Moderator: Andrew
JourneyTroll wrote:So Sammy Hager is joining Van Halen again. That's good news for some.
But if David Lee Roth and Valen reunited, the would be outstanding world news with demand exceeding supply for tour tickets.
Van Halen with Sammy Hager will never be as good as classic Van Halen.
Journeytroll
SomedayExcitedAgain wrote:JourneyTroll wrote:So Sammy Hager is joining Van Halen again. That's good news for some.
But if David Lee Roth and Valen reunited, the would be outstanding world news with demand exceeding supply for tour tickets.
Van Halen with Sammy Hager will never be as good as classic Van Halen.
JourneytrollTo begin with, what source did you hear that Hagar was back in Van Halen? I checked the official site for the band, and there is no mention of this whatsoever.
Hardly surprising, considering the official site has not had an update for nearly two years.....
Finally, your statement that the classic VH will never be as good as the second incarnation of the band is purely your opinion, and not a fact. But given your assumed intelligence, I'm sure you're well aware of this
Kenny wrote:[Actually.......it was the other way around, dude.
JourneyTroll wrote:. Well I've certainly heard mixed reports on this issue - it seems clear that on the Sam and Dave tour, some nights Sammy sucked, other nights Dave sucked.David Lee Roth and his band were outstanding in 2002 in Massachusetts, while Sammy Hager "needed" Boston celebrities such as Tom Brady and the Mighty, Mighty Bostones on the stage
One thing for sure though - Sammy didn't need to rely almost exclusively on his VH back catalogue !The Van Halen songs with David Lee Roth are far superior than the average Van Halen with Sammy Hager.
Maybe, maybe not - everyone will have a different opinion about this.....I love both eras, so I wouldn't agree.Van Halen was sooooo much better with David Lee Roth, and the majority of the public would prefer the original Van Halen over the other two versions of Van Halen.
Basically, VH with Roth isn't gonna happen. Ever
Ling_Chung wrote:Come on !
I love the early VH stuff, especially the 1st album and 1984 but there is absolutely no question that Sammy is by far the better singer.
You just have to listen to their recent solo albums to see that DLR just cannot measure up. Sure, back in those days he was the best front man around but he is now a sad looking characature of himself with a wig.
They were like two completely different bands with the two singers and I loved them both but VH with Sammy can still be relevant. VH with DLR could be embarassing.
JourneyTroll wrote:Sammy Hagar is way older than David Lee Roth, and I don't pay the $$$ to see Hagar promoting his stupid liquor company.
David Lee Roth is the better singer & showman. With Hagar, Van Halen seldomly plays any pre-1984 classics.
Jovi Fan 70 wrote:I like DLR but it's obvious to everyone (except you) that he's pretty much washed up.
Jovi Fan 70 wrote:Journey Troll my friend, I strongly disagree with you. Sammy Hagar is Mr. Teflon when it comes to his voice. He's one of the most consistent singers I've ever heard. I like DLR but it's obvious to everyone (except you) that he's pretty much washed up. If it wasn't for Sammy Hagar, VH would've crashed and burned after 1985. He kept the train rolling for another 10 strong years....even in the height of grunge music!!!
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests