Moderator: Andrew
slucero wrote:Niners lose.. I think its almost time to call it a season for them.. Kaepernick did not look good.. at all.
Memorex wrote:slucero wrote:Niners lose.. I think its almost time to call it a season for them.. Kaepernick did not look good.. at all.
I think last week was time to call it. Today confirmed it. Maybe expectations were falsely high. Both top receivers out. And a QB in his first full year. Had he not done so well last year, no one would have thought this team should be a contender. Look at Green Bay. Everyone knows that without a healthy team, they are done. I think they can still hit a stride when Crabtree is back and in the system, but it's too late. No way to catch Seattle and other teams, like AZ, are hot.
The rest of this year should be spent on understanding what Kap can do, etc. We have quite a few draft picks next year as well. At least there is more hope than a few years ago.
Fact Finder wrote:
That looked nasty.
slucero wrote:Niners lose.. I think its almost time to call it a season for them.. Kaepernick did not look good.. at all.
Memorex wrote:Um, yea. Injuries have no affect on a team, said almost no one ever.
Enigma869 wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
That looked nasty.
Nowhere near as nasty as these horrid fucking uniforms! Someone...please stop allowing them to wear these shit shows![]()
![]()
Enigma869 wrote:Memorex wrote:Um, yea. Injuries have no affect on a team, said almost no one ever.
I never suggested that injuries didn't have any affect on a team. That wasn't my point at all. My point was that EVERY team in the NFL has injuries, and is forced to play with the players who can show up on Sundays! Of course injuries factor in. That said, I suspect that at least half the teams in the NFL have had at least as many (if not more) injuries as San Francisco has had this season! Last I checked, the 49'ers still have a winning record, and would be a playoff team if the playoffs were to start today.
DavidWT wrote:Hard to say if that was pass interference or not. The ball was underthrown and was picked off before it would have reached the receiver, so it could be considered uncatchable.
Still, the Panthers shouldn't have gotten themselves into that situation. No way that ball would have been caught, so just stand back, and let the pass be incomplete or intercepted, and have a clean victory rather than a controversial one.
Oh well, a win is a win, so I'm glad. But still, a win without a question mark would be nicer.
(not that I'm a Panthers fan, but the Jets need all the help they can get, especially after that horrendous/laughable performance in Buffalo.)
Memorex wrote:With the Niners game, that was a fair hit and we got burned because of a bad call.
Pelata wrote: Bad calls and non-calls happen in every game, every week.
Pelata wrote:Either way, the pick happens
Pelata wrote: Brady himself said it was a poor throw.
Pelata wrote: Pats made several mistakes that cost them points.
Pelata wrote: Gronkowski really even makes no attempt to crawl over Keuchly who is crawling over him...he just folds up.
Pelata wrote:Talib is a punk.
Um, no it doesn't. If the correct call is made, the pick doesn't happen!
Tough for me to criticize Gronkowski on that play, given the guy defending him had him in a bear hug!
Pelata wrote:What I am saying is that, even if Keuchly didn't get in his way, IMO Gronkowski wasn't going to scramble back fast enough to prevent that pick...that ball was way under-thrown. .
Memorex wrote:The ball was catchable and should have been a penalty. That said, it would have given Brady an advantage because had there been no foul, it would have still been intercepted and game over. So based on the throw, the correct outcome happened, but the Patriots could have gotten an undeserved second chance if the right call had of been made.
All I am saying is no matter how you slice it, that was going to be a pick. But sometimes things like that get taken away on a foul.
With the Niners game, that was a fair hit and we got burned because of a bad call.
slucero wrote:Memorex wrote:The ball was catchable and should have been a penalty. That said, it would have given Brady an advantage because had there been no foul, it would have still been intercepted and game over. So based on the throw, the correct outcome happened, but the Patriots could have gotten an undeserved second chance if the right call had of been made.
All I am saying is no matter how you slice it, that was going to be a pick. But sometimes things like that get taken away on a foul.
With the Niners game, that was a fair hit and we got burned because of a bad call.
One could argue the interference call.. but it still was defensive holding at a minimum. The Pats should have gotten one more shot, 1st and goal at the 1 yard line.
Brooks hit Brees fairly.. until he put his hand on Brees head, and the ref saw him pull Brees head down... the call was for the clothesline at the end of the play.
Memorex wrote:slucero wrote:Memorex wrote:The ball was catchable and should have been a penalty. That said, it would have given Brady an advantage because had there been no foul, it would have still been intercepted and game over. So based on the throw, the correct outcome happened, but the Patriots could have gotten an undeserved second chance if the right call had of been made.
All I am saying is no matter how you slice it, that was going to be a pick. But sometimes things like that get taken away on a foul.
With the Niners game, that was a fair hit and we got burned because of a bad call.
One could argue the interference call.. but it still was defensive holding at a minimum. The Pats should have gotten one more shot, 1st and goal at the 1 yard line.
Brooks hit Brees fairly.. until he put his hand on Brees head, and the ref saw him pull Brees head down... the call was for the clothesline at the end of the play.
I didn't see that as intentional. I saw it as a taller guy tackling a shorter guy. If that can't be a good hit in the nfl, why bother? And Brees sold it too. But just like our four shots at the end zone in the last super bowl, what's done is done.
slucero wrote:
Bottom line you can't touch the head (intentionally or unintentionally)..
The initial hit was legit.. Brooks had his hand on Brees mask as he went down. In the video of the hit its obvious to see Brooks hand come off Brees mask and Brees head snap as a result. That's the foul.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests