by The Sushi Hunter » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:17 am
Yeah, this morning on my drive in to work I was listening to the news on the radio and they mentioned Obama's visit over there. They were interviewing someone and they were ranting about how Obama has to go after Syria with US Military might. A sound byte of the guy was played and he was ranting how Obama needs to do something now because only doing it after 5,000 plus people are gassed will be too late. I got to thinking this was exactly what Bush did with the WMD in Iraq. In that case no WMD were found so he got hammered for it. So what makes Obama different from Bush? It's now ok to go after Syria with only suspecting a gas attack is imminent and no real proof that this is going to happen, but wasn't ok to go after Iraq when Bush was in office? Bush went after the WMD issue for the safety of citizens on American soil. Obama's going to go after suspect imminent gas attack on citizens no on American soil?
I've never eaten a piece of sushi I didn't thoroughly enjoy.