bluejeangirl76 wrote:
The C&D was about more than just those stupid pictures. That should be obvious. There was a whole paragraph about his attendance and his guest interaction, and it was all placed on a specific page called steveperry.html... come on... if it was JUST the pics in some little gallery on their site it would be different.
Perhaps we don't know the whole story. Perhaps a phone call from the attorney's office was placed first before the C&D. I'd hope so. A formal cease & desist is still overboard for this situation. Should they have used his image and written what they did without his permission? No. Could this have been resolved without the extremes? YES.
I'm ALL for Steve's privacy, as I used to moderate a Perry board and recited my mantra about respecting Steve's privacy each and every day. There's nothing appropriate with the photos or what they wrote. I'd just like to see things handled without "the hand of god" coming down and smacking someone when a phone call from the attorney's office would have probably done the deed. Had the wedding people been pricks about it, then sure, C&D...but what was tried FIRST?
Was this a cease & desist order or letter? The two are very different. Order requires a judge, letter can be written by the attorney. Wikipedia sez: In the US, a recipient of a cease-and-desist letter who is placed in a "reasonable apprehension" of litigation may respond through a request for declaratory judgment proceeding in his own jurisdiction. So basically, this letter became a threat of a lawsuit.
THAT's what I felt was overboard. Sorry.... I'm opinionated on this, and I didn't like how it was handled. But then again, we only have one side of the story.