Moderator: Andrew
Fact Finder wrote: Will Sandy be at the funeral?
Ehwmatt wrote:I knew Paterno wasn't long for this world even before he announced the lung cancer. Like those stories you hear of an old couple dying within months of each other, Paterno lost his will live to live when he lost football. Unfortunately, I don't think history is going to be kind to him. This scandal was just too big and too heinous.
Red13JoePa wrote:Joe said he didn't know a thing about Sandusky's alleged predilections until 2002, though, 3 years after he stopped working for Joe.
Enigma869 wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Joe said he didn't know a thing about Sandusky's alleged predilections until 2002, though, 3 years after he stopped working for Joe.
That, I wasn't aware of. The reports I have heard were that he did know and kept the guy on his staff. If that's the case, I would feel a whole lot better about Joe. I always liked the guy and always believed that he did things the right way in the world of college football, where things are almost never done the right way.
Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Joe said he didn't know a thing about Sandusky's alleged predilections until 2002, though, 3 years after he stopped working for Joe.
That, I wasn't aware of. The reports I have heard were that he did know and kept the guy on his staff. If that's the case, I would feel a whole lot better about Joe. I always liked the guy and always believed that he did things the right way in the world of college football, where things are almost never done the right way.
A lot of people aren't aware of a lot of what did or didn't go down, especially in the media who has tried and closed Joe's case in public.
However, John, I like you, will be very disapointed if we never find out that Joe did more than just kick Mcqueary's story up to Curley/Schultz once and left it at that. Right NOW, that is what we know he did, though.
Enigma869 wrote:I'm just sad that it all ended the way it did for Joe. I will say this, and I suspect I'm in the minority here. That said, it's tough to overlook the fact that the guy presided over the biggest scandal in the history of college football. That doesn't mean I'm an advocate of scumbags picketing his funeral or pissing on his grave. I think Joe Paterno was a decent man who made mistakes. I'm simply not willing to overlook the fact that children were abused on his watch. He did the absolute minimum that was required, but he is a guy who always did more than what was required in every other facet of life, so he needed to be held to a higher standard. At the very minimum, it's simply inexcusable that he didn't fire that sick fuck, Sandusky, given the knowledge he had about what Sandusky was doing. I think Paterno deserved to be fired. I understand those connected to Penn State viewed the guy as an iconic God, and believe that he could do no wrong. It doesn't alter what the sad reality is. I believe Joe did a lot of great things in his life and had a positive impact on countless lives. I also believe that he made the most egregious error, EVER, when he decided to keep Sandusky on his staff. If he fired the guy immediately, none of this would be on his hands, at all, and his legacy would remain unblemished.
Rockindeano wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:Joe said he didn't know a thing about Sandusky's alleged predilections until 2002, though, 3 years after he stopped working for Joe.
That, I wasn't aware of. The reports I have heard were that he did know and kept the guy on his staff. If that's the case, I would feel a whole lot better about Joe. I always liked the guy and always believed that he did things the right way in the world of college football, where things are almost never done the right way.
A lot of people aren't aware of a lot of what did or didn't go down, especially in the media who has tried and closed Joe's case in public.
However, John, I like you, will be very disapointed if we never find out that Joe did more than just kick Mcqueary's story up to Curley/Schultz once and left it at that. Right NOW, that is what we know he did, though.
Sorry Ben. Joe must be judged on his ENTIRE time on Earth. Sure he was great coach, a great leader, made his kids go to class and graduate, but a man of his stature, through his own success, he raised the bar, and that bar was unfortunately not meant with the Sandusky issue. He messed up, and there is NO debating that. You seem to be making the case the "entire story hasn't come out yet." Sorry, we know enough- Enough to know what he did do- and that was simply reporting what was told to him to an higher up. Sorry, while that may be "legally good enough," it sure as Hell isn't good enough for a great man, and a man of Paterno's stature. I have NO doubt he died knowing he could have and should have done more. Instead of grieving for JoePa's death, think about the dozens of little boys who had their innocence striiped from them by a member of Paterno's staff, who he KEPT ON THE THE FUCKING STAFF AFTER KNOWING WHAT HE WAS TOLD. Man, I loved the old guy too, but sorry, this scandal is the biggest, darkest scandal in sports history, and he could have done so much more....maybe and probably stopped more assrapings. Goddammit, open your eyes and put aside your fucking stupid PSU alegiance- these boys were violated by a demon, a demon employed and NOT fired by Mr. Paterno.
I am sick of the PSU community crying over this. There is absolutely NO doubt Joe knew about what he knew, and certainly could have and should have done more; a LOT MORE.
Red13JoePa wrote:Dan dug this up:
"Should you call the police yourself? You, with possibly the most widely recognized face -- and voice -- in Pennsylvania? You call and they'll recognize you, even if you call anonymously. And the story will get out, because it always does (as it did now). And it will be, "Joe Paterno called the police to report sexual assault of a minor." Well, on whom was he reporting? That road leads back to Sandusky. And even if he's innocent, he's destroyed.
And the media would still crucify you. You can just imagine the questioning:
Reporter: So, you reported the sexual assault?
Paterno: Yes.
Reporter: Can you describe what you saw?
Paterno I didn't see anything.
Reporter: What?
Paterno: My graduate assistant told me about it.
Reporter: He told you about it?
Paterno: Yes.
Reporter: But you didn't see it yourself?
Paterno: I did not.
Reporter: Did anyone else tell you about it?
Paterno: No.
Reporter: So you turned in a man for sexual assault of a minor solely on the word of one of your graduate assistants?
The questioning would likely go downhill from there.
How about calling child welfare? The child abuse hotline? Same problem -- you'd be recognized and the story would get out -- further complicated by the fact that you don't know the identity of the child involved.
You see where I'm going with this. You, Joe Paterno, are damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Look at what I've presented above. Look at the scenarios. In my opinion, there is no easy answer for Paterno. What he did here is understandable, rational and reasonable under the circumstances.
In this situation, Paterno was in over his head, and he knew it. He turned it over to people who had the authority and the expertise to investigate it and pursue it as far as it needed to go. That they did not and instead covered it up is not on Paterno. He did what he was supposed to do. If he had tried to go further ... well, you saw above what probably would have happened.
Now, you may say, "The easy answer is to do what's best for the children." I understand that, whatever that means. But my question to you is, "What if Sandusky is innocent?"
Based on the grand jury presentment and the charges of multiple incidents, it looks like the chances of Sandusky being innocent are slim. But, based on what I've seen so far, that is not what Joe Paterno knew or was told. He saw nothing. He was told of a single incident witnessed by a single assistant coach.
The assistant's allegation is obviously extremely serious, but it's also slim on the evidence. Maybe McQueary was somehow mistaken in what he saw. What if Sandusky is innocent?
The bosses at Penn State could see if there is more evidence to either prove or disprove the charge here -- question Sandusky, find the child, etc. But that is not something Joe Paterno could do. He is a football coach.
That the Penn State administration allegedly did not is inexcusable. But that is not on Joe Paterno.
I know I'm probably in a minority position on this one. But just give it some thought. Paterno's case is not as easy as it it being made out to be."
Ehwmatt wrote:The fact of the matter is this: Sandusky,
Michigan Girl wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:The fact of the matter is this: Sandusky,
Smartest thing said since this whole thing went down ...
Ehwmatt wrote:[ But I'm really wondering if any JoePa loyalists feel like I do: the guy should have let go of his beloved position long before this scandal reached its height. I wonder if the loyalists will at least admit that if nothing else, he was flawed in wanting to maintain his power grip on the football program, the university, and the community and that ultimately, that brought his legacy down (and believe me, this will forever tarnish his image in a big way).
Ehwmatt wrote:But I'm really wondering if any JoePa loyalists feel like I do: the guy should have let go of his beloved position long before this scandal reached its height. I wonder if the loyalists will at least admit that if nothing else, he was flawed in wanting to maintain his power grip on the football program, the university, and the community and that ultimately, that brought his legacy down (and believe me, this will forever tarnish his image in a big way).
ebake02 wrote:Can't believe Westboro plans to protest his funeral.![]()
![]()
All I have to say is they had better say a prayer for themselves. They should know not to poke a lion with a stick, especially a lion that is willing to fiercely defend what they hold near and dear to their heart.
Ehwmatt wrote:The JoePa apologists (and critics, for that matter) are really quite silly getting into the merits ONCE AGAIN of what Joe did and didn't know/do. The fact of the matter is this: Sandusky, a highly touted defensive coordinator at a powerhouse program, retires in his early 50s (despite having several kids... gross) and never goes elsewhere?
Something tells me that a LOT of people knew this guy was "off" long before anyone knew of these allegations.
So, I really doubt ignorance played much of a role at all in this, except maybe willful ignorance.
Rockindeano wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:The JoePa apologists (and critics, for that matter) are really quite silly getting into the merits ONCE AGAIN of what Joe did and didn't know/do. The fact of the matter is this: Sandusky, a highly touted defensive coordinator at a powerhouse program, retires in his early 50s (despite having several kids... gross) and never goes elsewhere?
Something tells me that a LOT of people knew this guy was "off" long before anyone knew of these allegations.
So, I really doubt ignorance played much of a role at all in this, except maybe willful ignorance.
Are you insinuating other programs, coaches, etc knew of the problems at Happy Valley? You think Switzer down in Norman knew of this? You think Bo knew in Ann Arbor? I am seriously asking. If you are suggesting this, it does make sense. The fraternity of head coaches and staffs for that matter in NCAA is a pretty close knit family.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests