MR

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:24 am**

12.12.12: The Concert for Sandy Relief (Live from MSG)

http://www.youtube.com/user/fuse?v=s5cxpRRmCg8

(says 2 hours before starting..has a countdown clock)

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:26 am**

Fact Finder wrote:
tater1977 wrote:12.12.12: The Concert for Sandy Relief (Live from MSG)

http://www.youtube.com/user/fuse?v=s5cxpRRmCg8

(says 2 hours before starting..has a countdown clock)

That's probably the best place to watch this if the stream holds up with the load. I imagine most of the TV Channels will bust in with commercials right when McCartney is singing Smells Like Teen Spirit with Dave Grohl.

I'm settleing in with a few cold ones and hoping to see some good performances. I had read earlier this week that a few of the "Big Stars" had asked for 45 minute sets and apparently that was granted. We'll see, I just hope it ain't Bruce to start the show.

Pizza & beer in hand...
Can't imagine :lol:

...Grohl & McCartney together ..so I gotta see this... :shock:

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:29 am**

tater1977 wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:
tater1977 wrote:12.12.12: The Concert for Sandy Relief (Live from MSG)

http://www.youtube.com/user/fuse?v=s5cxpRRmCg8

(says 2 hours before starting..has a countdown clock)

That's probably the best place to watch this if the stream holds up with the load. I imagine most of the TV Channels will bust in with commercials right when McCartney is singing Smells Like Teen Spirit with Dave Grohl.

I'm settleing in with a few cold ones and hoping to see some good performances. I had read earlier this week that a few of the "Big Stars" had asked for 45 minute sets and apparently that was granted. We'll see, I just hope it ain't Bruce to start the show.

Pizza & beer in hand...
Can't imagine ...Grohl & McCartney together ..so I gotta see this...

Starting up here in a few minutes. THIS is when dual monitors comes in very handy.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:31 am**

32,878 watching now

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:00 am**

Fact Finder wrote:Alright, lets get Bruce outta the way first. Hail Mary!

Bruce is the man. Missing Clarence, but the new guy is doing an admirable job.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:17 am**

Rick wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Alright, lets get Bruce outta the way first. Hail Mary!

Bruce is the man. Missing Clarence, but the new guy is doing an admirable job.

Heard that was Clarence's son playing the sax?

102,079 watching now

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:21 am**

tater1977 wrote:
Rick wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Alright, lets get Bruce outta the way first. Hail Mary!

Bruce is the man. Missing Clarence, but the new guy is doing an admirable job.

Heard that was Clarence's son playing the sax?

102,079 watching now

I sure hope that's true.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:29 am**

Fact Finder wrote:Digging the Floyd.

Man, me too. You just can't beat that.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:32 am**

Man if these songs don't take you back...

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:34 am**

tater1977 wrote:
Rick wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Alright, lets get Bruce outta the way first. Hail Mary!

Bruce is the man. Missing Clarence, but the new guy is doing an admirable job.

Heard that was Clarence's son playing the sax?

102,079 watching now

It's his nephew, Jake Clemons

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:36 am**

Lora wrote:
tater1977 wrote:
Rick wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Alright, lets get Bruce outta the way first. Hail Mary!

Bruce is the man. Missing Clarence, but the new guy is doing an admirable job.

Heard that was Clarence's son playing the sax?

102,079 watching now

It's his nephew, Jake Clemons

Is he the new full time member?

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:36 am**

Lora wrote:
tater1977 wrote:
Rick wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:Alright, lets get Bruce outta the way first. Hail Mary!

Bruce is the man. Missing Clarence, but the new guy is doing an admirable job.

Heard that was Clarence's son playing the sax?

102,079 watching now

It's his nephew, Jake Clemons

Thanks Lora...

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:47 am**

Adam Sandler is not a singer... :lol:

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:48 am**

Fact Finder wrote:So a full 40 minutes from Roger...COOL!

Vedder did good I think. But I'm cranking it..

Who was the guy who was singing with Roger right before Vedder?

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:03 pm**

Lora wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:So a full 40 minutes from Roger...COOL!

Vedder did good I think. But I'm cranking it..

Who was the guy who was singing with Roger right before Vedder?

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:09 pm**

tater1977 wrote:
Lora wrote:
Fact Finder wrote:So a full 40 minutes from Roger...COOL!

Vedder did good I think. But I'm cranking it..

Who was the guy who was singing with Roger right before Vedder?

one of his backup musicians i think...looks a lot like vedder though

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:13 pm**

Not that i'm biased but how come styx isn't on this show?

Now now I probably would've watched if journey was on as well.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:27 pm**

Jon Stewart: "How many of you remembered where you hid your pot in 9th grade when Roger Waters was playing?" LMAO!! I

Got home from work late and tried to find a radio station that was synced to a TV station - any tv station so I could have it playing on the radio on a few different stereos around the house and in the garage while I work on some domestic projects. That wasn't going to happen so I'm streaming YouTube with the stereo in the living room CRANKED!! :lol:

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:29 pm**

Oh yeah Slow Hand himself! Is it just me or is Clapton getting better looking as he gets older? I don't mean that in a gay sorta way... I just mean he seems to look more distinguished and downright handsome. There I said it! :lol:

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:39 pm**

JRNYMAN wrote:Oh yeah Slow Hand himself! Is it just me or is Clapton getting better looking as he gets older? I don't mean that in a gay sorta way... I just mean he seems to look more distinguished and downright handsome. There I said it!

Hmmmm, debating whether to keep you as a friend........... LOL j/k man!! :lol:

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:52 pm**

Fact Finder wrote:I'm going to watch this in bed...btw, New York does not rule the world. All the good actcs are British.

Im not sure they meant musically. I think NY/NJ... north easterners in general, are pretty tough people. In that way they do. They are pretty resilient, and they've been through a lot in recent years. Gotta give them that.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:54 pm**

Wow! Keith looks rough! My wife said, "He looks like an old Scandinavian woman!" :lol:

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:32 pm**

JRNYMAN wrote:Wow! Keith looks rough! My wife said, "He looks like an old Scandinavian woman!"

Fuck off! I just ate dinner, asshole. :lol:

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:34 pm**

I did not watch the hyped rock show tonight. I know what The Stones, and others charge for their own concerts purely for profit. Color me not impressed that these acts "donated" 15 to 30 minute sets and then ask us to donate. Fan of a lot of the music tonight, but no need to tune in.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:44 pm**

AR wrote:I did not watch the hyped rock show tonight. I know what The Stones, and others charge for their own concerts purely for profit. Color me not impressed that these acts "donated" 15 to 30 minute sets and then ask us to donate. Fan of a lot of the music tonight, but no need to tune in.

Lighten up dude. It's for a good cause!

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:03 pm**

steveo777 wrote:
AR wrote:I did not watch the hyped rock show tonight. I know what The Stones, and others charge for their own concerts purely for profit. Color me not impressed that these acts "donated" 15 to 30 minute sets and then ask us to donate. Fan of a lot of the music tonight, but no need to tune in.

Lighten up dude. It's for a good cause!

Let the Stones donate the proceeds of this weekend's Pay Per View to this cause and their $1,000+ tickets per show.

Sorry bro, I just find this a huge hipocracy by a bunch of 1 percenters' who claim to be for the common man. I'm sure the music was good, just wasn't interested.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:34 pm**

AR wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
AR wrote:I did not watch the hyped rock show tonight. I know what The Stones, and others charge for their own concerts purely for profit. Color me not impressed that these acts "donated" 15 to 30 minute sets and then ask us to donate. Fan of a lot of the music tonight, but no need to tune in.

Lighten up dude. It's for a good cause!

Let the Stones donate the proceeds of this weekend's Pay Per View to this cause and their $1,000+ tickets per show.

Sorry bro, I just find this a huge hipocracy by a bunch of 1 percenters' who claim to be for the common man. I'm sure the music was good, just wasn't interested.

You've got a point, I suppose. I'd like to have earned a position where I could get 1/10th of what the Stones make. They must have done something to command that price. Oh, wait, they only tour once in awhile, so making their performances rare is a good business model for increased ticket prices. I don't doubt for a minute that they know what they're doing.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:06 pm**

Grohl reminds me of this....

http://youtu.be/gyZYIEgcj-Q

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:06 pm**

steveo777 wrote:
JRNYMAN wrote:Wow! Keith looks rough! My wife said, "He looks like an old Scandinavian woman!"

Fuck off! I just ate dinner, asshole.

Posted: **Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:46 pm**

Fact Finder wrote:I'm going to watch this in bed...btw, New York does not rule the world. All the good actcs are British.

British bands have ruled the music world as I have known it like.....FOREVER! The dude singing with Waters was the same one he had on "The Wall" tour

singing David Gilmours songs.

MR

12-12-12 Concert for Hurricane Sandy