
Moderator: Andrew
yulog wrote:Ugh!Yes its that bad, and its not the music itself because they did retain the giant "sound" on several songs. Its the singer, horrible tone, low end is bad, voice sounds warbley at times. there are a couple of songs that could have been gems....well at least 1 song ,but his voice brings it down to slightly better than average (through my eyes). It would be a mistake if they used this singer again.
yulog wrote:Ugh!Yes its that bad, and its not the music itself because they did retain the giant "sound" on several songs. Its the singer, horrible tone, low end is bad, voice sounds warbley at times. there are a couple of songs that could have been gems....well at least 1 song ,but his voice brings it down to slightly better than average (through my eyes). It would be a mistake if they used this singer again.
kgdjpubs wrote:yulog wrote:Ugh!Yes its that bad, and its not the music itself because they did retain the giant "sound" on several songs. Its the singer, horrible tone, low end is bad, voice sounds warbley at times. there are a couple of songs that could have been gems....well at least 1 song ,but his voice brings it down to slightly better than average (through my eyes). It would be a mistake if they used this singer again.
Really?!?!? Terry Brock is one of the better singers out there--and probably one of the most famous "names" in the melodic rock scene for his work with Strangeways. I'll agree he didn't sound so hot on Promise Land, but that song is really out of his vocal range (low end was never his strong point, so that was a mismatch from the beginning)--and he sounds considerably better higher pitched. He certainly doesn't sound like Dann Huff, but I hope he isn't losing it.
For what it's worth, there are some videos of Giant live in the old days on youtube, and Dann's vocals were decidedly average at best--very pitchy, etc. He always sounded good in the studio, but I guess the inexperience of singing lead vocal live really showed.
That being said, Terry Brock was certainly an "out there" choice for the band. Not sure offhand who I would have picked.
yulog wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:yulog wrote:Ugh!Yes its that bad, and its not the music itself because they did retain the giant "sound" on several songs. Its the singer, horrible tone, low end is bad, voice sounds warbley at times. there are a couple of songs that could have been gems....well at least 1 song ,but his voice brings it down to slightly better than average (through my eyes). It would be a mistake if they used this singer again.
Really?!?!? Terry Brock is one of the better singers out there--and probably one of the most famous "names" in the melodic rock scene for his work with Strangeways. I'll agree he didn't sound so hot on Promise Land, but that song is really out of his vocal range (low end was never his strong point, so that was a mismatch from the beginning)--and he sounds considerably better higher pitched. He certainly doesn't sound like Dann Huff, but I hope he isn't losing it.
For what it's worth, there are some videos of Giant live in the old days on youtube, and Dann's vocals were decidedly average at best--very pitchy, etc. He always sounded good in the studio, but I guess the inexperience of singing lead vocal live really showed.
That being said, Terry Brock was certainly an "out there" choice for the band. Not sure offhand who I would have picked.
For what its worth there are some videos of Every band on you tube that shows the singer of the band being average at best ( very pitchy)This guy sounds weak in the studio, I can Imagine how he would sound on you tube
![]()
yulog wrote:That vid of him doesn't work. My guess is, this is another european singer, because as far as i know this guy was not big in the states , nor was strangeways. I did some research and found very little on him(but he's apparently one of the best in the business?)
Apparently he sang back up for kansas back when elefante was the lead singer, and some other work with molly hatchett? and then his strangeways stint(trust me they were never big in the states), and also a little bit in Leroux. This list doesn't scream best in the business, or 1 of the best aor singers.
I don't know, to me to be one of the best you have to have made it to the top at some point and This guy is a relative unknown accept maybe to some of the people here at MR. The most notable band in his resume was kansas and this guy doesnt come close to elefante or Walsh as far as an AOR singer. The next best would be molly hatchet and the only guy who made that band the best as far as singing was Danny jo Brown.
Leroux? Strangeways? neither of these bands could be considered at the same level as the other 2.
I guess what i'm saying is, how can you be one of the best if you only made it to the minors.![]()
kgdjpubs wrote:yulog wrote:Ugh!Yes its that bad, and its not the music itself because they did retain the giant "sound" on several songs. Its the singer, horrible tone, low end is bad, voice sounds warbley at times. there are a couple of songs that could have been gems....well at least 1 song ,but his voice brings it down to slightly better than average (through my eyes). It would be a mistake if they used this singer again.
Really?!?!? Terry Brock is one of the better singers out there--and probably one of the most famous "names" in the melodic rock scene for his work with Strangeways. I'll agree he didn't sound so hot on Promise Land, but that song is really out of his vocal range (low end was never his strong point, so that was a mismatch from the beginning)--and he sounds considerably better higher pitched. He certainly doesn't sound like Dann Huff, but I hope he isn't losing it.
For what it's worth, there are some videos of Giant live in the old days on youtube, and Dann's vocals were decidedly average at best--very pitchy, etc. He always sounded good in the studio, but I guess the inexperience of singing lead vocal live really showed.
That being said, Terry Brock was certainly an "out there" choice for the band. Not sure offhand who I would have picked.
Rip Rokken wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:yulog wrote:Ugh!Yes its that bad, and its not the music itself because they did retain the giant "sound" on several songs. Its the singer, horrible tone, low end is bad, voice sounds warbley at times. there are a couple of songs that could have been gems....well at least 1 song ,but his voice brings it down to slightly better than average (through my eyes). It would be a mistake if they used this singer again.
Really?!?!? Terry Brock is one of the better singers out there--and probably one of the most famous "names" in the melodic rock scene for his work with Strangeways. I'll agree he didn't sound so hot on Promise Land, but that song is really out of his vocal range (low end was never his strong point, so that was a mismatch from the beginning)--and he sounds considerably better higher pitched. He certainly doesn't sound like Dann Huff, but I hope he isn't losing it.
For what it's worth, there are some videos of Giant live in the old days on youtube, and Dann's vocals were decidedly average at best--very pitchy, etc. He always sounded good in the studio, but I guess the inexperience of singing lead vocal live really showed.
That being said, Terry Brock was certainly an "out there" choice for the band. Not sure offhand who I would have picked.
Terry Brock RULES, and since Yulog hates the CD I know I have the double thumbs-up to buy it now.Plus, John Roth plays guitar on it. Here is their video from the first single if anyone hasn't seen it. I likes it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB_ClwymQlU
kgdjpubs wrote:Personally, I'm awaiting the long overdue Terry Brock 2nd solo album that is supposedly due out this year, and the Strangeways reunion album. Both of those have the potential to be good. We'll see...
Rip Rokken wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:Personally, I'm awaiting the long overdue Terry Brock 2nd solo album that is supposedly due out this year, and the Strangeways reunion album. Both of those have the potential to be good. We'll see...
Per his Facebook post, he's leaving on the 18th to go record the new Strangeways album. Hope it ROCKS!!!!!
Rip Rokken wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:yulog wrote:Ugh!Yes its that bad, and its not the music itself because they did retain the giant "sound" on several songs. Its the singer, horrible tone, low end is bad, voice sounds warbley at times. there are a couple of songs that could have been gems....well at least 1 song ,but his voice brings it down to slightly better than average (through my eyes). It would be a mistake if they used this singer again.
Really?!?!? Terry Brock is one of the better singers out there--and probably one of the most famous "names" in the melodic rock scene for his work with Strangeways. I'll agree he didn't sound so hot on Promise Land, but that song is really out of his vocal range (low end was never his strong point, so that was a mismatch from the beginning)--and he sounds considerably better higher pitched. He certainly doesn't sound like Dann Huff, but I hope he isn't losing it.
For what it's worth, there are some videos of Giant live in the old days on youtube, and Dann's vocals were decidedly average at best--very pitchy, etc. He always sounded good in the studio, but I guess the inexperience of singing lead vocal live really showed.
That being said, Terry Brock was certainly an "out there" choice for the band. Not sure offhand who I would have picked.
Terry Brock RULES, and since Yulog hates the CD I know I have the double thumbs-up to buy it now.Plus, John Roth plays guitar on it. Here is their video from the first single if anyone hasn't seen it. I likes it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB_ClwymQlU
Jana wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:That being said, Terry Brock was certainly an "out there" choice for the band. Not sure offhand who I would have picked.
Terry Brock RULES, and since Yulog hates the CD I know I have the double thumbs-up to buy it now.Plus, John Roth plays guitar on it. Here is their video from the first single if anyone hasn't seen it. I likes it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB_ClwymQlU
kgdjpubs wrote:umm....Strangeways isn't really known for "rocking". Uptempo, maybe, but they were generally pretty soft. Still, hope it's good. I can deal with slower if the quality is there.
Rip Rokken wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:umm....Strangeways isn't really known for "rocking". Uptempo, maybe, but they were generally pretty soft. Still, hope it's good. I can deal with slower if the quality is there.
You have heard Walk In The Fire, right? That's not rock?!? Pounding drums, heavy guitar, and Brockie Lawless on vocals?
Rip Rokken wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:umm....Strangeways isn't really known for "rocking". Uptempo, maybe, but they were generally pretty soft. Still, hope it's good. I can deal with slower if the quality is there.
You have heard Walk In The Fire, right? That's not rock?!? Pounding drums, heavy guitar, and Brockie Lawless on vocals?
yulog wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:umm....Strangeways isn't really known for "rocking". Uptempo, maybe, but they were generally pretty soft. Still, hope it's good. I can deal with slower if the quality is there.
You have heard Walk In The Fire, right? That's not rock?!? Pounding drums, heavy guitar, and Brockie Lawless on vocals?
This is a prime example of why these guys were not big in the states
Rick wrote:yulog wrote:Rip Rokken wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:umm....Strangeways isn't really known for "rocking". Uptempo, maybe, but they were generally pretty soft. Still, hope it's good. I can deal with slower if the quality is there.
You have heard Walk In The Fire, right? That's not rock?!? Pounding drums, heavy guitar, and Brockie Lawless on vocals?
This is a prime example of why these guys were not big in the states
Giant = not big. That's very confusing.
T-Bone wrote:Is it a good CD? Yes... But it's still not Giant to me. I like Brocks vocals and I love Roth's playing, but neither one of them is Dann Huff. It's not a slam by any means, but it's just different. Some bands can replace members here and there and actually stay on level and sometimes even improve, but this is one of those times that I think a name change would have worked better for them.
kgdjpubs wrote:parts of WITF rock. Generally speaking though, they were softer than Journey was. I'm expecting a few rock songs, a bunch of midtempo and a few ballads (basically what you would expect from Journey).
I think this has more to do with the definition of a "rocking cd" moreso than anything else.
T-Bone wrote:Is it a good CD? Yes... But it's still not Giant to me. I like Brocks vocals and I love Roth's playing, but neither one of them is Dann Huff. It's not a slam by any means, but it's just different. Some bands can replace members here and there and actually stay on level and sometimes even improve, but this is one of those times that I think a name change would have worked better for them.
Rip Rokken wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:parts of WITF rock. Generally speaking though, they were softer than Journey was. I'm expecting a few rock songs, a bunch of midtempo and a few ballads (basically what you would expect from Journey).
I think this has more to do with the definition of a "rocking cd" moreso than anything else.
This was the first Strangeways song I heard, and only late in 2009:
Where Are They Now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KbbDCWRNa4
Someone had shared 5 of those tracks with me probably a year ago, but I didn't listen to them until several months later during a long drive home. I loved the stuff so much, I played them over and over for most of the 2 hour trip. It was a real treat hearing them play a few of those songs live in Elgin, and I'm glad I filmed them.
Terry told me the new Strangeways album would pick up where WITF left off -- not exactly the same style, but the next step. Really looking forward to it. That dude is too cool... he also gave me his lyric cheat sheet for Helter Skelter that he jammed at MR Fest II with Winger, and signed it to me with a very nice note.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests