MR

And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!!

G.I.Jim wrote:

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!!

How could we push drew to land a spot in next year's super bowl?

G.I.Jim wrote:

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!!

+1

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

G.I.Jim wrote:

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!!

+1

Damn... you mean we actually AGREE on something?

G.I.Jim wrote:

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

G.I.Jim wrote:

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!!

+1

Damn... you mean we actually AGREE on something?

Screw the game itself, here you go. Click the photos so you can watch the videos.

http://adland.tv/superbowlads/2010-supe ... ommercials

What the hell is up with the "no pants" theme in a lot of the Superbowl commercials?

Thenightbull wrote:

G.I.Jim wrote:

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!!

How could we push drew to land a spot in next year's super bowl?

Uh, give him a cool $2.5m.

Superbowl commercial...... Dove, for men.



Major fail. That is SO not gonna sell.

steveo777 wrote:

Thenightbull wrote:

G.I.Jim wrote:

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!!

How could we push drew to land a spot in next year's super bowl?

Uh, give him a cool $2.5m.

What would Drew be advertising, I wonder?

Comercials and the SAINTS. Not that I am a big fan of the STs mind you, but because my ex loved the Colts.

JasonD wrote:

steveo777 wrote:

Thenightbull wrote:

G.I.Jim wrote:

TRAGChick wrote:And I just want the BEST TEAM TO WIN!!!!

I just want the commercials to win! That's the ONLY reason to watch it. Oh yeah... and for the half-time show!!!

How could we push drew to land a spot in next year's super bowl?

Uh, give him a cool $2.5m.

What would Drew be advertising, I wonder?

Obviously the site

Just got home from work - halftime show is awful!

I'm getting the shakes because I'm starting to feel the annual football withdrawal - last 30 min until next fall!

artist4perry wrote:Comercials and the SAINTS. Not that I am a big fan of the STs mind you, but because my ex loved the Colts.

Comercials not to bad. I want the Saints to win this one.

The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

I thought so as well.

Fact Finder wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

They sounded good but Daltry was getting "some help". Twice he was off with the track.

Yea I noticed that as well.

Fact Finder wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

They sounded good but Daltry was getting "some help". Twice he was off with the track.

Yup. Roger can't really do much besides scream any more. The Who are still cool motherfuckers though

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.

Oooo, I love the E*TRADE babies!!! Cute!!!

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.

Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.

KDOUBLEU wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.

Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.

No way. I loved the Stones.

The Stones at haltime - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg6DTytwrLA

The Who at haltime - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PEM4uFcaF0

I guess you gotta be a die-hard Who fan to notice the suckitude level of their performance, b/c I'm not a die-hard fan & they sounded okay to me.

KDOUBLEU wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.

Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.

Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff.That has nothing to do with age. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.

JasonD wrote:Oooo, I love the E*TRADE babies!!! Cute!!!

Funny add. I like the original kid though.

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.

Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.

Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.

I think Roger's problems are more due to his gruff style and screaming rather than infirmities of age. The guy looks to be in the shape of a fit 30-something year old! He just can't do it any more. My dad caught him a few months back and Roger literally couldn't even talk on the mic between the songs and had to quit an hour into the show because he couldn't sing any more.

Ehwmatt wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.

Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.

Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.

I think Roger's problems are more due to his gruff style and screaming rather than infirmities of age. The guy looks to be in the shape of a fit 30-something year old! He just can't do it any more. My dad caught him a few months back and Roger literally couldn't even talk on the mic between the songs and had to quit an hour into the show because he couldn't sing any more.

I think I remember you saying that a few months ago. Roger is way physically fit but NEEDS a voice coach. I was AMAZED that they did "See Me". They SHOULD have stuck with My Generation and some lower tunes for Roger. However, if the band had been good (meaning if Pete didn't walk over all the vocal parts and sing shit harmonies and play sloppy ass guitar), I think it would've been a lot better. It looked like Pete didn't rehearse. Also, when you've got a full backup band playing and singing all the harmonies and stuff, I would think that it'd make you pretty lazy and complacent, so you'd kind of just sing wherever you felt like it.
I wasn't thrilled.

brywool wrote:

Ehwmatt wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.

Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.

Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.

I think Roger's problems are more due to his gruff style and screaming rather than infirmities of age. The guy looks to be in the shape of a fit 30-something year old! He just can't do it any more. My dad caught him a few months back and Roger literally couldn't even talk on the mic between the songs and had to quit an hour into the show because he couldn't sing any more.

I think I remember you saying that a few months ago. Roger is way physically fit but NEEDS a voice coach. I was AMAZED that they did "See Me". They SHOULD have stuck with My Generation and some lower tunes for Roger. However, if the band had been good (meaning if Pete didn't walk over all the vocal parts and sing shit harmonies and play sloppy ass guitar), I think it would've been a lot better. It looked like Pete didn't rehearse. Also, when you've got a full backup band playing and singing all the harmonies and stuff, I would think that it'd make you pretty lazy and complacent, so you'd kind of just sing wherever you felt like it.
I wasn't thrilled.

Yeah, the full backup band was a huge crutch. I think they hate My Generation, don't they? or at least one of them does. I hate that song too. So overrated.

Ehwmatt wrote:

brywool wrote:

Ehwmatt wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:

brywool wrote:

KDOUBLEU wrote:The Who sounded pretty good tonight.

You're kidding, right?
They were terrible. Zak was great, Roger and especially Pete were terrible.
He was kind of singing whenever he felt like it and playing major slop guitar.
Worst Who performance I've ever seen.

Theyre old men for gods sake give them a break. I thought they did alright. And better than the Stones.

Better than the Stones? I'd call it a draw. They both sucked.
McCartney's old too and still kicks ass live. Many bands are pushing or above 60 and are still doing great.
Being old may have something to do with Roger, and I'm actually cutting him a bit of slack.
Pete's voice is pretty much still intact. However, his age doesn't excuse sloppy, under rehearsed playing.
Pete's guitar parts are not that difficult and it was like he just showed up and phoned it in and acted really loopy even for Pete.
Regarding his voice, he would just kind of sing wherever he felt like it.
You can't do that and any musician making a living can tell you that. You sing where you're supposed to and stay off the mic unless you're going to be there for your parts.
Otherwise, they could've left the backup band to just do the harmony stuff. I hope Roger was all over Pete after the gig.

I think Roger's problems are more due to his gruff style and screaming rather than infirmities of age. The guy looks to be in the shape of a fit 30-something year old! He just can't do it any more. My dad caught him a few months back and Roger literally couldn't even talk on the mic between the songs and had to quit an hour into the show because he couldn't sing any more.

I think I remember you saying that a few months ago. Roger is way physically fit but NEEDS a voice coach. I was AMAZED that they did "See Me". They SHOULD have stuck with My Generation and some lower tunes for Roger. However, if the band had been good (meaning if Pete didn't walk over all the vocal parts and sing shit harmonies and play sloppy ass guitar), I think it would've been a lot better. It looked like Pete didn't rehearse. Also, when you've got a full backup band playing and singing all the harmonies and stuff, I would think that it'd make you pretty lazy and complacent, so you'd kind of just sing wherever you felt like it.
I wasn't thrilled.

Yeah, the full backup band was a huge crutch. I think they hate My Generation, don't they? or at least one of them does. I hate that song too. So overrated.

Overrated, but much easier to pull off for them.

I loved the Cheap trick comercial "The GREEN police" song. Cute, environmental, and funny. Gold stars for the Cheap trick for doing that one. They would kick the Who's butt live. [url]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFkbSAH7yb4

It was Cheap trick......the song is on their web site.