steveo777 wrote:JRNYMAN wrote:That's my biggest issue with live news coverage of events like this. On the one hand, you're happy and appreciative of the technology that allows everyone to get real time status reports literally as it happens. On the other hand, every news agency fights to be THE source for info and will sensationalize the slightest detail and put the most ridiculous spin on something so they can say they were the exclusive source for this and that. The sentimentalization of anything and everything - including situations which are literally life and death has created a news media monster that has become agonizing and unreliable.scarygirl wrote:Rick wrote:scarygirl wrote:Typical drama, yawn, yawn..... It has been downgraded to a storm. Are you kidding me? I have seen worse during a routine thunderstorm. Looks more like a regular rainstorm to me.
My daughter lives in Norfolk, and she said the same thing.
It is kind of like, okay, they keep talking about the darn CRANE collapse. Really, you don't think we got that the first 1200 times it was reported? Someone wake me when the Wicked Witch of the West shows up, okay?
+1
Yet, they won't cover what happened in Benghazi, to the extent it needs to be covered, to let the American people know that they have been shammed by Obama.
Oh fuck yourself. They're covering a major catastrophe as its approaching our country and its already killed more people than Benghazi. You want live coverage from the past from something that can't be undone , instead of live coverage of what's happening and updates and warning to try to save more people?
The only reason YOU really want more info about Benghazi is cause you hate Obama. Shame on you and thousands like you who are always hoping for the failure of their president , you pathetic piece of shit.
