I don't know who is more stupid: Skechers for blatantly and factually claiming that just wearing their Shape-ups would make you lose weight or the idiots who actually bought them and then were angry they didn't. So angry in fact, they filed a class action suit against the company and actually won! They had a little help from competitors Reebok and Nike who got the ball rolling and hired the right lawyers to get the action suit approved. Here's the story...
A class-action lawsuit filed against Skechers USA Inc. over claims that just wearing their shoes would provide the benefit of exercise was settled today — opening the door to payments to consumers who purchased them.
Skechers Shape-ups XF
© Chicago Tribune/MCT /Landov Skechers
051313_RM_300
The sneakers at issue in the case — Skechers' Shape-ups, Resistance Runner, Shape-ups Toners/Trainers, and Tone-ups — were sold between August 2008 and August 2012. Those who have submitted claims in the case — more than 500,000 consumers — will be eligible to receive refunds up to $84 per pair of Resistance Runners, $80 for Shape-ups, $54 for Podded Sole Shoes, and $40 for Tone-Ups.
It has taken a while for the case to get to this point. The Federal Trade Commission a year ago reached an agreement with Skechers, which admits no wrongdoing in the matter, to repay consumers and dial down its claims.
Skechers ran a series of advertisements, including one with Kim Kardashian and Brooke Burke that run during the 2011 Super Bowl, that boasted all someone had to do to kickstart their weigh-loss would be to lace up a pair of these shoes.
The FTC said Skechers crossed a lot of lines beyond just suggesting the sneakers would help tone and tighten muscles, but also pitching the shoes as a weight-loss tool.
"Skechers' unfounded claims went beyond stronger and more toned muscles. The company even made claims about weight loss and cardiovascular health," David Vladeck, the then-director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection said at the time. "The FTC’s message, for Skechers and other national advertisers, is to shape up your substantiation or tone down your claims."
Absent any scientific evidence to prove its case, Skecher agreed to stop making the claims about its shoes, including saying they can aid in:
strengthening
weight loss
blood circulation
aerobic conditioning
improving muscle tone
The claims so irked consumers and consumer advocates that more than 40 state attorneys general, the federal government and several groups of consumers all sued the company. The cases eventually were all consolidated, resulting in the just-finalized settlement.
Skechers isn't the only company to run into a similar jam with a similar product. In the fall of 2011, Reebok International Ltd. agreed to pay $25 million to settle allegations that it misled consumers in ads about its EasyTone and RunTone shoes.
http://money.msn.com/saving-money-tips/ ... 4b6132ed8a
Reebok's claims were largely focused on the idea that wearing its shoes would accelerate the process of toning and strengthening the legs and buttocks.