Page 1 of 4

SIZE 4 is now "too FAT"....???

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:25 am
by TRAGChick
Hey, all....

Have you heard about this?
Full story here:
http://www.stylelist.com/blog/2009/10/1 ... eing-fat/3

This woman is 5'10", 120 lbs....

:arrow:.....and a SIZE FOUR.


Look what the Ralph Lauren people did to her image for a new ad.
WTF??! :shock: :x
Image

Re: SIZE 4 is now "too FAT"....???

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:30 am
by Voyager
TRAGChick wrote:Image

Image

Image

:shock:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:41 am
by Rhiannon
They're going to keep making these clothes and styles that the average woman doesn't feel comfortable in, and soon enough they'll loose their revenue. Which I'm all for. Ralph Lauren's had the same designs and look for a million years. :roll:

And size 4 is NOT too big... :x

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 5:49 am
by TRAGChick
Full shot:

even WORSE....
:x :x :x
Image

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:08 am
by Saint John
I don't know too many women that are size 4's, but from what I'm gathering this article is insane. These "numbers" are all bullshit. The "number" should fit the person...not the other way around.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:52 am
by bluejeangirl76
Saint John wrote:I don't know too many women that are size 4's, but from what I'm gathering this article is insane. These "numbers" are all bullshit. The "number" should fit the person...not the other way around.


The numbers ARE bullshit. I have pants that all fit, yet have all different sizes on the tags. It's horseshit.
You notice how this doesn't happen with mens' clothing? :evil:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:00 am
by JasonD
TRAGChick wrote:Full shot:

even WORSE....
:x :x :x
Image


Any man who finds that picture sexy is a man who has pedophilia issues. Gimme a full grown woman with a little meat on her bones.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:20 am
by JH'sTXfan
I would think that someone 5'10" and size 4 would be one skipped meal away from hospitalization. I don't even see how her pelvis bones would fit into a 4.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:24 am
by stevew2
JasonD wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:Full shot:

even WORSE....
:x :x :x
Image


Any man who finds that picture sexy is a man who has pedophilia issues. Gimme a full grown man with a lot of meat and big boner.
I fixed it for ya Jason

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:26 am
by Rhiannon
JH'sTXfan wrote:I would think that someone 5'10" and size 4 would be one skipped meal away from hospitalization. I don't even see how her pelvis bones would fit into a 4.


I have a med-lg bone frame and at 5'8 my hip bones barely fit into a 4... if they're made with the relaxed fit or the flexible fabric I can wear them comfortably. But an honest-to-God non-vanity sized pair of old school Levi's, no way. Ain't happenin'.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:29 am
by Ehwmatt
I ain't had to change clothes sizes in years, I just exercise and eat decently, makes up for the beer calories I consume. NO problems

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:21 am
by YoungJRNY
A shame. To me, models are down right DISGUSTING. What man in this world loves bones? I love the way she looks, if anything she could add a few more. Word to all women, more meat, THEE better (But don't get it mixed up with obesity, but a little extra junk is no problem) :wink:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:26 am
by Ehwmatt
YoungJRNY wrote:A shame. To me, models are down right DISGUSTING. What man in this world loves bones? I love the way she looks, if anything she could add a few more. Word to all women, more meat, THEE better (But don't get it mixed up with obesity, but a little extra junk is no problem) :wink:


Only to a certain extent, if it was a thicker girl she'd have to be solid and a good athlete for me... I'm not gonna tolerate a lot of extra fat that's not good and solid, especially at our age... if it's like that now, just imagine in 15 years *shudder*. But yea, bone thin? no thanks... but they can't be much past in very good shape at this point for me.

Yes, I'll judge, fuck that. Plenty of girls prolly judge me for bein 5'8", I reserve the right :lol: :lol:

EDIT: Exceptions made for cougars with great faces, they can carry a little bit extra, not too much though.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:52 am
by Angel
Size 4 is "too fat?" I wish I were "too fat."

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:55 am
by Ehwmatt
Angel wrote:Size 4 is "too fat?" I wish I were "too fat."


Yea, that's pretty ridiculous. But women should really just get more secure in their own skin. You don't see me running around whining I don't have Christian Bale's biceps and hairline or can wear an Armani suit like the latest GQ model.

The celebs have nothing better to do than to work out and eat the healthiest food all day and look good. not to mention no stress, at least not day-to-day like the rest of us mere mortals have to deal with. They should look fuckin good.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:35 am
by JasonD
stevew2 wrote:
JasonD wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:Full shot:

even WORSE....
:x :x :x


Any man who finds that picture sexy is a man who has pedophilia issues. Gimme a full grown man with a lot of meat and big boner.
I fixed it for ya Jason


Yeah, that too.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:36 am
by Saint John
Rhiannon wrote:I have a med-lg bone frame and at 5'8 my hip bones barely fit into a 4


:lol: :roll:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:37 am
by JasonD
Ehwmatt wrote:
YoungJRNY wrote:A shame. To me, models are down right DISGUSTING. What man in this world loves bones? I love the way she looks, if anything she could add a few more. Word to all women, more meat, THEE better (But don't get it mixed up with obesity, but a little extra junk is no problem) :wink:


Only to a certain extent, if it was a thicker girl she'd have to be solid and a good athlete for me... I'm not gonna tolerate a lot of extra fat that's not good and solid, especially at our age... if it's like that now, just imagine in 15 years *shudder*. But yea, bone thin? no thanks... but they can't be much past in very good shape at this point for me.

Yes, I'll judge, fuck that. Plenty of girls prolly judge me for bein 5'8", I reserve the right :lol: :lol:

EDIT: Exceptions made for cougars with great faces, they can carry a little bit extra, not too much though.


Hmmm..... now ya got me thinking. I'll take a cougar or a MILF for $100, Alex. :wink:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:46 am
by Journey Mom
I'm a size 4, and don't look anything like that. I'm 5'4" tall and weigh around 100 pounds. She makes me look fat.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:59 am
by Triple S
Journey Mom wrote:I'm a size 4, and don't look anything like that. I'm 5'4" tall and weigh around 100 pounds. She makes me look fat.


See, that's why a tag size doesn't matter. I'm 3 inches shorter and 10 lbs heavier than you, but also wear a 4. I'm an absolute chunker next to her!!!

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:11 am
by cyndy!
Journey Mom wrote:I'm a size 4, and don't look anything like that. I'm 5'4" tall and weigh around 100 pounds. She makes me look fat.

i'm close to the same size (5'3", 97lbs) & am probably on the verge of being underweight. after being bombarded with these unrealistic images & all the "lose weight to be healthier" articles, i occasionally find myself automatically limiting my food intake. it's as if i've been brainwashed by the media into acting this way, which is really fucked up & unhealthy. i can see how this can really mess with an impressionable teenager's mind & push her into anorexia.

as far as the vanity sizing - that's just downright INSULTING. i used to wear a juniors size 5 or womens size 4. the size of my body has not changed, but i'm lucky if a size 0 isn't too loose on me now. is fooling us into thinking we're smaller supposed to make us feel more attractive & make us buy more of that manufacturer's clothing? i've complained to store managers about the silly vanity sizing. not sure if that does any good.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:54 am
by Voyager
Whoever said size matters anyway?

:lol:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:20 am
by Enigma869
cyndy! wrote:i'm close to the same size (5'3", 97lbs) & am probably on the verge of being underweight.


Oh my...I think I weighed 97lbs as a fetus :shock: You're still beautiful Cyndy :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:26 am
by cyndy!
Enigma869 wrote:Oh my...I think I weighed 97lbs as a fetus :shock: You're still beautiful Cyndy :lol:

aww, thanks! the point is that it should be HEALTHY=BEAUTIFUL. not SKINNY=BEAUTIFUL.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:54 am
by Enigma869
cyndy! wrote:aww, thanks! the point is that it should be HEALTHY=BEAUTIFUL. not SKINNY=BEAUTIFUL.


We definitely agree on that point. Women shouldn't be held to some absurd standard. As long as you're healthy and feel good about who you are, none of the other stuff really matters.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 1:06 pm
by tammy
TRAGChick wrote:Full shot:

even WORSE....
:x :x :x
Image


That photo is laughable if anything! lol. It looks cartoony not airbrushed...who'd take that ad seriously? Anyway, the model looks just fine as she is in the real life pic, although, at 5'10" and 120 that is pretty skinny. Shame on Ralph Lauren (I do love my old RL bed comforter, 'tho).
The vanity sizing thing is nutty, too. I've been all over the scale from very skinny to overweight...but, now I'm wearing a size 4 jeans (which is probably the old size 8?) and I'm good with just being in the healthy range for my age & height.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:21 pm
by ebake02
JasonD wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:Full shot:

even WORSE....
:x :x :x
Image


Gimme a full grown woman with a little meat on her bones.


Amen!! I like a little extra myself.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:12 pm
by T-Bone
If that woman got any skinnier, she'd fall through her asshole

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:30 pm
by Rick
T-Bone wrote:If that woman got any skinnier, she'd fall through her asshole
:lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:54 pm
by Playitloudforme
If I could afford Ralph Lauren, I'd boycott his ass. So... lucky for me I'm flat broke. What a dickweed.