MR

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8741895/Frenchman-ordered-to-pay-wife-damages-for-lack-of-sex.html


A Frenchman has been ordered to pay his ex-wife £8,500 in damages for failing to have enough sex with her during their marriage.

The 51-year-old man was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”.

A judge has now ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”.

The rare legal decision came after the wife filed for divorce two years ago, blaming the break-up on her husband’s lack of activity in the bedroom.

A judge in Nice, southern France, then granted the divorce and ruled the husband named only as Jean-Louis B. was solely responsible for the split.

But the 47-year-old ex-wife then took him back to court demanding 10,000 euros in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”.

The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from being more attentive between the sheets.

But a judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled: “A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other, and in this case it was absent.

“By getting married, couples agree to sharing their life and this clearly implies they will have sex with each other.”

Who would want to have sex with a Frenchman anyway? LOL Just kidding don't get your baguette in a bunch.

www.gingerbbwtitjiz.com is one of my favourites.

There's something for everyone.

Duncan wrote:www.gingerbbwtitjiz.com is one of my favourites.

There's something for everyone.

The site does not open Duncan. I am sure the only one who wants me is married to me. And that just suits me fine.

I'm going to ask my wife to write me a check then.

Rick wrote:I'm going to ask my wife to write me a check then.

How big's the number going to be?

Gideon wrote:

Rick wrote:I'm going to ask my wife to write me a check then.

How big's the number going to be?

Why? You gonna pay half of it ?

Gideon wrote:

Rick wrote:I'm going to ask my wife to write me a check then.

How big's the number going to be?

(I dunno, but I bet it just got whole lot bigger). 8)

Gideon wrote:

Rick wrote:I'm going to ask my wife to write me a check then.

How big's the number going to be?

Well, there are a lot of variables. I'm ugly, so you have to take points off for that. She works hard, so you have to figure that in. I'm thinking 25 bucks.

AlteredDNA wrote:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8741895/Frenchman-ordered-to-pay-wife-damages-for-lack-of-sex.html


A Frenchman has been ordered to pay his ex-wife £8,500 in damages for failing to have enough sex with her during their marriage.

The 51-year-old man was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”.

A judge has now ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”.

The rare legal decision came after the wife filed for divorce two years ago, blaming the break-up on her husband’s lack of activity in the bedroom.

A judge in Nice, southern France, then granted the divorce and ruled the husband named only as Jean-Louis B. was solely responsible for the split.

But the 47-year-old ex-wife then took him back to court demanding 10,000 euros in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”.

The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from being more attentive between the sheets.

But a judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled: “A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other, and in this case it was absent.

“By getting married, couples agree to sharing their life and this clearly implies they will have sex with each other.”

Took her 21 years to figure out there was a lack of sex, probably only took him a few years to figure out he had a lack of desire

yulog wrote:

AlteredDNA wrote:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8741895/Frenchman-ordered-to-pay-wife-damages-for-lack-of-sex.html


A Frenchman has been ordered to pay his ex-wife £8,500 in damages for failing to have enough sex with her during their marriage.

The 51-year-old man was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”.

A judge has now ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”.

The rare legal decision came after the wife filed for divorce two years ago, blaming the break-up on her husband’s lack of activity in the bedroom.

A judge in Nice, southern France, then granted the divorce and ruled the husband named only as Jean-Louis B. was solely responsible for the split.

But the 47-year-old ex-wife then took him back to court demanding 10,000 euros in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”.

The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from being more attentive between the sheets.

But a judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled: “A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other, and in this case it was absent.

“By getting married, couples agree to sharing their life and this clearly implies they will have sex with each other.”

Took her 21 years to figure out there was a lack of sex, probably only took him a few years to figure out he had a lack of desire

This must be a dumb woman. Rather than sue for lack of sex, maybe she should have worked to find out who he was doing. All logic tells me
that's worth more money. He's a man, right? Had to be screwing somebody.

steveo777 wrote:

yulog wrote:

AlteredDNA wrote:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8741895/Frenchman-ordered-to-pay-wife-damages-for-lack-of-sex.html


A Frenchman has been ordered to pay his ex-wife £8,500 in damages for failing to have enough sex with her during their marriage.

The 51-year-old man was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”.

A judge has now ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”.

The rare legal decision came after the wife filed for divorce two years ago, blaming the break-up on her husband’s lack of activity in the bedroom.

A judge in Nice, southern France, then granted the divorce and ruled the husband named only as Jean-Louis B. was solely responsible for the split.

But the 47-year-old ex-wife then took him back to court demanding 10,000 euros in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”.

The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from being more attentive between the sheets.

But a judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled: “A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other, and in this case it was absent.

“By getting married, couples agree to sharing their life and this clearly implies they will have sex with each other.”

Took her 21 years to figure out there was a lack of sex, probably only took him a few years to figure out he had a lack of desire

This must be a dumb woman. Rather than sue for lack of sex, maybe she should have worked to find out who he was doing. All logic tells me
that's worth more money. He's a man, right? Had to be screwing somebody.

Perhaps they don't recognize erectile dysfunction in the courts of France, tired/health problems, same diff!

Michigan Girl wrote:Perhaps they don't recognize erectile dysfunction in the courts of France, tired/health problems, same diff!

I'm with ya on this. The poor guy has health problems. I can't believe this was even brought up in court, whatever happened to "in sickness and in health"? Maybe they don't say that in their vows in France.

Rick wrote:

Gideon wrote:

Rick wrote:I'm going to ask my wife to write me a check then.

How big's the number going to be?

Well, there are a lot of variables. I'm ugly, so you have to take points off for that. She works hard, so you have to figure that in. I'm thinking 25 bucks.

Rickster, a little advise.....might help. Lose the damn Pryor mask.

Michigan Girl wrote:Perhaps they don't recognize erectile dysfunction in the courts of France, tired/health problems, same diff!

Youre just worried you may have to start writing checks to PeePee

Behshad wrote:

Michigan Girl wrote:Perhaps they don't recognize erectile dysfunction in the courts of France, tired/health problems, same diff!

Youre just worried you may have to start writing checks to PeePee

lol ...if he needs money for meds, I'll help him out!!

I'm just saying the law is ridiculous ...the poor guy reached his sexual peak before
he even had a chance to move out of his little ol' mama's house, she ^^^ has just now
reached hers ...he's petered out.
There's more to this story ...I'll have to see the movie on Lifetime before I make
a judgement call!!

Maybe I can sue my in-laws' for my wife's lack of 'performance' for the last 10 years....citing lack of parental guidance and upbringing.

This story gives me hope LOL

Too bad that law isnt in the USA I would have sued my wife over 25 years ago!!