slucero wrote:Labels used to have hundreds of artists under contract that were "discovered" by their A&R people... but we'd only hear the top 10%...
Then the Interwebs happened... and the labels lost all their ability to be "only way" an artist could get heard... (or not heard, if you were one of the unfortunate 90% under contract)
Now we have everyone and their cousin able to put out their "music" on the interwebs for all to see, hear and possible purchase... which is a good thing actually.. while the big labels keep doing what they've always done.. putting huge money into a few artists for the big payday...
BUT
The problem is they now are competing with everyone on the Interwebs (some of who were that aforementioned 90%)... and people are taking the time to wade through all the crap... bad news for the big labels...
The larger problem I see is the lack of songwriting skills... most of us who are older than 40 grew up loving the Beatles... Frampton, Etc.... and those artists grew up listening very well written music...
A great example is John Lennon, who's influences were the music his mother listened to... Bing Crosby, etc... eventually he got into American music like Elvis, and black R&R.. but those earlier influences are what makes his writing so diverse and still timeless, even today ... a great read is "The Songwriting Secrets of the Beatles"... which really delves into what influences John, Paul and George as songwriters...
Fast forward to today... and these kids grew up listening to what "great" writers??
IMHO.... that is why most of todays stuff is so one dimensional..
Absolutely...And most of the "country" songs are written by people who wrote pop rock in the 1980s.
Additionally, I think the idea of the singer/songwriter a la Arlo Guthrie, Gordon Lightfoot, Carole King, was a product of it's time....that genre came out of a pretty socially and politically volatile time, and that form of expression was pretty well suited for it's time.