MR

Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

You're out of your mind.

Tito wrote:

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

You're out of your mind.

Probably...

Red Rocker baby!

Diamond Dave!

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

so you are sporting a huge Jim Morrison avatar and you are saying you like capri pants wearing fat boy spammy hagar over hard rocking DLR ?

come on now, stop the joking!

bru87tr wrote:

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

so you are sporting a huge Jim Morrison avatar and you are saying you like capri pants wearing fat boy spammy hagar over hard rocking DLR ?

come on now, stop the joking!

Yea, "Just a Giggalo", "California Girls" "Livin' in Paradise" were hard rocking

Although, "Yankee Rose" STILL kicks major ass to this day!

bru87tr wrote:

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

so you are sporting a huge Jim Morrison avatar and you are saying you like capri pants wearing fat boy spammy hagar over hard rocking DLR ?

come on now, stop the joking!

DLR Hard Rocking???? Come on, he's more pop than rock.

They both rock, but have had their cheesy moments. What was Dave thinking with the bluegrass album?

hagar solo may be king, but roth rules
the only way anyone thinks that van tequilla is better than VH is if you never like van halen to begin with
sammy is the better vocalists and was a good live preformer before he became the tequilla guy aka jimmy buffet of the non yuppies.

how many times do you hear any of the van hagar songs on the radio now, compared to classic VAN HALEN.
look at all the people here tonight or
that stupid thing sammy did with his fingers
no contest.

sniper16 wrote:hagar solo may be king, but roth rules
the only way anyone thinks that van tequilla is better than VH is if you never like van halen to begin with
sammy is the better vocalists and was a good live preformer before he became the tequilla guy aka jimmy buffet of the non yuppies.

how many times do you hear any of the van hagar songs on the radio now, compared to classic VAN HALEN.
look at all the people here tonight or
that stupid thing sammy did with his fingers
no contest.

I agree with everything you said except the solo king comments. Although, he has good solo songs and I like his solo stuff, I think Sammy's solo career is a little overblown.

sniper16 wrote:how many times do you hear any of the van hagar songs on the radio now, compared to classic VAN HALEN.

People still listen to music radio in 2008?

Huh.

They both had their moments- why the competition??? I can listen to the VH debut and 5150 and rock out to both!
ANYTHING except that gawdawful VH III - what the hell were they thinking????

X factor wrote:They both had their moments- why the competition??? I can listen to the VH debut and 5150 and rock out to both!
ANYTHING except that gawdawful VH III - what the hell were they thinking????

I completely agree. But I still prefer the DLR-era.

Hagar brought some serious melodic vocal work that allowed the band to reach a different audience, but Roth...even now...he just screams raw, fun, rock and roll on stage. Van Halen w/Roth is STILL the ultimate bar band and always will be!

X factor wrote:They both had their moments- why the competition??? I can listen to the VH debut and 5150 and rock out to both!
ANYTHING except that gawdawful VH III - what the hell were they thinking????

They really seemed to dive off the cliff with that record. Gary Cherone is a great vocalist, and it's a shame they didn't do something better with his talent. Very dark album.

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

I prefer Sam Halen too...just personal taste/preference. I like the DLR era, how can one not...but the Sammy albums top the Dave albums for me...

It was always Van Hagar for me. Sammy got me into them. The best ever vocalist brought some maturity to the band (but still maintained the fun-side). Sad that its all over for them.

UnderTheFridge wrote:

bru87tr wrote:

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

so you are sporting a huge Jim Morrison avatar and you are saying you like capri pants wearing fat boy spammy hagar over hard rocking DLR ?

come on now, stop the joking!

DLR Hard Rocking???? Come on, he's more pop than rock.

thats funny, I thought we were talking Van Halen versions ? I didnt say solo DLR. I was replying to the original post of incarnations of the band and yes, DLR was wayyyy more hard rocking in his time with Van Halen,

now take your head out of your ass.

Carlitto H@kk wrote:

bru87tr wrote:

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

so you are sporting a huge Jim Morrison avatar and you are saying you like capri pants wearing fat boy spammy hagar over hard rocking DLR ?

come on now, stop the joking!

Yea, "Just a Giggalo", "California Girls" "Livin' in Paradise" were hard rocking

Although, "Yankee Rose" STILL kicks major ass to this day!

read post above and then you too can take your head out of your ass, its not a DLR solo thread moron. did you read the first post ?

bru87tr wrote:

Carlitto H@kk wrote:

bru87tr wrote:

Moose wrote:Roth is driving the car right now, but having seen both all incarnations of the band....(sorry Gary)Sam provides the magic.

so you are sporting a huge Jim Morrison avatar and you are saying you like capri pants wearing fat boy spammy hagar over hard rocking DLR ?

come on now, stop the joking!

Yea, "Just a Giggalo", "California Girls" "Livin' in Paradise" were hard rocking

Although, "Yankee Rose" STILL kicks major ass to this day!

read post above and then you too can take your head out of your ass, its not a DLR solo thread moron. did you read the first post ?

Pull your own head out of your ass, douchebag
and lick my taint while you're at it...

Notice the after my comment?
Since you're new I'll fill you in:
That means I was "joking", making a "joke",
being "sarcastic"...
Making fun at how lame Roth vs Hagar arguements can be...

Get past a Dr Suess reading level and get back to me

BTW, I still think Sammy is the better of the 2...
Then & Now.

ya, nice try.

then why post anything at all ?

I figured you for a homo, you would love it wouldnt ya ?

now STFU and get back to cooking dinner for your boyfriend, homo.

bru87tr wrote:ya, nice try.

then why post anything at all ?

I figured you for a homo, you would love it wouldnt ya ?

now STFU and get back to cooking dinner for your boyfriend, homo.

BAWHAAAHAAAHAAA!!!

Ah, you're killing me, Waldo!
Keep it coming...

DLR VH was a unique band that if continued would have been our generations version of the Rolling Stones. There was just something special with them. With Van Hagar, they just became a hard rock version of Journey or REO. Just a bunch of guys singing songs.

Hagar all the way...Van Roth would have popped out in a couple of more years...Don't get me wrong, have all the albums and love all the stuff, but Roth's act would have wore thin - which it did anyways. Hagar brought an element of substance to that band that launched it into a new decade. Do you really think the '90's would have had much use for Roth running around in spandex and grabbing his crotch? It didn't as I recall....

bru87tr wrote:
so you are sporting a huge Jim Morrison avatar and you are saying you like capri pants wearing fat boy spammy hagar over hard rocking DLR ?

come on now, stop the joking!

Dude, Morrison was great! Anyway, Sam would kick Dave's ass! Just because Edward Van Heineken called Sammy fat doesn't make it so.

Maybe I like Sammy better since I am younger than you folks, but I still love the Van Hagar sound better.

you obvously dont look at pics of spammy.

spermmy blows and made Van Halen into a weak version of Journey. no slam on Journey, I love them.

but the Van Hagar tunes dont hold up today. they sound dated and cheesy 80's. the roth era holds up.

you think Van Hagar can gross sales that Van Halen just did ? it is an age thing for sure. you grew up with hagar, I grew up with roth.

though, I just cant see how someone loves Morrison (I do too) and in turn prefers hagar over roth. just my opinion.

I grew up with DLR-Halen (Fair Warning and 1984 were my favorite albums way back when) and I first remembered being confounded that Sammy Hagar had become VH's new singer.

That was because I didn't know shit about Hagar back then, as I do now.

Yes, the DLR era is more, one could say, "unique" due to Dave and Ed.

However, as a pure vocalist, and songwriter (not to mention Sam also plays an instrument, and Dave can only play with himself), I respect Sam far more than Dave. Montrose and many (not all) of Sammy's solo albums are great rock records. Dave's are all jokes. Yes, even the one he did with Vai and Sheehan. I have NO idea why it gets so much praise. In spite of the top-shelf musicians Dave surrounded himself with, Eat 'Em And Smile sounds like a limp-dicked version of VH. And it just got worse after that. Rejoining VH is the best thing that's ever happened to Dave, and I'm sure it's working wonders for his mortgage, his bank accounts, and his credit card balances.

So with me, it's not an age issue. I just know what I like.

very well said...

But with Van halen, I think you have to look at the band as a whole, and with DLR I think it was just better. I actually enjoy Hagar's solo stuff much more then DLR. The only song of DLR's I like is "Going Crazy". Sammy was a better singer, maybe a better guy etc etc, but DLR with Van Halen just clicked and was special. For some reason Sammy with VH just did not do it for me. I'm not a musician, but I think the reason was his voice was too high (for lack of a better term) and in combo with the high backing vocals and screeching high VH solo's it was too much. I found it irritating after awhile. DLR's low growl sort of balanced everything out.

verslibre wrote:I grew up with DLR-Halen (Fair Warning and 1984 were my favorite albums way back when) and I first remembered being confounded that Sammy Hagar had become VH's new singer.

That was because I didn't know shit about Hagar back then, as I do now.

Yes, the DLR era is more, one could say, "unique" due to Dave and Ed.

However, as a pure vocalist, and songwriter (not to mention Sam also plays an instrument, and Dave can only play with himself), I respect Sam far more than Dave. Montrose and many (not all) of Sammy's solo albums are great rock records. Dave's are all jokes. Yes, even the one he did with Vai and Sheehan. I have NO idea why it gets so much praise. In spite of the top-shelf musicians Dave surrounded himself with, Eat 'Em And Smile sounds like a limp-dicked version of VH. And it just got worse after that. Rejoining VH is the best thing that's ever happened to Dave, and I'm sure it's working wonders for his mortgage, his bank accounts, and his credit card balances.

So with me, it's not an age issue. I just know what I like.

if you knew anything about dave, you would know he doesnt need money. the guy came from money, made his own money and had no money problems.