you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.


I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days

Moderator: Andrew
Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick. I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
Behshad wrote:I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Saint John wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick. I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
I did, for the most, too.Behshad wrote:I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
You lying bastard!
SherriBerry wrote:Rick wrote:They're like 25 bucks at the pet store.
No disrespect to any pet lovers, but I just don't get it. Sorry Scary.
I see people on my friends list on Facebook that absolutely flood the page with "This dog will be euthanized at some certain time if someone doesn't adopt it" and so on.
I look at these posts and am completely baffled. How in hell can you put this much energy into worrying about what some dog's fate is going to be when there are people in the world that need help. Beats the hell out of me.
Of all of the people who post on here, I didn't expect this from you. You're usually one of the first to stand up for others, not kick someone when they are down and in pain. Just because you "don't get it" and don't understand why someone would love their pet so much is no excuse.
Until we had a dog of our own, my dad was old school and didn't understand it either - how someone could love their pet as a family member and would be willing to pay $1500 to save it. There is no question now that he would. Until you really look at a pet as an individual with its own personality who loves you unconditionally, you probably won't understand it. And yes, it is worth the long hours I would have to work to save $1500 if it meant saving my beloved dog's life. She is irreplaceable.
As for how people can be so concerned for animals when there are humans who need help - just because someone is trying to help animals does not mean they do not also care about and help humans. Humans have always been in need and suffering somewhere, so the idea that we cannot help animals until every human is squared away and taken care of is ridiculous. Perhaps if you are so concerned about the fate of humans, it might have behooved you to be the person who posted a thread about Somalia and found some way to help those people, instead of a thread belittling another person's pain and insulting others over something you "just don't get".
Rick wrote:SherriBerry wrote:Rick wrote:They're like 25 bucks at the pet store.
No disrespect to any pet lovers, but I just don't get it. Sorry Scary.
I see people on my friends list on Facebook that absolutely flood the page with "This dog will be euthanized at some certain time if someone doesn't adopt it" and so on.
I look at these posts and am completely baffled. How in hell can you put this much energy into worrying about what some dog's fate is going to be when there are people in the world that need help. Beats the hell out of me.
Of all of the people who post on here, I didn't expect this from you. You're usually one of the first to stand up for others, not kick someone when they are down and in pain. Just because you "don't get it" and don't understand why someone would love their pet so much is no excuse.
Until we had a dog of our own, my dad was old school and didn't understand it either - how someone could love their pet as a family member and would be willing to pay $1500 to save it. There is no question now that he would. Until you really look at a pet as an individual with its own personality who loves you unconditionally, you probably won't understand it. And yes, it is worth the long hours I would have to work to save $1500 if it meant saving my beloved dog's life. She is irreplaceable.
As for how people can be so concerned for animals when there are humans who need help - just because someone is trying to help animals does not mean they do not also care about and help humans. Humans have always been in need and suffering somewhere, so the idea that we cannot help animals until every human is squared away and taken care of is ridiculous. Perhaps if you are so concerned about the fate of humans, it might have behooved you to be the person who posted a thread about Somalia and found some way to help those people, instead of a thread belittling another person's pain and insulting others over something you "just don't get".
We have a dog, two cats, two parakeets and a fish in this 850 square foot apartment. I assure you, we be family.
I'm not trying to hurt Scary Girl or make light of her loss, I think she's a top notch person. I hope she gets another one and that will make her feel a lot better. I don't care if she starts a thread or two on here about it either, but the chick on Facebook that floods page after page with shelter animals is a bit much.
DrFU wrote:These "hierarchy of tragedy" debates make me grind my teeth.
Plenty of shit, slime, and suffering to go around ... pick something that moves you and try to make it better ...
DrFU wrote:These "hierarchy of tragedy" debates make me grind my teeth.
Plenty of shit, slime, and suffering to go around ... pick something that moves you and try to make it better ...
StevePerryHair wrote:Rick wrote:SherriBerry wrote:Rick wrote:They're like 25 bucks at the pet store.
No disrespect to any pet lovers, but I just don't get it. Sorry Scary.
I see people on my friends list on Facebook that absolutely flood the page with "This dog will be euthanized at some certain time if someone doesn't adopt it" and so on.
I look at these posts and am completely baffled. How in hell can you put this much energy into worrying about what some dog's fate is going to be when there are people in the world that need help. Beats the hell out of me.
Of all of the people who post on here, I didn't expect this from you. You're usually one of the first to stand up for others, not kick someone when they are down and in pain. Just because you "don't get it" and don't understand why someone would love their pet so much is no excuse.
Until we had a dog of our own, my dad was old school and didn't understand it either - how someone could love their pet as a family member and would be willing to pay $1500 to save it. There is no question now that he would. Until you really look at a pet as an individual with its own personality who loves you unconditionally, you probably won't understand it. And yes, it is worth the long hours I would have to work to save $1500 if it meant saving my beloved dog's life. She is irreplaceable.
As for how people can be so concerned for animals when there are humans who need help - just because someone is trying to help animals does not mean they do not also care about and help humans. Humans have always been in need and suffering somewhere, so the idea that we cannot help animals until every human is squared away and taken care of is ridiculous. Perhaps if you are so concerned about the fate of humans, it might have behooved you to be the person who posted a thread about Somalia and found some way to help those people, instead of a thread belittling another person's pain and insulting others over something you "just don't get".
We have a dog, two cats, two parakeets and a fish in this 850 square foot apartment. I assure you, we be family.
I'm not trying to hurt Scary Girl or make light of her loss, I think she's a top notch person. I hope she gets another one and that will make her feel a lot better. I don't care if she starts a thread or two on here about it either, but the chick on Facebook that floods page after page with shelter animals is a bit much.
My son wants a parakeet so bad.... I have no clue why!I am against it, but he just keeps pleading his case for one! He swears they aren't noisy birds... is this true? Or is he trying to make them sound like the perfect pet? We have no pets!
Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
![]()
I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
![]()
I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Don't be, they create anywhere from 60,000 to 80,000 new ones every day. Besides, who else is god going to get to work on his big plantation in the sky?
Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
![]()
I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Don't be, they create anywhere from 60,000 to 80,000 new ones every day. Besides, who else is god going to get to work on his big plantation in the sky?
And they create 10 times more than that in the animal kingdom. You lose again.
Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
![]()
I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Don't be, they create anywhere from 60,000 to 80,000 new ones every day. Besides, who else is god going to get to work on his big plantation in the sky?
Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
![]()
I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Don't be, they create anywhere from 60,000 to 80,000 new ones every day. Besides, who else is god going to get to work on his big plantation in the sky?
And they create 10 times more than that in the animal kingdom. You lose again.
Why would I lose, I wasn't the one crying about my cat.
Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
![]()
I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Don't be, they create anywhere from 60,000 to 80,000 new ones every day. Besides, who else is god going to get to work on his big plantation in the sky?
And they create 10 times more than that in the animal kingdom. You lose again.
Why would I lose, I wasn't the one crying about my cat.
But you are the one who basically implied that human life is dime a dozen
Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
![]()
I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Don't be, they create anywhere from 60,000 to 80,000 new ones every day. Besides, who else is god going to get to work on his big plantation in the sky?
And they create 10 times more than that in the animal kingdom. You lose again.
Why would I lose, I wasn't the one crying about my cat.
But you are the one who basically implied that human life is dime a dozen
It is, in a sense. When you have an over abundance, you cut back on production. In nature, a natural culling of the herd occurs or we do it artificially ourselves. In a place where there is no industry, no food substance there will inevitably be checks and balances in keeping the population manageable, just like in the animal kingdom. Instead of sending hunters out to bring down the numbers, we do the opposite when it comes to humans and just leave that overpopulated area to fend for itself and it usually lowers the numbers on its own every few years.
Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Don wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.I think he made a great point and I totally agree with him.
![]()
I'm more sad about the 29000+ children that have died in Africa the last 90 days
Don't be, they create anywhere from 60,000 to 80,000 new ones every day. Besides, who else is god going to get to work on his big plantation in the sky?
And they create 10 times more than that in the animal kingdom. You lose again.
Why would I lose, I wasn't the one crying about my cat.
But you are the one who basically implied that human life is dime a dozen
It is, in a sense. When you have an over abundance, you cut back on production. In nature, a natural culling of the herd occurs or we do it artificially ourselves. In a place where there is no industry, no food substance there will inevitably be checks and balances in keeping the population manageable, just like in the animal kingdom. Instead of sending hunters out to bring down the numbers, we do the opposite when it comes to humans and just leave that overpopulated area to fend for itself and it usually lowers the numbers on its own every few years.
So we have the money to make sure that animals dont go hungry and stay protected, yet kids starving.
Behshad wrote:So we have the money to make sure that animals dont go hungry and stay protected, yet kids starving.
Rick wrote:
Can't argue with that. I just don't see pouring money down the drain by taking an animal in for an expensive surgery or whatnot. You're going to have to get a new one sooner than later anyway. They don't live that long. We already spend plenty on food for these animals and cat litter.
Saint John wrote:Rick wrote:
Can't argue with that. I just don't see pouring money down the drain by taking an animal in for an expensive surgery or whatnot. You're going to have to get a new one sooner than later anyway. They don't live that long. We already spend plenty on food for these animals and cat litter.
While I pretty much agree with you, I think it's ultimately up to the owner to decide whether they're "pouring money down the drain." Besides, we do the same every day with welfare recipients, and a good amount of them aren't worth the salt on a dog's nuts.
verslibre wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.
You could say the same for a couple people in the religion thread, but I don't see you speaking for them there.
verslibre wrote:Behshad wrote:So we have the money to make sure that animals dont go hungry and stay protected, yet kids starving.
Nobody is forcing you to do anything.
Curiously, how are your own efforts to do something for hungry disadvantaged children coming along? Or are you just babbling?
Behshad wrote:verslibre wrote:Behshad wrote:Wow,
you guys totally gangbanged poor Rick.
You could say the same for a couple people in the religion thread, but I don't see you speaking for them there.
Thats more like an ongoing battle back and forth between two sides. Not one against 100 !![]()
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests