Page 1 of 1

Who should wear make-up?

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 12:17 pm
by Metal Ed
Paul said in 1983 that the make up belongs to the original members. Why are Eric and Tommy wearing it? Carr and Vincent had their own make up ( the fox and the lizard guy). Either give them their own or " lick it up " again.

Metal Ed[/b]

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 8:58 pm
by Serendipity
When Carr and Vincent joined, Kiss also wrote new songs. Now they are back to only playing old songs, it would add to the feeling of authenticity to see a Frehley and Criss lookalike on stage... Not that it is more honest, but when I saw the Kiss Symphony DVD the other day, I was surprised to notice that it actually didn't bother me. That might be because Kiss with make up is an act, a concept, and the individuals behind the make up are not as important as they would be in a different band...

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 5:37 am
by Guest
i think they should've created new characters for eric singer and Tommy Thayer. It's only right, they deserve to have theuir own identity in the band and ace and peter deserve to have their characters retired unless they decide to return.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:35 am
by Ambrosia04
who was this lizard guy?
i remember something about an egyptian cross on vinnie's face, but a lizard?
the only lizard was the "bat lizard" and that was gene.

the reason that the "new kids" don't get the new makeup is because the new makeup is not the "true likeness of KISS".
eric and vinne were made to feel welcome somehow as an extension of kiss as an imaginary likeness of kiss
currently, the business end of kiss is motivated by the 4 faces
Catch my drift? It's like, the REAL kiss is the $$$

nothing else matters.

record and video game sales, kids.
don't screw with the tried and true
the real kiss is a sure thing.
$$$