QUESTION...

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

QUESTION...

Postby lights1961 » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:36 am

If your bands songs were being used for NATIONAL SECURITY... WHY would you not be a PROUD AMERICAN and say hell ya use them, I am honored to be a part of the sacrafice for the GOOD of the country... JUST SAYING... if the practice of using your songs saved millions of lives.... would it not be worth it...
just saying... I dont get the SELFISHNESS of musicains here in their thinking... just saying...



Rick
Rick
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Postby G.I.Jim » Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:38 am

Huh? :shock: Maybe I missed something, but I have NO freaking clue who or what you're talking about!??? :shock: :lol: :lol: Please elaborate...
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby fightingilliniJRNY » Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:43 am

Songs being used for national security? Color me confused... :?

I can see how Baby I'm A Leavin' You could be used when torturing prisoners, but beyond that...I'm lost.
User avatar
fightingilliniJRNY
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1779
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:53 am

Postby Gin and Tonic Sky » Sat Oct 24, 2009 6:46 am

fightingilliniJRNY wrote:Songs being used for national security? Color me confused... :?

I can see how Baby I'm A Leavin' You could be used when torturing prisoners, but beyond that...I'm lost.


lol, if you gave the enemy a choice between getting nuked and having Generations played outloud over their base camp they would definitely choose the A-bomb

:D
Matt
User avatar
Gin and Tonic Sky
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:46 am
Location: in a purple and gold haze

Postby lights1961 » Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:08 am

for those confused about this news...

here is a link to the story...... and I know some here will agree with the musicans... and hey thats your right... ;-)

R http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33423672/ns ... terrorism/
Rick
lights1961
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5362
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:33 am

Postby Michigan Girl » Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:26 am

fightingilliniJRNY wrote:Songs being used for national security? Color me confused... :?

I can see how Baby I'm A Leavin' You could be used when torturing prisoners, but beyond that...I'm lost.

I love this, no torture there!!

Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:lol, if you gave the enemy a choice between getting nuked and having Generations played outloud over their base camp they would definitely choose the A-bomb

:D


Play Faithfully, the one w/the writer singing!!! :wink:


You're just sayin' alot Rick, but what exactly is it you're sayin'?!?!? :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Re: QUESTION...

Postby Arianddu » Sat Oct 24, 2009 8:52 pm

lights1961 wrote:If your bands songs were being used for NATIONAL SECURITY... WHY would you not be a PROUD AMERICAN and say hell ya use them, I am honored to be a part of the sacrafice for the GOOD of the country... JUST SAYING... if the practice of using your songs saved millions of lives.... would it not be worth it...
just saying... I dont get the SELFISHNESS of musicains here in their thinking... just saying...



Rick


Hmm, should an American be proud that their nation has endorsed the use of torture? I thought the right not to be terrorised and tortured by government agencies was one of those much lauded American liberties so highly valued in a democracy. These musician object to their music being used to torture people, and so I should hope they would. It has nothing to do with their stance on Iraq, the insurgents or their political alliance, and everything to do with an objection to America using torture, as if it were one of the oppressive regimes it says it opposes (wasn't Hussein's use of torture one of the reasons given for the USA going into Iraq in the first place?)

For what it's worth, torture has never produced good or reliable information, because people will eventually say anything to make it stop, guilty or not.
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: QUESTION...

Postby strangegrey » Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:09 pm

Arianddu wrote:Hmm, should an American be proud that their nation has endorsed the use of torture? I thought the right not to be terrorised and tortured by government agencies was one of those much lauded American liberties so highly valued in a democracy. These musician object to their music being used to torture people, and so I should hope they would. It has nothing to do with their stance on Iraq, the insurgents or their political alliance, and everything to do with an objection to America using torture, as if it were one of the oppressive regimes it says it opposes (wasn't Hussein's use of torture one of the reasons given for the USA going into Iraq in the first place?)

For what it's worth, torture has never produced good or reliable information, because people will eventually say anything to make it stop, guilty or not.


How do you know? Are you a military/intelligence expert?
Sorry...I'm not condoning torture here...but please don't spray off things as 'facts' when you know they clearly are not.
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby walkslikealady » Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:26 pm

Good points, Arianddu.
Image

"There is no distance on this earth as far away as yesterday." Robert Nathan
User avatar
walkslikealady
8 Track
 
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:33 pm

Re: QUESTION...

Postby Lula » Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:10 am

Arianddu wrote:
Hmm, should an American be proud that their nation has endorsed the use of torture? I thought the right not to be terrorised and tortured by government agencies was one of those much lauded American liberties so highly valued in a democracy. These musician object to their music being used to torture people, and so I should hope they would. It has nothing to do with their stance on Iraq, the insurgents or their political alliance, and everything to do with an objection to America using torture, as if it were one of the oppressive regimes it says it opposes (wasn't Hussein's use of torture one of the reasons given for the USA going into Iraq in the first place?)

For what it's worth, torture has never produced good or reliable information, because people will eventually say anything to make it stop, guilty or not.


our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.
Until we meet again, may God
Hold you in the palm of his hand.

for Dean
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Re: QUESTION...

Postby strangegrey » Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:21 am

Lula wrote:
our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.



Restored? keep dreaming!...and if you want scary, look no further than the blatant attempt to take a huge chunk out of the first ammendment this week!

Like I said in another post. Bush clearly pissed in the punch bowl while he was in office...but YoMama has taken the bowl, put it on the party floor, dropped trou, shat a nasty watery shit into it, stirred it up...and signed legislation forcing everyone to take a big long sip!

Seriously. Pointing to the egregious errors of the previous administration is the only thing that the current one is doing with any clarity or transparency (a solemn campaign promise of the current liar in chief)....
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Re: QUESTION...

Postby RedWingFan » Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:58 pm

strangegrey wrote:
Lula wrote:
our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.



Restored? keep dreaming!...and if you want scary, look no further than the blatant attempt to take a huge chunk out of the first ammendment this week!

Like I said in another post. Bush clearly pissed in the punch bowl while he was in office...but YoMama has taken the bowl, put it on the party floor, dropped trou, shat a nasty watery shit into it, stirred it up...and signed legislation forcing everyone to take a big long sip!

Seriously. Pointing to the egregious errors of the previous administration is the only thing that the current one is doing with any clarity or transparency (a solemn campaign promise of the current liar in chief)....

Did you see this Frank? Coming in December....scary times indeed!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlTagSZPm7o
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
User avatar
RedWingFan
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7868
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:37 pm
Location: The Peoples Republic of Michigan

Re: QUESTION...

Postby Arianddu » Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:19 pm

strangegrey wrote:Are you a military/intelligence expert?


Former father-in-law was precisely that. Know many people who work in that area and more than a few psychologists working for the Defence Department. Industry opinion is - information gained through torture is highly unreliable because people being tortured will tell you what they think you want to hear.

strangegrey wrote:Sorry...I'm not condoning torture here...but please don't spray off things as 'facts' when you know they clearly are not.


Please don't assume someone you know little about doesn't know what they are talking about. You might be surprised.
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: QUESTION...

Postby strangegrey » Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:40 pm

Arianddu wrote:
strangegrey wrote:Are you a military/intelligence expert?


Former father-in-law was precisely that. Know many people who work in that area and more than a few psychologists working for the Defence Department. Industry opinion is - information gained through torture is highly unreliable because people being tortured will tell you what they think you want to hear.

strangegrey wrote:Sorry...I'm not condoning torture here...but please don't spray off things as 'facts' when you know they clearly are not.


Please don't assume someone you know little about doesn't know what they are talking about. You might be surprised.



And exactly what are his qualifications for you citing that you can make such a blatant and eronious statement?
Good lord...former father in law.....that's almost as bad as "I knew a guy once..."

Seriously...I don't condone torture...but there isn't a successful classified intelligence gathering mission in this country (i.e. NOT yours)...especially one over the past 8 years...that is going to reveal it's methods of acquiring information that lead to successful mission ops or thwarting of terrorism....

That sorta thing remains quite classified for several years.


You can't make a blanket statement about something that, by a matter of routine, is kept classified.



Stick to what you can cite as fact....because you clearly are not citing anything other than a "I know a guy that knows a guy" as your support. Hardly conclusive...and highly laughable.
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Re: QUESTION...

Postby Ehwmatt » Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:59 pm

strangegrey wrote:
Lula wrote:
our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.



Restored? keep dreaming!...and if you want scary, look no further than the blatant attempt to take a huge chunk out of the first ammendment this week!

Like I said in another post. Bush clearly pissed in the punch bowl while he was in office...but YoMama has taken the bowl, put it on the party floor, dropped trou, shat a nasty watery shit into it, stirred it up...and signed legislation forcing everyone to take a big long sip!

Seriously. Pointing to the egregious errors of the previous administration is the only thing that the current one is doing with any clarity or transparency (a solemn campaign promise of the current liar in chief)....


Liar in chief? I prefer buffoon in chief
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Re: QUESTION...

Postby Arianddu » Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:07 am

strangegrey wrote:And exactly what are his qualifications for you citing that you can make such a blatant and eronious statement?


He is A Military Intelligence Expert. Works for Australian Foreign Affairs as Embassy Security (and if you can't work out what the hell that actually means, all I'll tell you is it isn't a security guard.) And still very much my family. And no, you don't get more than that. Some things don't get talked about.

What I said is based on those people I know who are fucking experts Frank. You want to spout your opposing opinion, go for it. I don't agree, and my opinion is based on what I hear straight from the horses mouth, not on what someone said down the pub or what I read in the paper.
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: QUESTION...

Postby strangegrey » Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:27 am

Arianddu wrote:
strangegrey wrote:And exactly what are his qualifications for you citing that you can make such a blatant and eronious statement?


He is A Military Intelligence Expert. Works for Australian Foreign Affairs as Embassy Security (and if you can't work out what the hell that actually means, all I'll tell you is it isn't a security guard.) And still very much my family. And no, you don't get more than that. Some things don't get talked about.

What I said is based on those people I know who are fucking experts Frank. You want to spout your opposing opinion, go for it. I don't agree, and my opinion is based on what I hear straight from the horses mouth, not on what someone said down the pub or what I read in the paper.



Whatever. If he is what you say he is...which we can save the verification for another psycho....then even he can't or shouldn't be telling you whether torture results from viable information without breaking a whole slew of confidences (assuming the ausie military is run with proper controls)....but maybe the Ausie military is run loosie goosie...who knows.

I can tell you this....A so-called military intelligence expert in another country doesn't have much authority to comment on military operations outside of his country... :roll:

...so your opinion, which is all it is, and that of your so-called father-in-law....isn't very valid "here" in the US. :oops:


I have military friends in gov here in the actual country we're talking about. Highly placed. I can gaurantee you that they will never tell me, one way or another, whether any of the 'torture' policies that the US adopted over the past few years has resulted in successful military ops or thwarting of terrorism...and their official positions are clear. Anyone that claims to know, ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. Is lying through their teeth. Such a position is consistent with everyone in OUR government (not yours) with the exception of those that stand to politically benefit from saying otherwise.


However, let me add something for you to choke on. My military friends in gov will CLEARLY state that serious terrorism HAS been thwarted here in the states over the past 8 years. You can do your best to try to skirt around the dots that can be connected....
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Re: QUESTION...

Postby Glenn » Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:09 am

RedWingFan wrote:
strangegrey wrote:
Lula wrote:
our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.



Restored? keep dreaming!...and if you want scary, look no further than the blatant attempt to take a huge chunk out of the first ammendment this week!

Like I said in another post. Bush clearly pissed in the punch bowl while he was in office...but YoMama has taken the bowl, put it on the party floor, dropped trou, shat a nasty watery shit into it, stirred it up...and signed legislation forcing everyone to take a big long sip!

Seriously. Pointing to the egregious errors of the previous administration is the only thing that the current one is doing with any clarity or transparency (a solemn campaign promise of the current liar in chief)....

Did you see this Frank? Coming in December....scary times indeed!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlTagSZPm7o



Scary indeed .... WOW
User avatar
Glenn
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1262
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:30 am
Location: TEXAS

Re: QUESTION...

Postby Sarah » Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:49 am

lights1961 wrote:If your bands songs were being used for NATIONAL SECURITY... WHY would you not be a PROUD AMERICAN and say hell ya use them, I am honored to be a part of the sacrafice for the GOOD of the country... JUST SAYING... if the practice of using your songs saved millions of lives.... would it not be worth it...
just saying... I dont get the SELFISHNESS of musicains here in their thinking... just saying...

LOL so people who don't support torture hate America? That's scary.
Sarah
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:34 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: QUESTION...

Postby Gin and Tonic Sky » Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:19 am

[quote="strangegrey"]

Like I said in another post. Bush clearly pissed in the punch bowl while he was in office...but YoMama has taken the bowl, put it on the party floor, dropped trou, shat a nasty watery shit into it, stirred it up...and signed legislation forcing everyone to take a big long sip!

[quote]

AND 4 out of 5 sippers surveyed STILL preferred that cocktail to listening to "Butterfly" or "in self defense". :D
Matt
User avatar
Gin and Tonic Sky
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:46 am
Location: in a purple and gold haze


Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests