verslibre wrote:It's your nickel.
You don't have to poll the theater when everybody next to you and in front of you starts looking at each other and laughing.

Uh-huh.

You truly expect me to believe that audiences are willing to suspend disbelief over judo-practicing vampire hunters, but somehow draw the line at creatures with protractable jaws? Oooookaaay. It's a monster movie. Sounds like your entourage needs to lighten up, or maybe go re-watch The King's Speech again. Blade 2 was a critical and fan favorite. Part 3 was a turkey, featuring an urbanized version of Dracula wearing gold chains, that looked more like the general manager at a Gold's gym. You may hate Blade 2 - personally I've never seen a
bad Del Toro movie - but your opinion is in the minority.
verslibre wrote:Right. Who cares, except you liked it enough to pay to see it four times.
I enjoyed it. I did not demand a refund due to monster prosthetics that may or may not have been inspired by HR Giger's work in Predator. You could make the argument that the entire film is derivative of Bram Stoker and that Marvel owe's the Stoker estate back royalties. Or, you could act normally, sit back, and enjoy the ride.