Moderator: Andrew
fightingilliniJRNY wrote:Songs being used for national security? Color me confused...![]()
I can see how Baby I'm A Leavin' You could be used when torturing prisoners, but beyond that...I'm lost.
fightingilliniJRNY wrote:Songs being used for national security? Color me confused...![]()
I can see how Baby I'm A Leavin' You could be used when torturing prisoners, but beyond that...I'm lost.
Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:lol, if you gave the enemy a choice between getting nuked and having Generations played outloud over their base camp they would definitely choose the A-bomb
lights1961 wrote:If your bands songs were being used for NATIONAL SECURITY... WHY would you not be a PROUD AMERICAN and say hell ya use them, I am honored to be a part of the sacrafice for the GOOD of the country... JUST SAYING... if the practice of using your songs saved millions of lives.... would it not be worth it...
just saying... I dont get the SELFISHNESS of musicains here in their thinking... just saying...
Rick
Arianddu wrote:Hmm, should an American be proud that their nation has endorsed the use of torture? I thought the right not to be terrorised and tortured by government agencies was one of those much lauded American liberties so highly valued in a democracy. These musician object to their music being used to torture people, and so I should hope they would. It has nothing to do with their stance on Iraq, the insurgents or their political alliance, and everything to do with an objection to America using torture, as if it were one of the oppressive regimes it says it opposes (wasn't Hussein's use of torture one of the reasons given for the USA going into Iraq in the first place?)
For what it's worth, torture has never produced good or reliable information, because people will eventually say anything to make it stop, guilty or not.
Arianddu wrote:
Hmm, should an American be proud that their nation has endorsed the use of torture? I thought the right not to be terrorised and tortured by government agencies was one of those much lauded American liberties so highly valued in a democracy. These musician object to their music being used to torture people, and so I should hope they would. It has nothing to do with their stance on Iraq, the insurgents or their political alliance, and everything to do with an objection to America using torture, as if it were one of the oppressive regimes it says it opposes (wasn't Hussein's use of torture one of the reasons given for the USA going into Iraq in the first place?)
For what it's worth, torture has never produced good or reliable information, because people will eventually say anything to make it stop, guilty or not.
Lula wrote:
our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.
strangegrey wrote:Lula wrote:
our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.
Restored? keep dreaming!...and if you want scary, look no further than the blatant attempt to take a huge chunk out of the first ammendment this week!
Like I said in another post. Bush clearly pissed in the punch bowl while he was in office...but YoMama has taken the bowl, put it on the party floor, dropped trou, shat a nasty watery shit into it, stirred it up...and signed legislation forcing everyone to take a big long sip!
Seriously. Pointing to the egregious errors of the previous administration is the only thing that the current one is doing with any clarity or transparency (a solemn campaign promise of the current liar in chief)....
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
strangegrey wrote:Are you a military/intelligence expert?
strangegrey wrote:Sorry...I'm not condoning torture here...but please don't spray off things as 'facts' when you know they clearly are not.
Arianddu wrote:strangegrey wrote:Are you a military/intelligence expert?
Former father-in-law was precisely that. Know many people who work in that area and more than a few psychologists working for the Defence Department. Industry opinion is - information gained through torture is highly unreliable because people being tortured will tell you what they think you want to hear.strangegrey wrote:Sorry...I'm not condoning torture here...but please don't spray off things as 'facts' when you know they clearly are not.
Please don't assume someone you know little about doesn't know what they are talking about. You might be surprised.
strangegrey wrote:Lula wrote:
our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.
Restored? keep dreaming!...and if you want scary, look no further than the blatant attempt to take a huge chunk out of the first ammendment this week!
Like I said in another post. Bush clearly pissed in the punch bowl while he was in office...but YoMama has taken the bowl, put it on the party floor, dropped trou, shat a nasty watery shit into it, stirred it up...and signed legislation forcing everyone to take a big long sip!
Seriously. Pointing to the egregious errors of the previous administration is the only thing that the current one is doing with any clarity or transparency (a solemn campaign promise of the current liar in chief)....
strangegrey wrote:And exactly what are his qualifications for you citing that you can make such a blatant and eronious statement?
Arianddu wrote:strangegrey wrote:And exactly what are his qualifications for you citing that you can make such a blatant and eronious statement?
He is A Military Intelligence Expert. Works for Australian Foreign Affairs as Embassy Security (and if you can't work out what the hell that actually means, all I'll tell you is it isn't a security guard.) And still very much my family. And no, you don't get more than that. Some things don't get talked about.
What I said is based on those people I know who are fucking experts Frank. You want to spout your opposing opinion, go for it. I don't agree, and my opinion is based on what I hear straight from the horses mouth, not on what someone said down the pub or what I read in the paper.
RedWingFan wrote:strangegrey wrote:Lula wrote:
our nation was altered with the policies of the previous administration, but will hopefully be restored by our present one. dick cheney continues to pimp the idea of torture as a good thing. scary man.
Restored? keep dreaming!...and if you want scary, look no further than the blatant attempt to take a huge chunk out of the first ammendment this week!
Like I said in another post. Bush clearly pissed in the punch bowl while he was in office...but YoMama has taken the bowl, put it on the party floor, dropped trou, shat a nasty watery shit into it, stirred it up...and signed legislation forcing everyone to take a big long sip!
Seriously. Pointing to the egregious errors of the previous administration is the only thing that the current one is doing with any clarity or transparency (a solemn campaign promise of the current liar in chief)....
Did you see this Frank? Coming in December....scary times indeed!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlTagSZPm7o
lights1961 wrote:If your bands songs were being used for NATIONAL SECURITY... WHY would you not be a PROUD AMERICAN and say hell ya use them, I am honored to be a part of the sacrafice for the GOOD of the country... JUST SAYING... if the practice of using your songs saved millions of lives.... would it not be worth it...
just saying... I dont get the SELFISHNESS of musicains here in their thinking... just saying...
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests