artist4perry wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
No, actually it depends on the religion.
And accuracy, thy name is artist4perry.
Well, with this spot-on post, anyway.

Moderator: Andrew
artist4perry wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
No, actually it depends on the religion.
Red13JoePa wrote:artist4perry wrote:No, actually it depends on the religion.ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
And accuracy, thy name is artist4perry.
Well, with this spot-on post, anyway.
RossValoryRocks wrote:7 Wishes wrote:Jim, most of my male friends in music school were gay.
And a majority of them came from stable, loving households.
You're a great guy but I don't agree with you on this one, at all.
Bet you this surprises you...but I don't agree with him either...
It's GENETIC...more than environmental...
Of course there are the 2% that just get ummm...sucked...into it!![]()
G.I.Jim wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:
Sorry to disappoint you here Bobby, but I'm not "following any talking points". I can't say why you decided to go your route, but I'm talking from experience I've learned while talking to my friends. Maybe not everyone has the same experiences, but I'd bet my life on the fact that you weren't "born" that way. Something triggered your choices. I may be completely wrong here, but until I see some proof, I'll stick with my assessment.
And to say that my friends only feel ashamed because I "make them feel that way"? WTF??? Just like I've told you here (and in PM's), I don't care that you're that way if it makes you happy. As long as you aren't hitting on me, we're cool. I'm the same way around my other friends, and I always have a great time when I'm with them. I'm not judging them OR you, I'm just saying that it's a lifestyle I don't understand, and don't agree with.
To me, I think God made beautiful women for a reason. I'll stick with the vagina dude!![]()
RossValoryRocks wrote:7 Wishes wrote:Jim, most of my male friends in music school were gay.
And a majority of them came from stable, loving households.
You're a great guy but I don't agree with you on this one, at all.
Bet you this surprises you...but I don't agree with him either...
It's GENETIC...more than environmental...
Of course there are the 2% that just get ummm...sucked...into it!![]()
Jana wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:7 Wishes wrote:Jim, most of my male friends in music school were gay.
And a majority of them came from stable, loving households.
You're a great guy but I don't agree with you on this one, at all.
Bet you this surprises you...but I don't agree with him either...
It's GENETIC...more than environmental...
Of course there are the 2% that just get ummm...sucked...into it!![]()
So true. I can't believe someone of Jim's age believes that it's not for the most part genetic. It shocks me. I have gay friends and they all came from great families and are all well-grounded. They were born that way and they have discussed it.
LOL your description of the 2 percent.
G.I.Jim wrote:Jana wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:7 Wishes wrote:Jim, most of my male friends in music school were gay.
And a majority of them came from stable, loving households.
You're a great guy but I don't agree with you on this one, at all.
Bet you this surprises you...but I don't agree with him either...
It's GENETIC...more than environmental...
Of course there are the 2% that just get ummm...sucked...into it!![]()
So true. I can't believe someone of Jim's age believes that it's not for the most part genetic. It shocks me. I have gay friends and they all came from great families and are all well-grounded. They were born that way and they have discussed it.
LOL your description of the 2 percent.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.Hey, wait a minute... are you calling me OLD?
![]()
artist4perry wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:artist4perry wrote:No, actually it depends on the religion.ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
And accuracy, thy name is artist4perry.
Well, with this spot-on post, anyway.
I think Sherrie is O.K. I think I get what she is saying. But she made a blanket statement and I wanted to be sure of what her actual take was. Intolerence comes in many forms. It isn't just in extreme religious circles.
Arianddu wrote:artist4perry wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:artist4perry wrote:No, actually it depends on the religion.ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
And accuracy, thy name is artist4perry.
Well, with this spot-on post, anyway.
I think Sherrie is O.K. I think I get what she is saying. But she made a blanket statement and I wanted to be sure of what her actual take was. Intolerence comes in many forms. It isn't just in extreme religious circles.
I don't think it's so much the religion as the individual. Every religion has texts that can be interpreted in ways that say the believer should force their beliefs on others, or defend their beliefs to the point of taking other lives, or convince the individual that only they can hold the truth and anyone who disagrees is not only wrong, but disagreeing with God.
But every religion also has more texts that can be interpreted as being ways to live with each other harmoniously, in peace, and with mutual benefit to the whole community, even if not everyone in that community is the same. I think it's true to say that every religion holds the same basic principles - live your life well, with love and compassion, without harming others if you can, and do so in a way that allows others to live the same way.
It isn't religion that's intolerant. It's the people who cherry-pick which bits they adhere to who use religion to justify there own intolerance. And that's true of every belief system the world has ever seen, because it's easier for us to say 'I'm right, here's the proof, now you have to change' than say 'you know what, maybe I'm just being an arsehole and I need to change.'
7 Wishes wrote:Stu, it's more like 12%.
BobbyinTN wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:7 Wishes wrote:Jim, most of my male friends in music school were gay.
And a majority of them came from stable, loving households.
You're a great guy but I don't agree with you on this one, at all.
Bet you this surprises you...but I don't agree with him either...
It's GENETIC...more than environmental...
Of course there are the 2% that just get ummm...sucked...into it!![]()
Now that was funny, I don't care who you are.
lol7 Wishes wrote:7 Wishes wrote:Stu, it's more like 12%.
I had always heard about one in ten people were homosexual, that's all. If you take away Wham! and Air Supply, that number drops to 8%.
Arianddu wrote:artist4perry wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:artist4perry wrote:No, actually it depends on the religion.ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
And accuracy, thy name is artist4perry.
Well, with this spot-on post, anyway.
I think Sherrie is O.K. I think I get what she is saying. But she made a blanket statement and I wanted to be sure of what her actual take was. Intolerence comes in many forms. It isn't just in extreme religious circles.
I don't think it's so much the religion as the individual. Every religion has texts that can be interpreted in ways that say the believer should force their beliefs on others, or defend their beliefs to the point of taking other lives, or convince the individual that only they can hold the truth and anyone who disagrees is not only wrong, but disagreeing with God.
But every religion also has more texts that can be interpreted as being ways to live with each other harmoniously, in peace, and with mutual benefit to the whole community, even if not everyone in that community is the same. I think it's true to say that every religion holds the same basic principles - live your life well, with love and compassion, without harming others if you can, and do so in a way that allows others to live the same way.
It isn't religion that's intolerant. It's the people who cherry-pick which bits they adhere to who use religion to justify there own intolerance. And that's true of every belief system the world has ever seen, because it's easier for us to say 'I'm right, here's the proof, now you have to change' than say 'you know what, maybe I'm just being an arsehole and I need to change.'
Michigan Girl wrote:This thread is about our civil rights and yes, we have the
right to believe as we wish~for now!!! This is AMERICA!!![]()
Someone in Michigan has definitely pissed god off ...he seems to
be a Buckeye Fan as of late!!![]()
![]()
Perhaps someone can explain Sharia LAW?!? All I seem to know is that Muslims agree on the ShariaArianddu wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:This thread is about our civil rights and yes, we have the
right to believe as we wish~for now!!! This is AMERICA!!![]()
Someone in Michigan has definitely pissed god off ...he seems to
be a Buckeye Fan as of late!!![]()
![]()
MG, the whole point about this is that it isn't about Sharia law, no matter what Joe and/or this group wants to claim. Whether or not it's an injustice that police officers got involved, whether or not it is a reasonable law or a violation of civil rights, it has nothing to do with Sharia law. Nothing at all. Which is the issue - a group of people are highlighting what might well be a very unfair and unreasonable law, but their claims about it being caused by muslim beliefs is total and utter bullshit, and to state otherwise is just daft.
Muslims aren't stealing anyone's civil rights, nor are they somehow perverting US Law into a reflection of Sharia Law, and it's inflamatory crap to say that this is the case. That's the bottom line here, not whether or not someone's civil rights are being abused - that's a very different story.
Arianddu wrote:artist4perry wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:artist4perry wrote:No, actually it depends on the religion.ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
And accuracy, thy name is artist4perry.
Well, with this spot-on post, anyway.
I think Sherrie is O.K. I think I get what she is saying. But she made a blanket statement and I wanted to be sure of what her actual take was. Intolerence comes in many forms. It isn't just in extreme religious circles.
I don't think it's so much the religion as the individual. Every religion has texts that can be interpreted in ways that say the believer should force their beliefs on others, or defend their beliefs to the point of taking other lives, or convince the individual that only they can hold the truth and anyone who disagrees is not only wrong, but disagreeing with God.
But every religion also has more texts that can be interpreted as being ways to live with each other harmoniously, in peace, and with mutual benefit to the whole community, even if not everyone in that community is the same. I think it's true to say that every religion holds the same basic principles - live your life well, with love and compassion, without harming others if you can, and do so in a way that allows others to live the same way.
It isn't religion that's intolerant. It's the people who cherry-pick which bits they adhere to who use religion to justify there own intolerance. And that's true of every belief system the world has ever seen, because it's easier for us to say 'I'm right, here's the proof, now you have to change' than say 'you know what, maybe I'm just being an arsehole and I need to change.'
parfait wrote:Arianddu wrote:artist4perry wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:artist4perry wrote:No, actually it depends on the religion.ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
Woah woah. You're a smart girl, but this post is just a load of bullshit. Religion is intolerant. God (the man created deity) is a judgmental, vindicative and vicious man - the fact is that religious people hand pick what they like to believe and try to justify it with quasi based science. Man's oldest enemy is the authoritarian dictatorship that is God. Religion breeds zealots, who have in many cases started wars that has resulted in blood baths.
Most religious people today does not follow the bible/Qur'an, they stick to whatever metaphysical explanation for the origins of cosmos and life - but now we have good scientific explanation to the aforementioned, in a way that if they would have been there to begin with, we would not have any need for religion. Whatever "science" the theists have tried to bring to the table, has been shown to be utterly and conclusively false. Religion is not moral or ethical either. Far from it, it's a ugly doctrine that abolishes the concept of personal responsibility, on which all ethics must depend.
The idea that I'm born under a celestial dictatorship, which I have no hand in choosing, and I'm told it can convict me of "thought crime", which basically makes it completely totalistic, is sickening. It undermines us in our most essential integrity, it dissolves our obligation to live and witness in truth. I'm not going to believe something just cause it promises me a after life. The bible's history is dubious at best, but it provides consolation. Sure it would be nice if you could throw your responsibility over someone else, but it's not true and it's not morally sound.
Religion makes me sick. At least the world is getting more and more secular. 64 % of the Japanese population is non believers and it's up to 85 % for Sweden. I'm glad I was born in a home where I had the chance to choose if I wanted to believe in religion or not.
parfait wrote:Arianddu wrote:artist4perry wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:artist4perry wrote:No, actually it depends on the religion.ohsherrie wrote:Intolerance, thy name is religion.
And accuracy, thy name is artist4perry.
Well, with this spot-on post, anyway.
I think Sherrie is O.K. I think I get what she is saying. But she made a blanket statement and I wanted to be sure of what her actual take was. Intolerence comes in many forms. It isn't just in extreme religious circles.
I don't think it's so much the religion as the individual. Every religion has texts that can be interpreted in ways that say the believer should force their beliefs on others, or defend their beliefs to the point of taking other lives, or convince the individual that only they can hold the truth and anyone who disagrees is not only wrong, but disagreeing with God.
But every religion also has more texts that can be interpreted as being ways to live with each other harmoniously, in peace, and with mutual benefit to the whole community, even if not everyone in that community is the same. I think it's true to say that every religion holds the same basic principles - live your life well, with love and compassion, without harming others if you can, and do so in a way that allows others to live the same way.
It isn't religion that's intolerant. It's the people who cherry-pick which bits they adhere to who use religion to justify there own intolerance. And that's true of every belief system the world has ever seen, because it's easier for us to say 'I'm right, here's the proof, now you have to change' than say 'you know what, maybe I'm just being an arsehole and I need to change.'
Woah woah. You're a smart girl, but this post is just a load of bullshit. Religion is intolerant. God (the man created deity) is a judgmental, vindicative and vicious man - the fact is that religious people hand pick what they like to believe and try to justify it with quasi based science. Man's oldest enemy is the authoritarian dictatorship that is God. Religion breeds zealots, who have in many cases started wars that has resulted in blood baths.
Most religious people today does not follow the bible/Qur'an, they stick to whatever metaphysical explanation for the origins of cosmos and life - but now we have good scientific explanation to the aforementioned, in a way that if they would have been there to begin with, we would not have any need for religion. Whatever "science" the theists have tried to bring to the table, has been shown to be utterly and conclusively false. Religion is not moral or ethical either. Far from it, it's a ugly doctrine that abolishes the concept of personal responsibility, on which all ethics must depend.
The idea that I'm born under a celestial dictatorship, which I have no hand in choosing, and I'm told it can convict me of "thought crime", which basically makes it completely totalistic, is sickening. It undermines us in our most essential integrity, it dissolves our obligation to live and witness in truth. I'm not going to believe something just cause it promises me a after life. The bible's history is dubious at best, but it provides consolation. Sure it would be nice if you could throw your responsibility over someone else, but it's not true and it's not morally sound.
Religion makes me sick. At least the world is getting more and more secular. 64 % of the Japanese population is non believers and it's up to 85 % for Sweden. I'm glad I was born in a home where I had the chance to choose if I wanted to believe in religion or not.
ohsherrie wrote:Great post and absolutely true. I'm also glad I wasn't raised to feel guilty or threatened for not drinking the Kool-Aid. My parents prized truth and education over marching lock-step with the bible thumpers.
Michigan Girl wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Great post and absolutely true. I'm also glad I wasn't raised to feel guilty or threatened for not drinking the Kool-Aid. My parents prized truth and education over marching lock-step with the bible thumpers.
Yet you raised one!!
Oh ...and no disrespect intended, I'm sure she's wonderful!!
parfait wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Great post and absolutely true. I'm also glad I wasn't raised to feel guilty or threatened for not drinking the Kool-Aid. My parents prized truth and education over marching lock-step with the bible thumpers.
Yet you raised one!!
Oh ...and no disrespect intended, I'm sure she's wonderful!!
Don't be like that. If you got something to say, then say it![]()
A kid should not be indoctrinated in whatever stupid ass religion just because his/her parents believe it - a kid should make his/her own choice.
parfait wrote:Michigan Girl wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Great post and absolutely true. I'm also glad I wasn't raised to feel guilty or threatened for not drinking the Kool-Aid. My parents prized truth and education over marching lock-step with the bible thumpers.
Yet you raised one!!
Oh ...and no disrespect intended, I'm sure she's wonderful!!
Don't be like that. If you got something to say, then say it![]()
A kid should not be indoctrinated in whatever stupid ass religion just because his/her parents believe it - a kid should make his/her own choice.
BobbyinTN wrote:I gays went to a church parade and disrupted, that would be wrong. I think protesting abortion clinics is wrong, if you don't believe in abortion don't have one.
I think every gay person should walk into every church that preaches against homosexuality and raise hell, literally and show them what it's like to have their lives questioned and judged.
BobbyinTN wrote:I gays went to a church parade and disrupted, that would be wrong. I think protesting abortion clinics is wrong, if you don't believe in abortion don't have one.
I think every gay person should walk into every church that preaches against homosexuality and raise hell, literally and show them what it's like to have their lives questioned and judged.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests