They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[Aaron]

It will be dismissed for lack of evidence like any competent court would respond.

Can’t wait for this to get to the senate, Then the fun really starts.

[Aaron]

Please present your facts sir. Emotion and hearsay don't apply here.

Well, it's your show so maybe it does?

Russia is not a hoax. Whatever way you look at it, Trump and the GOP have sold out to Putin. Literally everything he wants to happen IS happening.

[Aaron]

Yep you're a dumb ass just like me. yawn

Russia is not a hoax. Whatever way you look at it, Trump and the GOP have sold out to Putin. Literally everything he wants to happen IS happening.

Like what? Our great economy? Getting Ukraine the military help? The sanctions Trump put on Russia? I guess I'm too stupid to see it.

[Aaron]

Come on Drew. You've been beating the drum and when I drop the mic with truth you're out? No way, you're stronger than this.

The facts are when the US puts in "aid" money in one generation that culture wants to kill us. Name it, Libia, Iran, etc. We help, times change and now they want to kill us. So why would we want to do this further? The only shite happening is the free loading that's happened for 50 years is being checked and questioned. Anytime you rock the boat and disagree with the current leadership in power, you're going to get the bollocks. You should know this being in one of the most ruthless businesses, music.

Trump is a disrupter and is changing the balance of power with bureaucrats. Look at the data and facts, not the words of current corrupt bureaucrats trying to hold on to their power.

There's one thing you're missing, we don't GAF about the world, free riders in Greece, etc. Fund you're own dumb shit if you want but don't rely on us to support your dumb shit.

That sums up exactly what I think Trump supporters stand for. And it will end you up in a whole world of shit...eventually.

The ROTW doesn't leech of the USA, it's just NOT true. USA puts in money (and extra on military etc) where it wants to be an influence. Take that away and the USA's influence over ANYTHING in the future is going to be nil.

You guys act the tough guys, but that's because you have (had) power and influence. The world sees Trump as a joke and you guys may not care now, but you WILL care one day.

That's it from me....you can't talk logic to followers of a guy that needs to flush 15 times.

[Aaron]

FK yes. 30% gain this year. You can't argue with results if your competent.

What a great week for President Trump, secured a new trade deal with our biggest partners. secured funding for the government including money for the border wall, and created a new branch of our military. The best part is the Christmas gift from Pelosi & Schiff virtually guaranteeing his second term. The Stock market obviously agrees hitting another record high.

[Aaron]

So now that all of that stuff is out of the way. When are we all getting together to jam? Music TTFMF!

[Monker]

Look at NATO. It was put in place to protect Europe from the USSR. he USSR is gone but Russia is still there. And Europe has a great relationship with Russia. Germany buys 70% of their energy from Russia. But we need NATO to protect Europe, really? It should have been dissolved decades ago. It's now a mechanism to milk the US of $. Follow the money.

And, the only time Charter 5 of NATO has been invoked, which calls other nations together in the collective defense of an attack on an allied nation, was after the US was attacked on 9/11. It does not just "protect Europe" and if it were dissolved when the USSR fell, the response to 9/11 may have been quite different.

Also, it is true that the USSR does not exist, but it is obvious that Putin wants to expand Russia power and world influence in a similar way. There are also other threats in the world such as China, North Korea, Iran, etc.

[Monker]

Dude did you watch the "hearings"? Or are you listening to what the media spins to you. I watched 80% of the theater in DC. It was total BS. No direct witnesses or evidence of any crime.

You are willfully ignorant that there does not need to be a crime to impeach a President. The House could have impeached him because he is the wrong shade of orange, or his hair is fake. All you are doing is repeating Republican talking points which are simply lies.

There was a lot hearsay and second hand information but zero evidence of any crime.

His "crime" was abuse of power. The evidence was the transcript, his own public admission to doing it, and then repeating the same with China, and a bunch of witnesses that backed that evidence. He is OBVIOUSLY guilty of abusing his power as President.

If you really watched the "hearings" you would know this. You're loosing credibility if you're running on media spin. I watched it, you couldn't have. If you looked at the data you could not have that view.

And, if you understood impeachment, you would not be arguing about "crimes".

[Monker]

You'll be pissed when the results roll in. The only people that don't like him are the folks looking for a free ride, free healthcare, free citizenship, free school, free free free. The rest of the country paying the bills don't have an issue. He'll win in a landslide and you heard it here first.

This is just flat out not true. There are plenty of traditional Republicans who do not like Trump because of his ethics. So much so that they left the part and are independents now. You would call them "never Trumpers".

Throwing out this idea that only liberals are against him is flat out not true.

[Monker]

It will be dismissed for lack of evidence like any competent court would respond.

Can’t wait for this to get to the senate, Then the fun really starts.

That is very doubtful. I'm sure there will be some motion to dismiss and then a voice vote, and then a real vote...and I would bet there are enough Republicans who want this to play out that it will go to a full trial.

[Monker]

Come on Drew. You've been beating the drum and when I drop the mic with truth you're out? No way, you're stronger than this.

The facts are when the US puts in "aid" money in one generation that culture wants to kill us. Name it, Libia, Iran, etc. We help, times change and now they want to kill us.

As I have said, if you want to stop aid to other nations, start with Israel. Until people like you say you are willing to stop aid to Israel, then you are just all talk and bullshit politics.

Trump is a disrupter and is changing the balance of power with bureaucrats.

That is just nuts. The only shift in the balance of power among nations is that the US is no longer being taken seriously on the world stage. A "disrupter", that's hillarious.

[RPM]

It will be dismissed for lack of evidence like any competent court would respond.

Can’t wait for this to get to the senate, Then the fun really starts.

He will be Become the first President in our history to be impeached by the house, acquitted by the senate and re- elected.
And we have all seen the ending before it even started.

[RPM]

While Nancy sits on her articles....President Trump is getting things done.


President Donald Trump signed a spending package Friday night that included the Secure Act — which stands for Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement. The legislation is designed to help more people set aside more money for retirement, primarily by removing some of the hurdles that keep people from saving.
Among its highlights is a provision that would make it easier for small businesses to band together to offer retirement plans to their employees. It also opens the door for long-term part-time employees to gain access to workplace retirement plans.

In addition, it raises the age that Americans must start drawing from retirement savings, known as the required minimum distribution age, from 70½ to 72, as people are living and working longer. It also provides more years for people to contribute to individual retirement accounts, for the same reason.

[Aaron]

I agree with your points. The practicality of the matter Europe needs the help, we don't. I don't see the need to fund NATO because we don't need it but opinions vary for sure.

Look at NATO. It was put in place to protect Europe from the USSR. he USSR is gone but Russia is still there. And Europe has a great relationship with Russia. Germany buys 70% of their energy from Russia. But we need NATO to protect Europe, really? It should have been dissolved decades ago. It's now a mechanism to milk the US of $. Follow the money.

And, the only time Charter 5 of NATO has been invoked, which calls other nations together in the collective defense of an attack on an allied nation, was after the US was attacked on 9/11. It does not just "protect Europe" and if it were dissolved when the USSR fell, the response to 9/11 may have been quite different.

Also, it is true that the USSR does not exist, but it is obvious that Putin wants to expand Russia power and world influence in a similar way. There are also other threats in the world such as China, North Korea, Iran, etc.

[Aaron]

Man, because I have a different view than you I'm ignorant? The constitution documents "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" as reason for impeachment. This was put in place based on the risk identified when Benedict Arnold rolled over for England. That is the intent of the constitution. You can claim my ignorance based on technicality and you're right, the House can impeach him on anything. Dig out of your pedantic points as a right fighter and look at the big picture.

Where is the evidence of abuse of power? Show me please.

And it's all for not anyhow. The House builds the case and the Senate tries the case. It will never get out of the Senate. So why do we continue wasting our money on this silly stuff?

Dude did you watch the "hearings"? Or are you listening to what the media spins to you. I watched 80% of the theater in DC. It was total BS. No direct witnesses or evidence of any crime.

You are willfully ignorant that there does not need to be a crime to impeach a President. The House could have impeached him because he is the wrong shade of orange, or his hair is fake. All you are doing is repeating Republican talking points which are simply lies.

There was a lot hearsay and second hand information but zero evidence of any crime.

His "crime" was abuse of power. The evidence was the transcript, his own public admission to doing it, and then repeating the same with China, and a bunch of witnesses that backed that evidence. He is OBVIOUSLY guilty of abusing his power as President.

If you really watched the "hearings" you would know this. You're loosing credibility if you're running on media spin. I watched it, you couldn't have. If you looked at the data you could not have that view.

And, if you understood impeachment, you would not be arguing about "crimes".

[Aaron]

It's a prediction so who knows whether it's true or not. I called it in 2016 and I'll call it again, Trump will win in a land slide in 2020. You cant't argue with results.

And you are right, there are a lot of traditional RINO's that are rowing against him as well. It goes back to him disrupting the power of the so called DC "experts".

You'll be pissed when the results roll in. The only people that don't like him are the folks looking for a free ride, free healthcare, free citizenship, free school, free free free. The rest of the country paying the bills don't have an issue. He'll win in a landslide and you heard it here first.

This is just flat out not true. There are plenty of traditional Republicans who do not like Trump because of his ethics. So much so that they left the part and are independents now. You would call them "never Trumpers".

Throwing out this idea that only liberals are against him is flat out not true.

[Aaron]

Man I can't see that happening based on the partisan vote in the House. Let's see what happens. My guess is it will be dismissed if the Articles ever get to the Senate. Why is this not happening? I think the Dems up for re-election are scared but who knows.

It will be dismissed for lack of evidence like any competent court would respond.

Can’t wait for this to get to the senate, Then the fun really starts.

That is very doubtful. I'm sure there will be some motion to dismiss and then a voice vote, and then a real vote...and I would bet there are enough Republicans who want this to play out that it will go to a full trial.

[Aaron]

Israel is one of the few countries that should qualify for aid. They have similar values to ours, similar religion to ours, and continually are challenged by other countries in the region. Why would you not help Israel?

The other countries are scared and have nothing other than political bullshite. Trump is clearly not a politician. And he will make a decision. You have your view and I have mine. He's clearly a disrupter which is why he's hated, it's disrupting the current power structure.

You need to look at the results and quit listening to filtered info from the BS media. Stock market, all time high. Return this year in the market, 30%. Lowest unemployment in history. What else do you need to know?

Come on Drew. You've been beating the drum and when I drop the mic with truth you're out? No way, you're stronger than this.

The facts are when the US puts in "aid" money in one generation that culture wants to kill us. Name it, Libia, Iran, etc. We help, times change and now they want to kill us.

As I have said, if you want to stop aid to other nations, start with Israel. Until people like you say you are willing to stop aid to Israel, then you are just all talk and bullshit politics.

Trump is a disrupter and is changing the balance of power with bureaucrats.

That is just nuts. The only shift in the balance of power among nations is that the US is no longer being taken seriously on the world stage. A "disrupter", that's hillarious.

[Aaron]

Yep, I'm sure that's right. Time will tell.

It will be dismissed for lack of evidence like any competent court would respond.

Can’t wait for this to get to the senate, Then the fun really starts.

He will be Become the first President in our history to be impeached by the house, acquitted by the senate and re- elected.
And we have all seen the ending before it even started.

[Monker]

Man, because I have a different view than you I'm ignorant?

No. I said you are "willfully ignorant". That means that you are in denial of the truth. You do not want to learn the truth.

The constitution documents "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" as reason for impeachment. This was put in place based on the risk identified when Benedict Arnold rolled over for England.

This is completely wrong. It is just as wrong as saying the electoral college was put in place to balance city vs. country.

The "high crimes and misdemeanors" bit exist specifically to address abuse of power. I already quoted things on this.

You can claim my ignorance based on technicality and you're right, the House can impeach him on anything. Dig out of your pedantic points as a right fighter and look at the big picture.

Small words from a small mind, trying to attack what it doesn't understand.

Where is the evidence of abuse of power? Show me please.

Transcript. Trump admitting to it.

And it's all for not anyhow. The House builds the case and the Senate tries the case.

Not true. The House decides if a trial is warranted. The Senate does the trial. There is nothing specific in the Constitution that says the House must gather all the evidence and the Senate does the trial based only on that evidence.

It will never get out of the Senate.

That is a guess...there is no way for you to know that for absolute certain.

So why do we continue wasting our money on this silly stuff?

Because the Constitution says we have to. And, a President abusing his power is not silly.

[Monker]

It will be dismissed for lack of evidence like any competent court would respond.

Can’t wait for this to get to the senate, Then the fun really starts.

He will be Become the first President in our history to be impeached by the house, acquitted by the senate and re- elected.
And we have all seen the ending before it even started.

What an ignorant comment.

This was a bill introduced to the House by a Democrat that passed the House MONTHS ago. The Senate passed it recently. All Trump did was sign it.

It was a bipartisan effort and giving all the credit to Trump is simply lying about his part.

[Monker]

It's a prediction so who knows whether it's true or not. I called it in 2016 and I'll call it again, Trump will win in a land slide in 2020. You cant't argue with results.

First of all, he didn't win in a land slide in 2016.

Saying "you will be pissed when the results come in" is not a statement of opinion.

And you are right, there are a lot of traditional RINO's that are rowing against him as well. It goes back to him disrupting the power of the so called DC "experts".

So, you believe that you can predict with certainty that Trump will win reelection even when Republicans are deserting the party because of Trump? Very, very foolish.

[Monker]

Israel is one of the few countries that should qualify for aid.

So, when you said that country get aid for a year and then they want to kill us, you were wrong.

But, you are wrong. If saving money on foreign aid is an objective, than cutting Israel off should be first on the list. If you can stomach that, then you are not serious about it. And, it sounds like you are not serious about it and are repeating political bullshit.

Why would you not help Israel?

They get multiple BILLIONS of dollars of our aid. If you are going to bitch and complain about foreign aid, then they should be top on your list because they receive more aid than almost any other country.

Trump is clearly not a politician.

Yes he is, he is just a very bad one.

You need to look at the results and quit listening to filtered info from the BS media. Stock market, all time high.

If you truly watch what is being said, we are in a HUGE bubble right now...when it bursts, it is going to be bad, really bad.

Return this year in the market, 30%.

For what reason? Trade wars, interest rates on bonds are reversed, slow growth in manufacturing, etc. At some point there will be a trigger and the bottom is going to fall out...there is no real reason for stock returns to be that high.

Lowest unemployment in history.

And, that is just continuing a trend dating back to Obama. Funny how a a few years ago people were quoting these numbers and people like you were saying the "real" unemployment was %20, and Trump was saying the numbers were fake and unemployment was at %30. The truth is that Trump did very little for this.

What else do you need to know?

I want to know why you think this economy is going to carry the election when polls show 70% agree that the economy is good but 50% want Trump removed from office.

[Aaron]

LOL, you presented nothing and claim victory? The truth is in your mind, not the truth based on any evidence. You're a full blown expert with big words and no evidence. Yawn Just like watching TV.

Just because you quote something does not make if fact. You can call me a small mind all you want. But what you miss is the big picture of what's happening. Because you disagree with my view you only can come back with derogatory words to back up your "Big Brain"? I'm not subscribing. That's all you have? You can't argue the facts so you only can revert to calling names?

You must be from a big city. And you must be an under achiever. And you use your pedantic information to fuel your own self worth because you it's all you have. It's why you have the time to go sentence by sentence presenting your case lacking of real practicability or looking at the big picture.

It's the only thing you have when you have nothing but bullshite and pedantics driving your message. You can't back up your shite with data so you fall back to name calling. Get a brain and come to the party. You won't.

If you want help please drop me a PM.

Man, because I have a different view than you I'm ignorant?

No. I said you are "willfully ignorant". That means that you are in denial of the truth. You do not want to learn the truth.

The constitution documents "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" as reason for impeachment. This was put in place based on the risk identified when Benedict Arnold rolled over for England.

This is completely wrong. It is just as wrong as saying the electoral college was put in place to balance city vs. country.

The "high crimes and misdemeanors" bit exist specifically to address abuse of power. I already quoted things on this.

You can claim my ignorance based on technicality and you're right, the House can impeach him on anything. Dig out of your pedantic points as a right fighter and look at the big picture.

Small words from a small mind, trying to attack what it doesn't understand.

Where is the evidence of abuse of power? Show me please.

Transcript. Trump admitting to it.

And it's all for not anyhow. The House builds the case and the Senate tries the case.

Not true. The House decides if a trial is warranted. The Senate does the trial. There is nothing specific in the Constitution that says the House must gather all the evidence and the Senate does the trial based only on that evidence.

It will never get out of the Senate.

That is a guess...there is no way for you to know that for absolute certain.

So why do we continue wasting our money on this silly stuff?

Because the Constitution says we have to. And, a President abusing his power is not silly.

[Aaron]

You are an incompetent clown and don't deserve any real responses. You ignore history and run in your own mind.

I now expect a word by word analysis by a dmfk that thinks that means something. It's coming LOL ...

Israel is one of the few countries that should qualify for aid.

So, when you said that country get aid for a year and then they want to kill us, you were wrong.

But, you are wrong. If saving money on foreign aid is an objective, than cutting Israel off should be first on the list. If you can stomach that, then you are not serious about it. And, it sounds like you are not serious about it and are repeating political bullshit.

Why would you not help Israel?

They get multiple BILLIONS of dollars of our aid. If you are going to bitch and complain about foreign aid, then they should be top on your list because they receive more aid than almost any other country.

Trump is clearly not a politician.

Yes he is, he is just a very bad one.

You need to look at the results and quit listening to filtered info from the BS media. Stock market, all time high.

If you truly watch what is being said, we are in a HUGE bubble right now...when it bursts, it is going to be bad, really bad.

Return this year in the market, 30%.

For what reason? Trade wars, interest rates on bonds are reversed, slow growth in manufacturing, etc. At some point there will be a trigger and the bottom is going to fall out...there is no real reason for stock returns to be that high.

Lowest unemployment in history.

And, that is just continuing a trend dating back to Obama. Funny how a a few years ago people were quoting these numbers and people like you were saying the "real" unemployment was %20, and Trump was saying the numbers were fake and unemployment was at %30. The truth is that Trump did very little for this.

What else do you need to know?

I want to know why you think this economy is going to carry the election when polls show 70% agree that the economy is good but 50% want Trump removed from office.

[RPM]

President Trump gets more judges approved.


The Senate on Thursday confirmed 12 more of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees, just hours before leaving for Christmas recess.

The final confirmations for 2019 come as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has turned his attention to approving district court nominees, after filling virtually every circuit court vacancy.


The confirmations this week bring the total number of judicial confirmations for 2019 to 20 circuit judges and 67 district judges. Senate Republicans last week confirmed Trump’s 50th circuit judge.

[Monker]

Just because you quote something does not make if fact.

Fact: The original 13 colonies were BRITISH colonies. The history of the concept of impeachment in Brittan dates back to the 1400's...which was used to remove royalty who abused their power. The founders were well schooled in the concept.

Fact: Alexander Hamilton wrote that the US borrowed the impeachment process from the Brittish, "

Fact: Alexander Hamilton introduced the impeachment clause with the words "“mal- and corrupt conduct” instead of "high crimes and misdemeanors".

Facts: James Madison saw the Impeachment Clause as “indispensable . . . for defending the Community [against] the incapacity, negligence or perfidy of the chief Magistrate.” Elbridge Gerry stated that impeachment was needed as a check against presidential abuse of power. “A good magistrate will not fear [impeachments]. A bad one ought to be kept in fear of them,” he argued. George Mason then refuted Morris’ argument that only the President’s assistants should face the impeachment process. “No point is of more importance than that the right of impeachment should be continued. Shall any man be above Justice?” he asked. Benjamin Franklin also said, in his unique way, the impeachment was preferable to the more traditional way of removing a monarch in Europe – by death.

Fact: The first constitution, the "Articles of Confederation", created a very limited federal government and left most of the power to the states. Impeachment was written in many of the original state constitutions. Today, all states except Oregon allow for the impeachment of the governor for abuse of power.

Fact: Adding the impeachment clause had NOTHING to do with Benedict Arnold...it had EVERYTHING to do with the founders knowledge of British government, and the abuse of power by British kings.

You can call me a small mind all you want.

Keep it in context. I replied to your attempted insult with "small words, from a small mind, trying to attack that which it doesn't understand".

Because you disagree with my view

This is not a matter of opinion. Some of what you say are stating as facts, which absolutely are not.

you only can come back with derogatory words to back up your "Big Brain"?

Well, thank you. I never said that I had a big brain.

What I said was in reply to YOUR petty insult, calling me 'pedantic'. Get over it already.

You can't argue the facts so you only can revert to calling names?

You have not presented any fact...just lot of incorrect assertions, and opinion.

You must be from a big city. And you must be an under achiever. And you use your pedantic information to fuel your own self worth because you it's all you have.

Like I said, "....trying to attack what you don't understand." You don't know me.

It's why you have the time to go sentence by sentence presenting your case lacking of real practicability or looking at the big picture.

Oh, please. I've posted this way for almost 30yrs. At one time, I would be bitched at for NOT quoting. This way you know EXACTLY what I am replying...and so do I if I need to go back and read the post.

It's the only thing you have when you have nothing but bullshite and pedantics driving your message. You can't back up your shite with data so you fall back to name calling. Get a brain and come to the party. You won't.

Blah, blah, blah.

[Monker]

All I want you to do is answer this question:

I want to know why you think this economy is going to carry the election when polls show 70% agree that the economy is good but 50% want Trump removed from office.

Ironically, I just saw this on CNN today. Wow, they're reading my posts and getting their own ideas. I said it first...tho they cited his mediocre popularity.

You are an incompetent clown and don't deserve any real responses. You ignore history and run in your own mind.

I now expect a word by word analysis by a dmfk that thinks that means something. It's coming LOL ...

Israel is one of the few countries that should qualify for aid.

So, when you said that country get aid for a year and then they want to kill us, you were wrong.

But, you are wrong. If saving money on foreign aid is an objective, than cutting Israel off should be first on the list. If you can stomach that, then you are not serious about it. And, it sounds like you are not serious about it and are repeating political bullshit.

Why would you not help Israel?

They get multiple BILLIONS of dollars of our aid. If you are going to bitch and complain about foreign aid, then they should be top on your list because they receive more aid than almost any other country.

Trump is clearly not a politician.

Yes he is, he is just a very bad one.

You need to look at the results and quit listening to filtered info from the BS media. Stock market, all time high.

If you truly watch what is being said, we are in a HUGE bubble right now...when it bursts, it is going to be bad, really bad.

Return this year in the market, 30%.

For what reason? Trade wars, interest rates on bonds are reversed, slow growth in manufacturing, etc. At some point there will be a trigger and the bottom is going to fall out...there is no real reason for stock returns to be that high.

Lowest unemployment in history.

And, that is just continuing a trend dating back to Obama. Funny how a a few years ago people were quoting these numbers and people like you were saying the "real" unemployment was %20, and Trump was saying the numbers were fake and unemployment was at %30. The truth is that Trump did very little for this.

What else do you need to know?

I want to know why you think this economy is going to carry the election when polls show 70% agree that the economy is good but 50% want Trump removed from office.

[Aaron]

Truth, but Trump is an evil dumbass? While bureaucrats complain about their valueless power being removed, Trump is making hay. A disrupter and they don't even see it. LOL

President Trump gets more judges approved.


The Senate on Thursday confirmed 12 more of President Donald Trump's judicial nominees, just hours before leaving for Christmas recess.

The final confirmations for 2019 come as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has turned his attention to approving district court nominees, after filling virtually every circuit court vacancy.


The confirmations this week bring the total number of judicial confirmations for 2019 to 20 circuit judges and 67 district judges. Senate Republicans last week confirmed Trump’s 50th circuit judge.

[Aaron]

Brother, for once in a row I read your line by line comments. I don't disagree. What is your point? Where is it going? What are you trying to prove?

I've seen a lot of folks with high levels of seniority that we're dmfks and did negative work. I've been here for a while too but I'm a capability based person, not a seniority based person. It's clear you're showing your cards and explains your line by line responses.

Data:
Market is at an all time high
30% gain in the market this year
lowest unemployment in history for all

These are the facts and reasonable people will respond to these results with their vote.

Just because you quote something does not make if fact.

Fact: The original 13 colonies were BRITISH colonies. The history of the concept of impeachment in Brittan dates back to the 1400's...which was used to remove royalty who abused their power. The founders were well schooled in the concept.

Fact: Alexander Hamilton wrote that the US borrowed the impeachment process from the Brittish, "

Fact: Alexander Hamilton introduced the impeachment clause with the words "“mal- and corrupt conduct” instead of "high crimes and misdemeanors".

Facts: James Madison saw the Impeachment Clause as “indispensable . . . for defending the Community [against] the incapacity, negligence or perfidy of the chief Magistrate.” Elbridge Gerry stated that impeachment was needed as a check against presidential abuse of power. “A good magistrate will not fear [impeachments]. A bad one ought to be kept in fear of them,” he argued. George Mason then refuted Morris’ argument that only the President’s assistants should face the impeachment process. “No point is of more importance than that the right of impeachment should be continued. Shall any man be above Justice?” he asked. Benjamin Franklin also said, in his unique way, the impeachment was preferable to the more traditional way of removing a monarch in Europe – by death.

Fact: The first constitution, the "Articles of Confederation", created a very limited federal government and left most of the power to the states. Impeachment was written in many of the original state constitutions. Today, all states except Oregon allow for the impeachment of the governor for abuse of power.

Fact: Adding the impeachment clause had NOTHING to do with Benedict Arnold...it had EVERYTHING to do with the founders knowledge of British government, and the abuse of power by British kings.

You can call me a small mind all you want.

Keep it in context. I replied to your attempted insult with "small words, from a small mind, trying to attack that which it doesn't understand".

Because you disagree with my view

This is not a matter of opinion. Some of what you say are stating as facts, which absolutely are not.

you only can come back with derogatory words to back up your "Big Brain"?

Well, thank you. I never said that I had a big brain.

What I said was in reply to YOUR petty insult, calling me 'pedantic'. Get over it already.

You can't argue the facts so you only can revert to calling names?

You have not presented any fact...just lot of incorrect assertions, and opinion.

You must be from a big city. And you must be an under achiever. And you use your pedantic information to fuel your own self worth because you it's all you have.

Like I said, "....trying to attack what you don't understand." You don't know me.

It's why you have the time to go sentence by sentence presenting your case lacking of real practicability or looking at the big picture.

Oh, please. I've posted this way for almost 30yrs. At one time, I would be bitched at for NOT quoting. This way you know EXACTLY what I am replying...and so do I if I need to go back and read the post.

It's the only thing you have when you have nothing but bullshite and pedantics driving your message. You can't back up your shite with data so you fall back to name calling. Get a brain and come to the party. You won't.

Blah, blah, blah.