Mitt Romney - Next President Thread.
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:08 pmThis thread intentionally left blank until next year. I just wanted a place marker. I love you Andrew....don't nuke this thread, as it will have value, as will be later shown. 
MR
https://forums.melodicrock.com/phpBB/
Mitt Romney - Next President Thread.
https://forums.melodicrock.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=93&t=55828
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:08 pmPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:16 pmThere is no doubt Romney is going to win. The main reason is, OB has lost enough of the minority vote already to Romney. Romney only needs a small percent of the minority vote to win.
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:26 pm
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:30 pmMy vote will come down to which candidate is the lesser of two evils. Right now I'm leaning towards re-election.
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:30 am :lPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:00 amRNC...St Pete times forum...hockey stadium... Holds roughly 17,000Fact Finder wrote:
YOU DIDN'T FILL THAT
DNC...stadium holds roughly 72,000 people
RNC could not fill theirs either from what I watched locally here.... a much smaller one. I think people are tired of both really.
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:32 am
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:34 amBehshad wrote:
So does this mean you're moving on from your man-love of Obama?
[/quote]
I haven't voted a straight Republican ticket in years and will never do so again. You might be interested to know, along with several libertarian votes in the last major election, I even voted for a Democrat!
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:48 amconversationpc wrote:Behshad wrote:
So does this mean you're moving on from your man-love of Obama?
It means moving forward from idiot republicans who don't even dare to admit they're republican.
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 5:51 am{{If John Madden replied to this thread his post would go something like this...}}
Ultimately, it's gonna come down to votes. The candidate who racks up the highest number of votes is gonna be the one who gets to put the word "President" at the front of their name. So yeah, this one'll definitely be a "vote" thing.
Ultimately, it's gonna come down to votes. The candidate who racks up the highest number of votes is gonna be the one who gets to put the word "President" at the front of their name. So yeah, this one'll definitely be a "vote" thing.
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 5:35 amthe contrast between the 2 elections was enlightening. the democratic base is absolutely fired up! i found it sad that president w bush was not included as a speaker. it says a lot about a party/admin that did not include an appearance by w, a still vibrant former president. i've learned they had a video presentation, but i find that chickenshit.
bill clinton laid it all out so well. so simple. joe biden, well, i've always loved him. i am proud to say obama/biden have my vote. i like being able to make my own choices for my body. i like my friends and family members to have the same rights as all citezens have. i like the thought that the middle class has a chance of surviving, that public education will continue, that college can be affordable, and that we will finally get out of this bloody war.
things have been shit. i don't know anyone that hasn't been touched by the horrendous economy, but i am seeing light, change and yes, hope.
bill clinton laid it all out so well. so simple. joe biden, well, i've always loved him. i am proud to say obama/biden have my vote. i like being able to make my own choices for my body. i like my friends and family members to have the same rights as all citezens have. i like the thought that the middle class has a chance of surviving, that public education will continue, that college can be affordable, and that we will finally get out of this bloody war.
things have been shit. i don't know anyone that hasn't been touched by the horrendous economy, but i am seeing light, change and yes, hope.
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:11 amLula wrote:i like being able to make my own choices for my body.
What choices are you talking about?
i like my friends and family members to have the same rights as all citezens have.
Huh?
i like the thought that the middle class has a chance of surviving...
The middle class won't survive much longer at all if we continue piling on as much debt as Obama's done over the last 3+ years. Bush was no financial hawk but Obama has stepped on the gas.
...that public education will continue
The Republicans don't want to end public education.
...and that we will finally get out of this bloody war.
Do you realize the war has gone FAR worse under Obama's leadership than under Bush's? The lowest amount of casualties in a year under Obama are higher than the highest number in a year under Bush, easily. Regardless, I agree. We've been there for about 10 years and it's time to start bringing our folks home.
http://icasualties.org/OEF/ByMonth.aspx
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:13 amBehshad wrote:It means moving forward from idiot republicans who don't even dare to admit they're republican.
If I were a Republican, I'd have no problem admitting it, but I'm not. Do I agree with conservative Republicans far more often than Democrats? Sure but that in on way means I support the Republican party as a whole. I'm not registered Republican, will never do so, and don't donate nor support any Republican candidates financially or attend any of their stupid political rallies. Any political rallies are just for sheeple anyway, in my opinion.
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:23 amPresidential campaign slogans, interesting similarities between both parties..
1980 Ronald Reagan -Are you better off than you were four years ago?
1984 Ronald Reagan - It’s morning again in America
1988 George Bush - Kinder, Gentler Nation
1992 Bill Clinton - Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow
1996 Bill Clinton - Building a bridge to the 21st century
2000 George W. Bush - Compassionate conservatism
2004 George W. Bush - Yes, America Can!
2008 Barack Obama - Change We Can Believe In
2012 Barack Obama - Forward
2012 Mitt Romney - Believe in America
And then there's Ralph Naders campaign slogan in 2000: Government of, by, and for the people...not the monied interests
Hmmm... that one actually says something specific...
Based on what both parties have done in the last 2 decades...
Obama wins... Dem Senate and a Rep House... 4 more years of nothing
Obama wins... Rep Senate and Rep House... Obama is fucked
Obama wins... Dem Senate and Dem House... we'll get bigger government, more spending
Romney wins... Dem Senate and a Rep House.... 4 more years of nothing
Romney wins... Rep Senate and Rep House... who knows.. but given the Rep record... we'll get bigger government, more spending
1980 Ronald Reagan -Are you better off than you were four years ago?
1984 Ronald Reagan - It’s morning again in America
1988 George Bush - Kinder, Gentler Nation
1992 Bill Clinton - Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow
1996 Bill Clinton - Building a bridge to the 21st century
2000 George W. Bush - Compassionate conservatism
2004 George W. Bush - Yes, America Can!
2008 Barack Obama - Change We Can Believe In
2012 Barack Obama - Forward
2012 Mitt Romney - Believe in America
And then there's Ralph Naders campaign slogan in 2000: Government of, by, and for the people...not the monied interests
Hmmm... that one actually says something specific...
Based on what both parties have done in the last 2 decades...
Obama wins... Dem Senate and a Rep House... 4 more years of nothing
Obama wins... Rep Senate and Rep House... Obama is fucked
Obama wins... Dem Senate and Dem House... we'll get bigger government, more spending
Romney wins... Dem Senate and a Rep House.... 4 more years of nothing
Romney wins... Rep Senate and Rep House... who knows.. but given the Rep record... we'll get bigger government, more spending
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 2:29 pmconversationpc wrote:Lula wrote:i like being able to make my own choices for my body.
What choices are you talking about?i like my friends and family members to have the same rights as all citezens have.
Huh?i like the thought that the middle class has a chance of surviving...
The middle class won't survive much longer at all if we continue piling on as much debt as Obama's done over the last 3+ years. Bush was no financial hawk but Obama has stepped on the gas....that public education will continue
The Republicans don't want to end public education....and that we will finally get out of this bloody war.
Do you realize the war has gone FAR worse under Oba
ma's leadership than under Bush's? The lowest amount of casualties in a year under Obama are higher than the highest number in a year under Bush, easily. Regardless, I agree. We've been there for about 10 years and it's time to start bringing our folks home.
http://icasualties.org/OEF/ByMonth.aspx
i don't want any person making any kind of decision for me where my health is concerned period.
my 2 best friends are gay men, if they fall in love and want to marry they should have that right period. this includes my gay cousins as well. love is love is love.
voucher for school choice? the republicans want to privatize everything and anything they can.
the war sucks, always has. i just want our men and women home.
as far as my future as a public union emplyee/middle class tax payer, i feel much safer with obama and biden than i do with romney and ryan, MUCH!
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 2:44 pmLula wrote:i don't want any person making any kind of decision for me where my health is concerned period.
...but you have no problem with the government (a bunch of people) doing it?
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:00 pmHow awesome was Clinton's speech at the Democratic Convention? I'm telling you, you could pit that man up against ANYBODY and he'd STILL win in a landslide. That said, Hillary will probably be our first woman president and I think once that chicken shit Romney gets in front of Obama in their debates, he's going to put his hands between his knees and start sucking his thumb. Dudes a straight up PUSSY. Fuck Romney.
If the American people weren't willing to go against the Bush administration in the middle of war after his 4 year term, then this is CERTAINLY not the time to go against the Obama administration in this plummeting economy. Not the time to be changing presidency's while our kids are still fighting and when we're in economic crisis. Obama needs more than 4 years to start turning things around. I'm not interested in putting a shmuck Republican in there quite yet after it was another schmuck Republican that got us in this SHITHOLE in the first place!
If the American people weren't willing to go against the Bush administration in the middle of war after his 4 year term, then this is CERTAINLY not the time to go against the Obama administration in this plummeting economy. Not the time to be changing presidency's while our kids are still fighting and when we're in economic crisis. Obama needs more than 4 years to start turning things around. I'm not interested in putting a shmuck Republican in there quite yet after it was another schmuck Republican that got us in this SHITHOLE in the first place!
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:28 pmYoungJRNY wrote:How awesome was Clinton's speech at the Democratic Convention? I'm telling you, you could pit that man up against ANYBODY and he'd STILL win in a landslide. That said, Hillary will probably be our first woman president and I think once that chicken shit Romney gets in front of Obama in their debates, he's going to put his hands between his knees and start sucking his thumb. Dudes a straight up PUSSY. Fuck Romney.
If the American people weren't willing to go against the Bush administration in the middle of war after his 4 year term, then this is CERTAINLY not the time to go against the Obama administration in this plummeting economy. Not the time to be changing presidency's while our kids are still fighting and when we're in economic crisis. Obama needs more than 4 years to start turning things around. I'm not interested in putting a shmuck Republican in there quite yet after it was another schmuck Republican that got us in this SHITHOLE in the first place!
OBAMA ALL THE WAY BABY!
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:51 pmI love how people are trying to blame Obama for not getting much done the last 4 years. People seem to forget that the president can't really do much when those fuckers in congress can't agree on anything. I truly believe that the republicans in congress are choosing to act this way with the intention of getting a republican back in the white house. I'll be damned if I'm going to give those rich, holier than thou bastards what they want.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:03 amebake02 wrote:I love how people are trying to blame Obama for not getting much done the last 4 years. People seem to forget that the president can't really do much when those fuckers in congress can't agree on anything. I truly believe that the republicans in congress are choosing to act this way with the intention of getting a republican back in the white house. I'll be damned if I'm going to give those rich, holier than thou bastards what they want.
Well fucking said! Everybody doesn't want to go into the territory that Republicans pretty much rule the House of Representatives and have more than once, shut down the president's will to do basically ANYTHING in the White House. We might as well have another Civil War with all of this Blue VS Red bullshit. This country is in the shape that it's in because of inner-battles. Just turn on you television for 2 minutes, whether it be a Republican channel like Fox TV, or Democratic channel like MSNBC and you'll find out right away the problem in the Unites States. Hatred between two parties as the middle class (or should I say, lower class) continues to suffer as billionaires continue to pocket money. It's appalling the direction we've headed, starting with the Bush administration and to put full blame on Obama is blasphemous.
When it's all said and done, atleast Obama has shown backbone. This Romney twit sure is one big piece of bloody vagina.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:39 amYoungJRNY wrote:ebake02 wrote:I love how people are trying to blame Obama for not getting much done the last 4 years. People seem to forget that the president can't really do much when those fuckers in congress can't agree on anything. I truly believe that the republicans in congress are choosing to act this way with the intention of getting a republican back in the white house. I'll be damned if I'm going to give those rich, holier than thou bastards what they want.
Well fucking said! Everybody doesn't want to go into the territory that Republicans pretty much rule the House of Representatives and have more than once, shut down the president's will to do basically ANYTHING in the White House. We might as well have another Civil War with all of this Blue VS Red bullshit. This country is in the shape that it's in because of inner-battles. Just turn on you television for 2 minutes, whether it be a Republican channel like Fox TV, or Democratic channel like MSNBC and you'll find out right away the problem in the Unites States. Hatred between two parties as the middle class (or should I say, lower class) continues to suffer as billionaires continue to pocket money. It's appalling the direction we've headed, starting with the Bush administration and to put full blame on Obama is blasphemous.
When it's all said and done, atleast Obama has shown backbone. This Romney twit sure is one big piece of bloody vagina.
Why don't you tell us how you REALLY feel about Romney ?!
Hope all is well with you bro.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:57 amYoungJRNY wrote:ebake02 wrote:I love how people are trying to blame Obama for not getting much done the last 4 years. People seem to forget that the president can't really do much when those fuckers in congress can't agree on anything. I truly believe that the republicans in congress are choosing to act this way with the intention of getting a republican back in the white house. I'll be damned if I'm going to give those rich, holier than thou bastards what they want.
Well fucking said! Everybody doesn't want to go into the territory that Republicans pretty much rule the House of Representatives and have more than once, shut down the president's will to do basically ANYTHING in the White House. We might as well have another Civil War with all of this Blue VS Red bullshit. This country is in the shape that it's in because of inner-battles. Just turn on you television for 2 minutes, whether it be a Republican channel like Fox TV, or Democratic channel like MSNBC and you'll find out right away the problem in the Unites States. Hatred between two parties as the middle class (or should I say, lower class) continues to suffer as billionaires continue to pocket money. It's appalling the direction we've headed, starting with the Bush administration and to put full blame on Obama is blasphemous.
When it's all said and done, atleast Obama has shown backbone. This Romney twit sure is one big piece of bloody vagina.
If I could give Obama some advice I would tell him to use the power of the Executive Order to his advantage. If congress can't come to an agreement of a piece of his legislation then go around them and sign an Executive Order authorizing said piece of legislation. Force their hand and make congress take action.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:00 amLula wrote:i don't want any person making any kind of decision for me where my health is concerned period.
But you're willing to give it over in a major way to the bureaucrats who came up with Obamacare? That makes no sense at all.
voucher for school choice? the republicans want to privatize everything and anything they can.
Thank God for that! Private business almost always runs things better than big government ever has. I don't get the opposition to vouchers by Democrats since it would more easily enable lower income families to send their kids to the schools of their choice. As it is now, only rich families or those making more sacrifices than they ought to have to, can afford to send their kids to private school. You'd think the Democrats, who are supposed to be for the plight of the poor, would be on the opposite side of this issue if it weren't for the fact that they're in bed with the teacher's unions.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:01 amebake02 wrote:If I could give Obama some advice I would tell him to use the power of the Executive Order to his advantage. If congress can't come to an agreement of a piece of his legislation then go around them and sign an Executive Order authorizing said piece of legislation. Force their hand and make congress take action.
That's dangerous and likely unconstitutional when used to bypass Congress. Bush was really bad with this kind of stuff and Obama has been way worse.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:03 amconversationpc wrote:ebake02 wrote:If I could give Obama some advice I would tell him to use the power of the Executive Order to his advantage. If congress can't come to an agreement of a piece of his legislation then go around them and sign an Executive Order authorizing said piece of legislation. Force their hand and make congress take action.
That's dangerous and likely unconstitutional when used to bypass Congress. Bush was really bad with this kind of stuff and Obama has been way worse.
I know it's a slippery slope but from my point of view it's the only way to force the House and Senate and stop arguing and do their damn jobs.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:06 amHey Dave , why don't you just blame Obama for the Afghanistan war like Clint Eastwood did
You seriously gonna blame the casualties of a war - that Bush started and Obama is going to finish - on Obama ?!
I didn't know that a president had control over how many people die on battlefield. Kudos to Bush for being there front line and making sure he keeps the casualties to a minimum
You seriously gonna blame the casualties of a war - that Bush started and Obama is going to finish - on Obama ?!
I didn't know that a president had control over how many people die on battlefield. Kudos to Bush for being there front line and making sure he keeps the casualties to a minimum
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 3:57 amYoungJRNY wrote: Hillary will probably be our first woman president...
Hillary is never running for president again. In 2008, she faced all sorts of superficial, idiotic scrutiny based on her high-pitched laugh (or "cackle"), her looks, her cleavage etc. The passage of time, unfortunately, has only made her more frumpy. I don't know why the conventional wisdom-spewers and pundits think her 2016 presidential ambitions are such a sure thing. I think she's done.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:22 amBehshad wrote:Hey Dave , why don't you just blame Obama for the Afghanistan war like Clint Eastwood did
You seriously gonna blame the casualties of a war - that Bush started and Obama is going to finish - on Obama ?!
I didn't know that a president had control over how many people die on battlefield. Kudos to Bush for being there front line and making sure he keeps the casualties to a minimum
For those with interpretive reading difficulties, I never said it was Obama's fault. I was simply making a comparison. During Bush's term in office, those casualty numbers were parroted in the media ad infinitum and were often blamed on the President. I have not seen that done since the day Obama took office. My statement was about how the media treated the same story between the two Presidents, not that war casualties are the fault of any one office holder.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:24 amebake02 wrote:conversationpc wrote:ebake02 wrote:If I could give Obama some advice I would tell him to use the power of the Executive Order to his advantage. If congress can't come to an agreement of a piece of his legislation then go around them and sign an Executive Order authorizing said piece of legislation. Force their hand and make congress take action.
That's dangerous and likely unconstitutional when used to bypass Congress. Bush was really bad with this kind of stuff and Obama has been way worse.
I know it's a slippery slope but from my point of view it's the only way to force the House and Senate and stop arguing and do their damn jobs.
For myself, I'm glad someone's obstructed Obama's agenda even though it means little legislation is being done. We've already got hundreds of thousands if not millions of laws on the books, most of which no one is even aware of. We aren't going to be worse off if lots of additional legislation is stopped from going on the books.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:24 amThe_Noble_Cause wrote:YoungJRNY wrote: Hillary will probably be our first woman president...
Hillary is never running for president again. In 2008, she faced all sorts of superficial, idiotic scrutiny based on her high-pitched laugh (or "cackle"), her looks, her cleavage etc. The passage of time, unfortunately, has only made her more frumpy. I don't know why the conventional wisdom-spewers and pundits think her 2016 presidential ambitions are such a sure thing. I think she's done.
I'll be surprised if she doesn't.