Rip Rokken wrote:Saint John wrote:Skylorde wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:I mean... re-recording the hits. Note the re-recording issue wasn't addressed specifically.
Part of the 10 mile long contract the band signed with Perry was that Journey cannot re-record ANY of the Perry-era material and offer it for sale. The only exception was the Arrival DVD (Vegas) in which Perry waived the contract for that one performance.
In short, you will not be seeing any re-recorded material being released unless of course Perry signs off on it.....yea right
Someone mentioned that this agreement was a nine year one. ?????????????
I didn't think about that covering LIVE recordings! Wow, would that be tough for the band... I would think it wouldn't hold up in court. But yes, it's now been mentioned by Andrew that word is it was only a 9-year contract:
And that part still has me shaking my head and going "whaaaaaa?" For one thing, I'm surprised to know that he would ever enter into an agreement that allowed for the possibility of something like this happening no matter what the time frame was, but hey - I wasn't there and I don't know the method behind this sheer madness. Maybe he just never figured they would actually DO something like rerecord all the songs.

But 9 is a strange number to me. You would nomally see an agreement with a certain time-limit based on a more round figure - 5, 10, 15... if I had to guess (and I'd probably be wrong), I might venture that they're counting from early 1997, Journey's last work with Perry, came up with a '10 years from the time we were last "active" ' thing, and having been drafted, legally, in 1998, would put it at a 9 year term?
It's a stab in the dark, but it's all I got. Maybe 9 is just the Frig's lucky number, or something?

