MR

Posted: **Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:50 am**

If anyone's interested. Take a look before it's pulled. Damn you Sony Pictures!

http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2011/07 ... internets/

Posted: **Fri Jul 22, 2011 7:58 am**

It does look like shit. I guess the new take on it is we can see the action from Spiderman's eyes? Gay. Of course when you talk about over hyped you have to look no further than Spiderman 3.

Posted: **Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:18 am**

I rather like the re-introduction of Gwen Stacey. Or introduction, rather. Very few mainstream viewers are aware of her minor, pitiful existence

Posted: **Sat Jul 30, 2011 9:23 pm**

Why are they even doing another Spiderman movie? Its too soon...I know, its all about the $$

Posted: **Sun Jul 31, 2011 1:57 am**

Vocalsmanvocals wrote:Why are they even doing another Spiderman movie? Its too soon...I know, its all about the $$

Because if Sony doesn't put out a SM movie, after so many years the Character rights go back to Marvel...where they belong.

Posted: **Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:31 am**

They wanted to reboot with the character being in high school.

Posted: **Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:42 am**

I saw Garfield in LIONS FOR LAMBS...doesn't fit the SM role. As a whole, the entire superhero/comic book movie genre has been rather lame anyway....either the movie is TOO comic booky, or they ruin it with TOO much comedy....Iron Man has been the cream of the crop in terms of superhero movies...the rest? Lame.

Posted: **Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:33 am**

S2M wrote:I saw Garfield in LIONS FOR LAMBS...doesn't fit the SM role. As a whole, the entire superhero/comic book movie genre has been rather lame anyway....either the movie is TOO comic booky, or they ruin it with TOO much comedy....Iron Man has been the cream of the crop in terms of superhero movies...the rest? Lame.

Iron Man had plenty of comedy. Robert Downey's Tony Stark isn't much like the comic version — a lot less serious, actually. Didn't bother me at all.

And you know Batman Begins and The Dark Knight are BADASS. Smoke this!! :lol:

Posted: **Mon Aug 01, 2011 4:50 am**

Iron Man, besides the effects & suit was only below the Spiderman films with Toby (I'm a pussy) Mcguire as the worst of the bunch. Hell, Green Lantern was

twice as good as Iron Man. Robert Downey took Tony Stark's character and totally fucked him up, what an ass. The best film of any of them was "Thor". Stayed

true to the comic, introduced you to many of Asgard's Gods and Chris Hemsworth was actually a great pick to play the title role. I haven't seen Captain America

so I cannot comment on that one yet.

Posted: **Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:07 am**

No Surprize wrote:The best film of any of them was "Thor". Stayed true to the comic, introduced you to many of Asgard's Gods and Chris Hemsworth was actually a great pick to play the title role.

I agree with this, except it isn't better than Nolan's Batman films. Thor almost got everything right, but I had some quibbles with the script/story. Hemsworth indeed plays a great Thor and I can't wait for the Avengers movie...with the caveat that I am NOT a fan of Joss Whedon. I hope he doesn't fuck it up.

No Surprize wrote:I haven't seen Captain America so I cannot comment on that one yet.

Same here, I hear it's great, better than Thor.

MR

Sony's new trailer for Spider-Man version 2.blow

Sony's new trailer for Spider-Man version 2.blow