OFFICIAL NFL Week by Week Thread:

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:11 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Travis....What things? You couldn't come up with a list of things I've said that were 'coo-coo'. You just couldn't do it.

I'm not going to go point-counterpoint with you all day because it seems the Cleveland Cuntbag is circling now, just waiting to swoop down and take a bite.



Trav might be a major fanboy, but you are just an imbecile. Your arguments have no logic to them, the "assertions" you make are retarded, and half the time, 99% of the board can't even tell what (errant) point you are trying to make in the middle of your convoluted ramblings.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:14 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Travis....What things? You couldn't come up with a list of things I've said that were 'coo-coo'. You just couldn't do it.

I'm not going to go point-counterpoint with you all day because it seems the Cleveland Cuntbag is circling now, just waiting to swoop down and take a bite.

You, my friend, are so wound up in your little Steeler fantasy world, that you just can't see reality. When you are arguing a point - stay with that point, don't resort to ad hominem retorts and non-sensical data to make your point. If back-pedaling were an NFL position you'd be a HOFer.

You said Ben was the league leader in 4Q comebacks....you were wrong. Then you switched it to the best cause of his 15/5 comeback to years in league ratio.

Do you regard Montana as a legend amoung QBs?

Well here's a stat for you:

Montana had 31 'comebacks'. In close games decided by 7 points(in his 13 year career), or less he was an average 29-29, or 50%. But those 31 'comebacks' sound pretty good when they are used as a stand alone stat. In close games Joe was average. So the 4thQ Comeback stat is cherry-picked to make him appear legendary. Ever hear of Data Mining?


When throwing out that useless stat about how many comebacks Ben has in his first 5 years....why not also throw out how many he lost.


You said Ben was the league leader in 4Q comebacks....you were wrong.


When you want to get technical and give the EXACT list of numbers between quarterbacks alike and retired quarterbacks, fine. I was simply throwing a comment out there, I knew Ben's 15 wasn't the league leader or the best ever! The only thing I'm saying is at this giving time in the league, RIGHT NOW..Ben's the best at doing it compared to where the others have been the last few years. Period.

There's no point in layin the smackdown on you any longer. Fanboy, whatever you want to call it, everyone of their respected teams are fanboys. I'm a diehard Steelers fan, so I guess you could say I'm a fanboy, but that still doesn't take away the fact that I give every other 31 NFL teams their respect and know the Steelers won't go 16-0 and win the Super Bowl every season. I AM living in my Steelers fantasy world, but the reality of it is, we won 2 Super Bowls in the last 4 years, are Super Bowl Champs sitting great at 6-2 with a big game within the division at home come Sunday, and we are looking damn good at winning at this time of the year, just like any other. I'm just loving it since the Steelers are simply winning! What is a fan supposed to do? (If the Steelers somehow lose the rest of their games, obviously I won't talk with such confidence and admit they have major problems!) They just back me up. So what exactly is fantasy, and reality to all of this? It's not cocky, it's confidence.

Image
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby S2M » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:46 am

Wrap your mind around this:

Peyton Manning
1998: 3-13 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 2-9 & 0-0 (2-9) in close games.
1999: 13-3 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 10-2 & 0-1 (10-3) in close games.
2000: 10-6 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 8-6 & 0-1 (8-7) in close games.
2001: 6-10 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 5-6 & 0-0 (5-6) in close games.
2002: 10-6 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 8-4 & 0-0 (8-4) in close games.
2003: 12-4 regular season & 2-1 playoff record; 9-4 & 1-1 (10-5) in close games.
2004: 11-4 regular season & 2-1 playoff record; 8-3 & 1-1 (9-4) in close games.
2005: 13-1 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 9-1 & 0-1 (9-2) in close games.
2006: 12-4 regular season & 4-0 playoff record; 8-3 & 4-0 (12-3) in close games.
2007: 12-3 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 8-2 & 0-1 (8-3) in close games.
2008: 11-4 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 10-2 & 0-1 (10-3) in close games.
Total: 113-58 regular season & 8-7 playoff (121-65) record; 85-42 & 6-7 (91-49) in close games.


Tom Brady
2001: 11-3 regular season & 3-0 playoff record; 8-2 & 3-0 (11-2) in close games.
2002: 9-7 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 6-6 & 0-0 (6-6) in close games.
2003: 14-2 regular season & 3-0 playoff record; 12-1 & 3-0 (15-1) in close games.
2004: 14-2 regular season & 3-0 playoff record; 12-1 & 3-0 (15-1) in close games.
2005: 10-5 regular season & 1-1 playoff record; 7-1 & 0-0 (7-1) in close games.
2006: 12-4 regular season & 2-1 playoff record; 8-4 & 2-1 (10-5) in close games.
2007: 16-0 regular season & 2-1 playoff record; 8-0 & 2-1 (10-1) in close games.
Total: 86-23 regular season & 14-3 playoff (100-27) record; 61-15 & 13-2 (74-17) in close games.


Ben Roethlisberger
2004: 13-1 regular season & 1-1 playoff record; 12-0 & 1-1 (13-1) in close games.
2005: 9-3 regular season & 4-0 playoff record; 5-3 & 4-0 (9-3) in close games.
2006: 7-8 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 4-7 & 0-0 (4-7) in close games.
2007: 10-5 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 6-3 & 0-1 (6-4) in close games.
2008: 12-4 regular season & 3-0 playoff record; 10-4 & 3-0 (13-4) in close games.

Total: 51-20 regular season & 8-2 playoff (49-22) record; 37-17 & 8-2 (45-19) in close games.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:54 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Wrap your mind around this:

Peyton Manning
1998: 3-13 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 2-9 & 0-0 (2-9) in close games.
1999: 13-3 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 10-2 & 0-1 (10-3) in close games.
2000: 10-6 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 8-6 & 0-1 (8-7) in close games.
2001: 6-10 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 5-6 & 0-0 (5-6) in close games.
2002: 10-6 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 8-4 & 0-0 (8-4) in close games.
2003: 12-4 regular season & 2-1 playoff record; 9-4 & 1-1 (10-5) in close games.
2004: 11-4 regular season & 2-1 playoff record; 8-3 & 1-1 (9-4) in close games.
2005: 13-1 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 9-1 & 0-1 (9-2) in close games.
2006: 12-4 regular season & 4-0 playoff record; 8-3 & 4-0 (12-3) in close games.
2007: 12-3 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 8-2 & 0-1 (8-3) in close games.
2008: 11-4 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 10-2 & 0-1 (10-3) in close games.
Total: 113-58 regular season & 8-7 playoff (121-65) record; 85-42 & 6-7 (91-49) in close games.


Tom Brady
2001: 11-3 regular season & 3-0 playoff record; 8-2 & 3-0 (11-2) in close games.
2002: 9-7 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 6-6 & 0-0 (6-6) in close games.
2003: 14-2 regular season & 3-0 playoff record; 12-1 & 3-0 (15-1) in close games.
2004: 14-2 regular season & 3-0 playoff record; 12-1 & 3-0 (15-1) in close games.
2005: 10-5 regular season & 1-1 playoff record; 7-1 & 0-0 (7-1) in close games.
2006: 12-4 regular season & 2-1 playoff record; 8-4 & 2-1 (10-5) in close games.
2007: 16-0 regular season & 2-1 playoff record; 8-0 & 2-1 (10-1) in close games.
Total: 86-23 regular season & 14-3 playoff (100-27) record; 61-15 & 13-2 (74-17) in close games.


Ben Roethlisberger
2004: 13-1 regular season & 1-1 playoff record; 12-0 & 1-1 (13-1) in close games.
2005: 9-3 regular season & 4-0 playoff record; 5-3 & 4-0 (9-3) in close games.
2006: 7-8 regular season & 0-0 playoff record; 4-7 & 0-0 (4-7) in close games.
2007: 10-5 regular season & 0-1 playoff record; 6-3 & 0-1 (6-4) in close games.
2008: 12-4 regular season & 3-0 playoff record; 10-4 & 3-0 (13-4) in close games.

Total: 51-20 regular season & 8-2 playoff (49-22) record; 37-17 & 8-2 (45-19) in close games.


Counting this season it's now totaled through 10 weeks: (Regular Season)

Peyton: 121-58
Brady: 92-24
Ben: 57-24

Uhh, okay. I wrapped my mind around it. Your point? This is just showing me statistics and records of 3 outstanding quarterbacks during the course's of their career. 2 having some outstanding playoff records and multiple Super Bowl victories. (Ben is also the fastest QB to win 50 games.) What are you getting at, dude? :roll:
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby S2M » Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:24 am

Ben - 50 wins in his 71st game
Tom - 50 wins in his 73rd game

Going by regular season stats.....

and since winning his 50th game(in game 73), Brady has gone 42-5. Roll that around on your tongue a few times. 42-5.
Last edited by S2M on Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:29 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Ben - 50 wins in his 71st game
Tom - 50 wins in his 73rd game

Going by regular season stats.....

and since winning his 50th game(in game 73), Brady has gone 42-2. Roll that around on your tongue a few times. 42-2.


Ben - 50 wins in his 71st game
Tom - 50 wins in his 73rd game

Exactly my point. 71 comes before 73 jackass. Ben is the fastest ever QB to win 50 games. Moron. As far as Brady, that's wonderful, and a helluva stat. I still don't know what I'm supposed to get out of this?

Nice edit by the way.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:35 am

If you're comparing Ben to Brady, then okay?

Brady is Brady and Ben is Ben. Brady has played in the league 3 more solid season than Ben. Ben, in his rookie year, took the Steelers to the title game. In his second year, he won the Super Bowl (youngest QB to ever do so) in 2006 he had a motorcyle accident and was rushed back to where he shouldn't of and had a terrible season, in 2007 he was voted to his first Pro-bowl and set all kinds of Steelers records, including 32 touchdown pass's and in 2008 he won his 2nd Super Bowl in his 5th season, 2nd in 4 years.

Ben is JUST entering his prime NOW, just wait and see how easily he adds onto to all these stats. Still, your forcing me to defend the arguments. I still don't know what you're trying to say, and what's the argument? :roll: You can't deny both men's success.
Last edited by YoungJRNY on Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby S2M » Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:35 am

YoungJRNY wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Ben - 50 wins in his 71st game
Tom - 50 wins in his 73rd game

Going by regular season stats.....

and since winning his 50th game(in game 73), Brady has gone 42-2. Roll that around on your tongue a few times. 42-2.


Ben - 50 wins in his 71st game
Tom - 50 wins in his 73rd game

Exactly my point. 71 comes before 73 jackass. Ben is the fastest ever QB to win 50 games. Moron. As far as Brady, that's wonderful, and a helluva stat. I still don't know what I'm supposed to get out of this?

Nice edit by the way.


Well I read my figures wrong....and you get out of it what you want. i didn't make any assertions. I just gave stats for you to peruse. YOU were the one that had to add the fact that Ben was the fastest to 50 wins. Like anybody cares about that.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:38 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:
YoungJRNY wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Ben - 50 wins in his 71st game
Tom - 50 wins in his 73rd game

Going by regular season stats.....

and since winning his 50th game(in game 73), Brady has gone 42-2. Roll that around on your tongue a few times. 42-2.


Ben - 50 wins in his 71st game
Tom - 50 wins in his 73rd game

Exactly my point. 71 comes before 73 jackass. Ben is the fastest ever QB to win 50 games. Moron. As far as Brady, that's wonderful, and a helluva stat. I still don't know what I'm supposed to get out of this?

Nice edit by the way.


Well I read my figures wrong....and you get out of it what you want. i didn't make any assertions. I just gave stats for you to peruse. YOU were the one that had to add the fact that Ben was the fastest to 50 wins. Like anybody cares about that.


Okay then. :roll: :idea: Well, you were on your little tirade of absolutely nothing.. again.. and were providing records, and the records indicate that Ben's the fastest player to 50 wins. It's been said many times. Noone has to care (obviously you did to pull up the stat.. and who gives a shit that Brady's 42-2 since his 50th? hmmm, moron), just as no one cares the all time record of The Pats over the Jets. It's still a record worth mentioning due to your post that has no point to it. You're just an instigator, and it's not working out for you.

WARNING: Don't read Malone's post's. Your IQ will drop at least 15% by just trying to comprehend what he's trying to say.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby S2M » Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:57 am

Travis, my Xmas gift to you:



Image


I'd like this one in return:

Image
Last edited by S2M on Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:58 am, edited 2 times in total.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:03 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Travis, my Xmas gift to you:



Image


I'd like this one in return:

Image


Man, you're a goofy son of a bitch. Schizophrenic?
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:10 am

YoungJRNY wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Travis, my Xmas gift to you:



Image



Man, you're a goofy son of a bitch. Schizophrenic?


Aristotle?

Image
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:21 am

I've said it before and I'll say it again...Roethlisberger is a VERY good NFL QB and well on his way to being great. I'd still take Manning, Brady, and Brees ahead of him, but that's no knock on Ben. I definitely agree with Malone that he fourth quarter comeback stat is one of the more moronic stats in football, in spite of Matt's point that they are all great QB's on the list. A team being behind the second the 4th quarter begins is nothing more than just some chance equation. When it comes to NFL QB's, the only stats that matter are wins, losses, td's, interceptions, playoff record, and rings. I would say that Ben is doing just fine in those departments. A QB has ZERO control over whether or not his team is behind in the 4th quarter (unless he made dopey plays to cause his team to be behind). He has a whole lot of control over all of those other statistics! It's the same reason I think a win/loss record for a major league pitcher is VASTLY overrated. Pitchers have zero control over their team winning a game, even if they pitch their ass off. It's all about ERA and WHIP!

On another note, in spite of Travis' claims, I am no "fanboy", AT ALL. I was a HUGE NFL fan when the Patriots were 1-15 and the most embarrassing team in the NFL. I would never claim Brady was a great player simply because he plays for the Patriots. I thought Montana was a great player and Barry Sanders was the greatest running back I ever saw, and I'm quite sure that neither guy ever played for the Patriots! As for Travis inflating the numbers...That's what he does. He claimed last season that Pittsburgh had the best win/loss record in the NFL over the previous 5 years (which was not close to being true). He's a fan and his fandom clouds his objectivity, BIG TIME. I promise you that when the Patriots run is done and they suck again (which they will, because it happens to ALL NFL teams), you won't catch me on this board claiming they're remotely great or a contender!
Last edited by Enigma869 on Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:40 am

YoungJRNY wrote:
If I'm a posterboy for fanism then what does that make John? He goes as far as saying any team winning a Super Bowl doesn't count because they didn't go through N.E


You never heard me say that. They all count! I simply said that in my opinion, Pittsburgh wasn't getting out of the AFC last season without Brady sitting on the sidelines!
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:55 am

Enigma869 wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again...Roethlisberger is a VERY good NFL QB and well on his way to being great. I'd still take Manning, Brady, and Brees ahead of him, but that's no knock on Ben. I definitely agree with Malone that he fourth quarter comeback stat is one of the more moronic stats in football, in spite of Matt's point that they are all great QB's on the list. A team being behind the second the 4th quarter begins in nothing more than just some chance equation. When it comes to NFL QB's, the only stats that matter are wins, losses, td's, interceptions, playoff record, and rings. I would say that Ben is doing just fine in those departments. A QB has ZERO control over whether or not his team is behind in the 4th quarter (unless he made dopey plays to cause his team to be behind). He has a whole lot of control over all of those other statistics! It's the same reason I think a win/loss record for a major league pitcher is VASTLY overrated. Pitchers have zero control over their team winning a game, even if they pitch their ass off. It's all about ERA and WHIP!

On another note, in spite of Travis' claims, I am no "fanboy", AT ALL. I was a HUGE NFL fan when the Patriots were 1-15 and the most embarrassing team in the NFL. I would never claim Brady was a great player simply because he plays for the Patriots. I thought Montana was a great player and Barry Sanders was the greatest running back I ever saw, and I'm quite sure that neither guy ever played for the Patriots! As for Travis inflating the numbers...That's what he does. He claimed last season that Pittsburgh had the best win/loss record in the NFL over the previous 5 years (which was not close to being true). He's a fan and his fandom clouds his objectivity, BIG TIME. I promise you that when the Patriots run is done and they suck again (which they will, because it happens to ALL NFL teams), you won't catch me on this board claiming they're remotely great or a contender!


John, you've said many upon many of times that Roethlisberger is overrated. Come on. Plus you're as much as a fanboy as you claim me to be. Whatever you just said about yourself is the way I feel. I too have been a huge NFL fan since I can remember and I've sat through many seasons that ended in heart break. Very rare for a Steelers team, but during an embarrassing stretch through 98-00, the Steelers had one of the worst teams I've ever seen. I still went to many games just like I do today and I too have favorite players outside of the Steelers team. (Jason Witten, Favre, Emmitt Smith, Curtis Martin, etc)

I never really inflated any number. When it comes time to defend my team I'm going to defend them, and all I did was say Ben's the leagues best come from behind quarterback in a jokingly way in another thread to bust FF's balls. Of course, Malone blew it out of epic proportions. As I stated, I admit when the Steelers suck and I too won't claim they'd be a contender if they indeed fall back off the charts one day. As far as saying the Steelers had the best w/l record in the nfl over the previous 5, I'm sure there was more to it and I can't even recall such arguments that probably happened in a heat of a debate. I talk straight forward and don't dive into the statistic sheets as much as you do right away, it's just natural instinct. But as far as being a fan, dude, I'm a diehard, but I'm not going to claim the Steelers are going to win the SB just because of my fanism. They just have the team to do it at the giivin moment and sorry that's the way it is right now. I still feel I give a fair amount of judgmental no matter who the team is, it's just like I said, the Steelers back me up. I'm a fan of a winning franchise, how am I supposed to act when I have most good things on my side? Fuckin' A!
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:57 am

Enigma869 wrote:
YoungJRNY wrote:
If I'm a posterboy for fanism then what does that make John? He goes as far as saying any team winning a Super Bowl doesn't count because they didn't go through N.E


You never heard me say that. They all count! I simply said that in my opinion, Pittsburgh wasn't getting out of the AFC last season without Brady sitting on the sidelines!


Dude, you said it MULTIPLE times that as "far as your concerned" you are putting an * next to the Steelers Super Bowl win last season because they didn't play New England. What the hell do you think you're saying?
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:09 am

YoungJRNY wrote:
Dude, you said it MULTIPLE times that as "far as your concerned" you are putting an * next to the Steelers Super Bowl win last season because they didn't play New England.


It was said in jest, young lad. As I said, I don't believe the Steelers of last season would have beat the Patriots with Brady, but given Brady was home banging Giselle, it really doesn't matter!
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:17 am

YoungJRNY wrote:John, you've said many upon many of times that Roethlisberger is overrated.


I promise you that you won't find ONE SINGLE THREAD since I've been a member of this forum where I claimed Roethlisberger is overrated! Not ONE. As much as I loathe the Steelers and their fans, I know a good football player when I see one. Roethlisberger is the 4th best QB in the league, as far as I'm concerned, and has gotten better each season. I said as recently as this season that I think Polamalu is the best defensive player in the entire NFL! Contrary to the shit you spew dude, I am a VERY objective NFL observer. I'm not someone who thinks that the team I root for is going to win just because that's the team my allegiance lies with. Fuck, I predicted the Patriots would lose to the Jets this season on the weekly picks, and it turns out I was correct. You'll also never see me in here making excuses every time the Patriots lose (like you do when the Steelers lose). Being a fan loses all credibility when no objectivity enters the equation. At this point, the Steelers and Patriots are two of the best three teams in the AFC (and I don't think either of them are the best), so we'll just see how it all unfolds in January. I can only pray that another moronic Steelers player starts running his mouth and talking trash in the media leading up to a playoff matchup with the Patriots in January. The Patriots live for the guys who simply can't shut their pie holes. Ask Joey Porter how that worked out last week :shock:
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby S2M » Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:47 am

I will say that Ben is a serviceable enough QB. But he is overrated. If I were starting a team today - he would not be my QB. And If I had 2 minutes to go in a game - he would not be my QB. Fastest to 50 - great. 2 SB 'victories' - outstanding.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:59 am

Enigma869 wrote:
YoungJRNY wrote:John, you've said many upon many of times that Roethlisberger is overrated.


I promise you that you won't find ONE SINGLE THREAD since I've been a member of this forum where I claimed Roethlisberger is overrated! Not ONE. As much as I loathe the Steelers and their fans, I know a good football player when I see one. Roethlisberger is the 4th best QB in the league, as far as I'm concerned, and has gotten better each season. I said as recently as this season that I think Polamalu is the best defensive player in the entire NFL! Contrary to the shit you spew dude, I am a VERY objective NFL observer. I'm not someone who thinks that the team I root for is going to win just because that's the team my allegiance lies with. Fuck, I predicted the Patriots would lose to the Jets this season on the weekly picks, and it turns out I was correct. You'll also never see me in here making excuses every time the Patriots lose (like you do when the Steelers lose). Being a fan loses all credibility when no objectivity enters the equation. At this point, the Steelers and Patriots are two of the best three teams in the AFC (and I don't think either of them are the best), so we'll just see how it all unfolds in January. I can only pray that another moronic Steelers player starts running his mouth and talking trash in the media leading up to a playoff matchup with the Patriots in January. The Patriots live for the guys who simply can't shut their pie holes. Ask Joey Porter how that worked out last week :shock:


I believed Porter to be one of the most overrated linebackers at his position. Even though he was a mad man in his earlier young career, he was known to always disappear in BIG games (aside from Indy in '05) kind of like Jason Gildon at the end of his career. Even though Porter had a re-emergence year last season with Miami, I still think he's just not that great as people make him out to be. His yap is a BIG part of his play, that won't change.

As far as the Steelers mouthing off, that's a hard judgment to make since the playoff picture is a still a couple a weeks away to just shaping up. Pitting a Steelers VS Patriots matchup this early can't really be talked about now since divisions or wild card contenders aren't played out yet. Believe me when I say it, I too am hoping for a Pitt/N.E matchup. Have been the last couple of years. As far as mouthing off if the matchup does somehow play out, don't expect anyone to. There is no Anthony Smith OR Joey Porter to run their mouth, plus it won't ever happen again under Tomlin's watch. I agree N.E is the best team to using that to their advantage.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:00 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:I will say that Ben is a serviceable enough QB. But he is overrated. If I were starting a team today - he would not be my QB. And If I had 2 minutes to go in a game - he would not be my QB. Fastest to 50 - great. 2 SB 'victories' - outstanding.


Whatever you say. :lol: Ben's just getting better & better.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:58 am

StocktontoMalone wrote: I will say that Ben is a serviceable enough QB.


Ben is FAR better than "serviceable"! He's a VERY good QB. He's tough. He has a big arm and he simply knows how to win games, period!


StocktontoMalone wrote: But he is overrated.


I don't agree. I think most of the NFL so called experts view Ben as a top 5 NFL QB, and I'm not sure how even you could disagree with that. If you can tell me more than 4 or 5 QB's who are better than he is, than I'm more than willing to listen and be convinced that I'm wrong.


StocktontoMalone wrote: If I were starting a team today - he would not be my QB.


I don't think most people outside of Pittsburgh would pick Ben as their guy to start a team with. That said, you could certainly do a lot worse. The one thing I will say is that Ben won his Super Bowls with FAR, FAR, FAR more talent than Tom Brady ever won his with. I'm not saying that to diminish his accomplishments, but you can't ignore the teams that guys play on. I've said it before about Joe Montana...the guy played his entire career with the best wide receiver in the NFL and that's never a bad thing for a QB!

StocktontoMalone wrote:And If I had 2 minutes to go in a game - he would not be my QB.


Peyton Manning and Tom Brady have been the best two QB's in the past 5-7 years when it comes to the 2 minute drill at the end of the game. That said, if I were a fan of the Steelers, having Ben back there would certainly be okay with me. Ben is showing that he has the potential to be an elite QB this season. I don't think he's the reason Pittsburgh has won two championships recently. Those teams have been all about defense. I think he's finally becoming a reason they could win one, but god willing, it won't be this season, because I can't stand another off-season of nauseating Steeler fans. I hate them as much as I hate Yankee fans!
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:10 am

Enigma869 wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote: I will say that Ben is a serviceable enough QB.


Ben is FAR better than "serviceable"! He's a VERY good QB. He's tough. He has a big arm and he simply knows how to win games, period!


StocktontoMalone wrote: But he is overrated.


I don't agree. I think most of the NFL so called experts view Ben as a top 5 NFL QB, and I'm not sure how even you could disagree with that. If you can tell me more than 4 or 5 QB's who are better than he is, than I'm more than willing to listen and be convinced that I'm wrong.


StocktontoMalone wrote: If I were starting a team today - he would not be my QB.


I don't think most people outside of Pittsburgh would pick Ben as their guy to start a team with. That said, you could certainly do a lot worse. The one thing I will say is that Ben won his Super Bowls with FAR, FAR, FAR more talent than Tom Brady ever won his with. I'm not saying that to diminish his accomplishments, but you can't ignore the teams that guys play on. I've said it before about Joe Montana...the guy played his entire career with the best wide receiver in the NFL and that's never a bad thing for a QB!

StocktontoMalone wrote:And If I had 2 minutes to go in a game - he would not be my QB.


Peyton Manning and Tom Brady have been the best two QB's in the past 5-7 years when it comes to the 2 minute drill at the end of the game. That said, if I were a fan of the Steelers, having Ben back there would certainly be okay with me. Ben is showing that he has the potential to be an elite QB this season. I don't think he's the reason Pittsburgh has won two championships recently. Those teams have been all about defense. I think he's finally becoming a reason they could win one, but god willing, it won't be this season, because I can't stand another off-season of nauseating Steeler fans. I hate them as much as I hate Yankee fans!


I'm glad you're taking your "objective" approach and telling it like it is. If I would of said the same thing word for word I'd just be a fanboy and all of what you just said is pretty much what I've been saying about the subject. 8)

I hate them as much as I hate Yankee fans!


I'd take that as a compliment, without a doubt. But when it comes down to it, all over the world, N.E is one of the most hated teams in the league next to the Cowturds because simply of the reason of their image of running up scores, spy gate and winning 3* Super Bowls in the midst of it, not mentioning back to back's.

The Steelers certainly didn't win last years Super Bowl because of Ben or the offense ('05's victory is overshadowed by his performance in the SB but he put the team on his back through the '05 playoffs) , hardly the case and if the Steelers didn't have the defense they had last season they wouldn't of won more than 7 games, period! With that said, the defense did have many breakdowns at the worst time of the game and Ben and the offense surely came alive and drove the field with pretty much ease to win the game, including the Super Bowl. They did show flashes, but couldn't nail anything down so to speak. This season, they are finally putting it all together with much more room to get better and the results are appalling compared to last seasons offense. Mainly due to the O-line, who lost many key starters to the season early last year.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby S2M » Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:18 am

Why do you keep mentioning Spygate? All teams do it! And before you swing back with, 'But they got caught!' - let me clue you in to the logic of things. People are upset(first of all because they are jealous - let's get that straight) because it was brought out that they cheated....which - the last time I looked could still happen even if a team ISN'T caught. You are driving 80 in a 55 zone....are you still speeding even if you don't get caught? Absolutely. So if the cheating part of spygate is what has everyone up in arms and wanting to take back those superbowls and leading the charge to put three Asterixes on the record, then it only follows that if everyone is doing it - there's should be asterixed as well. Including your team's victories. I mean...it only follows, right? :wink:

Another thing, Trav....please explain to me how taping the opposition's sidelines from field level gives the Patriots a decided advantage.....I'm waiting.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:36 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Why do you keep mentioning Spygate? All teams do it! And before you swing back with, 'But they got caught!' - let me clue you in to the logic of things. People are upset(first of all because they are jealous - let's get that straight) because it was brought out that they cheated....which - the last time I looked could still happen even if a team ISN'T caught. You are driving 80 in a 55 zone....are you still speeding even if you don't get caught? Absolutely. So if the cheating part of spygate is what has everyone up in arms and wanting to take back those superbowls and leading the charge to put three Asterixes on the record, then it only follows that if everyone is doing it - there's should be asterixed as well. Including your team's victories. I mean...it only follows, right? :wink:

Another thing, Trav....please explain to me how taping the opposition's sidelines from field level gives the Patriots a decided advantage.....I'm waiting.


I'm really getting sick of this pissing match with you. Seriously. Your act is old. It was only a few weeks ago that you made fun of John through those funny video clips of such subjects about the Patriots and all of this out of fun. Ironically your doing the same thing you were making fun of John about, just because you want to engage me this time. But I will tell you why.

#1 I keep mentioning it because the NFL was forced to open an investigation on this subject and the media and other news outlets across the world touched up on the subject and claimed it to be pretty big news and this lasted throughout the 2007 season week in and week out and we were forced to hear about it at any turn of the channel when dealing with anything NFL related. That alone gives the Patriots a bad rap. #2 They had multiple shots of the dude STANDING on the sidelines with the camera pointed directly at the Jets sideline, in clear view! #3 Yes, every team tries these tactics I'm sure and I know, but that doesn't exclude the Patriots were called out for it and if it wasn't such a big deal I'm sure Mangini wouldn't of even bothered. The Patriots got what they deserved and the punishment could of been worse. They broke the rules and got caught.

As far as them having an advantage, it's pretty clear captain obvious. Them being on field level, this let them key in on many signals, gestures, and movements that could of tipped them off as far as a package before a play is concerned, a certain tip off in any sense of the word could be a huge plot to any team as far as playcall, formation, and where guys are lining up during the coarse of the games is concerned. Whatever they saw were probably jotted down and were used to their advantage in many adjustments they could of made during certain times of the game and if they have those signals, they simply know what the team is going to be in before the team breaks huddle and see a similiar formation. This allows players to key in and pretty much know what's coming before hand. Instead of brushing up on the field around them , they simply know where to drop, come, or stay depending on the signal that they certainly know of. Plus they could call a right package defensively with he right personal. This could of been a HUGE indicator to halftime adjustments, which is a huge part to any football game or team. That's why spygate is mentioned, and it WAS a big deal.

I really don't care about it neither. This happened 2 full seasons ago and there really is no point in brushing up on it from here on out. But trust me when I say this, if the Steelers, Colts, Ravens, or any OTHER team would of been accused of the same thing, then I'm sure this would be a heavily debated case against any of those teams when discussing these things.
Last edited by YoungJRNY on Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:43 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Why do you keep mentioning Spygate? All teams do it! And before you swing back with, 'But they got caught!' - let me clue you in to the logic of things. People are upset(first of all because they are jealous - let's get that straight) because it was brought out that they cheated....which - the last time I looked could still happen even if a team ISN'T caught. You are driving 80 in a 55 zone....are you still speeding even if you don't get caught? Absolutely. So if the cheating part of spygate is what has everyone up in arms and wanting to take back those superbowls and leading the charge to put three Asterixes on the record, then it only follows that if everyone is doing it - there's should be asterixed as well. Including your team's victories. I mean...it only follows, right? :wink:

Another thing, Trav....please explain to me how taping the opposition's sidelines from field level gives the Patriots a decided advantage.....I'm waiting.



Dude...I really wouldn't let the "spygate" thing bother you, AT ALL. As I've said before, if the Patriots had the Cleveland Browns talent pool, they could have 10 years of video on every team in the league, and it wouldn't matter one iota. "Stealing signs" happens in football and baseball and would happen in the other two sports if it were possible! It will NEVER end and shouldn't. If you're smart enough to figure out what the other team is doing based on their signs, good for you. Football is the ultimate chess match, and if you can outthink your opponent, you'll win a whole lot more than you lose.

When Mark Schlereth was asked about the whole "spygate" thing on NFL Live when the story broke, he said flat out that it happens on a lot of teams, that it's been going on in football forever, and that he really couldn't begin to understand why it was even a story. He's a guy who played in the NFL for many years with the Redskins and Broncos so has been exposed to what goes on behind the scenes. If it makes teams and fans in other cities feel better because they came up short those three seasons, it's all okay with me. It doesn't and won't change the three trophies sitting in the trophy cabinet at Gillette Stadium. Fuck, those douchebag Shitsburgh fans can drive up to MA and attempt to put asterisks directly on the trophies. My hunch is that they won't get out of MA alive :shock: :shock: :shock:
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:47 am

Enigma869 wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Why do you keep mentioning Spygate? All teams do it! And before you swing back with, 'But they got caught!' - let me clue you in to the logic of things. People are upset(first of all because they are jealous - let's get that straight) because it was brought out that they cheated....which - the last time I looked could still happen even if a team ISN'T caught. You are driving 80 in a 55 zone....are you still speeding even if you don't get caught? Absolutely. So if the cheating part of spygate is what has everyone up in arms and wanting to take back those superbowls and leading the charge to put three Asterixes on the record, then it only follows that if everyone is doing it - there's should be asterixed as well. Including your team's victories. I mean...it only follows, right? :wink:

Another thing, Trav....please explain to me how taping the opposition's sidelines from field level gives the Patriots a decided advantage.....I'm waiting.



Dude...I really wouldn't let the "spygate" thing bother you, AT ALL. As I've said before, if the Patriots had the Cleveland Browns talent pool, they could have 10 years of video on every team in the league, and it wouldn't matter one iota. "Stealing signs" happens in football and baseball and would happen in the other two sports if it were possible! It will NEVER end and shouldn't. If you're smart enough to figure out what the other team is doing based on their signs, good for you. Football is the ultimate chess match, and if you can outthink your opponent, you'll win a whole lot more than you lose.

When Mark Schlereth was asked about the whole "spygate" thing on NFL Live when the story broke, he said flat out that it happens on a lot of teams, that it's been going on in football forever, and that he really couldn't begin to understand why it was even a story. He's a guy who played in the NFL for many years with the Redskins and Broncos so has been exposed to what goes on behind the scenes. If it makes teams and fans in other cities feel better because they came up short those three seasons, it's all okay with me. It doesn't and won't change the three trophies sitting in the trophy cabinet at Gillette Stadium. Fuck, those douchebag Shitsburgh fans can drive up to MA and attempt to put asterisks directly on the trophies. My hunch is that they won't get out of MA alive :shock: :shock: :shock:


Of course and I agree. But "spy gate" was the last thing the NFL would want digging up esp since the Patriots are the NFL's poster child. A lot of dirty things happen behind the scenes no doubt, but for it to come out publicly and be investigated by the league, that alone doesn't sound too good for any team. Too bad for the NFL it was against a franchise that the NFL wanted to "model" after. Things like that are secret for a reason, and for it to be dished out like that, the Patriots will always be the team to get caught.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:51 am

YoungJRNY wrote: But trust me when I say this, if the Steelers, Colts, Ravens, or any OTHER team would of been accused of the same thing, then I'm sure this would be a heavily debated case against any of those teams when discussing these things.



It wouldn't be by me! Football is full of "cheating". Listen, I've been on the bottom of piles where dudes are biting, pinching, and anything else they can get away with. It's not a "gentleman's" game and never has been. Fuck, a U of Florida player practically ripped out an opponent's eyeball two weeks ago. If you're looking for manners and decorum, go watch a fucking polo match. In my opinion, every player, coach, ball boy, equipment operator, etc. should do everything in their power to win every week. The NFL now has stadiums with retractable roofs and teams choose to open or close the roof based on an advantage that it gives their specific team. There are groundskeepers who don't cut the fucking grass because they think it will slow down a super fast running back like Chris Johnson. Again, this shit has been going on in the NFL FOREVER and will never end.
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby YoungJRNY » Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:57 am

Enigma869 wrote:
YoungJRNY wrote: But trust me when I say this, if the Steelers, Colts, Ravens, or any OTHER team would of been accused of the same thing, then I'm sure this would be a heavily debated case against any of those teams when discussing these things.



It wouldn't be by me! Football is full of "cheating". Listen, I've been on the bottom of piles where dudes are biting, pinching, and anything else they can get away with. It's not a "gentleman's" game and never has been. Fuck, a U of Florida player practically ripped out an opponent's eyeball two weeks ago. If you're looking for manners and decorum, go watch a fucking polo match. In my opinion, every player, coach, ball boy, equipment operator, etc. should do everything in their power to win every week. The NFL now has stadiums with retractable roofs and teams choose to open or close the roof based on an advantage that it gives their specific team. There are groundskeepers who don't cut the fucking grass because they think it will slow down a super fast running back like Chris Johnson. Again, this shit has been going on in the NFL FOREVER and will never end.


Agreed, and I've said that many times as well, and I have played. The game is a form of brutality, and members of each team would do anything in any way shape or form to gain an advantage, whether that is gauging out someones eye, laying on someones ankle. punching thighs under piles, twisting wrists, and grabbing a nose through a face mask. Still, this isn't the way the NFL wants things portrayed, and that's why they are trying to think of ANY PENALTY possible to prevent this during the coarse of the game. They are simply, like Polamalu said, trying to turn it into a pansy game.

Guys like Dick Butkus, Shell, and Lambert took no shit in the early days of the NFL. That's the way I see the game meant to be played. With a reckless abandoned. Too bad the NFL is trying to put a stop to that, and spygate was one of those things they tried to get rid of as fast as they could, and that will always give N.E a bad rap because of it. Of course shit like that happens, but the Patriots will always be that team that had the dude taping on the sideline no matter how you spin it.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:00 am

YoungJRNY wrote:Guys like Dick Butkus and Lambert took no shit in the early days of the NFL.


It's unfortunate that guys like Butkus and Lambert aren't even in the NFL record books because a stat like "sacks" didn't even exist when they played!
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests