, have many things against it.


Catholicism IS a religion, Dave...and I'm not trying to score points. These people are doing things in the name of religion....the terrorists are doing things in the name of religion. Syria, Palestine, and Israel do things in the name of religion....religion is the cause of quite a lot of strife in the world...don't worry, I'm an equal opportunity contrarian....I just happen to be on Catholics today....


I didn't say Catholicism wasn't a religion. It is. I don't agree with it.


Because it doesn't promote Rapture theory, or...? Just curious.
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby conversationpc » Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:31 pm

verslibre wrote:
conversationpc wrote:I didn't say Catholicism wasn't a religion. It is. I don't agree with it.


Because it doesn't promote Rapture theory, or...? Just curious.


No, it has nothing to do with that. I'm not a fan of salvation by works, worship of Mary, purgatory, confession to a priest, etc., etc., etc.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby RedWingFan » Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:13 am

conversationpc wrote:
verslibre wrote:
conversationpc wrote:I didn't say Catholicism wasn't a religion. It is. I don't agree with it.


Because it doesn't promote Rapture theory, or...? Just curious.


No, it has nothing to do with that. I'm not a fan of salvation by works, worship of Mary, purgatory, confession to a priest, etc., etc., etc.

Christianity isn't a religion!
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Postby S2M » Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:21 am

RedWingFan wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
verslibre wrote:
conversationpc wrote:I didn't say Catholicism wasn't a religion. It is. I don't agree with it.


Because it doesn't promote Rapture theory, or...? Just curious.


No, it has nothing to do with that. I'm not a fan of salvation by works, worship of Mary, purgatory, confession to a priest, etc., etc., etc.

Christianity isn't a religion!


Ever since the 1st Century....brush up on your Nicene Creed.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby conversationpc » Sat Aug 06, 2011 2:51 am

RedWingFan wrote:
conversationpc wrote:No, it has nothing to do with that. I'm not a fan of salvation by works, worship of Mary, purgatory, confession to a priest, etc., etc., etc.

Christianity isn't a religion!


I think I know where you're going with that but still, yes, it is a religion.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Greg » Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:01 am

parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:
S2M wrote:I'll use this example again. I've never seen an amputee miraculously grow a new limb...and I'm sure they've prayed to 'god' for new ones. So either praying is useless, or 'god' just hates amputees..


Assumption isn't fact.

S2M wrote:And more to your point about existence before essense - astronomers can see the effects of blacks holes without actually observing the black hole itself. So I think that religious types uses unexplained phenomena to actually 'prove' the existence of a supreme being. They claim to see the effects of him...thus moving to the conclusion that he must exist.


Your black hole analogy doesn't match with your argument. We already have proof that black holes exist, so knowing this, there would be no mystery to their effects. Personally, I think it's a bunch of whoo haaa that one day, this "big bang" came about and just happened to make a perfectly livable planet in which all living things on the planet happened to have their own unique DNA code as if it was all carefully planned out. The nonreligious speak of being more intelligent than the religious, yet they would believe all of this stuff happened because of an accident? Come on! I actually believe it would take much more faith to believe in that than to believe that there was a supreme being that carefully plotted out a plan for all of this.


The Big Bang model is well established in cosmology. Modern science, particularly quantum physics, which in some respect seems more confusing the more one studies it, continues to shed light on earlier hypotheses. String theory, loop quantum gravity, and causal sets will in the future give answer to the early timeline of the BB. The Big bang isn't based on faith and hunches, in comparison to whatever mumbo jumbo you might think happened. Just because you reject the evidence, doesn't make your "theory" (or lack thereof) correct.

You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


No, I don't have any agenda. I'm just merely pointing out the fact that at some point, whether if you're one who follows science strictly, or one who follows the idea of creationism, you have to put your faith in one or the other...and in some cases both. Science itself is probably just as much faith-based as anything else. Maybe not in the religious sense, but nevertheless, faith based. And you're right, just because I reject the big bang theory does not make me correct, nor does it make me incorrect.
User avatar
Greg
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2317
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:16 am
Location: Stealth Mode

Postby parfait » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:28 am

Greg wrote:
parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:
S2M wrote:I'll use this example again. I've never seen an amputee miraculously grow a new limb...and I'm sure they've prayed to 'god' for new ones. So either praying is useless, or 'god' just hates amputees..


Assumption isn't fact.

S2M wrote:And more to your point about existence before essense - astronomers can see the effects of blacks holes without actually observing the black hole itself. So I think that religious types uses unexplained phenomena to actually 'prove' the existence of a supreme being. They claim to see the effects of him...thus moving to the conclusion that he must exist.


Your black hole analogy doesn't match with your argument. We already have proof that black holes exist, so knowing this, there would be no mystery to their effects. Personally, I think it's a bunch of whoo haaa that one day, this "big bang" came about and just happened to make a perfectly livable planet in which all living things on the planet happened to have their own unique DNA code as if it was all carefully planned out. The nonreligious speak of being more intelligent than the religious, yet they would believe all of this stuff happened because of an accident? Come on! I actually believe it would take much more faith to believe in that than to believe that there was a supreme being that carefully plotted out a plan for all of this.


The Big Bang model is well established in cosmology. Modern science, particularly quantum physics, which in some respect seems more confusing the more one studies it, continues to shed light on earlier hypotheses. String theory, loop quantum gravity, and causal sets will in the future give answer to the early timeline of the BB. The Big bang isn't based on faith and hunches, in comparison to whatever mumbo jumbo you might think happened. Just because you reject the evidence, doesn't make your "theory" (or lack thereof) correct.

You have a religious agenda. That's fine. Just keep your opinions away from places where evidence and observations are trusted more than scribblings in a fairytale book.


No, I don't have any agenda. I'm just merely pointing out the fact that at some point, whether if you're one who follows science strictly, or one who follows the idea of creationism, you have to put your faith in one or the other...and in some cases both. Science itself is probably just as much faith-based as anything else. Maybe not in the religious sense, but nevertheless, faith based. And you're right, just because I reject the big bang theory does not make me correct, nor does it make me incorrect.


Again: science isn't faith-based, but the complete opposite. One doesn't really need faith when one got the observations and evidence. Creationism is just pseudo-scientific bullshit created with an agenda in mind; the downplaying of reason and science. The crap about science requiring faith has been regurgitated by the religious side for years (incidentally the side which is far less educated.). I can't imagine how the level of irony of sitting in an air conditioned home built by skilled architects, engineers (both electrical and mechanical), surveyors, construction workers, etc. is 100% missed by the people making the “science requires faith” argument. Science doesn't require faith, because without the absolutes of science our modern societies would never work. Your argument is pretty much just garbage.

Regarding your last statement: rejecting the big bang theory most likely makes you correct in some circles (religious and uneducated), but in the world of reason, rationality and science, then you're dead, motherfucking, incorrect. Most enlightened people, including myself, prefers to side with the latter.
User avatar
parfait
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:38 pm
Location: France

Postby Gideon » Sat Aug 06, 2011 8:42 am

I think what Greg is trying to get at is that science is incomplete in that we do not yet have a definite scientific answer for everything. It's not all-encompassing or infallible.

Consider that Plato and Aristotle, two of the most highly regarded minds in history, helped bring the now obsolete geocentric cosmology to prominence until we later discovered that they were, to borrow your phrase, "dead motherfucking incorrect."
'Nothing was bigger for Journey than 1981’s “Escape” album. “I have to attribute that to Jonathan coming in and joining the writing team,” Steve Perry (Feb 2012).'
User avatar
Gideon
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4560
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:12 am
Location: Kentucky.

Postby Rick » Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:35 am

I agree Gideon, siding with creationism doesn't mean someone has an agenda. Unless that agenda is truth seeking. People just want to know how we got here and why we're here. Science can't fully explain either. Their theories are nothing more than educated guesses. Nobody was here when the big bang happened to know whether that's what happened or not. It's a plausibility, but it leaves a lot of unanswered questions. One being, what was there before the big bang? Maybe it's a repetitive event. Maybe there have been uncountable big bangs. The bang happens and everything disperses until it's propulsive energy becomes zero and then it all begins to collapse back the point it started from and it starts over. Maybe there are dimensions that the human senses can't detect. Maybe there are explanations all around us that we are unable to sense because of that. But until someone throws down a blue print with all of the answers, it's ridiculous to cast aspersions on someone else because they don't believe what you do.
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby parfait » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:05 am

Rick wrote:I agree Gideon, siding with creationism doesn't mean someone has an agenda. Unless that agenda is truth seeking. People just want to know how we got here and why we're here. Science can't fully explain either. Their theories are nothing more than educated guesses. Nobody was here when the big bang happened to know whether that's what happened or not. It's a plausibility, but it leaves a lot of unanswered questions. One being, what was there before the big bang? Maybe it's a repetitive event. Maybe there have been uncountable big bangs. The bang happens and everything disperses until it's propulsive energy becomes zero and then it all begins to collapse back the point it started from and it starts over. Maybe there are dimensions that the human senses can't detect. Maybe there are explanations all around us that we are unable to sense because of that. But until someone throws down a blue print with all of the answers, it's ridiculous to cast aspersions on someone else because they don't believe what you do.


Cut the bullshit. Creationism was created by the church, to give some proof of God's creation. However; there's not one, not one piece of evidence pointing in creationism's way. Ask any scientists and they'll all tell you the same thing; it's nonsense, which, though given the chance, have never been able to produce any evidence through the scientific method. A scientific theory (way different from the colloquial use of the word theory) isn't an educated guess. The universe is expanding in an increasing rate, so your propulsive energy hypothesis doesn't work. Not to mention that the big bang wasn't an bang or explosion. Time was created in the Time Zero - the singularity of the Big Bang, so there was nothing before it. So was 3-dimensional space. This is all predicted with what is probably the 20th century's greatest and most accurate theory: the theory of general relativity.

We don't know anything yet, but science continues to do major breakthroughs every day. No rational person would then say; "since science can't answer anything, then I'll just believe in something which isn't supported by shit. Pass the Bible!" The religious do however suspend reason and then tries to defend it with pseudo-scientific ignorant mumbo jumbo.

I really should start charging for these online reason and science 101-classes.
User avatar
parfait
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:38 pm
Location: France

Postby Gideon » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:08 am

parfait wrote:We don't know anything yet,


Freudian slip? :lol:
'Nothing was bigger for Journey than 1981’s “Escape” album. “I have to attribute that to Jonathan coming in and joining the writing team,” Steve Perry (Feb 2012).'
User avatar
Gideon
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4560
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:12 am
Location: Kentucky.

Postby Don » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:09 am

Church and atheist clergy.

The Rev Klaas Hendrikse can offer his congregation little hope of life after death, and he's not the sort of man to sugar the pill.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14417362

An imposing figure in black robes and white clerical collar, Mr Hendrikse presides over the Sunday service at the Exodus Church in Gorinchem, central Holland.

It is part of the mainstream Protestant Church in the Netherlands (PKN), and the service is conventional enough, with hymns, readings from the Bible, and the Lord's Prayer. But the message from Mr Hendrikse's sermon seems bleak - "Make the most of life on earth, because it will probably be the only one you get".

"Personally I have no talent for believing in life after death," Mr Hendrikse says. "No, for me our life, our task, is before death."

Nor does Klaas Hendrikse believe that God exists at all as a supernatural thing.

"When it happens, it happens down to earth, between you and me, between people, that's where it can happen. God is not a being at all... it's a word for experience, or human experience."

Mr Hendrikse describes the Bible's account of Jesus's life as a mythological story about a man who may never have existed, even if it is a valuable source of wisdom about how to lead a good life.

His book Believing in a Non-Existent God led to calls from more traditionalist Christians for him to be removed. However, a special church meeting decided his views were too widely shared among church thinkers for him to be singled out.

A study by the Free University of Amsterdam found that one-in-six clergy in the PKN and six other smaller denominations was either agnostic or atheist.

The Rev Kirsten Slattenaar, Exodus Church's regular priest, also rejects the idea - widely considered central to Christianity - that Jesus was divine as well as human.

"I think 'Son of God' is a kind of title," she says. "I don't think he was a god or a half god. I think he was a man, but he was a special man because he was very good in living from out of love, from out of the spirit of God he found inside himself."

Mrs Slattenaar acknowledges that she's changing what the Church has said, but, she insists, not the "real meaning of Christianity".

She says that there "is not only one answer" and complains that "a lot of traditional beliefs are outside people and have grown into rigid things that you can't touch any more".

Dienie van Wingaarden, who's been going to Exodus Church for 20 years, is among lay people attracted to such free thinking.

"I think it's very liberating. [Klaas Hendrikse] is using the Bible in a metaphorical way so I can bring it to my own way of thinking, my own way of doing."

Wim De Jong says, "Here you can believe what you want to think for yourself, what you really feel and believe is true."

Churches in Amsterdam were hoping to attract such people with a recent open evening.

At the Old Church "in the hottest part of the red light district", the attractions included "speed-dating".

As skimpily dressed girls began to appear in red-lit windows in the streets outside, visitors to the church moved from table to table to discuss love with a succession of strangers.

Professor Hijme Stoeffels of the Free University in Amsterdam says it is in such concepts as love that people base their diffuse ideas of religion.

"In our society it's called 'somethingism'," he says. "There must be 'something' between heaven and earth, but to call it 'God', and even 'a personal God', for the majority of Dutch is a bridge too far.

"Christian churches are in a market situation. They can offer their ideas to a majority of the population which is interested in spirituality or some kind of religion."

To compete in this market of ideas, some Christian groups seem ready virtually to reinvent Christianity.

They want the Netherlands to be a laboratory for Christianity, experimenting with radical new ways of understanding the faith

Stroom ("Stream") West is the experiment devised by one church to reach out to the young people.

In an Amsterdam theatre young people contemplate the concept of eternity by spacing out a heap of rice grains individually across the floor.

"The difference from other churches is that we are… experimenting with the contents of the gospel," says Rikko Voorberg, who helps to run Stroom West. "Traditionally we bring a beautiful story and ask people to sit down listen and get convinced. This is the other way around."

Stroom focuses on people's personal search for God, not on the church's traditional black-and-white answers.

Rikko believes traditional Christianity places God in too restricted a box.

He believes that in a post-modern society that no longer has the same belief in certainty, there is an urgent need to "take God out of the box".

"The Church has to be alert to what is going on in society," he says. "It has to change to stay Christian. You can't preach heaven in the same way today as you did 2,000 years ago, and we have to think again what it is. We can use the same words and say something totally different."

When I asked Rikko whether he believed Jesus was the son of God he looked uncomfortable.

"That's a very tough question. I'm not sure what it means," he says.

"People have very strict ideas about what it means. Some ideas I might agree with, some ideas I don't."

Such equivocation is anathema in Holland's Bible Belt, among the large number of people who live according to strict Christian orthodoxy.

In the quiet town of Staphorst about a quarter of the population attends the conservative Dutch Reformed Church every Sunday.

The town even has a by-law against swearing.

Its deputy mayor, Sytse de Jong, accuses progressive groups of trying to change Christianity to fit current social norms.

"When we get people into the Church by throwing Jesus Christ out of the Church, then we lose the core of Christianity. Then we are not reforming the institutions and attitudes but the core of our message."

But many churches are keen to work with anyone who believes in "something".

They believe that only through adaptation can their religion survive.

The young people at Stroom West write on plates the names of those things that prevent earth from being heaven - cancer, war, hunger - and destroy them symbolically.

The new Christianity is already developing its own ritual.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby conversationpc » Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:11 am

parfait wrote:
Rick wrote:I agree Gideon, siding with creationism doesn't mean someone has an agenda. Unless that agenda is truth seeking. People just want to know how we got here and why we're here. Science can't fully explain either. Their theories are nothing more than educated guesses. Nobody was here when the big bang happened to know whether that's what happened or not. It's a plausibility, but it leaves a lot of unanswered questions. One being, what was there before the big bang? Maybe it's a repetitive event. Maybe there have been uncountable big bangs. The bang happens and everything disperses until it's propulsive energy becomes zero and then it all begins to collapse back the point it started from and it starts over. Maybe there are dimensions that the human senses can't detect. Maybe there are explanations all around us that we are unable to sense because of that. But until someone throws down a blue print with all of the answers, it's ridiculous to cast aspersions on someone else because they don't believe what you do.


Cut the bullshit. Creationism was created by the church, to give some proof of God's creation. However; there's not one, not one piece of evidence pointing in creationism's way. Ask any scientists and they'll all tell you the same thing; it's nonsense, which, though given the chance, have never been able to produce any evidence through the scientific method. A scientific theory (way different from the colloquial use of the word theory) isn't an educated guess. The universe is expanding in an increasing rate, so your propulsive energy hypothesis doesn't work. Not to mention that the big bang wasn't an bang or explosion. Time was created in the Time Zero - the singularity of the Big Bang, so there was nothing before it. So was 3-dimensional space. This is all predicted with what is probably the 20th century's greatest and most accurate theory: the theory of general relativity.

We don't know anything yet, but science continues to do major breakthroughs every day. No rational person would then say; "since science can't answer anything, then I'll just believe in something which isn't supported by shit. Pass the Bible!" The religious do however suspend reason and then tries to defend it with pseudo-scientific ignorant mumbo jumbo.

I really should start charging for these online reason and science 101-classes.


This is rich...The forum's resident numbskull attempting to school someone of supposed lesser intelligence. I've seen it all now. :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests