
http://www.spinner.com/2010/01/15/great ... ?icid=main
Moderator: Andrew
steveo777 wrote:Nobody in the comments even questioned that Steve Perry wasn't on that list? That in itself proves corruption! The world is all fucked up!
ProgRocker53 wrote:Robert Plant at #20- needs to be higher
Zombie and Manson don't belong on here
Springsteen needs to be a bit higher
Glad that I didn't see Cobain on here
T-Bone wrote:How did Rob Zombie and Marilyn Manson even make the top 20, let alone the top 100? And Gene Simmons over Paul? No Steve Perry? This list has a slight flaw...
squirt1 wrote:Everytime I see these lists, I say WHO SAYS. It is kind of like the R&R HOF and the guy who selects and controls it in Cleveland. Add the Grammy to the list ! The only thing that means anything is CD sales so artists and bands can tour, which is more $$$.
squirt1 wrote:Everytime I see these lists, I say WHO SAYS. It is kind of like the R&R HOF and the guy who selects and controls it in Cleveland. Add the Grammy to the list ! The only thing that means anything is CD sales so artists and bands can tour, which is more $$$.
Triple S wrote:Right there
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Ehwmatt wrote:Triple S wrote:Right there
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I'd say Burton's frontman skills are pretty underrated. He's a more classic style "man's man" frontman, eschewing the oft-androgynous strutting and dancing of more flamboyant frontmen for simply great presence, great facial expressions, his "real life" (ie not just a lame "HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU DOIN" kinda stuff) conversational rapport with the fans in the audience at shows, and good chemistry with his bandmates.
Triple S wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Triple S wrote:Right there
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I'd say Burton's frontman skills are pretty underrated. He's a more classic style "man's man" frontman, eschewing the oft-androgynous strutting and dancing of more flamboyant frontmen for simply great presence, great facial expressions, his "real life" (ie not just a lame "HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU DOIN" kinda stuff) conversational rapport with the fans in the audience at shows, and good chemistry with his bandmates.
Agreed! (but you know I was talking about Michael Hutchence - in my av - right?)
Ehwmatt wrote:Triple S wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Triple S wrote:Right there
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I'd say Burton's frontman skills are pretty underrated. He's a more classic style "man's man" frontman, eschewing the oft-androgynous strutting and dancing of more flamboyant frontmen for simply great presence, great facial expressions, his "real life" (ie not just a lame "HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU DOIN" kinda stuff) conversational rapport with the fans in the audience at shows, and good chemistry with his bandmates.
Agreed! (but you know I was talking about Michael Hutchence - in my av - right?)
Yes, I did. But I knew you would know what I was talking about !
Triple S wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Triple S wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Triple S wrote:Right there
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
I'd say Burton's frontman skills are pretty underrated. He's a more classic style "man's man" frontman, eschewing the oft-androgynous strutting and dancing of more flamboyant frontmen for simply great presence, great facial expressions, his "real life" (ie not just a lame "HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU DOIN" kinda stuff) conversational rapport with the fans in the audience at shows, and good chemistry with his bandmates.
Agreed! (but you know I was talking about Michael Hutchence - in my av - right?)
Yes, I did. But I knew you would know what I was talking about !
Slightly OT - but do you ever read his MySpace blog? He is one deep dude!
JasonD wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:Robert Plant at #20- needs to be higher
Zombie and Manson don't belong on here
Springsteen needs to be a bit higher
Glad that I didn't see Cobain on here
I agree. I also don't understand why Elvis is on the list. Can you really call someone a Frontman when there are no ..... er.... uh, Backmen? (What's the word I'm looking for?) How can a solo artist be considered a Frontman? When I think "Frontman," I think of someone who fronts a band. Manson's a no talent freak. He needs to come off the list altogether. I love The Cure so it's good to see Robert Smith's name mentioned but I don't believe he belongs on the list..... not in the top 20 at least!
X factor wrote:Robert Plant at 20???How bout Plant at ONE where he belongs! And no Daltry? Crapola, if I'm gonna put anyone ahead of Plant, it'd be Daltry (or maybe Freddie. At least they got that right!)
parfait wrote:X factor wrote:Robert Plant at 20???How bout Plant at ONE where he belongs! And no Daltry? Crapola, if I'm gonna put anyone ahead of Plant, it'd be Daltry (or maybe Freddie. At least they got that right!)
Plant is hugely (?) overrated. He had like 3-4 vocally good years with LZ, and that's about it.
The world's best frontman got to Bruce Springsteen - or Mr. Kittens from 1980-83
Babyblue wrote:JasonD wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:Robert Plant at #20- needs to be higher
Zombie and Manson don't belong on here
Springsteen needs to be a bit higher
Glad that I didn't see Cobain on here
I agree. I also don't understand why Elvis is on the list. Can you really call someone a Frontman when there are no ..... er.... uh, Backmen? (What's the word I'm looking for?) How can a solo artist be considered a Frontman? When I think "Frontman," I think of someone who fronts a band. Manson's a no talent freak. He needs to come off the list altogether. I love The Cure so it's good to see Robert Smith's name mentioned but I don't believe he belongs on the list..... not in the top 20 at least!
I agre Elvis was never a front man ever.And the list is crazy but we knew that going in.Do they ever add Perry no not for the most part.
T-Bone wrote:How did Rob Zombie and Marilyn Manson even make the top 20, let alone the top 100? And Gene Simmons over Paul? No Steve Perry? This list has a slight flaw...
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests