Moderator: Andrew
brandonpfn wrote:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/
I fuckin' love this movie...I remember being scared shitless when I saw it in the theatres as an 8 year old....And I know it wasn't supposed to be as scary as the first one. To me it's the perfect execution of science fiction, future / space themes. You actually give 2 shits about the characters by the time everything "goes down" on screen. As far as action, future / sci fi, nothing's really topped it IMHO...I dig Cameron too (I really enjoyed Avatar, even though it enduced me to sleep). Anyway, i'm buzzed lol..
- Brandon
Monker wrote:
The only one that can compete is John Carpenters "The Thing".
kgdjpubs wrote:wonderful film, even though I tend to prefer the extended version over the theatrical cut.
Monker wrote:brandonpfn wrote:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/
I fuckin' love this movie...I remember being scared shitless when I saw it in the theatres as an 8 year old....And I know it wasn't supposed to be as scary as the first one. To me it's the perfect execution of science fiction, future / space themes. You actually give 2 shits about the characters by the time everything "goes down" on screen. As far as action, future / sci fi, nothing's really topped it IMHO...I dig Cameron too (I really enjoyed Avatar, even though it enduced me to sleep). Anyway, i'm buzzed lol..
- Brandon
The only one that can compete is John Carpenters "The Thing".
brandonpfn wrote:http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/
I fuckin' love this movie...I remember being scared shitless when I saw it in the theatres as an 8 year old....And I know it wasn't supposed to be as scary as the first one. To me it's the perfect execution of science fiction, future / space themes. You actually give 2 shits about the characters by the time everything "goes down" on screen. As far as action, future / sci fi, nothing's really topped it IMHO...I dig Cameron too (I really enjoyed Avatar, even though it enduced me to sleep). Anyway, i'm buzzed lol..
- Brandon
verslibre wrote:I guess I get to be Mr. Unpopular in this thread.
James Cameron needs to stay away from anything "SF" as far as I'm concerned. Avatar was a joke, and it's a sure bet Cameron will turn on his Recyclotron again if he writes another script. Aliens hasn't held up nearly as well as Ridley Scott's atmospheric masterpiece that featured just "one" alien. Same for The Terminator. The first movie ("co-written by Cameron" — see http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/fullcredits#writers for the note about Harlan Ellison's successful lawsuit) is this nice, tidy little tale of a cyborg from the future on a killing rampage. After that...meh.
brandonpfn wrote:verslibre wrote:I guess I get to be Mr. Unpopular in this thread.
James Cameron needs to stay away from anything "SF" as far as I'm concerned. Avatar was a joke, and it's a sure bet Cameron will turn on his Recyclotron again if he writes another script. Aliens hasn't held up nearly as well as Ridley Scott's atmospheric masterpiece that featured just "one" alien. Same for The Terminator. The first movie ("co-written by Cameron" — see http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/fullcredits#writers for the note about Harlan Ellison's successful lawsuit) is this nice, tidy little tale of a cyborg from the future on a killing rampage. After that...meh.
What are you talking about? Terminator...Aliens...The Abyss...Avatar...he practically re-created the genre....Too many haters out there to appreciate something when it's good. While not my preferred genre, Titanic was really well done. He fought the studios all along the way on that one too (Even after his previous successes). Finally he had the budget and time to do the movie he wanted, and he continues to push the technology to uncharted areas....Look at how much better his motion capture is compared to anything Robert Zemeckis has done recently (Beowulf, Christmas Carol, etc)...night and day quality... As for Aliens - it was done at a moment of time (mid 80s) - Sure, 'Alien' probably holds up better as an exercise of extreme claustrophobia, but who wants to watch that? Even Ridley Scott admitted Cameron raised the bar, and will target to improve upon that with his upcoming prequel (definitely looking forward to that!) In the end, I like a roller coaster ride, and Aliens continues to deliver. I mean, almost every other line of dialogue is classically quotable banter... I'll admit it probably holds a special place in the chockles of my heart (maybe perhaps, even the sub chockles), due to watching it in my youth, but come on, why the hate??
Peartree12249 wrote:brandonpfn wrote:verslibre wrote:I guess I get to be Mr. Unpopular in this thread.
James Cameron needs to stay away from anything "SF" as far as I'm concerned. Avatar was a joke, and it's a sure bet Cameron will turn on his Recyclotron again if he writes another script. Aliens hasn't held up nearly as well as Ridley Scott's atmospheric masterpiece that featured just "one" alien. Same for The Terminator. The first movie ("co-written by Cameron" — see http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/fullcredits#writers for the note about Harlan Ellison's successful lawsuit) is this nice, tidy little tale of a cyborg from the future on a killing rampage. After that...meh.
What are you talking about? Terminator...Aliens...The Abyss...Avatar...he practically re-created the genre....Too many haters out there to appreciate something when it's good. While not my preferred genre, Titanic was really well done. He fought the studios all along the way on that one too (Even after his previous successes). Finally he had the budget and time to do the movie he wanted, and he continues to push the technology to uncharted areas....Look at how much better his motion capture is compared to anything Robert Zemeckis has done recently (Beowulf, Christmas Carol, etc)...night and day quality... As for Aliens - it was done at a moment of time (mid 80s) - Sure, 'Alien' probably holds up better as an exercise of extreme claustrophobia, but who wants to watch that? Even Ridley Scott admitted Cameron raised the bar, and will target to improve upon that with his upcoming prequel (definitely looking forward to that!) In the end, I like a roller coaster ride, and Aliens continues to deliver. I mean, almost every other line of dialogue is classically quotable banter... I'll admit it probably holds a special place in the chockles of my heart (maybe perhaps, even the sub chockles), due to watching it in my youth, but come on, why the hate??
What's a chockle?![]()
Don wrote:
Aliens was great as an action flick but for sheer terror, I say the first one takes the cake.
S2M wrote: " Why don't ya put her in charge!!! "
Melissa wrote:S2M wrote: " Why don't ya put her in charge!!! "
THAT was my favorite Bill Paxton line from the whole movie!
Oh and the female marine in that movie, wasn't she later in Titanic also? The one with the two kids and she says "It'll all be over soon"... could swear that's her, lol...
brandonpfn wrote:Melissa wrote:S2M wrote: " Why don't ya put her in charge!!! "
THAT was my favorite Bill Paxton line from the whole movie!
Oh and the female marine in that movie, wasn't she later in Titanic also? The one with the two kids and she says "It'll all be over soon"... could swear that's her, lol...
Yeah - Vazquez! Same actress!
Melissa wrote:S2M wrote: " Why don't ya put her in charge!!! "
THAT was my favorite Bill Paxton line from the whole movie!
Oh and the female marine in that movie, wasn't she later in Titanic also? The one with the two kids and she says "It'll all be over soon"... could swear that's her, lol...
brandonpfn wrote:verslibre wrote:James Cameron needs to stay away from anything "SF" as far as I'm concerned. Avatar was a joke, and it's a sure bet Cameron will turn on his Recyclotron again if he writes another script. Aliens hasn't held up nearly as well as Ridley Scott's atmospheric masterpiece that featured just "one" alien. Same for The Terminator. The first movie ("co-written by Cameron" — see http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/fullcredits#writers for the note about Harlan Ellison's successful lawsuit) is this nice, tidy little tale of a cyborg from the future on a killing rampage. After that...meh.
What are you talking about? Terminator...Aliens...The Abyss...Avatar...he practically re-created the genre....Too many haters out there to appreciate something when it's good. While not my preferred genre, Titanic was really well done. He fought the studios all along the way on that one too (Even after his previous successes). Finally he had the budget and time to do the movie he wanted, and he continues to push the technology to uncharted areas....Look at how much better his motion capture is compared to anything Robert Zemeckis has done recently (Beowulf, Christmas Carol, etc)...night and day quality... As for Aliens - it was done at a moment of time (mid 80s) - Sure, 'Alien' probably holds up better as an exercise of extreme claustrophobia, but who wants to watch that? Even Ridley Scott admitted Cameron raised the bar, and will target to improve upon that with his upcoming prequel (definitely looking forward to that!) In the end, I like a roller coaster ride, and Aliens continues to deliver. I mean, almost every other line of dialogue is classically quotable banter... I'll admit it probably holds a special place in the chockles of my heart (maybe perhaps, even the sub chockles), due to watching it in my youth, but come on, why the hate??
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests